Fig. 3: Comprehensive comparison of sector-level differences between single-region (U.S.-based) and multiregional models. | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: Comprehensive comparison of sector-level differences between single-region (U.S.-based) and multiregional models.

From: The importance of multiregional accounting for corporate carbon emissions

Fig. 3: Comprehensive comparison of sector-level differences between single-region (U.S.-based) and multiregional models.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Across all 400 industry sectors, the emission intensities (emissions per dollar of products or services produced) estimated by the multiregional model are generally greater than those estimated by the single-region model (points above 1:1 line in (a), particularly among manufacturing sectors (orange points). Grouping sectors according to their emissions intensity as estimated by the multiregional model shows that the emission intensities from the multiregional are most different (roughly 30% greater) in sectors with emissions intensity of 0.4−0.8 kgCO2e/$, and the rare cases in which the single-region model estimates greater emissions intensity than the multiregional model are mostly in sectors which very high emissions intensities (>0.8 kgCO2e/$; b). Colors plotted in c indicate the magnitude of increases in the rank order of contributing (upstream) sectors (y-axis) as sources of emissions to different sectors of interest (x-axis) when using the multiregional rather than single-region model.

Back to article page