Fig. 2: Characterization of BPTES@MNT/PGA and the release kinetics at implant interfaces.
From: Directed rescue strategy for enhanced implant osteointegration in aged rats
A Representative ESEM images of different samples. 2000×: Scale bar = 40 μm; 10,000×: Scale bar = 8 μm. B AFM images of different samples. Surface Ra roughness data of different samples is shown at the bottom of the image (n = 3 independent samples per group). C The water contact angle of different samples (n = 3 independent samples per group). High-resolution XPS spectra of D N1s scan and E C1s scan of BPTES@MNT/PGA. Release profile of F Ca2+, G BPTES, and H Glu at different pH values (n = 3 independent samples per group). Data was presented as means ± SD (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). Data analysis was conducted utilizing one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (C). Data analysis was conducted by using a two-tailed unpaired Student t test (F–H). Exact P values were given in the Source data file. Source data are provided as a Source data file.
