Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
The widening partisan gap in legislative support for civil rights in the United States
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 26 May 2026

The widening partisan gap in legislative support for civil rights in the United States

  • Joshua Conrad Jackson  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-98151,2,3,
  • Yuanze Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1437-18921 &
  • Nour Kteily  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4331-40374 

Nature Communications (2026) Cite this article

  • 2093 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Human behaviour
  • Politics
  • Social sciences

Abstract

The history of civil rights legislation offers a window into how American democracy codified social justice over time, and whether this process unfolded gradually or through punctuated shifts. Sixty years after the civil rights movement, we apply natural language processing to legislative archives to track how civil rights has evolved as a policy domain. We show that civil rights legislation has become more common, but also has diverged by party. Divergence accelerated during the early 1990s and mid-2010s—the latter coinciding with the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement and driven by a surge in sponsorship among racial minority Democrats in Congress. Topic modeling reveals that divergence is concentrated in legislation concerning racial minorities, women, and LGBTQ+ populations, while attention to older adults and people with disabilities has declined across both parties. Our findings offer potential insights into party divergence, race and ethnicity politics, and collective action tipping points.

Similar content being viewed by others

An experienced racial-ethnic diversity dataset in the United States using human mobility data

Article Open access 17 June 2024

Drawing digital lines: pattern analysis of divisive rhetoric in social network discussions

Article Open access 30 December 2025

A switching-based deep learning framework for personalized and adaptive E-commerce recommendations

Article Open access 24 February 2026

Acknowledgments

We thank Eli Finkel, Danila Medvedev, Tessa Charlesworth, William Brady, and Nava Caluori for comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Funding

No funding is applicable to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America

    Joshua Conrad Jackson & Yuanze Liu

  2. Data Science Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America

    Joshua Conrad Jackson

  3. Harvard University, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, MA, United States of America

    Joshua Conrad Jackson

  4. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America

    Nour Kteily

Authors
  1. Joshua Conrad Jackson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuanze Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nour Kteily
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Joshua Conrad Jackson or Nour Kteily.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jackson, J.C., Liu, Y. & Kteily, N. The widening partisan gap in legislative support for civil rights in the United States. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73607-x

Download citation

  • Received: 12 March 2024

  • Accepted: 11 May 2026

  • Published: 26 May 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73607-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Group diversity

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing