Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. review articles
  4. article
Microbiota-derived metabolites as modulators of cancer immunotherapy response
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Review Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 April 2026

Microbiota-derived metabolites as modulators of cancer immunotherapy response

  • Catherine Toner-Bartelds1,2 na1,
  • Iris L. Mimpen1,2 na1,
  • Miguel Parra-Martinez1,2,
  • Boudewijn M. T. Burgering  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4044-95962,3 &
  • …
  • Emile E. Voest  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8249-95861,2 

Nature Communications (2026) Cite this article

  • 4824 Accesses

  • 8 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bacterial secretion
  • Cancer immunotherapy
  • Microbiome

Abstract

The microbiome is a key regulator of host homeostasis and immune activity, in part through the production of metabolites. These microbiota-derived metabolites can modulate both the innate and adaptive immune system, as well as directly target tumour cells, thereby regulating anti-tumour immunity and response to immunotherapy. Here, we describe the current mechanistic knowledge on how these metabolites exert their effects and outline the methodologies used to detect and assess these metabolites. Finally, we summarize microbiota-targeted therapies capable of improving microbial functionality to ultimately enhance immunotherapy responses and improve patient survival.

Similar content being viewed by others

Role of the microbiota in response to and recovery from cancer therapy

Article 06 November 2023

Microbiota in cancer: current understandings and future perspectives

Article Open access 02 February 2026

Harnessing the microbiome for cancer therapy

Article 05 January 2026

References

  1. Gaynor, N., Crown, J. & Collins, D. M. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: key trials and an emerging role in breast cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 79, 44–57 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Das, S. & Johnson, D. B. Immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J. Immunother. Cancer 7, 306 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hanahan, D. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions. Cancer Discov. 12, 31–46 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson, B. E., Routy, B., Nagrial, A. & Chin, V. T. The effect of antibiotics on clinical outcomes in immune-checkpoint blockade: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 69, 343–354 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elkrief, A. et al. Antibiotics are associated with worse outcomes in lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. NPJ Precis Oncol. 8, 143 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Routy, B. et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1–based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science 359, 91–97 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sivan, A. et al. Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy. Science 350, 1084–1089 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gopalakrishnan, V. et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science 359, 97–103 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, K. A. et al. Cross-cohort gut microbiome associations with immune checkpoint inhibitor response in advanced melanoma. Nat. Med. 28, 535–544 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davar, D. et al. Fecal microbiota transplant overcomes resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma patients. Science 371, 595–602 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baruch, E. N. et al. Fecal microbiota transplant promotes response in immunotherapy-refractory melanoma patients. Science 371, 602–609 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Routy, B. et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation plus anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in advanced melanoma: a phase I trial. Nat. Med. 29, 2121–2132 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tomita, Y. et al. Association of probiotic clostridium butyricum therapy with survival and response to immune checkpoint blockade in patients with lung cancer. Cancer Immunol. Res. 8, 1236–1242 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Takada, K. et al. Clinical impact of probiotics on the efficacy of anti-PD-1 monotherapy in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective survival analysis study with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Int. J. Cancer 149, 473–482 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dizman, N. et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without live bacterial supplementation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomized phase 1 trial. Nat. Med. 28, 704–712 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).

  17. Gilbert, J. A. et al. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat. Med. 24, 392–400 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li, C., Liang, Y. & Qiao, Y. Messengers from the gut: gut microbiota-derived metabolites on host regulation. Front. Microbiol 13, 863407 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krautkramer, K. A., Fan, J. & Bäckhed, F. Gut microbial metabolites as multi-kingdom intermediates. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 77–94 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pascal Andreu, V. et al. gutSMASH predicts specialized primary metabolic pathways from the human gut microbiota. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1416–1423 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hezaveh, K. et al. Tryptophan-derived microbial metabolites activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in tumor-associated macrophages to suppress anti-tumor immunity. Immunity 55, 324–340 e328 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mirji, G. et al. The microbiome-derived metabolite TMAO drives immune activation and boosts responses to immune checkpoint blockade in pancreatic cancer. Sci. Immunol. 7, eabn0704 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nastasi, C. et al. The effect of short-chain fatty acids on human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Sci. Rep. 5, 16148 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Coutzac, C. et al. Systemic short chain fatty acids limit antitumor effect of CTLA-4 blockade in hosts with cancer. Nat. Commun. 11, 2168 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Perez, M., Buey, B., Corral, P., Giraldos, D. & Latorre, E. Microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids boost antitumoral natural killer cell activity. J. Clin. Med. 13, 3885 (2024).

  26. Liu, N. et al. Eubacterium rectale improves the efficacy of anti-PD1 immunotherapy in melanoma via L-serine-mediated NK cell activation. Research 6, 0127 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maddocks, O. D. K. et al. Serine starvation induces stress and p53-dependent metabolic remodelling in cancer cells. Nature 493, 542–546 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maddocks, O. D. K. et al. Modulating the therapeutic response of tumours to dietary serine and glycine starvation. Nature 544, 372–376 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gungabeesoon, J. et al. A neutrophil response linked to tumor control in immunotherapy. Cell 186, 1448–1464.e1420 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, Y. et al. Neutrophil profiling illuminates anti-tumor antigen-presenting potency. Cell 187, 1422–1439.e1424 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Blomberg, O. S. et al. IL-5-producing CD4+ T cells and eosinophils cooperate to enhance response to immune checkpoint blockade in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 41, 106–123.e110 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ribot, J. C., Lopes, N. & Silva-Santos, B. gammadelta T cells in tissue physiology and surveillance. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 221–232 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jabeen, M. F. & Hinks, T. S. C. MAIT cells and the microbiome. Front. Immunol. 14, 1127588 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vogt, S. & Mattner, J. NKT cells contribute to the control of microbial infections. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol 11, 718350 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ruf, B., Greten, T. F. & Korangy, F. Innate lymphoid cells and innate-like T cells in cancer—at the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 23, 351–371 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hintz, M. et al. Identification of (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate as a major activator for human gammadelta T cells in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 509, 317–322 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Holmen Olofsson, G. et al. Vgamma9Vdelta2 T cells concurrently kill cancer cells and cross-present tumor antigens. Front. Immunol. 12, 645131 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mimpen, I. L. et al. Microbial metabolic pathways guide response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Cancer Discov. 16, 95–113 (2025).

  39. Kjer-Nielsen, L. et al. MR1 presents microbial vitamin B metabolites to MAIT cells. Nature 491, 717–723 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Eckle, S. B. et al. Recognition of vitamin B precursors and byproducts by mucosal associated invariant T Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 30204–30211 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Li, S. et al. Human Tumor-infiltrating MAIT cells display hallmarks of bacterial antigen recognition in colorectal cancer. Cell Rep. Med. 1, 100039 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ma, C. et al. Gut microbiome-mediated bile acid metabolism regulates liver cancer via NKT cells. Science 360, eaan5931 (2018).

  43. Adams, E. J., Gu, S. & Luoma, A. M. Human gamma delta T cells: evolution and ligand recognition. Cell Immunol. 296, 31–40 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mestas, J. & Hughes, C. C. Of mice and not men: differences between mouse and human immunology. J. Immunol. 172, 2731–2738 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Salou, M., Legoux, F. & Lantz, O. MAIT cell development in mice and humans. Mol. Immunol. 130, 31–36 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Phelps, C. M. et al. Exercise-induced microbiota metabolite enhances CD8 T cell antitumor immunity promoting immunotherapy efficacy. Cell 188, 5680–5700 (2025).

  47. Bender, M. J. et al. Dietary tryptophan metabolite released by intratumoral Lactobacillus reuteri facilitates immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Cell 186, 1846–1862 e1826 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Marcos-Kovandzic, L. et al. Gut microbiota modulation through akkermansia spp. supplementation increases CAR T-cell potency. Cancer Discov. 15, 1905–1926 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jin, W. B. et al. Microbiota-derived bile acids antagonize the host androgen receptor and drive anti-tumor immunity. Cell 188, 2336–2353 e2338 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Varanasi, S. K. et al. Bile acid synthesis impedes tumor-specific T cell responses during liver cancer. Science 387, 192–201 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Luu, M. et al. Microbial short-chain fatty acids modulate CD8(+) T cell responses and improve adoptive immunotherapy for cancer. Nat. Commun. 12, 4077 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wang, X. et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum facilitates anti-PD-1 therapy in microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell 42, 1729–1746 e1728 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhu, X. et al. Microbial metabolite butyrate promotes anti-PD-1 antitumor efficacy by modulating T cell receptor signaling of cytotoxic CD8 T cell. Gut Microbes 15, 2249143 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jia, D. et al. Microbial metabolite enhances immunotherapy efficacy by modulating T cell stemness in pan-cancer. Cell 187, 1651–1665 e1621 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mager, L. F. et al. Microbiome-derived inosine modulates response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Science 369, 1481–1489 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kang, X. et al. Roseburia intestinalis generated butyrate boosts anti-PD-1 efficacy in colorectal cancer by activating cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells. Gut 72, 2112–2122 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhu, X. et al. Interplay between gut microbial communities and metabolites modulates pan-cancer immunotherapy responses. Cell Metab. 37, 806–823 e806 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hazekawa, M., Ono, K., Nishinakagawa, T., Kawakubo-Yasukochi, T. & Nakashima, M. In vitro anti-inflammatory effects of the phenylbutyric acid metabolite phenylacetyl glutamine. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 41, 961–966 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Denk, D. et al. Expansion of T memory stem cells with superior anti-tumor immunity by Urolithin A-induced mitophagy. Immunity 55, 2059–2073 e2058 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. St Paul, M. et al. Coenzyme A fuels T cell anti-tumor immunity. Cell Metab. 33, 2415–2427 e2416 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Uribe-Herranz, M. et al. Microbiota shape metabolic and immune determinants of CAR-T therapy and correlate with outcomes in myeloma. Blood Cancer Discov. 6, 484–504 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Shen, Y. et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid reduces antitumor immunosuppression by inducing CHIP-mediated TGF-beta degradation. Nat. Commun. 13, 3419 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang, L. et al. Inhibition of UBA6 by inosine augments tumour immunogenicity and responses. Nat. Commun. 13, 5413 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ferrari, V. et al. Sensitizing cancer cells to immune checkpoint inhibitors by microbiota-mediated upregulation of HLA class I. Cancer Cell 41, 1717–1730 e1714 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang, J. et al. Targeting gut microbiota and arginase boosts MEK inhibitors’ enhancement of antitumour immunity via MHC-I upregulation in colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 133, 809–822 (2025).

  66. Teng, Y. et al. Plant-nanoparticles enhance anti-PD-L1 efficacy by shaping human commensal microbiota metabolites. Nat. Commun. 16, 1295 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wang, B. et al. Blautia coccoides and its metabolic products enhance the efficacy of bladder cancer immunotherapy by promoting CD8(+) T cell infiltration. J. Transl. Med. 22, 964 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Zhang, M. et al. Microbiota-derived urocanic acid triggered by tyrosine kinase inhibitors potentiates cancer immunotherapy efficacy. Cell Host Microbe 33, 915–931 e919 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Jiang, S. S. et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum-derived succinic acid induces tumor resistance to immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. Cell Host Microbe 31, 781–797 e789 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wang, H. et al. The microbial metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide promotes antitumor immunity in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Metab. 34, 581–594 e588 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Yu, P. et al. Pyroptosis: mechanisms and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 6, 128 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sardar, P., Almeida, A. & Pedicord, V. A. Integrating functional metagenomics to decipher microbiome-immune interactions. Immunol. Cell Biol. 102, 680–691 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Bauermeister, A., Mannochio-Russo, H., Costa-Lotufo, L. V., Jarmusch, A. K. & Dorrestein, P. C. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics in microbiome investigations. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 143–160 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Smirnov, K. S. et al. Challenges of metabolomics in human gut microbiota research. Int. J. Med Microbiol. 306, 266–279 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Sun, Y. et al. Integrative plasma and fecal metabolomics identify functional metabolites in adenoma-colorectal cancer progression and as early diagnostic biomarkers. Cancer Cell 42, 1386–1400.e1388 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Mirzayi, C. et al. Reporting guidelines for human microbiome research: the STORMS checklist. Nat. Med. 27, 1885–1892 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Action, H. M. <https://humanmicrobiomeaction.eu> (

