Table 1 Model discrimination using Harrell’s concordance index (c-index) to evaluate the prognostic performance of the risk models for predicting distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS)

From: Circulating tumor DNA refines risk stratification of neoadjuvant therapy-resistant breast tumors

Cox models

A

B

C

D

DRFS ~

RCB-II/III

RCB-II/III + ctDNA T0

RCB-II/III + ctDNA T3

RCB-II/III + ctDNA dynamics (T0-T3)

Predictors

RCB-II vs. RCB-III

RCB − II/ctDNA+ vs. RCB-II/ctDNA- vs. RCB-III/ctDNA+ vs. RCB-III/ctDNA-

RCB − II/ctDNA+ vs. RCB-II/ctDNA- vs. RCB-III/ctDNA+ vs. RCB-III/ctDNA-

Persistent negative vs. Cleared at T1 vs.Cleared at T2 vs.Cleared at T3 vs. No clearance at T3

Number of patients

249

249

249

249

Number of events

66

66

66

66

ctDNA time points

-

Pretretment (T0)

Post-NAT (T3)

Pretreatment (T0), Week 3 (T1), Week 12 (T2), Post-NAT (T3)

C-index

0.75

0.80

0.81

0.84

Lower 95% CI

0.65

0.73

0.74

0.79

Upper 95% CI

0.84

0.87

0.87

0.90

  1. To compare model performance, we analyzed survival data from patients common to all the Cox models (see Fig. 3). CIconfidence interval, NATneoadjuvant therapy, RCBresidual cancer burdenSummary.