Fig. 6: Comparison of experimental JSC results with transfer matrix method (TMM) based simulation, and the university of film-thickness dependent JSC fluctuation. | Nature Communications

Fig. 6: Comparison of experimental JSC results with transfer matrix method (TMM) based simulation, and the university of film-thickness dependent JSC fluctuation.

From: Intrinsic light reflection of conjugated films towards high-performance organic solar cells

Fig. 6: Comparison of experimental JSC results with transfer matrix method (TMM) based simulation, and the university of film-thickness dependent JSC fluctuation.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a Normalized calculation and experimental results of active layer thickness dependent AbsAM1.5G and JSC of PM6:Y6 devices. b The active layer thickness dependent experimental JSC results of PM6:L8-BO and D18:N3 devices. Error bars represent the standard deviation (10 independent devices). c Contour map of destructive interference wavelength for different refractive index n. d Refractive index n of PM6:L8-BO and D18:N3. e The thickness corresponds to destructive interference of PM6:L8-BO and D18:N3. f Simulated k-dependent and g n-dependent AbsAM1.5G of PM6:Y6 devices. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page