Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Global implications of uncertainty in China’s climate policy delivery
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 March 2026

Global implications of uncertainty in China’s climate policy delivery

  • Dan Zhang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6896-35461,
  • Steve Pye  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1793-25521,
  • Jim Watson  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8464-17182,
  • James Price1 &
  • …
  • Dan Welsby  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8800-02292 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 4122 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy modelling
  • Energy policy
  • Social sciences

Abstract

The delivery of China’s climate policy has substantial global implications, yet persistent gaps between policy targets and implementation raise concerns about policy credibility. This study presents a structured credibility assessment of 292 targets across 58 national climate and energy policies, including China’s updated 2035 NDC. We apply a morphological scenario framework to examine interactions between policy uncertainty and socio-economic and technological drivers, embedding these scenarios in an integrated assessment model under two global contexts: one aligned with current NDCs and one consistent with global net-zero ambition. We find that timely or accelerated delivery of China’s net-zero target could partially offset insufficient ambition elsewhere by mid-century. Full delivery by 2050 reduces global CO₂ emissions to 13 Gt, compared with 23 Gt without such policies. Policy delivery uncertainty alone could imply up to ~500 GtCO₂ difference in cumulative emissions by 2100 (~0.17 °C warming).

Similar content being viewed by others

Plausible global emissions scenario for 2 °C aligned with China’s net-zero pathway

Article Open access 29 August 2025

A cost-effective climate mitigation pathway for China with co-benefits for sustainability

Article Open access 02 November 2024

Unpacking China’s climate policy mixes shows a disconnect between policy density and intensity in the post-Paris era

Article Open access 24 March 2025

Data availability

The processed data underlying the figures and analyses presented in this study, including source data for the policy credibility assessment, net-zero assumptions, and figure generation, have been deposited in the Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18378439). The TIAM-UCL model outputs and files with the assumptions needed to run the model are available in the same repository.

Code availability

The underlying code (mathematical equations) for the model is available via GitHub (https://github.com/etsap-TIMES/TIMES_model).

References

  1. CCP & State Council. China’s Achievements, New Goals and New Measures for Nationally Determined Contributions. State Council of the People’s Republic of China (2021).

  2. Liu, H. What does China’s 14th ‘five year plan’ mean for climate change? Carbon Brief https://www.carbonbrief.org/qa-what-does-chinas-14th-five-year-plan-mean-for-climate-change/ (2021).

  3. National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). Working Guidance for Carbon Dioxide Peaking and Carbon Neutrality in Full and Faithful Implementation of the New Development Philosophy. https://en.ndrc.gov.cn/policies/202110/t20211024_1300725.html (2021).

  4. National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). ACTION PLAN FOR CARBON DIOXIDE PEAKING BEFORE 2030. https://en.ndrc.gov.cn/policies/202110/t20211027_1301020.html (2021).

  5. Friedlingstein, P. Fossil fuel CO2 emissions increase again in 2024. Global Carbon Budget https://globalcarbonbudget.org (2024).

  6. Rogelj, J. et al. Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk. Science 380, 1014–1016 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Victor, D. G., Lumkowsky, M. & Dannenberg, A. Determining the credibility of commitments in international climate policy. Nat. Clim. Chang. 12, 793–800 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dolphin, G., Pahle, M., Burtraw, D. & Kosch, M. A net-zero target compels a backward induction approach to climate policy. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 1033–1041 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nemet, G. F., Jakob, M., Steckel, J. C. & Edenhofer, O. Addressing policy credibility problems for low-carbon investment. Global Environmental Change 42, 47–57 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. O’Neill, B. C. et al. The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Global Environmental Change 42, 169–180 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, S. & Chen, W. Assessing the energy transition in China towards carbon neutrality with a probabilistic framework. Nat Commun 13, 87 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, X., Nielsen, C. P., Song, S. & McElroy, M. B. Breaking the hard-to-abate bottleneck in China’s path to carbon neutrality with clean hydrogen. Nat Energy 7, 955–965 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, L. et al. Mitigation of China’s carbon neutrality to global warming. Nat Commun 13, 5315 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gambhir, A., Butnar, I., Li, P.-H., Smith, P. & Strachan, N. A Review of Criticisms of Integrated Assessment Models and Proposed Approaches to Address These, through the Lens of BECCS. Energies 12, 1747 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Salvi, A.-N., Laura, V.-O. & Morgan, J. The failure of Integrated Assessment Models as a response to ‘climate emergency’ and ecological breakdown: the Emperor has no clothes. Globalizations 18, 1178–1188 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. IGSD. China Issues Measures to Regulate the Utilization of Domestically Produced and Imported Natural Gas. Institute For Governance & Sustainable Development https://www.igsd.org/china-issues-measures-to-regulate-the-utilization-of-domestically-produced-and-imported-natural-gas/ (2024).

  17. Meidan, M. The outlook for China’s fossil fuel consumption under the energy transition and its geopolitical implications. (2023).

  18. NDRC. Action Plan for Strict Energy Efficiency Constraints to Promote Energy Conservation and Carbon Reduction in Key Industries (2021-2025). https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/202110/t20211021_1300583_ext.html (2021).

  19. IEA. China: CO₂ emissions. IEA https://www.iea.org/countries/china/emissions (2023).

  20. Li, X., He, S., Gu, Y. & Sun, Y. Unpacking China’s climate policy mixes shows a disconnect between policy density and intensity in the post-Paris era. npj Clim. Action 4, 30 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Guy, J., Shears, E. & Meckling, J. National models of climate governance among major emitters. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 189–195 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brunner, S., Flachsland, C. & Marschinski, R. Credible commitment in carbon policy. Climate Policy 12, 255–271 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobs, A. M. Policy Making for the Long Term in Advanced Democracies. Annual Review of Political Science 19, 433–454 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Teng, F. Ambitious and credible pledges. Nat. Clim. Chang. 12, 779–780 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fransen, T. et al. Taking stock of the implementation gap in climate policy. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 752–755 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lauri, P. & Harro, V. A. Assessing risks to the implementation of NDCs under the Paris Agreement. Climate Policy 1–15 https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2025.2513023.

  27. Zhu, M. The Rule of Climate Policy: How Do Chinese Judges Contribute to Climate Governance without Climate Law? Transnational Environmental Law (2021).

  28. Xu, S. China’s climate governance for carbon neutrality: regulatory gaps and the ways forward. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10, 1–10 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Teng, F. & Wang, P. The evolution of climate governance in China: drivers, features, and effectiveness. Environmental Politics 30, 141–161 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, H., Feng, L. & Sun, X. Beyond central-local relations: the introduction of a new perspective on China’s environmental governance model. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11, 1–12 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wiedenbach, A. Divergent Central and Local Government Interests May Impede Implementation of China’s Climate Targets. Climate Scorecard https://www.climatescorecard.org/2021/08/divergent-central-and-local-government-interests-may-impede-implementation-of-chinas-climate-targets/ (2021).

  32. The World Bank. Unlocking Consumption: China Economic Update. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/8ae5ce818673952a85fee1ee57c3e933-0070012025/original/CEU-June-2025-EN.pdf (2025).

  33. Prater, T., Song, W., You, X., Cleaver, K. & Pearson, T. Glossary: Decoding how China talks about energy and climate change. Carbon Brief https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/glossary/china/ (2025).

  34. Chen, X. et al. Pathway toward carbon-neutral electrical systems in China by mid-century with negative CO2 abatement costs informed by high-resolution modeling. Joule 5, 2715–2741 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zwicky, F. The Morphological Approach to Discovery, Invention, Research and Construction. in New Methods of Thought and Procedure (eds Zwicky, F. & Wilson, A. G.) 273–297 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1967).

  36. State Council. China pushes ‘dual circulation’ to power growth in new development stage. https://english.www.gov.cn/news/topnews/202103/10/content_WS60486347c6d0719374afa854.html (2021).

  37. State Council. Strides made in advancing Beautiful China Initiative: official. https://english.www.gov.cn/news/topnews/202210/21/content_WS63526392c6d0a757729e17e0.html (2022).

  38. State Council. China’s property market shows stronger signs of recovery. https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/statistics/202412/16/content_WS6760192fc6d0868f4e8ee041.html (2024).

  39. State Council. New urbanization implementation plan approved. https://english.www.gov.cn/policies/latestreleases/202206/07/content_WS629f170ac6d02e533532bcf7.html (2022).

  40. Meinshausen, M. et al. Realization of Paris Agreement pledges may limit warming just below 2 °C. Nature 604, 304–309 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Van De Ven, D.-J. et al. A multimodel analysis of post-Glasgow climate targets and feasibility challenges. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 570–578 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Riahi, K. et al. The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Global Environmental Change 42, 153–168 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  43. He, Y., Piao, S., Ciais, P., Xu, H. & Gasser, T. Future land carbon removals in China consistent with national inventory. Nat Commun 15, 10426 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Erickson, P. et al. Why fossil fuel producer subsidies matter. Nature 578, E1–E4 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Loulou, R., Labriet, M. & Lehtila, A. TIMES Climate Module. ETSAP http://iea-etsap.org/docs/TIMES-ClimateModule.pdf, 2010. (2010).

  46. Meinshausen, M., Raper, S. C. B. & Wigley, T. M. L. Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 – Part 1: Model description and calibration. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 11, 1417–1456 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pye, S. et al. The global implications of a Russian gas pivot to Asia. Nature Communications 16, 386 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Li, X., Pattberg, P. & Widerberg, O. China’s climate governance from 2009 to 2019: motivations, instruments, actors, and geopolitics. Climate Policy 24, 378–395 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.P. and J.P. involvement was supported by the Horizon Europe R&I programme project DIAMOND (grant no. 101081179).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UCL Energy Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom

    Dan Zhang, Steve Pye & James Price

  2. UCL Institute for Sustainable Resources, University College London, London, United Kingdom

    Jim Watson & Dan Welsby

Authors
  1. Dan Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steve Pye
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jim Watson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. James Price
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dan Welsby
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.Z., S.P., J.P., and J.W. designed the study, with contributions from D.W. D.Z. and J.P. conducted the TIAM-UCL modelling, with contributions from D.W. D.Z. led the presentation of the modelling results. D.Z. and S.P. led on the drafting of the manuscript, with contributions from all other authors. D.Z. led the compilation of the supplementary information.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Fei Teng and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, D., Pye, S., Watson, J. et al. Global implications of uncertainty in China’s climate policy delivery. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70400-8

Download citation

  • Received: 29 May 2025

  • Accepted: 19 February 2026

  • Published: 06 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70400-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing