Fig. 3: Two components of the tensor jump method (TJM). | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: Two components of the tensor jump method (TJM).

From: Large-scale stochastic simulation of open quantum systems

Fig. 3: Two components of the tensor jump method (TJM).

Top Illustration of the application of the factorized dissipative MPO \({{{\mathcal{D}}}}\) (constructed from local matrices) to an MPS \(\left\vert \Psi \right\rangle\). Each local tensor corresponds to the exponentiation of local jump operators: \({{{{\mathcal{D}}}}}_{\ell }={e}^{-\frac{1}{2}\delta t{\sum }_{j\in S(\ell )}{L}_{j}^{[\ell ]{{\dagger}} }{L}_{j}^{[\ell ]}}\). This operation does not change the bond dimension and does not require canonicalization. Bottom Visualization of the tensor network required to compute δpm for a given jump operator Lm, which corresponds to the expectation value \(\langle {L}_{m}^{{{\dagger}} }{L}_{m}\rangle\). By putting the MPS in mixed canonical form centered at site , contractions over tensors to the left and right reduce to identities. This enables efficient computation of the probability distribution Π(t) via a sweep across the network, evaluating local jump probabilities Lj at each site jS().

Back to article page