Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Genome analyses and breeding of polyploid crops

Abstract

Polyploidization is a common and important evolutionary process in the plant kingdom. Compared with diploid plant species, the intricate genome architecture of polyploid plant species presents substantial challenges in applying multi-omics approaches for crop breeding improvement. In this Review, we summarize the current techniques for analysing polyploid genomes, including constructing reference genomes and pan-genomes, and detecting variants. We also assess findings related to polyploid genome architecture, population genetics and breeding programmes, highlighting advanced techniques in the breeding of polyploid crops. Finally, we explore the challenges and demands posed by polyploid genome complexity during analysis with available biotechnological tools. This Review emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive understanding of polyploid genomic features for the further genetic improvement of polyploid crops.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Global yield and phylogeny of sequenced polyploid crops.
Fig. 2: Establishment and variation landscape in polyploid genomes.
Fig. 3: Challenges in detecting variation in polyploid genomes.
Fig. 4: Genomic breeding for polyploid crops.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grant, V. Plant Speciation (Columbia Univ. Press, 1981).

  2. Masterson, J. Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 264, 421–424 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cui, L. et al. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Res. 16, 738–749 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dinesh Babu, K. S. et al. A short review on sugarcane: its domestication, molecular manipulations and future perspectives. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 69, 2623–2643 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Healey, A. L. et al. The complex polyploid genome architecture of sugarcane. Nature 628, 804–810 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. The International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC). A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome. Science 345, 1251788 (2014).

  7. Stokstad, E. The new potato. Science 363, 574–577 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sattler, M. C., Carvalho, C. R. & Clarindo, W. R. The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta 243, 281–296 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bird, K. A., VanBuren, R., Puzey, J. R. & Edger, P. P. The causes and consequences of subgenome dominance in hybrids and recent polyploids. N. Phytol. 220, 87–93 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Woodhouse, M. R. et al. Origin, inheritance, and gene regulatory consequences of genome dominance in polyploids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5283–5288 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lian, Q. et al. Acquisition of deleterious mutations during potato polyploidization. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 61, 7–11 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Conover, J. L. & Wendel, J. F. Deleterious mutations accumulate faster in allopolyploid than diploid cotton (Gossypium) and unequally between subgenomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msac024 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Stebbins, G. L. in Advances in Genetics Vol. 1 (ed. Demerec, M.) 403–429 (Elsevier, 1947).

  14. Spoelhof, J. P., Soltis, P. S. & Soltis, D. E. Pure polyploidy: closing the gaps in autopolyploid research. J. Syst. Evol. 55, 340–352 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Song, Y. et al. Phased gap-free genome assembly of octoploid cultivated strawberry illustrates the genetic and epigenetic divergence among subgenomes. Hortic. Res. 11, uhad252 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin, X. et al. Haplotype-resolved genomes of wild octoploid progenitors illuminate genomic diversifications from wild relatives to cultivated strawberry. Nat. Plants 9, 1252–1266 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chalhoub, B. et al. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science 345, 950–953 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, F. et al. Genome sequence of cultivated Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum TM-1) provides insights into genome evolution. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 524–530 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170–175 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nurk, S. et al. HiCanu: accurate assembly of segmental duplications, satellites, and allelic variants from high-fidelity long reads. Genome Res. 30, 1291–1305 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun, H. et al. Chromosome-scale and haplotype-resolved genome assembly of a tetraploid potato cultivar. Nat. Genet. 54, 342–348 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoopes, G. et al. Phased, chromosome-scale genome assemblies of tetraploid potato reveal a complex genome, transcriptome, and predicted proteome landscape underpinning genetic diversity. Mol. Plant 15, 520–536 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Edger, P. P. et al. Origin and evolution of the octoploid strawberry genome. Nat. Genet. 51, 541–547 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng, Y. et al. Allele-aware chromosome-scale assembly of the allopolyploid genome of hexaploid Ma bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 64, 649–670 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marcussen, T. et al. Ancient hybridizations among the ancestral genomes of bread wheat. Science 345, 1250092 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, T. et al. Sequencing of allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. acc. TM-1) provides a resource for fiber improvement. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 531–537 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bertioli, D. J. et al. The genome sequence of segmental allotetraploid peanut Arachis hypogaea. Nat. Genet. 