  78. Ferri-Borgogno, S. et al. Molecular, metabolic, and subcellular mapping of the tumor immune microenvironment via 3D targeted and non-targeted multiplex multi-omics analyses. Cancers 16, 846 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Alexandrov, T. Spatial metabolomics: from a niche field towards a driver of innovation. Nat. Metab. 5, 1443–1445 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Allen, T. M. et al. Humanized immune system mouse models: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat. Immunol. 20, 770–774 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Hugenholtz, F. & de Vos, W. M. Mouse models for human intestinal microbiota research: a critical evaluation. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 75, 149–160 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Day, C. P., Merlino, G. & Van Dyke, T. Preclinical mouse cancer models: a maze of opportunities and challenges. Cell 163, 39–53 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Park, J. C. & Im, S.-H. Of men in mice: the development and application of a humanized gnotobiotic mouse model for microbiome therapeutics. Exp. Mol. Med. 52, 1383–1396 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Shelkey, E. et al. Immuno-reactive cancer organoid model to assess effects of the microbiome on cancer immunotherapy. Sci. Rep. 12, 9983 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Puschhof, J. et al. Intestinal organoid cocultures with microbes. Nat. Protoc. 16, 4633–4649 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ballerini, M. et al. A gut-on-a-chip incorporating human faecal samples and peristalsis predicts responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors for melanoma. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 9, 967–984 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Shin, Y. C., Than, N., Min, S., Shin, W. & Kim, H. J. Modelling host–microbiome interactions in organ-on-a-chip platforms. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2, 175–191 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Voabil, P. et al. An ex vivo tumor fragment platform to dissect response to PD-1 blockade in cancer. Nat. Med 27, 1250–1261 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Spencer, C. N. et al. Dietary fiber and probiotics influence the gut microbiome and melanoma immunotherapy response. Science 374, 1632–1640 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Simpson, R. C. et al. Diet-driven microbial ecology underpins associations between cancer immunotherapy outcomes and the gut microbiome. Nat. Med. 28, 2344–2352 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Farias, R. M. et al. Diet and immune effects trial (DIET)—a randomized, double-blinded dietary intervention study in patients with melanoma receiving immunotherapy. BMC Cancer 24, 1493 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Messaoudene, M. et al. A natural polyphenol exerts antitumor activity and circumvents anti-PD-1 resistance through effects on the gut microbiota. Cancer Discov. 12, 1070–1087 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Han, K. et al. Generation of systemic antitumour immunity via the in situ modulation of the gut microbiome by an orally administered inulin gel. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 1377–1388 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Zhang, C. et al. Mannose enhances immunotherapy efficacy in ovarian cancer by modulating gut microbial metabolites. Cancer Res. 85, 2468–2484 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  95. da Silva, I. P. et al. Retreatment, rechallenge, and escalation with subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies across cancers after initial failure. ESMO Open 10, 105833 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Canale, F. P. et al. Metabolic modulation of tumours with engineered bacteria for immunotherapy. Nature 598, 662–666 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Vaaben, T. H. et al. Modulating tumor immunity using advanced microbiome therapeutics producing an indole metabolite. EMBO Rep. 26, 1688–1708 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Bignaud, A. et al. Phages with a broad host range are common across ecosystems. Nat. Microbiol. 10, 2537–2549 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Wirbel, J. et al. Long-read metagenomics reveals phage dynamics in the human gut microbiome. Nature 649, 982–990 (2025).

  100. Jault, P. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of a cocktail of bacteriophages to treat burn wounds infected by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PhagoBurn): a randomised, controlled, double-blind phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 19, 35–45 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Petrovic Fabijan, A. et al. Safety of bacteriophage therapy in severe Staphylococcus aureus infection. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 465–472 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Ding, X. et al. Bacteroides fragilis promotes chemoresistance in colorectal cancer, and its elimination by phage VA7 restores chemosensitivity. Cell Host Microbe 33, 941–956 e910 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Zheng, D. W. et al. Phage-guided modulation of the gut microbiota of mouse models of colorectal cancer augments their responses to chemotherapy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 717–728 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Cong, J. et al. Bile acids modified by the intestinal microbiota promote colorectal cancer growth by suppressing CD8(+) T cell effector functions. Immunity 57, 876–889 e811 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Hsu, B. B. et al. Dynamic modulation of the gut microbiota and metabolome by bacteriophages in a mouse model. Cell Host Microbe 25, 803–814 e805 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Shen, J. et al. Large-scale phage cultivation for commensal human gut bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 31, 665–677 e667 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Seifert, M. et al. Impact of the selective A2(A)R and A2(B)R dual antagonist AB928/etrumadenant on CAR T cell function. Br. J. Cancer 127, 2175–2185 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Zeverijn, L. J. et al. The innate immune landscape of dMMR/MSI cancers predicts the outcome of nivolumab treatment: results from the drug rediscovery protocol. Clin. Cancer Res. 30, 4339–4351 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Koh, A., De Vadder, F., Kovatcheva-Datchary, P. & Backhed, F. From dietary fiber to host physiology: short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites. Cell 165, 1332–1345 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Garcia-Villalba, R. et al. Urolithins: a comprehensive update on their metabolism, bioactivity, and associated gut microbiota. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 66, e2101019 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Tennoune, N., Andriamihaja, M. & Blachier, F. Production of indole and indole-related compounds by the intestinal microbiota and consequences for the host: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Microorganisms 10, 930 (2022).

  112. Fleishman, J. S. & Kumar, S. Bile acid metabolism and signaling in health and disease: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 9, 97 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Martinez-del Campo, A. et al. Characterization and detection of a widely distributed gene cluster that predicts anaerobic choline utilization by human gut bacteria. mBio 6, e00042-15 (2015).

  114. Wu, W. K. et al. Gut microbes with the gbu genes determine TMAO production from L-carnitine intake and serve as a biomarker for precision nutrition. Gut Microbes 17, 2446374 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Nemet, I. et al. A cardiovascular disease-linked gut microbial metabolite acts via adrenergic receptors. Cell 180, 862–877 e822 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  116. Bottcher, J., Sibon, O. C. M. & El Aidy, S. Coenzyme A metabolism: a key driver of gut microbiota dynamics and metabolic profiles. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 49, fuaf051 (2025).

  117. Javdan, B. et al. Personalized mapping of drug metabolism by the human gut microbiome. Cell 181, 1661–1679 e1622 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  118. Fidelle, M. et al. A microbiota-modulated checkpoint directs immunosuppressive intestinal T cells into cancers. Science 380, eabo2296 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely acknowledge Mrs Anneke Hoogendijk and the Foundation Weteringschans for their generous support, which has enabled our investigation of the role of the microbiome in cancer immunotherapy responses.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Catherine Toner-Bartelds, Iris L. Mimpen.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Catherine Toner-Bartelds, Iris L. Mimpen, Miguel Parra-Martinez & Emile E. Voest

  2. Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Catherine Toner-Bartelds, Iris L. Mimpen, Miguel Parra-Martinez, Boudewijn M. T. Burgering & Emile E. Voest

  3. Molecular Cancer Research, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Boudewijn M. T. Burgering

Authors
  1. Catherine Toner-Bartelds
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Iris L. Mimpen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miguel Parra-Martinez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Boudewijn M. T. Burgering
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Emile E. Voest
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C. Toner-Bartelds and I. L. Mimpen contributed equally to the preparation of this manuscript. C. Toner-Bartelds: conceptualisation, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, review, and editing. I. L. Mimpen: conceptualisation, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, review, and editing. M. Parra-Martinez: investigation, writing—original draft preparation, review, and editing. B. M. T. Burgering: assistance with revisions and writing—review. E. Voest: conceptualisation, supervision, funding acquisition and writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emile E. Voest.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

E. Voest is the founder and current member of the supervisory board of the Hartwig Medical Foundation, an independent non-executive director and shareholder of Sanofi, a co-founder and shareholder of Mosaic Therapeutics, and a board member and founder of the Centre for Personalised Cancer Treatment. He has received clinical study grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clovis, Eisai, Eli Lilly, GSK, Ipsen, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Servier, Incyte, MRM Health and Sanofi, all paid to the Netherlands Cancer Institute. C. Toner-Bartelds, I. Mimpen, M. Parra-Martinez and B. Burgering declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toner-Bartelds, C., Mimpen, I.L., Parra-Martinez, M. et al. Microbiota-derived metabolites as modulators of cancer immunotherapy response. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-72178-1

Download citation

  • Received: 11 August 2025

  • Accepted: 28 March 2026

  • Published: 21 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-72178-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Mechanistic insights into human host and microbiome interactions

Focus

Cancer

Collection

Cancer at Nature Portfolio

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing