Fig. 4: Cycling performance of the LZACO-based ASSLBs at the mass loading of 5−6 mg cm−2. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: Cycling performance of the LZACO-based ASSLBs at the mass loading of 5−6 mg cm−2.

From: Mechanically compliant and cost-effective 1.4Li2O-0.75ZrCl4-0.25AlCl3 solid electrolyte for all-solid-state batteries with improved cycling stability

Fig. 4: Cycling performance of the LZACO-based ASSLBs at the mass loading of 5−6 mg cm−2.

a–c Initial charge/discharge profiles (a) and the rate capability (b and c) of the Li-In | LPSCl-LZACO | LCO cell at 25 °C. ηCoulomb represents the Coulombic efficiency. d−f Initial charge/discharge profiles (d) and the rate capability (e and f) of the Li-In | LPSCl-LZACO | scNCM92 cell at 25 °C. ηCoulomb represents the Coulombic efficiency. g, h Long-term cycling performance of the Li-In | LPSCl-LZACO | LCO cell (g) and the Li-In | LPSCl-LZACO | scNCM92 cell (h) at 25 °C. The potential vs. Li/Li+ for each cell is calculated by adding the cell voltage and the potential of the Li-In alloy anode, i.e., 0.62 V vs. Li/Li+. All the cells above were cycled under the stacking pressure of 190 MPa.

Back to article page