Fig. 6: Key infrastructure for the top 1% of candidate designs (4 designs) according to the balanced priorities (BP) approach considering European survey responses. | Nature Communications

Fig. 6: Key infrastructure for the top 1% of candidate designs (4 designs) according to the balanced priorities (BP) approach considering European survey responses.

From: Considering distributive justice as a planning principle helps navigate a diversity of future energy infrastructure designs

Fig. 6

Columns (a–d) present the best-performing candidate designs ordered by rank. Column (a) shows the candidate design that best fulfils a balanced interpretation of distributive justice and column (d) shows the fourth-best-performing candidate design. Rows show national technology capacities and are ordered from most-to-least important technologies in terms of median capacity installations (Fig. 5b).

Back to article page