Fig. 6: Comparison of the observed and calculated Te based on the YSE.

The observed Te has been derived from 3000 bathymetry and gravity profiles and the calculated Te has been derived from the brittle16 and ductile flow17,18 laws based on a uniform strain rate of 10−14 s−1, a thermal age at the time of loading, and a curvature of flexure as shown in 5a, b along the HESC. Dotted black lines show the calculated ‘yield Te’ based on different brittle and ductile flow parameters. Numbers in bold red font show the original parameters as used in Goetze17,18 (Supplementary Table S2). Numbers in bold black font identify variations in these parameters. a Calculated Te based on reducing the coefficient of friction, μf,from 0.617,18 to 0.3, 0.15 and 0.075. b Calculated Te based on increasing the value of the pre-exponential constant, Ap, by factors of 1, 104, 108 and 1012. The factor of 1 corresponds to the original parameters as used in Goetze17,18. c Calculated Te based on reducing the activation energies, Qp and Qd, from 520 and 535 kJ mol-117,18 to 450, 350 and 250 kJ mol−1. d Calculated Te based on reducing the thermal age of the plate at the time of loading by factors of 0%17,18 to 33%, 66% and 83.5%. e) Bathymetry along the axis of the HESC derived from the SRTM15 V2.4 15 × 15 arc s bathymetric grid65.