Fig. 6: Performance evaluation and comparison.

a Task performance comparison between conventional and neuromorphic pipeline. b Comparison of total processing time, including both velocity calculation and task execution, for conventional pipeline versus neuromorphic pipeline. c Acceleration characteristics of our method, illustrating the relationship between acceleration ratio and the percentage of filtered regions based on temporal cues. d Comprehensive comparison of conventional and neuromorphic pipeline across various applications, including average task performance and processing time using different velocity inference methods (Farneback, GMFlow, and RAFT).