Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Clay-organic matter interactions drive microbial necromass preservation in soils
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 March 2026

Clay-organic matter interactions drive microbial necromass preservation in soils

  • Xu Wang1,
  • Cynthia M. Kallenbach2,
  • Maya Almaraz  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0556-633X3,4,
  • Katerina Georgiou5,
  • Lifei Sun1,
  • Changpeng Sang1,
  • Ping Jiang1,
  • Yue Liu1,
  • Edith Bai6,7 &
  • …
  • Chao Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5756-75051 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 6128 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

  • 10 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Carbon cycle
  • Climate-change ecology

Abstract

Microbial necromass is increasingly recognized as a major source of stable soil organic matter (SOM), and its persistence is often attributed to interactions with clay-sized minerals. However, the mechanisms underlying this mineral-mediated stabilization remain poorly understood. Here, we conducted an in situ dual-labeled (13C and 15N) microbial necromass experiment across a clay gradient to quantify how clay content and necromass origin (bacterial vs. fungal) regulate necromass persistence. We find that higher clay content markedly enhances necromass retention by strengthening mineral protection, suppressing microbial activity and diversity, and limiting leaching losses. NanoSIMS imaging shows that new necromass preferentially associates with organic matter coatings on the rough mineral surfaces, highlighting organo-organic interfaces as important stabilization pathways. Necromass origin exerts little effect on retention despite marked differences in C:N ratios and bulk chemical composition, indicating that finer-scale molecular features, rather than broad compositional differences, govern necromass stabilization in soils.

Similar content being viewed by others

Microbial necromass carbon and nitrogen persistence are decoupled in agricultural grassland soils

Article Open access 13 May 2022

Formation of necromass-derived soil organic carbon determined by microbial death pathways

Article 25 January 2023

Root exudates simultaneously form and disrupt soil organo-mineral associations

Article Open access 13 November 2024

Data availability

Microbial amplicon sequencing data have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) data repository under accession no. PRJNA1191639. All aggregated data supporting the findings of this study are available in the Figshare repository: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27896424.

Code availability

The main R code used in this study is available in the Figshare repository: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27896424.

References

  1. Ciais, P et al. Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F.) (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

  2. Melillo, J. M. et al. Long-term pattern and magnitude of soil carbon feedback to the climate system in a warming world. Science 358, 101–105 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paustian, K. et al. Climate-smart soils. Nature 532, 49–57 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simpson, A. J., Simpson, M. J., Smith, E. & Kelleher, B. P. Microbially derived inputs to soil organic matter: are current estimates too low? Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 8070–8076 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liang, C. & Balser, T. C. Microbial production of recalcitrant organic matter in global soils: implications for productivity and climate policy. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 75 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, B., An, S., Liang, C., Liu, Y. & Kuzyakov, Y. Microbial necromass as the source of soil organic carbon in global ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 162, 108422 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lehmann, J. & Kleber, M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528, 60 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt, M. W. et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478, 49–56 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Camenzind, T., Mason-Jones, K., Mansour, I., Rillig, M. & Lehmann, J. Formation of necromass-derived soil organic carbon determined by microbial death pathways. Nat. Geosci. 16, 1–8 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sokol, N. W., Sanderman, J. & Bradford, M. A. Pathways of mineral-associated soil organic matter formation: integrating the role of plant carbon source, chemistry, and point of entry. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 12–24 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kleber, M. et al. Mineral–organic associations: formation, properties, and relevance in soil environments. Adv. Agron. 130, 1–140 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xiao, K.-Q. et al. Introducing the soil mineral carbon pump. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 135–136 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liang, C., Schimel, J. & Jastrow, J. The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 17105 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ni, X. et al. The vertical distribution and control of microbial necromass carbon in forest soils. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1829–1839 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Buckeridge, K. M., Creamer, C. & Whitaker, J. Deconstructing the microbial necromass continuum to inform soil carbon sequestration. Funct. Ecol. 36, 1396–1410 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cai, Y. et al. Assessing the accumulation efficiency of various microbial carbon components in soils of different minerals. Geoderma 407, 115562 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mao, H.-R. et al. Dual role of silt and clay in the formation and accrual of stabilized soil organic carbon. Soil Biol. Biochem. 192, 109390 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kögel-Knabner, I. et al. Organo-mineral associations in temperate soils: Integrating biology, mineralogy, and organic matter chemistry. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 171, 61–82 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schweizer, S. A., Bucka, F. B., Graf-Rosenfellner, M. & Kögel-Knabner, I. Soil microaggregate size composition and organic matter distribution as affected by clay content. Geoderma 355, 113901 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kleber, M. et al. Dynamic interactions at the mineral–organic matter interface. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 402–421 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oades, J. The retention of organic matter in soils. Biogeochemistry 5, 35–70 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  22. von Lüetzow, M. et al. Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions – a review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 57, 426–445 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rakhsh, F., Golchin, A., Beheshti Al Agha, A. & Nelson, P. N. Mineralization of organic carbon and formation of microbial biomass in soil: effects of clay content and composition and the mechanisms involved. Soil Biol. Biochem. 151, 108036 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kindler, R. et al. Dissolved carbon leaching from soil is a crucial component of the net ecosystem carbon balance. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 1167–1185 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lieberman, H., Rothman, M., Sperber, C. & Kallenbach, C. Experimental flooding shifts carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus pool distribution and microbial activity. Biogeochemistry 165, 1–16 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Keiluweit, M., Nico, P. S., Kleber, M. & Fendorf, S. Are oxygen limitations under recognized regulators of organic carbon turnover in upland soils? Biogeochemistry 127, 157–171 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Krull, E., Baldock, J. & Skjemstad, J. Importance of mechanisms and processes of the stabilisation of soil organic matter for modelling carbon turnover. Funct. Plant Biol. 30, 207–222 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cuadros, J. Clay minerals interaction with microorganisms: a review. Clay Min. 52, 235–261 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schimel, J. Life in dry soils: effects of drought on soil microbial communities and processes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49, 409–432 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shabtai, I. et al. Soil organic carbon accrual due to more efficient microbial utilization of plant inputs at greater long-term soil moisture. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 327, 170–185 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wei, H. et al. High clay content accelerates the decomposition of fresh organic matter in artificial soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 77, 100–108 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wu, S., Konhauser, K. O., Chen, B. & Huang, L. “Reactive Mineral Sink” drives soil organic matter dynamics and stabilization. Npj Mater. Sustain 1, 3 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fernandez, C. W. & Koide, R. T. Initial melanin and nitrogen concentrations control the decomposition of ectomycorrhizal fungal litter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 77, 150–157 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fernandez, C. W. & Kennedy, P. G. Melanization of mycorrhizal fungal necromass structures microbial decomposer communities. J. Ecol. 106, 468–479 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Buckeridge, K. M. et al. Sticky dead microbes: rapid abiotic retention of microbial necromass in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 149, 107929 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schweigert, M., Herrmann, S., Miltner, A. & Fester, T. Kaestner M. Fate of ectomycorrhizal fungal biomass in a soil bioreactor system and its contribution to soil organic matter formation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 88, 120–127 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kindler, R., Miltner, A., Richnow, H.-H. & Kästner, M. Fate of gram-negative bacterial biomass in soil—mineralization and contribution to SOM. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 2860–2870 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kopittke, P. M. et al. Nitrogen-rich microbial products provide new organo-mineral associations for the stabilization of soil organic matter. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1762–1770 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Miltner, A., Bombach, P., Schmidt-Brücken, B. & Kästner, M. SOM genesis: microbial biomass as a significant source. Biogeochemistry 111, 41–55 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tong, Y., Xiang, H., Jiang, J. & Chen, W. Interfacial interactions between minerals and organic matter: Mechanisms and characterizations. Chemosphere 359, 142383 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gow, N. A. R., Latge, J.-P. & Munro, C. A. The fungal cell wall: structure, biosynthesis, and function. Microbiol. Spectr. 5, FUNK-0035-2016 (2017).

  42. Kleber, M., Sollins, P. & Sutton, R. A conceptual model of organo-mineral interactions in soils: self-assembly of organic molecular fragments into zonal structures on mineral surfaces. Biogeochemistry 85, 9–24 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Possinger, A. R. et al. Organo–organic and organo–mineral interfaces in soil at the nanometer scale. Nat. Commun. 11, 6103 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Throckmorton, H. M., Bird, J. A., Dane, L., Firestone, M. K. & Horwath, W. R. The source of microbial C has little impact on soil organic matter stabilisation in forest ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1257–1265 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rakhsh, F., Golchin, A., Ali, B. A. A. & Alamdri, P. Effects of exchangeable cations, mineralogy and clay content on the mineralization of plant residue carbon. Geoderma 307, 150–158 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Witzgall, K. et al. Particulate organic matter as a functional soil component for persistent soil organic carbon. Nat. Commun. 12, 4115 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Torn, M., Trumbore, S., Chadwick, O., Vitousek, P. & Hendricks, D. Mineral control of soil organic carbon storage and turnover. Nature 389, 170–173 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Vogel, C. et al. Submicron structures provide preferential spots for carbon and nitrogen sequestration in soils. Nat. Commun. 5, 2947 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Manzoni, S., Taylor, P., Richter, A., Porporato, A. & Agren, G. Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. N. Phytologist 196, 79–91 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Matzner, B. okenW. E. Reappraisal of drying and wetting effects on C and N mineralization and fluxes in soils. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 808–824 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Picek, T., Šimek, M. & Šantrůčková, H. Microbial responses to fluctuation of soil aeration status and redox conditions. Biol. Fert. Soils 31, 315–322 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Herbst, M., Tappe, W., Kummer, S. & Vereecken, H. The impact of sieving on heterotrophic respiration response to water content in loamy and sandy topsoils. Geoderma 272, 73–82 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Spence, A. et al. The degradation characteristics of microbial biomass in soil. Geochim Cosmochim. Acta 75, 2571–2581 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yang, N. et al. Leaf litter species identity influences biochemical composition of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 29, 85–96 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sokol, N. W. et al. Life and death in the soil microbiome: how ecological processes influence biogeochemistry. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 415–430 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K. & Paul, E. The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Glob. Change Biol. 19, 988–995 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Buckeridge, K. M. et al. Microbial necromass carbon and nitrogen persistence are decoupled in agricultural grassland soils. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 114 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Mooshammer, M., Wanek, W., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. & Richter, A. Stoichiometric imbalances between terrestrial decomposer communities and their resources: mechanisms and implications of microbial adaptations to their resources. Front. Microbiol. 5, 22 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mooshammer, M. et al. Adjustment of microbial nitrogen use efficiency to carbon:nitrogen imbalances regulates soil nitrogen cycling. Nat. Commun. 5, 3694 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Liu, J. et al. Different fates of deposited NH4+ and NO3− in a temperate forest in northeast China: a 15N tracer study. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 2441–2449 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Pronk, G. J. et al. Interaction of minerals, organic matter, and microorganisms during biogeochemical interface formation as shown by a series of artificial soil experiments. Biol. Fert. Soils 53, 9–22 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kallenbach, C. M., Frey, S. D. & Grandy, A. S. Direct evidence for microbial-derived soil organic matter formation and its ecophysiological controls. Nat. Commun. 7, 13630 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cotrufo, M. F. et al. Formation of soil organic matter via biochemical and physical pathways of litter mass loss. Nat. Geosci. 8, 776–781 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  64. North, P. Towards an absolute measurement of soil structural stability using ultrasound. Soil Sci. 27, 451–459 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Vance, E. D., Brookes, P. C. & Jenkinson, D. S. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19, 703–707 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Parikh, S. J., Goyne, K. W., Margenot, A.J., Mukome, F. N. & Calderón, F. J. Soil chemical insights provided through vibrational spectroscopy. In Advances in Agronomy (eds Sparks, D. L.) (Academic Press, 2014).

  67. Gao, D. et al. Small and transient response of winter soil respiration and microbial communities to altered snow depth in a mid-temperate forest. Appl. Soil Ecol. 130, 40–49 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wiesenberg, G. L. B., Schwarzbauer, J., Schmidt, M. W. I. & Schwark, L. Source and turnover of organic matter in agricultural soils derived from n-alkane/n-carboxylic acid compositions and C-isotope signatures. Org. Geochem. 35, 1371–1393 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Oksanen, J. Vegan: community ecology package. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html (2013).

  70. Lai, J., Zou, Y., Zhang, J. & Peres-Neto, P. R. Generalizing hierarchical and variation partitioning in multiple regression and canonical analyses using the rdacca.hp R package. Methods Ecol. Evol. 13, 782–788 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42322306, 32201412), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF1300501), the International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (064GJHZ2022054FN), Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC2403021) and the Natural Science Foundation Program of Liaoning Province (2025JH6/101100019, 2023-MSBA-142), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS to Chao Wang (Y2022064), and the CAS (Chinese Academy of Sciences) Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research (YSBR-108). We thank Guanghui Yu and Bohao Yin from Tianjin University for technical assistance and Jie Kang and Jiaxin Zhao from Huazhong Agricultural University) for NanoSIMS analysis. Additionally, we thank Weixing Zhu from Binghamton University for helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning, China

    Xu Wang, Lifei Sun, Changpeng Sang, Ping Jiang, Yue Liu & Chao Wang

  2. Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada

    Cynthia M. Kallenbach

  3. Yale Center for Natural Carbon Capture, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Maya Almaraz

  4. Yale School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Maya Almaraz

  5. Department of Biological & Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA

    Katerina Georgiou

  6. Key Laboratory of Geographical Processes and Ecological Security of Changbai Mountains, Ministry of Education, School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, China

    Edith Bai

  7. Changchun Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, China

    Edith Bai

Authors
  1. Xu Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cynthia M. Kallenbach
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maya Almaraz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katerina Georgiou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lifei Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Changpeng Sang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ping Jiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yue Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Edith Bai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.W., C.W., and E.B. designed the study. X.W., C.W., and P.J. performed the experiment. X.W., C.P.S., and L.F.S. performed the laboratory analyses. X.W., Y.L., and C.W. analyzed the data. X.W., C.M.K., M.A., K.G., E.B., and C.W. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Javier Cuadros and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Peer Review file (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Kallenbach, C.M., Almaraz, M. et al. Clay-organic matter interactions drive microbial necromass preservation in soils. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70156-1

Download citation

  • Received: 25 November 2024

  • Accepted: 19 February 2026

  • Published: 03 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70156-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing