Fig. 6: Cycling performance of the LZACO-based ASSLBs at the mass loading above 20 mg cm−2. | Nature Communications

Fig. 6: Cycling performance of the LZACO-based ASSLBs at the mass loading above 20 mg cm−2.

From: Mechanically compliant and cost-effective 1.4Li2O-0.75ZrCl4-0.25AlCl3 solid electrolyte for all-solid-state batteries with improved cycling stability

Fig. 6: Cycling performance of the LZACO-based ASSLBs at the mass loading above 20 mg cm−2.

a, b Initial charge/discharge profiles of the Li-In | LPSCl-LZACO | LCO cell (a) and the Li-In | LPSCl-LZACO | scNCM92 cell (b) with the PEAM mass loading of 28.17 and 25.75 mg cm−2, respectively, at 25 °C. The potential vs. Li/Li+ is calculated by adding the cell voltage and the potential of the Li-In alloy anode, i.e., 0.62 V vs. Li/Li+. ηCoulomb represents the Coulombic efficiency. c, d Long-term cycling performance of the Li-In | LPSCl-LZACO | LCO cell (c) and the Li-In | LPSCl-LZACO | scNCM92 cell (d), where the PEAM mass loading and the cycling conditions are the same as those used for (a) and (b), respectively. For both cells, the stacking pressure during cycling is 190 MPa.

Back to article page