Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Uniform bacterial genetic diversity along the gut
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 March 2026

Uniform bacterial genetic diversity along the gut

  • Michael Wasney  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2023-67371 na1,
  • Leah Briscoe  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5827-50132 na1,
  • Richard Wolff3,
  • Hans Ghezzi4,
  • Carolina Tropini  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7542-15775,6,7 &
  • …
  • Nandita Garud  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4217-44071,2,3 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2517 Accesses

  • 31 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bacterial evolution
  • Bacterial genetics
  • Metagenomics
  • Microbial ecology

Abstract

While environmental gradients are known to result in heterogeneous distributions of bacterial species along the gastrointestinal tract, the spatial distribution of genetic diversity within these species remains poorly understood. Because bacterial genetic variants influence host traits like inflammation and metabolism, understanding their distribution is critical. Here, we analyze ~30 common gut commensals in germ-free mice colonized with the same healthy human stool. Unexpectedly, we find that while species composition varied significantly across gut regions, genetic diversity within species remained remarkably uniform. This uniformity is driven by similar strain frequencies along the gut lumen, indicating that genetically divergent strains can coexist without spatial segregation. Furthermore, ~60 evolutionary adaptations arising within the mice tend to sweep globally throughout the gut, showing little region-specificity. We observe similar dynamics in conventional mice and humans, suggesting that uniform bacterial genetic diversity is a conserved, robust feature of mammalian gut ecosystems.

Similar content being viewed by others

Intrahost evolution of the gut microbiota

Article 17 April 2023

Identification of gut microbial species linked with disease variability in a widely used mouse model of colitis

Article Open access 01 April 2022

Quantifying the adaptive landscape of commensal gut bacteria using high-resolution lineage tracking

Article Open access 21 February 2024

Data availability

The raw metagenomics sequencing reads data generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA1230553. The processed count tables, associated metadata, and other data tables used to produce figures are available in Supplementary Information.

Code availability

All necessary metadata, as well as the source code for the sequencing pipeline, downstream analyses, and figure generation, are available on GitHub (https://github.com/garudlab/Wasney-Briscoe/).

References

  1. McCallum, G. & Tropini, C. The gut microbiota and its biogeography. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 105–118 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gu, S. et al. Bacterial community mapping of the mouse gastrointestinal tract. PLoS ONE 8, e74957 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ng, K. M. et al. Single-strain behavior predicts responses to environmental pH and osmolality in the gut microbiota. mBio 14, e00753–23 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D’Adamo, G. L. et al. Bacterial clade-specific analysis identifies distinct epithelial responses in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell Rep. Med. 4, 101124 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morowitz, M. J., Carlisle, E. & Alverdy, J. C. Contributions of intestinal bacteria to nutrition and metabolism in the critically Ill. Surg. Clin. North Am. 91, 771–785 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, B. M., Liou, M. J., Lee, J.-Y. & Bäumler, A. J. The longitudinal and cross-sectional heterogeneity of the intestinal microbiota. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 63, 221–230 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dapa, T. et al. Within-host evolution of the gut microbiome. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 71, 102258 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dapa, T., Ramiro, R. S., Pedro, M. F., Gordo, I. & Xavier, K. B. Diet leaves a genetic signature in a keystone member of the gut microbiota. Cell Host Microbe 30, 183–199.e10 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yang, Y. et al. Within-host evolution of a gut pathobiont facilitates liver translocation. Nature 607, 563–570 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Collins, J. et al. Dietary trehalose enhances virulence of epidemic Clostridium difficile. Nature 553, 291–294 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paepe, M. D. et al. Trade-off between bile resistance and nutritional competence drives Escherichia coli diversification in the mouse gut. PLoS Genet 7, e1002107 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Conway, T. & Cohen, P. S. Commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli metabolism in the gut. In Metabolism and Bacterial Pathogenesis 343–362 https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555818883.ch16 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2015).

  13. Barroso-Batista, J. et al. Specific eco-evolutionary contexts in the mouse gut reveal Escherichia coli metabolic versatility. Curr. Biol. 30, 1049–1062.e7 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vasquez, K. S. et al. Quantifying rapid bacterial evolution and transmission within the mouse intestine. Cell Host Microbe 29, 1454–1468.e4 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, S. G. et al. Microbiota-derived lantibiotic restores resistance against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Nature 572, 665–669 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dubinsky, V., Dotan, I. & Gophna, U. Strains colonizing different intestinal sites within an individual are derived from a single founder population. mBio 0, e03456–22 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu-Woods, N. J. et al. Microbial-enrichment method enables high-throughput metagenomic characterization from host-rich samples. Nat. Methods 20, 1672–1682 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johansson, M. E. V. et al. Normalization of host intestinal mucus layers requires long-term microbial colonization. Cell Host Microbe 18, 582–592 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Seedorf, H. et al. Bacteria from diverse habitats colonize and compete in the mouse gut. Cell 159, 253–266 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Turnbaugh, P. J. et al. The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized gnotobiotic mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 1, 6ra14 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sonnenburg, E. D. et al. Diet-induced extinction in the gut microbiota compounds over generations. Nature 529, 212–215 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tikhonov, M., Leach, R. W. & Wingreen, N. S. Interpreting 16S metagenomic data without clustering to achieve sub-OTU resolution. ISME J 9, 68–80 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garud, N. R., Good, B. H., Hallatschek, O. & Pollard, K. S. Evolutionary dynamics of bacteria in the gut microbiome within and across hosts. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000102 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roodgar, M. et al. Longitudinal linked-read sequencing reveals ecological and evolutionary responses of a human gut microbiome during antibiotic treatment. Genome Res. 31, 1433–1446 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wolff, R., Shoemaker, W. & Garud, N. Ecological stability emerges at the level of strains in the human gut microbiome. mBio 14, e02502–e02522 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nayfach, S., Rodriguez-Mueller, B., Garud, N. & Pollard, K. S. An integrated metagenomics pipeline for strain profiling reveals novel patterns of bacterial transmission and biogeography. Genome Res. 26, 1612–1625 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Faith, J. J. et al. The long-term stability of the human gut microbiota. Science 341, 1237439 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tropini, C., Earle, K. A., Huang, K. C. & Sonnenburg, J. L. The gut microbiome: connecting spatial organization to function. Cell Host Microbe 21, 433–442 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Donaldson, G. P., Lee, S. M. & Mazmanian, S. K. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 20–32 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vaga, S. et al. Compositional and functional differences of the mucosal microbiota along the intestine of healthy individuals. Sci. Rep. 10, 14977 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zafar, H. & Saier, M. H. Gut Bacteroides species in health and disease. Gut Microbes 13, 1848158 (2021).

  32. Beghini, F. et al. Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse microbial communities with bioBakery 3. eLife 10, e65088 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nickols, W. A. et al. MaAsLin 3: refining and extending generalized multivariable linear models for meta-omic association discovery. Nat. Methods 23, 554–564 (2026).

  34. Wright, S. The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugen. 15, 323–354 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Frazão, N. & Gordo, I. Shared evolutionary path in social microbiomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 40, msad153 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vasquez, K. S. et al. High-resolution lineage tracking of within-host evolution and strain transmission in a human gut symbiont across ecological scales. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.17.580834 (2024).

  37. Ghosh, O. M. & Good, B. H. Emergent evolutionary forces in spatial models of luminal growth and their application to the human gut microbiota. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2114931119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wichman, H. A., Badgett, M. R., Scott, L. A., Boulianne, C. M. & Bull, J. J. Different trajectories of parallel evolution during viral adaptation. Science 285, 422–424 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Woods, R., Schneider, D., Winkworth, C. L., Riley, M. A. & Lenski, R. E. Tests of parallel molecular evolution in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9107–9112 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lieberman, T. D. et al. Parallel bacterial evolution within multiple patients identifies candidate pathogenicity genes. Nat. Genet. 43, 1275–1280 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao, S. et al. Adaptive evolution within gut microbiomes of healthy people. Cell Host Microbe 25, 656–667.e8 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wong, D. P. G. H. & Good, B. H. Quantifying the adaptive landscape of commensal gut bacteria using high-resolution lineage tracking. Nat. Commun. 15, 1605 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gómez-Santos, N., Glatter, T., Koebnik, R., Świątek-Połatyńska, M. A. & Søgaard-Andersen, L. A TonB-dependent transporter is required for secretion of protease PopC across the bacterial outer membrane. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–18 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Moreno-Gámez, S. et al. Niche partitioning by resource size in the gut microbiome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.13.688124 (2025).

  45. Mills, R. H. et al. Multi-omics analyses of the ulcerative colitis gut microbiome link Bacteroides vulgatus proteases with disease severity. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 262–276 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Chen, D. W. & Garud, N. R. Rapid evolution and strain turnover in the infant gut microbiome. Genome Res. 32, 1124–1136 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cremer, J., Arnoldini, M. & Hwa, T. Effect of water flow and chemical environment on microbiota growth and composition in the human colon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6438–6443 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Shalon, D. et al. Profiling the human intestinal environment under physiological conditions. Nature 617, 581–591 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pédron, T. et al. A crypt-specific core microbiota resides in the mouse colon. mBio https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00116-12 (2012).

  50. Li, H. et al. The outer mucus layer hosts a distinct intestinal microbial niche. Nat. Commun. 6, 8292 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yasuda, K. et al. Biogeography of the intestinal mucosal and lumenal microbiome in the rhesus macaque. Cell Host Microbe 17, 385–391 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Desai, M. S. et al. A dietary fiber-deprived gut microbiota degrades the colonic mucus barrier and enhances pathogen susceptibility. Cell 167, 1339–1353.e21 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Chassaing, B. & Gewirtz, A. T. Identification of inner mucus-associated bacteria by laser capture microdissection. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 7, 157–160 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mas-Lloret, J. et al. Gut microbiome diversity detected by high-coverage 16S and shotgun sequencing of paired stool and colon sample. Sci. Data 7, 92 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Duncan, K., Carey-Ewend, K. & Vaishnava, S. Spatial analysis of gut microbiome reveals a distinct ecological niche associated with the mucus layer. Gut Microbes 13, 1874815 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mondragón-Palomino, O. et al. Three-dimensional imaging for the quantification of spatial patterns in microbiota of the intestinal mucosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2118483119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Guo, Y. et al. Oral pathobiont Klebsiella chaperon usher pili provide site-specific adaptation for the inflamed gut mucosa. Gut Microbes 16, 2333463 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lenski, R. E. Experimental evolution and the dynamics of adaptation and genome evolution in microbial populations. ISME J. 11, 2181–2194 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Goyal, A., Bittleston, L. S., Leventhal, G. E., Lu, L. & Cordero, O. X. Interactions between strains govern the eco-evolutionary dynamics of microbial communities. eLife 11, e74987 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Feng, L. et al. Identifying determinants of bacterial fitness in a model of human gut microbial succession. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 2622–2633 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Conwill, A. et al. Anatomy promotes neutral coexistence of strains in the human skin microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 30, 171–182.e7 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lee, S. M. et al. Bacterial colonization factors control specificity and stability of the gut microbiota. Nature 501, 426–429 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Jin, X. et al. Culturing of a complex gut microbial community in mucin-hydrogel carriers reveals strain- and gene-associated spatial organization. Nat. Commun. 14, 3510 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Gutiérrez-García, K. et al. A conserved bacterial genetic basis for commensal-host specificity. Science 386, 1117–1122 (2024).

  65. Tang, Q. et al. Current sampling methods for gut microbiota: a call for more precise devices. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10, 151 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lloyd-Price, J. et al. Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature 569, 655–662 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Nishihara, Y. et al. Mucosa-associated gut microbiota reflects clinical course of ulcerative colitis. Sci. Rep. 11, 13743 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Atreya, R. & Siegmund, B. Location is important: differentiation between ileal and colonic Crohn’s disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18, 544–558 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kordahi, M. C. et al. Genomic and functional characterization of a mucosal symbiont involved in early-stage colorectal cancer. Cell Host Microbe 29, 1589–1598.e6 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wu, D., Jospin, G. & Eisen, J. A. Systematic identification of gene families for use as ‘markers’ for phylogenetic and phylogeny-driven ecological studies of bacteria and archaea and their major subgroups. PLoS ONE 8, e77033 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Beresford-Jones, B. S. et al. The mouse gastrointestinal bacteria catalogue enables translation between the mouse and human gut microbiotas via functional mapping. Cell Host Microbe 30, 124–138.e8 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Smith, B. J. et al. Accurate estimation of intraspecific microbial gene content variation in metagenomic data with MIDAS v3 and StrainPGC. Genome Res. 35, 1247–1260 (2025).

  73. Zhao, C., Dimitrov, B., Goldman, M., Nayfach, S. & Pollard, K. S. MIDAS2: metagenomic intra-species diversity analysis system. Bioinformatics 39, btac713 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wattam, A. R. et al. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource center. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D535–D542 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  76. OKSANEN, J. Vegan: community ecology package. Httpveganr-Forg.-Proj. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1570291225091856896 (2010).

  77. Schloissnig, S. et al. Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome. Nature 493, 45–50 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Begun, D. J. et al. Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Biol 5, e310 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Truong, D. T., Tett, A., Pasolli, E., Huttenhower, C. & Segata, N. Microbial strain-level population structure and genetic diversity from metagenomes. Genome Res. 27, 626–638 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Van Rossum, T., Ferretti, P., Maistrenko, O. M. & Bork, P. Diversity within species: interpreting strains in microbiomes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 491–506 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Quince, C. et al. STRONG: metagenomics strain resolution on assembly graphs. Genome Biol. 22, 214 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Kang, J. T. L. et al. Long-term ecological and evolutionary dynamics in the gut microbiomes of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae colonized subjects. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 1516–1524 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Zheng, W. et al. High-throughput, single-microbe genomics with strain resolution, applied to a human gut microbiome. Science 376, eabm1483 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Politis, D. N. & Romano, J. P. The stationary bootstrap. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89, 1303–1313 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Egozcue, J. J., Lovell, D. Tools for compositional data with a total. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1471082X14535526 (2015).

  86. Greenacre, M. Compositional Data Analysis in Practice. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429455537 (Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 2018).

  87. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature 486, 215–221 (2012).

  88. Lloyd-Price, J. et al. Strains, functions and dynamics in the expanded Human Microbiome Project. Nature 550, 61–66 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Xie, H. et al. Shotgun metagenomics of 250 adult twins reveals genetic and environmental impacts on the gut microbiome. Cell Syst. 3, 572–584.e3 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Qin, J. et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490, 55–60 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Korpela, K. et al. Selective maternal seeding and environment shape the human gut microbiome. Genome Res. 28, 561–568 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Kristin Harper, PhD, of Harper Health & Science Communications, LLC, for providing editorial support in accordance with Good Publication Practice guidelines, and Alison Feder, PhD, for her helpful edits. The authors also thank the Garud and the Tropini labs for their valuable inputs. In particular, the authors thank Peter Laurin for his statistical advice and feedback on the manuscript. Finally, the authors thank Dr. Sidhartha Sinha and members of the Sinha Lab at Stanford University for helpful discussions. This work was funded by NIGMS NIH award R35GM151023 (to N.R.G.), NSF CAREER award (no. 2240098, to N.R.G), a Paul Allen Distinguished Investigator Award (to C.T. and N.R.G.), a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Team Grant: Canadian Microbiome Initiative 2 (to C.T.), Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (to C.T.), the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar Award (18239, to C.T.), Canada Foundation for Innovation/Infrastructure Operating Fund (38277, to C.T.), Canada Tier 2 Research Chair, Quantitative Microbiota Biology for Health Applications (CRC-2022-00036, to C.T.), Canadian Institute for Advanced Research/Humans and the Microbiome (FL-001253 Appt 3362, to C.T.), and the 4-Year Fellowship (to H.G.).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Michael Wasney, Leah Briscoe.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Michael Wasney & Nandita Garud

  2. Interdepartmental Program in Bioinformatics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Leah Briscoe & Nandita Garud

  3. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Richard Wolff & Nandita Garud

  4. Department of Bioinformatics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Hans Ghezzi

  5. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Carolina Tropini

  6. School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Carolina Tropini

  7. Humans and the Microbiome Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Carolina Tropini

Authors
  1. Michael Wasney
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leah Briscoe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard Wolff
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hans Ghezzi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carolina Tropini
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nandita Garud
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.R.G. conceived of the study. M.W., L.B., and N.R.G planned all analyses. M.W. and L.B. completed analyses and wrote all code associated with this study, with code and conceptual contributions from R.W. for the strain frequency estimation analyses. H.G. completed the mouse experiments and DNA extraction. M.W., L.B., C.T, and N.R.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nandita Garud.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 2 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 3 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 4 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 5 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 6 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 7 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 8 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 9 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 10 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 11 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 12 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 13 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 14 (download XLSX )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wasney, M., Briscoe, L., Wolff, R. et al. Uniform bacterial genetic diversity along the gut. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70705-8

Download citation

  • Received: 21 February 2025

  • Accepted: 27 February 2026

  • Published: 17 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70705-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing