Abstract
How functional brain networks and cognition co-evolve during adolescent development remains poorly understood. Using baseline and Year 2 data from 2949 individuals in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, we trained kernel ridge regression models to predict cognitive ability from resting-state functional connectivity. We find that baseline functional connectivity more strongly predicts future cognitive ability than baseline cognitive ability. Models trained on baseline functional connectivity to predict baseline cognition generalize better to Year 2 functional connectivity and cognition, suggesting that brain–cognition relationships strengthen over time. Intriguingly, baseline functional connectivity outperforms longitudinal functional connectivity change in predicting future cognitive ability. While longitudinal functional connectivity change is less reliable than baseline functional connectivity – intraclass correlation coefficient 0.24 vs. 0.56 – shortening scan duration to reduce reliability of baseline functional connectivity does not eliminate the predictive gap. Furthermore, neither baseline functional connectivity nor functional connectivity change meaningfully predicts longitudinal change in cognitive ability. We also identify converging and diverging predictive network features across cross-sectional and longitudinal brain-cognition models – a multivariate twist on Simpson’s paradox – with clear sex-specific patterns. Overall, in early adolescence, stable individual differences in brain functional network organization play a more critical role than dynamic changes in shaping future cognitive outcomes.
Acknowledgements
Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study® (https://abcdstudy.org), held in the NIMH Data Archive (NDA). This is a multisite, longitudinal study designed to recruit more than 10,000 children aged 9–10 and follow them over 10 years into early adulthood. The ABCD Study® is supported by the National Institutes of Health and additional federal partners under award numbers U01DA041048, U01DA050989, U01DA051016, U01DA041022, U01DA051018, U01DA051037, U01DA050987, U01DA041174, U01DA 041106, U01DA041117, U01DA041028, U01DA041134, U01DA050988, U01DA051039, U01DA041156, U01DA041025, U01DA041120, U01DA051038, U01DA041148, U01DA04 1093, U01DA041089, U24DA041123, U24DA041147. A full list of supporters is available at https://abcdstudy.org/federal-partners.html. A listing of participating sites and a complete listing of the study investigators can be found at https://abcdstudy.org/consortium_members/. ABCD consortium investigators designed and implemented the study and/or provided data but did not necessarily participate in the analysis or writing of this report. This manuscript reflects the views of the authors and may not reflect the opinions or views of the NIH or ABCD consortium investigators. ABCD data repository grows and changes over time. The ABCD data used in this report came from the NIMH Data Archive and were drawn from Release 4.0 (https://doi.org/10.15154/1523041) and Release 5.1 (https://doi.org/10.15154/z563-zd24).
Funding
B.T.T.Y. discloses support for the research of this work from the National University of Singapore Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (NUHSRO/2020/124/TMR/LOA), the Singapore National Medical Research Council (NMRC) LCG (OFLCG19May-0035), NMRC CTG-IIT (CTGIIT23jan-0001), NMRC OF-IRG (OFIRG24jan-0006; OFIRG24j ul-0049), NMRC STaR (STaR20nov-0003), Singapore Ministry of Health (MOH) Centre Grant (CG21APR1009), and the United States National Institutes of Health (R01MH133334). All other authors declare no relevant funding. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funders.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
L.Q.R.O. and R.K. are co-founders of B1Neuro. B.T.T.Y. is a shareholder of B1Neuro. The content in this manuscript is unrelated to the activities of the company. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, Y., Zhang, S., Orban, C. et al. Convergent and divergent brain–cognition development in early adolescence. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73668-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73668-y