Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Precise Quantum Chemistry calculations with few Slater Determinants
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 16 March 2026

Precise Quantum Chemistry calculations with few Slater Determinants

  • Clemens Giuliani  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0005-8769-50131,2,
  • Jannes Nys  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7491-36601,2,3,
  • Rocco Martinazzo  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1077-251X4,
  • Giuseppe Carleo  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8887-43561,2 &
  • …
  • Riccardo Rossi  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-62351,2,5 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2012 Accesses

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational chemistry
  • Quantum chemistry
  • Theoretical physics

Abstract

Slater determinants have underpinned quantum chemistry for nearly a century, yet their full potential has remained challenging to exploit. In this work, we show that a variational wavefunction composed of a few hundred optimized non-orthogonal determinants can achieve energy accuracies comparable to the state of the art. This is obtained by introducing an optimization method that leverages the quadratic dependence of the variational energy on the orbitals of each determinant, enabling an exact iterative optimization, and uses an efficient tensor-contraction algorithm to evaluate the effective Hamiltonian with a computational cost that scales as the fourth power of the number of basis functions. We benchmark the accuracy of the proposed method with exact full-configuration interaction results where available, and we achieve lower variational energies than coupled cluster (CCSD(T)) for several molecules in the double-zeta basis.

Similar content being viewed by others

Autoregressive neural-network wavefunctions for ab initio quantum chemistry

Article 31 March 2022

Experimental quantum computational chemistry with optimized unitary coupled cluster ansatz

Article 11 June 2024

Unleashed from constrained optimization: quantum computing for quantum chemistry employing generator coordinate inspired method

Article Open access 03 December 2024

Data availability

The data generated in this study are publicly available on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18390677.

Code availability

The code used to generate the results reported in this study is publicly available on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18390552.

References

  1. Heitler, W. & London, F. Wechselwirkung neutraler Atome und homöopolare Bindung nach der Quantenmechanik. Z. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01397394 (1927).

  2. Coulson, C. & Fischer, I. XXXIV. Notes on the molecular orbital treatment of the hydrogen molecule. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786444908521726 (1949).

  3. Goddard, W. A. Improved quantum theory of many-electron systems. I. Construction of Eigenfunctions of S2 which satisfy Pauli principle. Phys. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.157.73 (1967).

  4. Gerratt, J. General theory of spin-coupled wave functions for atoms and molecules. Adv. Atomic Mol. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2199(08)60360-7 (1971).

  5. Cooper, D. L., Gerratt, J. & Raimondi, M. Applications of spin-coupled valence bond theory. Chem. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00005a014 (1991).

  6. Lawley, K. P., Cooper, D. L., Gerratt, J. & Raimondi, M. Modern valence bond theory. AB Initio Methods Quantum Chem. II https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470142943.CH6 (2007).

  7. Wu, W. Su, P., Shaik, S. & Hiberty, P. C. Classical valence bond approach by modern methods. Chem. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100228r (2011).

  8. McWeeny, R. Methods of Molecular Quantum Mechanics (Academic Press, 1996).

  9. Pople, J. A., Head-Gordon, M. & Raghavachari, K. Quadratic configuration interaction. A general technique for determining electron correlation energies. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.453520 (1987).

  10. Coester, F. & Kümmel, H. Short-range correlations in nuclear wave functions. Nucl. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(60)90140-1 (1960).

  11. Thom, A. J. W. & Head-Gordon, M. Hartree-Fock solutions as a quasidiabatic basis for nonorthogonal configuration interaction. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3236841 (2009).

  12. Siegbahn, P., Heiberg, A., Roos, B. & Levy, B. A comparison of the Super-CI and the Newton-Raphson scheme in the complete active space SCF method. Phys. Scr. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/21/3-4/014 (1980).

  13. Olsen, J. Novel methods for configuration interaction and orbital optimization for wave functions containing non-orthogonal orbitals with applications to the chromium dimer and trimer. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4929724 (2015).

  14. Bremond, B. Hartree-Fock methods for degenerate cases. Nuclear Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(64)90579-6 (1964).

  15. Koch, H. & Dalgaard, E. Linear superposition of optimized non-orthogonal Slater determinants for singlet states. Chem. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(93)87129-q (1993).

  16. Schmid, K., Kyotoku, M., Grümmer, F. & Faessler, A. Small amplitude vibrations in symmetry-projected quasi-particle mean fields. Ann. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(89)90264-9 (1989).

  17. Jiménez-Hoyos, C. A., Rodríguez-Guzmán, R. & Scuseria, G. E. Multi-component symmetry-projected approach for molecular ground state correlations. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4832476 (2013).

  18. Fukutome, H. Theory of resonating quantum fluctuations in a fermion system: Resonating Hartree-Fock approximation. Prog. Theor. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1143/ptp.80.417 (1988).

  19. Ikawa, A., Yamamoto, S. & Fukutome, H. Orbital optimization in the resonating Hartree-Fock approximation and its application to the one dimensional Hubbard model. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn https://doi.org/10.1143/jpsj.62.1653 (1993).

  20. Tomita, N., Ten-no, S. & Tanimura, Y. Ab initio molecular orbital calculations by the resonating Hartree-Fock approach: superposition of non-orthogonal Slater determinants. Chem. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2614(96)01266-3 (1996).

  21. Mahler, A. D. & L. Thompson, M. Orbital optimization in nonorthogonal multiconfigurational self-consistent field applied to the study of conical intersections and avoided crossings. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0053615 (2021).

  22. Thouless, D. Stability conditions and nuclear rotations in the Hartree-Fock theory. Nuclear Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(60)90048-1 (1960).

  23. Sun, C., Gao, F. & Scuseria, G. E. Selected nonorthogonal configuration interaction with compressed single and double excitations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00240 (2024).

  24. Miller, E. R. & Parker, S. M. Numerically stable resonating Hartree-Fock. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0246790 (2025).

  25. Van Lenthe, J. & Balint-Kurti, G. The valence-bond SCF (VB SCF) method. Chem. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(80)80623-3 (1980).

  26. Rashid, Z. & van Lenthe, J. H. A quadratically convergent VBSCF method. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4788765 (2013).

  27. Meyer, H.-D., Manthe, U. & Cederbaum, L. The multi-configurational time-dependent Hartree approach. Chem. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(90)87014-i (1990).

  28. Lode, A. U., Lévêque, C., Madsen, L. B., Streltsov, A. I. & Alon, O. E. Colloquium: multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree approaches for indistinguishable particles. Rev. Mod. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.92.011001 (2020).

  29. Al-Saidi, W., Zhang, S. & Krakauer, H. Auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo calculations of molecular systems with a Gaussian basis. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2200885 (2006).

  30. Lee, J., Pham, H. Q. & Reichman, D. R. Twenty years of auxiliary-field quantum monte carlo in quantum chemistry: an overview and assessment on main group chemistry and bond-breaking. J. Chem. Theory Comput. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00802 (2022).

  31. Scemama, A., Applencourt, T., Giner, E. & Caffarel, M. Quantum Monte Carlo with very large multideterminant wavefunctions. J. Comput. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24382 (2016).

  32. Ceperley, D., Chester, G. V. & Kalos, M. H. Monte Carlo simulation of a many-fermion study. Phys. Rev. B https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.16.3081 (1977).

  33. Pfau, D., Spencer, J. S., Matthews, A. G. & Foulkes, W. M. C. Ab initio solution of the many-electron schrödinger equation with deep neural networks. Phys. Rev. Res. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033429 (2020).

  34. Hermann, J., Schätzle, Z. & Noé, F. Deep-neural-network solution of the electronic schrödinger equation. Nat. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-0544-y (2020).

  35. Liu, A.-J. & Clark, B. K. Neural network backflow for ab initio quantum chemistry. Phys. Rev. B https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.115137 (2024).

  36. Bortone, M., Rath, Y. & Booth, G. H. Simple fermionic backflow states via a systematically improvable tensor decomposition. Commun. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-025-02083-4 (2025).

  37. Gao, H., Imamura, S., Kasagi, A. & Yoshida, E. Distributed implementation of full configuration interaction for one trillion determinants. J. Chem. Theory Comput. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01190 (2024).

  38. Chan, G. K., Kállay, M. & Gauss, J. State-of-the-art density matrix renormalization group and coupled cluster theory studies of the nitrogen binding curve. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1783212 (2004).

  39. Scuseria, G. E., Jiménez-Hoyos, C. A., Henderson, T. M., Samanta, K. & Ellis, J. K. Projected quasiparticle theory for molecular electronic structure. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3643338 (2011).

  40. Hohenstein, E. G., Parrish, R. M. & Martínez, T. J. Tensor hypercontraction density fitting. I. Quartic scaling second- and third-order møller-plesset perturbation theory. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4732310 (2012).

  41. Peng, B. & Kowalski, K. Highly efficient and scalable compound decomposition of two-electron integral tensor and its application in coupled cluster calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00605 (2017).

  42. Burton, H. G. A. & Thom, A. J. W. Reaching full correlation through nonorthogonal configuration interaction: a second-order perturbative approach. J. Chem. Theory Comput. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00468 (2020).

  43. Löwdin, P.-O. Quantum theory of many-particle systems. II. Study of the ordinary Hartree-Fock approximation. Phys. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.97.1490 (1955).

  44. Malmqvist, P. Å. Calculation of transition density matrices by nonunitary orbital transformations. Int. J. Quantum Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.560300404 (1986).

  45. Broer, R. & Nieuwpoort, W. C. Broken orbital symmetry and the description of valence hole states in the tetrahedral [CrO4]2 anion. Theor. Chim. Acta https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00527744 (1988).

  46. Verbeek, J. & Van Lenthe, J. H. The generalized Slater-Condon rules. Int. J. Quantum Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.560400204 (1991).

  47. Mazziotti, D. A. Comparison of contracted schrödinger and coupled-cluster theories. Phys. Rev. A https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.60.4396 (1999).

  48. Dijkstra, F. & van Lenthe, J. H. Gradients in valence bond theory. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.482021 (2000).

  49. Tomita, N. Many-body wave functions approximated by the superposition of spin-projected nonorthogonal Slater determinants in the resonating Hartree-Fock method. Phys. Rev. B https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.69.045110 (2004).

  50. Brouder, C. Matrix elements of many-body operators and density correlations. Phys. Rev. A https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.72.032720 (2005).

  51. Utsuno, Y., Shimizu, N., Otsuka, T. & Abe, T. Efficient computation of Hamiltonian matrix elements between non-orthogonal Slater determinants. Comput. Phys. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.002 (2013).

  52. Rodriguez-Laguna, J., Robledo, L. M. & Dukelsky, J. Efficient computation of matrix elements of generic Slater determinants. Phys. Rev. A https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.012105 (2020).

  53. Burton, H. G. A. Generalized nonorthogonal matrix elements: unifying Wick’s theorem and the Slater-Condon rules. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0045442 (2021).

  54. Burton, H. G. A. Generalized nonorthogonal matrix elements. II: extension to arbitrary excitations. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0122094 (2022).

  55. Bertsch, G. F. & Robledo, L. M. Symmetry restoration in Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov-based theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.108.042505 (2012).

  56. Chen, G. P. & Scuseria, G. E. Robust formulation of Wick’s theorem for computing matrix elements between Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov wavefunctions. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0156124 (2023).

  57. King, H. F., Stanton, R. E., Kim, H., Wyatt, R. E. & Parr, R. G. Corresponding orbitals and the nonorthogonality problem in molecular quantum mechanics. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712221 (1967).

  58. Sunet, Q. et al. Recent developments in the PySCF program package. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0006074 (2020).

  59. Zhai, H. et al. Block2: a comprehensive open source framework to develop and apply state-of-the-art DMRG algorithms in electronic structure and beyond. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0180424 (2023).

  60. Smith, D. G. A. et al. PSI4 1.4: open-source software for high-throughput quantum chemistry. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0006002 (2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge insightful discussions with F. Vicentini and L. Viteritti. We thank H. Koch and G. Scuseria for valuable remarks. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation under Grant No. 200021_200336 (C.G.). This research was also supported by SEFRI through Grant No. MB22.00051 (NEQS - Neural Quantum Simulation) (R.R.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Physics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Clemens Giuliani, Jannes Nys, Giuseppe Carleo & Riccardo Rossi

  2. Center for Quantum Science and Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Clemens Giuliani, Jannes Nys, Giuseppe Carleo & Riccardo Rossi

  3. Institute for Theoretical Physics, ETH Zurich, 8093, Zürich, Switzerland

    Jannes Nys

  4. Department of Chemistry, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133, Milano, Italy

    Rocco Martinazzo

  5. CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique Théorique de la Matière Condensée, Sorbonne Université, 75005, Paris, France

    Riccardo Rossi

Authors
  1. Clemens Giuliani
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jannes Nys
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rocco Martinazzo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giuseppe Carleo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Riccardo Rossi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.R. conceived the overall idea, C.G. derived the final theoretical formulation, implemented the algorithm, performed the simulations, and curated the data for the article. C.G., J.N., R.N., G.C., and R.R. contributed to the choice of studied problems, discussions, and to the writing and review of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Clemens Giuliani or Riccardo Rossi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giuliani, C., Nys, J., Martinazzo, R. et al. Precise Quantum Chemistry calculations with few Slater Determinants. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70255-z

Download citation

  • Received: 07 May 2025

  • Accepted: 20 February 2026

  • Published: 16 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70255-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Methodological developments in electronic structure theory and chemical dynamics

Focus

Inorganic and physical chemistry

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing