Fig. 2: Bivariate relationships between herbivore stability, asynchrony, population stability, mean phylogenetic diversity (MPD) and tree species diversity based on linear model results. | Nature Communications

Fig. 2: Bivariate relationships between herbivore stability, asynchrony, population stability, mean phylogenetic diversity (MPD) and tree species diversity based on linear model results.

From: Asynchrony and functional diversity couple herbivore community dynamics to host plant diversity

Fig. 2: Bivariate relationships between herbivore stability, asynchrony, population stability, mean phylogenetic diversity (MPD) and tree species diversity based on linear model results.

“All” includes the entire herbivore community (generalists and specialists) analyzed together (All: light brown, generalist: red, specialist: dark red). Lines are linear regression model fits of the relationships between herbivore asynchrony and a tree species richness and b tree functional diversity. Relationships between herbivore abundance stability and c tree species richness and d herbivore asynchrony. Relationships between herbivore richness stability and e herbivore MPD and f herbivore population stability. Regression lines (with 95% confidence bands) show significant (solid lines, p ≤ 0.05) or non-significant (dashed lines, p > 0.05). Note that tree species richness, population stability, abundance stability and richness stability of herbivores were log-transformed. Error bands represent 95% confidence intervals around the mean.

Back to article page