51, 877–884 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. VanBuren, R. et al. Exceptional subgenome stability and functional divergence in the allotetraploid Ethiopian cereal teff. Nat. Commun. 11, 884 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Miao, J. et al. Chromosome-scale assembly and analysis of biomass crop Miscanthus lutarioriparius genome. Nat. Commun. 12, 2458 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mitros, T. et al. Genome biology of the paleotetraploid perennial biomass crop Miscanthus. Nat. Commun. 11, 5442 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Session, A. M. & Rokhsar, D. S. Transposon signatures of allopolyploid genome evolution. Nat. Commun. 14, 3180 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, H. et al. A chromosome-scale genome assembly of Artemisia argyi reveals unbiased subgenome evolution and key contributions of gene duplication to volatile terpenoid diversity. Plant Commun. 4, 100516 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Miao, Y. et al. Genome sequencing reveals chromosome fusion and extensive expansion of genes related to secondary metabolism in Artemisia argyi. Plant Biotechnol. J. 20, 1902–1915 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Song, A. et al. Analyses of a chromosome-scale genome assembly reveal the origin and evolution of cultivated chrysanthemum. Nat. Commun. 14, 2021 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang, J. et al. Haplotype-resolved sweet potato genome traces back its hexaploidization history. Nat. Plants 3, 696–703 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Zhao, Q., Ming, R. & Tang, H. Assembly of allele-aware, chromosomal-scale autopolyploid genomes based on Hi-C data. Nat. Plants 5, 833–845 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, J. et al. Allele-defined genome of the autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L. Nat. Genet. 50, 1565–1573 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen, H. et al. Allele-aware chromosome-level genome assembly and efficient transgene-free genome editing for the autotetraploid cultivated alfalfa. Nat. Commun. 11, 2494 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Long, R. et al. Genome assembly of alfalfa cultivar Zhongmu-4 and identification of SNPs associated with agronomic traits. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 20, 14–28 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, F. et al. The autotetraploid potato genome provides insights into highly heterozygous species. Plant Biotechnol. J. 20, 1996–2005 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang, H. et al. The haplotype-resolved genome assembly of autotetraploid rhubarb Rheum officinale provides insights into its genome evolution and massive accumulation of anthraquinones. Plant Commun. 5, 100677 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, S. et al. Haplotype-resolved chromosome-level genome of hexaploid Jerusalem artichoke provides insights into its origin, evolution, and inulin metabolism. Plant Commun. 5, 100767 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zeng, X. et al. Chromosome-level scaffolding of haplotype-resolved assemblies using Hi-C data without reference genomes. Nat. Plants 10, 1184–1120 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bao, Z. et al. Genome architecture and tetrasomic inheritance of autotetraploid potato. Mol. Plant 15, 1211–1226 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Serra Mari, R. et al. Haplotype-resolved assembly of a tetraploid potato genome using long reads and low-depth offspring data. Genome Biol. 25, 26 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Cheng, H., Asri, M., Lucas, J., Koren, S. & Li, H. Scalable telomere-to-telomere assembly for diploid and polyploid genomes with double graph. Nat. Methods 21, 967–970 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Bao, Y. et al. A chromosomal-scale genome assembly of modern cultivated hybrid sugarcane provides insights into origination and evolution. Nat. Commun. 15, 3041 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Deshpande, A. S. et al. Identifying synergistic high-order 3D chromatin conformations from genome-scale nanopore concatemer sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1488–1499 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, Z. et al. Haplotype-resolved genome assembly and resequencing provide insights into the origin and breeding of modern rose. Nat. Plants 10, 1659–1671 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gabriel, L. et al. BRAKER3: fully automated genome annotation using RNA-seq and protein evidence with GeneMark-ETP, AUGUSTUS, and TSEBRA. Genome Res. 34, 769–777 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang, R. et al. A high-resolution single-molecule sequencing-based Arabidopsis transcriptome using novel methods of Iso-seq analysis. Genome Biol. 23, 149 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Olson, N. D. et al. Variant calling and benchmarking in an era of complete human genome sequences. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 464–483 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hook, P. W. & Timp, W. Beyond assembly: the increasing flexibility of single-molecule sequencing technology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 627–641 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang, B. et al. Variant phasing and haplotypic expression from long-read sequencing in maize. Commun. Biol. 3, 78 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Wu, J., Mukhopadhyay, S. & Pérez-López Sr, E. Resistance gene enrichment sequencing refines the Brassica napus NLRome. Plant Physiol. 197, kiae631 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Holst, F. et al. Helixer—de novo prediction of primary eukaryotic gene models combining deep learning and a hidden Markov model. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.06.527280 (2023).

