Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Rapid subsurface warming in the subpolar North Atlantic from freshening
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 27 March 2026

Rapid subsurface warming in the subpolar North Atlantic from freshening

  • Laurie C. Menviel  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5068-15911,2,
  • Gabriel Pontes  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4397-42381,2,3,
  • Mathieu Lapeze1,4 &
  • …
  • Himadri Saini1,5 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 3554 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Climate and Earth system modelling
  • Physical oceanography

Abstract

Over recent decades, the Arctic has warmed four times faster than the global average, associated with a decline in sea ice and accelerating Greenland Ice Sheet mass loss, which has contributed to episodic freshening of the subpolar North Atlantic. Here, we show that a 0.05 Sv North Atlantic meltwater flux induces  ~ 1°C subsurface warming within a decade in Baffin Bay, Hudson Strait, and along Greenland’s southern and western coasts. This warming arises from enhanced stratification, weakened deep convection in the subpolar gyre, and a weaker Labrador Current. Freshening also alters horizontal density gradients, strengthening cyclonic circulation in the Nordic Seas and causing transient regional warming. The temperature response significantly depends on the location of deep-ocean convection, highlighting the need for simulations with accurate deep-ocean convection. This warming may create a positive feedback, accelerating Greenland and Arctic glacier melt with implications for ice-sheet stability and the strength of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Relatively warm deep-water formation persisted in the Last Glacial Maximum

Article Open access 21 January 2026

Subpolar North Atlantic Ocean heat content drives 21st-century Arctic multi-decadal variability in CESM1 LE

Article Open access 24 December 2025

Subsurface ocean warming preceded Heinrich Events

Article Open access 21 July 2022

Data availability

The data underpinning this work is available on the public UNSWorks repository: https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/31839.

References

  1. Stroeve, J. & Notz, D. Changing state of arctic sea ice across all seasons. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 103001 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meier, W. N. & Stroeve, J. An updated assessment of the changing arctic sea ice cover. Oceanography 35, 10–19 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bocquet, M., Fleury, S., Rémy, F. & Piras, F. Arctic and antarctic sea ice thickness and volume changes from observations between 1994 and 2023. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 129, e2023JC020848 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rantanen, M. et al. The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 168 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Otosaka, I. N. et al. Mass balance of the greenland and Antarctic ice sheets from 1992 to 2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 1597–1616 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jahn, A. & Laiho, R. Forced changes in the arctic freshwater budget emerge in the early 21st century. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL088854 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dickson, B. et al. Rapid freshening of the deep North Atlantic Ocean over the past four decades. Nature 416, 832–837 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Curry, R. & Mauritzen, C. Dilution of the Northern North Atlantic Ocean in recent decades. Science 308, doi:10.1126/science1109477 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rabe, B. et al. Arctic ocean basin liquid freshwater storage trend 1992-2012. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 961–968 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Molodtsov, S. et al. North Atlantic temperature and salinity changes are driven by external forcing, underestimated by CMIP6 models. Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 8, 332 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chomiak, L. N., Volkov, D. L., Johns, W. E., V, J. A. H. & Smith, R. H. Deep ocean cooling and freshening from Subpolar North Atlantic reaches Subtropics at 26.5°N. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 235 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Proshutinsky, A. et al. Analysis of the beaufort gyre freshwater content in 2003-2018. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 124, 9658–9689 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Häkkinen, S. An arctic source for the great salinity anomaly: A simulation of the arctic ice-ocean system for 1955-1975. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 98, 16397–16410 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holliday, N., Bersch, M. & Berx, B. et al. Ocean circulation causes the largest freshening event for 120 years in eastern subpolar North Atlantic. Nat. Commun. 11, 585 (2020).

  15. Fox, A. D. et al. Exceptional freshening and cooling in the eastern subpolar north atlantic caused by reduced labrador sea surface heat loss. Ocean Sci. 18, 1507–1533 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bamber, J. L. et al. Land ice freshwater budget of the Arctic and North Atlantic Oceans: 1. data, methods, and results. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 123, 1827–1837 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Igneczi, A. & Bamber, J. L. A high-resolution pan-Arctic meltwater discharge dataset from 1950 to 2021. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 17, 3203–3218 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Notz, D. & Community, S. Arctic Sea Ice in CMIP6. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL086749 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lozier, M. S. et al. A sea change in our view of overturning in the subpolar north atlantic. Science 363, 516–521 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Petit, T., Lozier, M. S., Josey, S. A. & Cunningham, S. A. Atlantic deep water formation occurs primarily in the Iceland basin and Irminger Sea by local buoyancy forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL091028 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Caesar, L., McCarthy, G., Thornalley, D., Cahill, N. & Rahmstorf, S. Current Atlantic meridional overturning circulation weakest in last millennium. Nat. Geosci. 14, 118–120 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rahmstorf, S. et al. Exceptional twentieth-century slowdown in Atlantic Ocean overturning circulation. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 475–480 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Caesar, L., Rahmstorf, S., Robinson, A., Feulner, G. & Saba, V. Observed fingerprint of a weakening Atlantic Ocean overturning circulation. Nature 556, 191–196 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moat, B. I. et al. Pending recovery in the strength of the meridional overturning circulation at 26° N. Ocean Sci. 16, 863–874 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ren, Q., Xie, S., Peng, Q., Li, Y. & Wang, F. Equatorial Atlantic mid-depth warming indicates Atlantic meridional overturning circulation slowdown. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 819 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pontes, G. & Menviel, L. Weakening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation driven by subarctic freshening since the mid-twentieth century. Nat. Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01568-1 (2024).

  27. He, C. et al. A North Atlantic warming hole without Ocean circulation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL100420 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Johns, W. et al. Towards two decades of Atlantic Ocean mass and heat transports at 26.5°N. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 381, 20220188 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Volkov, D. et al. Florida Current transport observations reveal four decades of steady state. Nat. Commun. 15, 7780 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. R, B. et al. Increased risk of near term global warming due to a recent AMOC weakening. Nat. Commun. 12, 6108 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Terhaar, J., Vogt, L. & Foukal, N. Atlantic overturning inferred from air-sea heat fluxes indicates no decline since the 1960s. Nat. Commun. 16, 222 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou, Y. & McManus, J. Heinrich event ice discharge and the fate of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Science 384, 983–986 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Henry, L. et al. North Atlantic ocean circulation and abrupt climate change during the last glaciation. Science 353, 470–474 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Menviel, L. C. et al. Enhanced mid-depth southward transport in the Northeast Atlantic at the last glacial maximum despite a weaker AMOC. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol. 35, e2019PA003793 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Matero, I., Gregoire, L., Ivanovic, R., Tindall, J. & Haywood, A. The 8.2 ka cooling event caused by Laurentide ice saddle collapse. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 473, 205–214 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stouffer, R. et al. Investigating the causes of the response of the thermohaline circulation to past and future climate changes. J. Clim. 19, 1365–1387 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kageyama, M. et al. Climatic impacts of fresh water hosing under Last Glacial Maximum conditions: a multi-model study. Clim. Past 9, 935–953 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jackson, L. et al. Global and European climate impacts of a slowdown of the AMOC in a high resolution GCM. Clim. Dyn. 45, 3299–3316 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Glaude, Q. et al. A factor two difference in 21st-century greenland ice sheet surface mass balance projections from three regional climate models under a strong warming scenario (SSP5-8.5). Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2024GL111902 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ziehn, T. et al. The australian earth system model: Access-esm1.5. J. Southern Hemisph. Earth Syst. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1071/ES19035 (2020).

  41. Kiss, A. E. et al. ACCESS-OM2 v1.0: a global ocean–sea ice model at three resolutions. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 401–442 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Greene, C. A., Gardner, A., Wood, M. & Cuzzone, J. Ubiquitous acceleration in Greenland Ice Sheet calving from 1985 to 2022. Nature 625, 523–528 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rahlves, C., Goelzer, H., Born, A. & Langebroek, P. M. Historically consistent mass loss projections of the Greenland ice sheet. Cryosphere, 19, 1205–1220 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ziehn, T. et al. Access-esm1.5 model output prepared for cmip6 ’scenariomip’. http://hdl.handle.net/102.100.100/422391?index=1 (2019).

  45. Bonan, D. et al. Observational constraints imply limited future Atlantic meridional overturning circulation weakening. Nat. Geosci. 18, 479–487 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Asbjørnsen, H., Årthun, M., Skagseth, Ø & Eldevik, T. Mechanisms of ocean heat anomalies in the norwegian sea. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 124, 2908–2923 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Martin, T. & Biastoch, A. On the ocean’s response to enhanced Greenland runoff in model experiments: relevance of mesoscale dynamics and atmospheric coupling. Ocean Sci. 19, 141–167 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Weijer, W., Cheng, W., Garuba, O. A., Hu, A. & Nadiga, B. T. CMIP6 Models predict significant 21st century decline of the atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Geophys. Res. Lett.47, e2019GL086075 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Swingedouw, D. et al. On the risk of abrupt changes in the North Atlantic subpolar gyre in CMIP6 models. Annal. New York Acad. Sci. 1504, 187–201 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  50. He, C. et al. North Atlantic subsurface temperature response controlled by effective freshwater input in “Heinrich" events. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 539, 116247 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. de Boyer Montégut, C. Mixed layer depth climatology computed with a density threshold criterion of 0.03 kg/m3 from 10 m depth value, SEANOE data set.https://doi.org/10.17882/91774 (2023).

  52. Årthun, M., Asbjørnsen, H., Chafik, L., Johnson, H. & Våge, K. Future strengthening of the Nordic Seas overturning circulation. Nat. Commun. 14, 2065 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Heuzé, C. North atlantic deep water formation and amoc in cmip5 models. Ocean Sci. 13, 609–622 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Treguier, A. M. et al. The mixed-layer depth in the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP): impact of resolving mesoscale eddies. Geosci. Model Dev. 16, 3849–3872 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Barker, S. et al. Icebergs not the trigger for North Atlantic cold events. Nature 520, 333–336 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Goelzer, H. et al. The future sea-level contribution of the Greenland ice sheet: a multi-model ensemble study of ISMIP6. Cryosphere 14, 3071–3096 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Curry, W. & Oppo, D. Glacial water mass geometry and the distribution of δ13C of ΣCO2 in the western Atlantic Ocean. Paleoceanography 20, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001021 (2005).

  58. Paolo, F. S., Fricker, H. A. & Padman, L. Volume loss from antarctic ice shelves is accelerating. Science 348, 327–331 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kochtitzky, W. & Copland, L. Retreat of Northern hemisphere marine-terminating glaciers, 2000-2020. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2021GL096501 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Foss, Ø et al. Ocean warming drives immediate mass loss from calving glaciers in the high Arctic. Nat. Commun. 15, 10460 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Bellouin, N. et al. The hadgem2 family of met office unified model climate configurations. Geosci. Model Dev. 4, 723–757 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kowalczyk, E. et al. The land surface model component of access: description and impact on the simulated surface climatology. Aust. Meteorol. Oceanogr. J. 63, 65–82 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Griffies, S. Elements of the Modular Ocean Model (MOM): 2012 release (GFDL Ocean Group Technical Report No. 7). (2012).

  64. Hunke, E. C., Lipscomb, W. H., Turner, A. K., Jeffery, N., & Elliott, S. Cice: The Los Alamos Sea Ice Model Documentation and Software User’s Manual, Version 4.1, LA-CC-06-012. (2010).

  65. Tsujino, H. et al. JRA-55 based surface dataset for driving ocean-sea-ice models (JRA55-do). Ocean Model. 130, 79–139 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Mackallah, C. et al. ACCESS datasets for CMIP6: methodology and idealised experiments. J. South. Hemisph. Earth Syst. Sci. 72, 93–116 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ziehn, T. et al. Csiro access-esm1.5 model output prepared for cmip6 cmip esm-picontrol. version 20210316. Earth Syst. Grid Federation https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4248 (2019).

  68. Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Oliveira Matos, F. D. A. et al. Diagnosing the atlantic meridional overturning circulation in density space is critical in warmer climates. EGUsphere 2025, 1–26 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Locarnini, R. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2013, vol. 1, chap. Temperature, 40 (Ed. NOAA Atlas NESDIS 73, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Laurie Menviel and Gabriel Pontes acknowledge funding from the Australian Research Council (ARC) grant SR200100008. Himadri Saini and Laurie Menviel acknowledge funding from the ARC grant DP220102134. This research was supported by the Australian Government’s National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS), with access to computational resources provided by the National Computational Infrastructure (NCI) through the National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme, and through UNSW. The authors thank CSIRO for developing the ACCESS-ESM1.5 model configuration and making it freely available to researchers, and thank COSIMA for developing the ACCESS-OM2-025 and making it available. This research used the ACCESS-ESM1.5 and ACCESS-OM2-025 model infrastructures provided by ACCESS-NRI, which is enabled by the Australian Government’s NCRIS. The authors would like to thank Peter Dobrohotoff for retrieving the CMIP6 data. The author(s) wish to acknowledge the use of the Ferret program for analysis and graphics in this paper. Ferret is a product of NOAA’s Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory. (Information is available at http://ferret.pmel.noaa.gov/Ferret/).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Climate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Laurie C. Menviel, Gabriel Pontes, Mathieu Lapeze & Himadri Saini

  2. The Australian Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Laurie C. Menviel & Gabriel Pontes

  3. School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK

    Gabriel Pontes

  4. Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

    Mathieu Lapeze

  5. School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Himadri Saini

Authors
  1. Laurie C. Menviel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabriel Pontes
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mathieu Lapeze
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Himadri Saini
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.M. conceived the study, G.P. performed the experiments, L.M. analyzed the results with help from M.L., G.P., and H.S. L.M. made the figures with the help of G.P. L.M. wrote the manuscript with contributions from G.P., H.S., and M.L.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurie C. Menviel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Elian Vanderborght and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Menviel, L.C., Pontes, G., Lapeze, M. et al. Rapid subsurface warming in the subpolar North Atlantic from freshening. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70635-5

Download citation

  • Received: 10 June 2025

  • Accepted: 02 March 2026

  • Published: 27 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70635-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing