Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Small-molecule degraders for oncogenic KRASG12C and pan-KRAS mutations
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 26 March 2026

Small-molecule degraders for oncogenic KRASG12C and pan-KRAS mutations

  • Jianxiong Deng1,2,3 na1,
  • Shujun Shen1,2,3 na1,
  • Lei Huang1,2,3 na1,
  • Fang Xu1,2,3 na1,
  • Weizhen Huang4,5 na1,
  • Chaoming Huang1,2,3,
  • Zhang Zhang1,2,3,
  • Tongzheng Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0859-39231,2,3,
  • Yi Tan  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0619-11731,2,3 &
  • …
  • Zhengqiu Li  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0433-21471,2,3,6 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 4989 Accesses

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Mass spectrometry
  • Protein–protein interaction networks
  • Proteomic analysis
  • Target identification

Abstract

KRAS, a frequently mutated oncogene, has been challenging to target therapeutically. Although covalent inhibitors like sotorasib against KRASG12C have been developed, their efficacy is often limited by acquired resistance. Targeted protein degradation offers a potential solution but has largely relied on large PROTAC molecules. Here, we report DJX-A-KM, a small-molecule degrader of KRASG12C, designed by incorporating an acrylamide warhead into the MRTX849 scaffold. It induces potent and sustained degradation of KRASG12C in cells and in vivo. Mechanistic investigation reveal that degradation is mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system, facilitated by covalent engagement with a E3 ligase, FBXO28, at cysteine 98. Antiproliferation assays demonstrate its potent inhibitory effects across multiple KRASG12C-mutant cancer models. This strategy also enables the development of pan-KRAS degraders against a broader spectrum of KRAS mutations. Our work presents a small-molecule degrader recruiting FBXO28 and provides a blueprint for exploring E3 ligases in protein degradation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Discovery of KRAS(G12D) selective degrader ASP3082

Article Open access 23 August 2025

Targeting KRAS in cancer

Article 18 April 2024

Chemical acylation of an acquired serine suppresses oncogenic signaling of K-Ras(G12S)

Article Open access 21 July 2022

Data availability

The Proteomics raw data have been deposited in a ProteomeXchange partner repository under PXD067337 and PXD072213. Source Data including uncropped and unprocessed scans of all blots and gels, reported means/averages in box plots, bar charts, and tables, including all quantified replicates are provided with this paper as a Source Data file.

References

  1. Reiner, D. J. & Lundquist, E. A. Small GTPases. WormBook 2018, 1–65 (2018).

  2. Land, H., Parada, L. F. & Weinberg, R. A. Tumorigenic conversion of primary embryo fibroblasts requires at least two cooperating oncogenes. Nature 304, 596–602 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hobbs, G. A., Der, C. J. & Rossman, K. L. RAS isoforms and mutations in cancer at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 129, 1287–1292 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter, J. C. et al. Biochemical and structural analysis of common cancer-associated KRAS mutations. Mol. Cancer Res. 13, 1325–1335 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, H. J. et al. Oncogenic KRAS: signaling and drug resistance. Cancers 13, 5599 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, S., Balmain, A. & Counter, C. M. A model for RAS mutation patterns in cancers: finding the sweet spot. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 767–777 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Milburn, M. V. et al. Molecular switch for signal transduction: structural differences between active and inactive forms of protooncogenic ras proteins. Science 247, 939–945 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ostrem, J. M. et al. K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions. Nature 503, 548–551 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Simanshu, D. K., Nissley, D. V. & McCormick, F. RAS proteins and their regulators in human disease. Cell 170, 17–33 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Timar, J. & Kashofer, K. Molecular epidemiology and diagnostics of KRAS mutations in human cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 39, 1029–1038 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Canon, J. et al. The clinical KRAS(G12C) inhibitor AMG 510 drives anti-tumour immunity. Nature 575, 217–223 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Skoulidis, F. et al. Sotorasib for lung cancers with KRAS p.G12C mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 2371–2381 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hallin, J. et al. The KRASG12C inhibitor MRTX849 provides insight toward therapeutic susceptibility of kras-mutant cancers in mouse models and patients. Cancer Discov. 10, 54–71 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jänne, P. A. et al. Adagrasib in non-small-cell lung cancer harboring a KRASG12C mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 120–131 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shi, Y. et al. Glecirasib in KRASG12C-mutated nonsmall-cell lung cancer: a phase 2b trial. Nat. Med. 31, 894–900 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, J., Kang, R. & Tang, D. The KRAS-G12C inhibitor: activity and resistance. Cancer Gene Ther. 29, 875–878 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tsai, Y. S. et al. Rapid idiosyncratic mechanisms of clinical resistance to KRASG12C inhibition. J. Clin. Invest. 132, e155523 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Prenen, H. et al. SO-39 evaluation of acquired resistance to sotorasib in KRAS p.G12C-mutated colorectal cancer: exploratory plasma biomarker analysis of CodeBreaK 100. Ann. Oncol. 33, S373 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koga, T. et al. KRAS secondary mutations that confer acquired resistance to KRASG12C inhibitors, sotorasib and adagrasib, and overcoming strategies: insights from in vitro experiments. J. Thorac. Oncol. 16, 1321–1332 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Akhave, N. S., Biter, A. B. & Hong, D. S. Mechanisms of resistance to KRASG12C-targeted therapy. Cancer Discov. 11, 1345–1352 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Foley, K. P. et al. Chemically induced chaperone-mediated protein degradation (CHAMP) of KRAS(G12C). Cancer Res. 83, 1649 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gong, R. H. et al. Combination of artesunate and WNT974 induces KRAS protein degradation by upregulating E3 ligase ANACP2 and β-TrCP in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Cell Commun. Signal. 20, 34 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Popow, J. et al. Targeting cancer with small-molecule pan-KRAS degraders. Science 385, 1338–1347 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sakamoto, K. M. et al. Protacs: chimeric molecules that target proteins to the Skp1-Cullin-F box complex for ubiquitination and degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8554–8559 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, K. & Crews, C. M. PROTACs: past, present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 5214–5236 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Henning, N. J. et al. Discovery of a covalent FEM1B recruiter for targeted protein degradation applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 701–708 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Samarasinghe, K. T. G. & Crews, C. M. Targeted protein degradation: a promise for undruggable proteins. Cell Chem. Biol. 28, 934–951 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oleinikovas, V. et al. From thalidomide to rational molecular glue design for targeted protein degradation. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 64, 291–312 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, A. et al. Targeting steroid hormone receptors for ubiquitination and degradation in breast and prostate cancer. Oncogene 27, 7201–7211 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, D. et al. Targeted degradation of proteins by small molecules: a novel tool for functional proteomics. Comb. Chem. High. Throughput Screen. 7, 689–697 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shi, Y. et al. Targeting KRAS: from metabolic regulation to cancer treatment. Mol. Cancer 24, 9 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zeng, M. et al. Exploring targeted degradation strategy for oncogenic KRASG12C. Cell Chem. Biol. 27, 19–31 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yang, F. et al. Efficient targeted oncogenic KRASG12C degradation via first reversible-covalent PROTAC. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 230, 114088 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yang, N. et al. Discovery of highly potent and selective KRASG12C degraders by VHL-recruiting PROTACs for the treatment of tumors with KRASG12C-mutation. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 261, 115857 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yokoo, H., Naito, M. & Demizu, Y. Investigating the cell permeability of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs). Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 18, 357–361 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kagiou, C. et al. Alkylamine-tethered molecules recruit FBXO22 for targeted protein degradation. Nat. Commun. 15, 5409 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Basu, A. A. et al. A CRISPR activation screen identifies FBXO22 supporting targeted protein degradation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 1608–1616 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lim, M. et al. DCAF16-based covalent handle for the rational design of monovalent degraders. ACS Cent. Sci. 10, 1318–1331 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pei, J. et al. Piperlongumine conjugates induce targeted protein degradation. Cell Chem. Biol. 30, 203–213 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shergalis, A. G. et al. CRISPR screen reveals BRD2/4 molecular glue-like degrader via recruitment of DCAF16. ACS Chem. Biol. 18, 331–339 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang, X. et al. DCAF11 supports targeted protein degradation by electrophilic proteolysis-targeting chimeras. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 5141–5149 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tao, Y. et al. Targeted protein degradation by electrophilic PROTACs that stereoselectively and site-specifically engage DCAF1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18688–18699 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Luo, M. et al. Chemoproteomics-enabled discovery of covalent RNF114-based degraders that mimic natural product function. Cell Chem. Biol. 28, 559–566 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Li, Y. D. et al. Template-assisted covalent modification underlies activity of covalent molecular glues. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 1640–1649 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Spradlin, J. N. et al. Harnessing the anti-cancer natural product nimbolide for targeted protein degradation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 747–755 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang, X., Crowley, V. M., Wucherpfennig, T. G., Dix, M. M. & Cravatt, B. F. Electrophilic PROTACs that degrade nuclear proteins by engaging DCAF16. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 737–746 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nie, D. Y. et al. Recruitment of FBXO22 for targeted degradation of NSD2. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 1597–1607 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  48. He, X. et al. Covalent recruitment of NEDD4 for targeted protein degradation: rational design of small molecular degraders. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 21512–21525 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ouyang, X. et al. Proteome-wide ligand and target discovery by using β-nitrostyrene electrophiles: supporting targeted protein degradation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 64, e202504813 (2025).

  50. Shah, R. R. et al. Structure-guided design and optimization of covalent VHL-targeted sulfonyl fluoride PROTACs. J. Med. Chem. 67, 4641–4654 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Qin, Z. et al. Discovering covalent inhibitors of protein-protein interactions from trillions of sulfur(VI) fluoride exchange-modified oligonucleotides. Nat. Chem. 15, 1705–1714 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhao, Q. et al. Broad-spectrum kinase profiling in live cells with lysine-targeted sulfonyl fluoride probes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 680–685 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yu, Z. et al. Simultaneous covalent modification of K-Ras(G12D) and K-Ras(G12C) with tunable oxirane electrophiles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 20403–20411 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Liang, L., Zhang, Z., You, Q. & Guo, X. Recent advances in the design of small molecular drugs with acrylamides covalent warheads. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 112, 117902 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Scattolin, T., Gharbaoui, T. & Chen, C. Y. A nucleophilic deprotection of carbamate mediated by 2-mercaptoethanol. Org. Lett. 24, 3736–3740 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Snead, D. R. et al. Development of Adagrasib’s commercial manufacturing route. Org. Process Res. Dev. 27, 530–538 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  57. RayzeBio Inc. et al. Conjugates Comprising Covalent Binders for Targeting Intracellular KRASG12C Proteins, WIPO, WO2023014979 (2023).

  58. Shindo, N. & Ojida, A. Recent progress in covalent warheads for in vivo targeting of endogenous proteins. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 47, 116386 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Koo, T. Y. et al. N-Acryloylindole-alkyne (NAIA) enables imaging and profiling new ligandable cysteines and oxidized thiols by chemoproteomics. Nat. Commun. 14, 3564 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Fell, J. B. et al. Identification of the clinical development candidate MRTX849, a covalent KRASG12C inhibitor for the treatment of cancer. J. Med. Chem. 63, 6679–6693 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Troup, R. I. et al. Current strategies for the design of PROTAC linkers: a critical review. Explor. Target Antitumor Ther. 1, 273–312 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bond, M. J. et al. Targeted degradation of oncogenic KRASG12C by VHL-recruiting PROTACs. ACS Cent. Sci. 6, 1367–1375 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cepeda, D. et al. CDK-mediated activation of the SCF(FBXO28) ubiquitin ligase promotes MYC-driven transcription and tumourigenesis and predicts poor survival in breast cancer. EMBO Mol. Med. 5, 1067–1086 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Phillips, E. et al. PFKFB4 interacts with FBXO28 to promote HIF-1α signaling in glioblastoma. Oncogenesis 11, 57 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Qiao, X. et al. FBXO28 suppresses liver cancer invasion and metastasis by promoting PKA-dependent SNAI2 degradation. Oncogene 42, 2878–2891 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wang, X., Lawson, J. D. & Marx, M. A. Azaquinazoline pan-KRAS Inhibitors, WIPO, WO2022132200 (2022).

  67. Yang, J. et al. A pan-KRAS degrader for the treatment of KRAS-mutant cancers. Cell Discov. 10, 70 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funds from Natural Science Foundation of China (22377033, 22377037, 22577038, 82473109), the Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province (2023B1515120023, 2025A0505080018, 2024A1515013002, 2023A0505050149), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2023B1515040016, 2025A1515012357, 2024A1515013266, 2026B1515020070). Science and Technology Project in Guangzhou (202102070001). Huizhou-Hong Kong-Macao Cooperation Development Fund (2025EQ010043). The authors sincerely thank to everyone who made scientific contributions to this work.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Jianxiong Deng, Shujun Shen, Lei Huang, Fang Xu, Weizhen Huang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

    Jianxiong Deng, Shujun Shen, Lei Huang, Fang Xu, Chaoming Huang, Zhang Zhang, Tongzheng Liu, Yi Tan & Zhengqiu Li

  2. International Cooperative Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Innovative Drug Development (MOE), Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

    Jianxiong Deng, Shujun Shen, Lei Huang, Fang Xu, Chaoming Huang, Zhang Zhang, Tongzheng Liu, Yi Tan & Zhengqiu Li

  3. School of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

    Jianxiong Deng, Shujun Shen, Lei Huang, Fang Xu, Chaoming Huang, Zhang Zhang, Tongzheng Liu, Yi Tan & Zhengqiu Li

  4. Medical Education Center of Jinan university, Guangzhou, China

    Weizhen Huang

  5. The First Huizhou Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Huizhou, China

    Weizhen Huang

  6. MOE Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Biology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

    Zhengqiu Li

Authors
  1. Jianxiong Deng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shujun Shen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lei Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fang Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Weizhen Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chaoming Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhang Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tongzheng Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yi Tan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhengqiu Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception: J.D., S.S., L.H., F.X., W.H., C.H., Z.Z., T.L., Y.T., and Z.L. Experimental design and execution: J.D., S.S., L.H., F.X., W.H., C.H., Z.Z., T.L., Y.T., and Z.L. Data analysis, interpretation, and generation of figures: J.D., S.S., L.H., F.X., C.H., Z.Z., T.L., Y.T., and Z.L. Authored, edited and substantively revised the manuscript: J.D., S.S., L.H., F.X., T.L., Y.T., and Z.L.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tongzheng Liu, Yi Tan or Zhengqiu Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data Table 1 - 6 (download XLSX )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, J., Shen, S., Huang, L. et al. Small-molecule degraders for oncogenic KRASG12C and pan-KRAS mutations. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71093-9

Download citation

  • Received: 07 August 2025

  • Accepted: 06 March 2026

  • Published: 26 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71093-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Targeted protein degradation

Focus

Structural biology, biochemistry and biophysics

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research