  57. Gabriel, L., Becker, F., Hoff, K. J. & Stanke, M. Tiberius: end-to-end deep learning with an HMM for gene prediction. Bioinformatics 40, btae685 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhai, J. et al. Cross-species modeling of plant genomes at single nucleotide resolution using a pre-trained DNA language model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2421738122 (2025).

  59. Benegas, G., Batra, S. S. & Song, Y. S. DNA language models are powerful predictors of genome-wide variant effects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2311219120 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Comai, L. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 836–846 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Cheng, F. et al. Gene retention, fractionation and subgenome differences in polyploid plants. Nat. Plants 4, 258–268 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Yuan, J. et al. Dynamic and reversible DNA methylation changes induced by genome separation and merger of polyploid wheat. BMC Biol. 18, 171 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Ramírez-González, R. H. et al. The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat. Science 361, eaar6089 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bourke, P. M., Voorrips, R. E., Visser, R. G. & Maliepaard, C. The double-reduction landscape in tetraploid potato as revealed by a high-density linkage map. Genetics 201, 853–863 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Julier, B. et al. Construction of two genetic linkage maps in cultivated tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa) using microsatellite and AFLP markers. BMC Plant Biol. 3, 9 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Hurgobin, B. et al. Homoeologous exchange is a major cause of gene presence/absence variation in the amphidiploid Brassica napus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 1265–1274 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang, Z. et al. Homoeologous exchanges occur through intragenic recombination generating novel transcripts and proteins in wheat and other polyploids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 14561–14571 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Fan, C. et al. The KL system in wheat permits homoeologous crossing over between closely related chromosomes. Crop J. 11, 808–816 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Hu, G. et al. Evolutionary dynamics of chromatin structure and duplicate gene expression in diploid and allopolyploid cotton. Mol. Biol. Evol. 41, msae095 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Wu, Y. et al. Phylogenomic discovery of deleterious mutations facilitates hybrid potato breeding. Cell 186, 2313–2328.e15 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Herben, T., Suda, J. & Klimešová, J. Polyploid species rely on vegetative reproduction more than diploids: a re-examination of the old hypothesis. Ann. Bot. 120, 341–349 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Walkowiak, S. et al. Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature 588, 277–283 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Li, J. et al. Convergence and divergence of diploid and tetraploid cotton genomes. Nat. Genet. 56, 2562–2573 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Hu, H. et al. Plant pangenomics, current practice and future direction. Agric. Commun. 2, 100039 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Schreiber, M., Jayakodi, M., Stein, N. & Mascher, M. Plant pangenomes for crop improvement, biodiversity and evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 563–577 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Shi, J., Tian, Z., Lai, J. & Huang, X. Plant pan-genomics and its applications. Mol. Plant 16, 168–186 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Li, Y. et al. De novo assembly of soybean wild relatives for pan-genome analysis of diversity and agronomic traits. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1045–1052 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Zhao, Q. et al. Pan-genome analysis highlights the extent of genomic variation in cultivated and wild rice. Nat. Genet. 50, 278–284 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hirsch, C. N. et al. Insights into the maize pan-genome and pan-transcriptome. Plant Cell 26, 121–135 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Jayakodi, M. et al. The barley pan-genome reveals the hidden legacy of mutation breeding. Nature 588, 284–289 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Jayakodi, M. et al. Structural variation in the pangenome of wild and domesticated barley. Nature 636, 654–662 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Chen, J. et al. Pangenome analysis reveals genomic variations associated with domestication traits in broomcorn millet. Nat. Genet. 55, 2243–2254 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Hickey, G. et al. Genotyping structural variants in pangenome graphs using the vg toolkit. Genome Biol. 21, 35 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. MacNish, T. R. et al. Brassica Panache: a multi-species graph pangenome representing presence absence variation across forty-one Brassica genomes. Plant Genome 18, e20535 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Zhang, Y. et al. Structural variation reshapes population gene expression and trait variation in 2,105 Brassica napus accessions. Nat. Genet. 56, 2538–2550 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Sun, H. et al. The phased pan-genome of tetraploid European potato. Nature 642, 389–397 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Nieto Feliner, G., Casacuberta, J. & Wendel, J. F. Genomics of evolutionary novelty in hybrids and polyploids. Front. Genet. 11, 792 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Brown, M. R., Abbott, R. J. & Twyford, A. D. The emerging importance of cross‐ploidy hybridisation and introgression. Mol. Ecol. 33, e17315 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Douglas, G. M. et al. Hybrid origins and the earliest stages of diploidization in the highly successful recent polyploid Capsella bursa-pastoris. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2806–2811 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Wang, Z. et al. Dispersed emergence and protracted domestication of polyploid wheat uncovered by mosaic ancestral haploblock inference. Nat. Commun. 13, 3891 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Zhao, X. et al. Population genomics unravels the Holocene history of bread wheat and its relatives. Nat. Plants 9, 403–419 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Wang, T. et al. Interploidy introgression shaped adaptation during the origin and domestication history of Brassica napus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 40, msad199 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Hardigan, M. A. et al. Genome diversity of tuber-bearing Solanum uncovers complex evolutionary history and targets of domestication in the cultivated potato. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E9999 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Shen, C. et al. The chromosome-level genome sequence of the autotetraploid alfalfa and resequencing of core germplasms provide genomic resources for alfalfa research. Mol. Plant 13, 1250–1261 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Monnahan, P. et al. Pervasive population genomic consequences of genome duplication in Arabidopsis arenosa. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 457–468 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Zhou, Y. et al. Triticum population sequencing provides insights into wheat adaptation. Nat. Genet. 52, 1412–1422 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Kamal, N. et al. The mosaic oat genome gives insights into a uniquely healthy cereal crop. Nature 606, 113–119 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Lu, K. et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals Brassica napus origin and genetic loci involved in its improvement. Nat. Commun. 10, 1154 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Wang, M. et al. Asymmetric subgenome selection and cis-regulatory divergence during cotton domestication. Nat. Genet. 49, 579–587 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Wang, S. et al. Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high‐density 90,000 single nucleotide polymorphism array. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 787–796 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Sun, C. et al. The Wheat 660K SNP array demonstrates great potential for marker‐assisted selection in polyploid wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 1354–1360 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Winfield, M. O. et al. High‐density SNP genotyping array for hexaploid wheat and its secondary and tertiary gene pool. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 1195–1206 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Felcher, K. J. et al. Integration of two diploid potato linkage maps with the potato genome sequence. PLoS ONE 7, e36347 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. You, Q. et al. Development of an Axiom Sugarcane100K SNP array for genetic map construction and QTL identification. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 2829–2845 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Meng, L., Li, H., Zhang, L. & Wang, J. QTL IciMapping: integrated software for genetic linkage map construction and quantitative trait locus mapping in biparental populations. Crop J. 3, 269–283 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Deb, S. K., Edger, P. P., Pires, J. C. & McKain, M. R. Patterns, mechanisms, and consequences of homoeologous exchange in allopolyploid angiosperms: a genomic and epigenomic perspective. N. Phytol. 238, 2284–2304 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Wu, Y. et al. Genomic mosaicism due to homoeologous exchange generates extensive phenotypic diversity in nascent allopolyploids. Natl Sci. Rev. 8, nwaa277 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Stein, A. et al. Mapping of homoeologous chromosome exchanges influencing quantitative trait variation in Brassica napus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 1478–1489 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Jiang, L., Ren, X. & Wu, R. Computational characterization of double reduction in autotetraploid natural populations. Plant J. 105, 1703–1709 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Manrique-Carpintero, N. C. et al. Genome reduction in tetraploid potato reveals genetic load, haplotype variation, and loci associated with agronomic traits. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 944 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Otto, S. P. The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 131, 452–462 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Bourke, P. M. et al. Partial preferential chromosome pairing is genotype dependent in tetraploid rose. Plant J. 90, 330–343 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Wadl, P. A. et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of the USDA sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) germplasm collections using GBSpoly. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1166 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Mollinari, M. et al. Unraveling the hexaploid sweetpotato inheritance using ultra-dense multilocus mapping. G3 10, 281–292 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Hackett, C. A., Boskamp, B., Vogogias, A., Preedy, K. F. & Milne, I. TetraploidSNPMap: software for linkage analysis and QTL mapping in autotetraploid populations using SNP dosage data. J. Hered. 108, 438–442 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Takagi, H. et al. QTL ‐seq: rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J. 74, 174–183 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Chen, J. et al. A tetrasomic inheritance model and likelihood‐based method for mapping quantitative trait loci in autotetraploid species. N. Phytol. 230, 387–398 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Ma, Z. et al. Resequencing a core collection of upland cotton identifies genomic variation and loci influencing fiber quality and yield. Nat. Genet. 50, 803–813 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Lu, Q. et al. A genomic variation map provides insights into peanut diversity in China and associations with 28 agronomic traits. Nat. Genet. 56, 530–540 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Song, J.-M. et al. Eight high-quality genomes reveal pan-genome architecture and ecotype differentiation of Brassica napus. Nat. Plants 6, 34–45 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Jin, S. et al. Structural variation (SV)-based pan-genome and GWAS reveal the impacts of SVs on the speciation and diversification of allotetraploid cottons. Mol. Plant 16, 678–693 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Dwivedi, S. L., Heslop‐Harrison, P., Amas, J., Ortiz, R. & Edwards, D. Epistasis and pleiotropy‐induced variation for plant breeding. Plant Biotechnol. J. 22, 2788–2807 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Jia, J. et al. Genome resources for the elite bread wheat cultivar Aikang 58 and mining of elite homeologous haplotypes for accelerating wheat improvement. Mol. Plant 16, 1893–1910 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Sharma, S. K. et al. Linkage disequilibrium and evaluation of genome-wide association mapping models in tetraploid potato. G3 8, 3185–3202 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Haque, E. et al. Polyploid GWAS reveals the basis of molecular marker development for complex breeding traits including starch content in the storage roots of sweet potato. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1181909 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Chen, M. et al. Genome-wide identification of agronomically important genes in outcrossing crops using OutcrossSeq. Mol. Plant 14, 556–570 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Huang, B., Spooner, D. M. & Liang, Q. Genome diversity of the potato. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6392 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Cooke, D. P., Wedge, D. C. & Lunter, G. Benchmarking small-variant genotyping in polyploids. Genome Res. 32, 403–408 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Liao, W.-W. et al. A draft human pangenome reference. Nature 617, 312–324 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Groza, C. et al. Pangenome graphs improve the analysis of structural variants in rare genetic diseases. Nat. Commun. 15, 657 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Dong, Y. & Wang, Y.-Z. Seed shattering: from models to crops. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 476 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Van Dam, J., Kooman, P. L. & Struik, P. C. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on early growth and final number of tubers in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Potato Res. 39, 51–62 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Martínez-García, J. F., García-Martínez, J. L., Bou, J. & Prat, S. The interaction of gibberellins and photoperiod in the control of potato tuberization. J. Plant Growth Regul. 20, 377–386 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Johns, T. Detoxification function of geophagy and domestication of the potato. J. Chem. Ecol. 12, 635–646 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Shang, Y. et al. Biosynthesis, regulation, and domestication of bitterness in cucumber. Science 346, 1084–1088 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Avni, R. et al. Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication. Science 357, 93–97 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Jia, J. et al. Aegilops tauschii draft genome sequence reveals a gene repertoire for wheat adaptation. Nature 496, 91–95 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Zheng, Z. et al. Chloroplast and whole-genome sequencing shed light on the evolutionary history and phenotypic diversification of peanuts. Nat. Genet. 56, 1975–1984 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Desta, Z. A. & Ortiz, R. Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 592–601 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Meuwissen, T., Hayes, B. & Goddard, M. Accelerating improvement of livestock with genomic selection. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 1, 221–237 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Batista, L. G., Mello, V. H., Souza, A. P. & Margarido, G. R. Genomic prediction with allele dosage information in highly polyploid species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 135, 723–739 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Yadav, S. et al. Accelerating genetic gain in sugarcane breeding using genomic selection. Agronomy 10, 585 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Gouy, M. et al. Experimental assessment of the accuracy of genomic selection in sugarcane. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126, 2575–2586 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Bonnett, D. et al. Response to early generation genomic selection for yield in wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 718611 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Pandey, J., Scheuring, D. C., Koym, J. W., Endelman, J. B. & Vales, M. I. Genomic selection and genome-wide association studies in tetraploid chipping potatoes. Plant Genome 16, e20297 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Wang, Y. et al. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 947–951 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Johansen, I. E. et al. High efficacy full allelic CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in tetraploid potato. Sci. Rep. 9, 17715 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Li, J., Yu, X., Zhang, C., Li, N. & Zhao, J. The application of CRISPR/Cas technologies to Brassica crops: current progress and future perspectives. aBIOTECH 3, 146–161 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Mall, A. K. et al. CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing for sugarcane improvement. Sugar Tech. 27, 1–13 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Vondracek, K., Altpeter, F., Liu, T. & Lee, S. Advances in genomics and genome editing for improving strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). Front. Genet. 15, 1382445 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Tripathi, L., Ntui, V. O. & Tripathi, J. N. CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing of banana for disease resistance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 56, 118–126 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Liu, Y. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in tetraploid switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) using CRISPR/Cas9. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 381–393 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Tang, H. et al. Fertility recovery of wheat male sterility controlled by Ms2 using CRISPR/Cas9. Plant Biotechnol. J. 19, 224–226 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Zhu, H., Li, C. & Gao, C. Applications of CRISPR–Cas in agriculture and plant biotechnology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 661–677 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Zhang, Y. et al. Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA. Nat. Commun. 7, 12617 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. Li, J., Li, Y. & Ma, L. Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9 and applications for wheat functional genomics and breeding. aBIOTECH 2, 375–385 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. Zaman, Q. U., Li, C., Cheng, H. & Hu, Q. Genome editing opens a new era of genetic improvement in polyploid crops. Crop J. 7, 141–150 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Levy, A. A. & Feldman, M. Evolution and origin of bread wheat. Plant Cell 34, 2549–2567 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Rosyara, U. et al. Genetic contribution of synthetic hexaploid wheat to CIMMYT’s spring bread wheat breeding germplasm. Sci. Rep. 9, 12355 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Yu, H. et al. A route to de novo domestication of wild allotetraploid rice. Cell 5, 1156–1170 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Cheng, L. et al. Leveraging a phased pangenome for haplotype design of hybrid potato. Nature 640, 408–417 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. Ye, M. et al. Generation of self-compatible diploid potato by knockout of S-RNase. Nat. Plants 4, 651–654 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Zhang, C. et al. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression in potato. Nat. Genet. 51, 374–378 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Zhang, C. et al. Genome design of hybrid potato. Cell 184, 3873–3883 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Washburn, J. D. & Birchler, J. A. Polyploids as a “model system” for the study of heterosis. Plant Reprod. 27, 1–5 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Mieulet, D. et al. Turning rice meiosis into mitosis. Cell Res. 26, 1242–1254 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  167. Wang, Y. et al. Harnessing clonal gametes in hybrid crops to engineer polyploid genomes. Nat. Genet. 56, 1075–1079 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. Liu, S. et al. A telomere-to-telomere genome assembly coupled with multi-omic data provides insights into the evolution of hexaploid bread wheat. Nat. Genet. 57, 1008–1020 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. Wang, Z. et al. Near-complete assembly and comprehensive annotation of the wheat Chinese Spring genome. Mol. Plant 18, 892–907 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Athiyannan, N. et al. Long-read genome sequencing of bread wheat facilitates disease resistance gene cloning. Nat. Genet. 54, 227–231 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. Jia, K.-H. et al. SubPhaser: a robust allopolyploid subgenome phasing method based on subgenome-specific k-mers. N. Phytol. 235, 801–809 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  172. Lovell, J. T. et al. Genomic mechanisms of climate adaptation in polyploid bioenergy switchgrass. Nature 590, 438–444 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  173. Yan, H. et al. Post-polyploidization centromere evolution in cotton. Nat. Genet. 57, 1021–1030 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Hu, G. et al. A telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of cotton provides insights into centromere evolution and short-season adaptation. Nat. Genet. 57, 1031–1043 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Sreedasyam, A. et al. Genome resources for three modern cotton lines guide future breeding efforts. Nat. Plants 10, 1039–1051 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. Li, B. et al. A gap-free reference genome reveals structural variations associated with flowering time in rapeseed (Brassica napus). Hortic. Res. 10, uhad171 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. Zhao, C. et al. Chromosome-scale genome assembly-assisted identification of Brassica napus BnDCPA1 for improvement of plant architecture and yield heterosis. Plant Commun. 5, 100854 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  178. Gao, S. et al. The centromere landscapes of four karyotypically diverse Papaver species provide insights into chromosome evolution and speciation. Cell Genom. 4, 100626 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  179. Yang, X. et al. Three chromosome-scale Papaver genomes reveal punctuated patchwork evolution of the morphinan and noscapine biosynthesis pathway. Nat. Commun. 12, 6030 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. Kumar, S. et al. TimeTree 5: an expanded resource for species divergence times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msac174 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. Clark, J. W. & Donoghue, P. C. Whole-genome duplication and plant macroevolution. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 933–945 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Kreiner, J. M., Kron, P. & Husband, B. C. Evolutionary dynamics of unreduced gametes. Trends Genet. 33, 583–593 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Ramsey, J. & Schemske, D. W. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29, 467–501 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  184. Chen, Z. J. et al. Genomic diversifications of five Gossypium allopolyploid species and their impact on cotton improvement. Nat. Genet. 52, 525–533 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  185. Dai, D. et al. Unzipped chromosome-level genomes reveal allopolyploid nematode origin pattern as unreduced gamete hybridization. Nat. Commun. 14, 7156 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The assembled polyploid genomes in Fig. 1 are based on our own compilation from publicly available resources, primarily the PubPlant database, which may not include all reported species. We thank the developers and curators of PubPlant for their efforts in collecting and maintaining the data. We thank W. J. Lucas, J. Zhang, Z. Liu and N. Wang for project discussions and critical comments. This project was funded by a Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research (2021B0301030004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 32488302 and 31991181), the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities (77000-12240018), the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (CAAS-ZDRW202404) and a Shenzhen Outstanding Talents Training Fund. Z.B. is supported by the grants to D. Weigel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Q.Z., Z.B. and S.H. co-designed the framework of the paper. L.C., Z.B. and Q.Z. wrote the draft of the paper and generated the figures. Q.K., L.L., N.S. and S.H. contributed to writing and revision of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Plants thanks Fay-Wei Li and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, L., Bao, Z., Kong, Q. et al. Genome analyses and breeding of polyploid crops. Nat. Plants 11, 1714–1728 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-025-02088-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-025-02088-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research