Fig. 4: Dot plots of plan quality comparison between ATP and manual planning across five disease sites. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: Dot plots of plan quality comparison between ATP and manual planning across five disease sites.

From: Multicenter study on the versatility and adoption of AI-driven automated radiotherapy planning across cancer types

Fig. 4

For each site, n = 30, 10, 10 cases at Institution A, B, C, respectively. The dots and shaded bars in a–e represent the average and 95% CI (confidence interval) bounds of the metric difference between the ATP and MNL plans in each institution or in each preferable group (by unanimous selection). Significant differences (p < 0.05) are shown in red (ATP worse) or blue (ATP better), while data points of no significance (p≥0.05) are denoted in black. The p values have been corrected to account for multiple comparisons across numerous dosimetric endpoints. Source data are provided as a Source data file.

Back to article page