Fig. 6: Comparison of species recovered in various hosts.

a The consistency ratio of UPGG with other species’ MAG databases is represented where green indicates the proportion of MAGs from different species’ MAG databases that are consistent with UPGG (ANI > 95%), and red represents the proportion of MAGs in UPGG that are consistent with those in other species’ databases (ANI > 95%). b The MAGs in the UPGG that are consistent with cattle, goat, mouse, and human are analyzed for the proportion of the population classification of the original metagenomic samples from which they were assembled. ‘Mixed breed’ refers only to hybrid varieties, while ‘commercial’ and ‘local’ refer only to pure breeds. c The distribution of metagenomic samples for the 5366 MAGs from Chinese human metagenome assemblies that are consistent with UPGG (ANI > 90%) is shown. The right pie chart illustrates these samples, with pink indicating local Chinese breeds. d The distribution of microbial diversity from humans and pigs, sourced from France and China, is shown. Colors represent countries, and symbol shapes denote species. e Differences in microbial abundance between two regions for the same species were compared, and the distribution of significantly different microbes was shown. Only microbes that were significantly upregulated in the groups are displayed. Those marked in red indicate microbes with consistent trends across different species at the same geographic location, with specific taxonomic levels shown in (f). g Overlap of core gut microbial species among humans, mice, and pigs. h Abundance distribution of core microbial species shared by pigs and humans across pig population samples (n = 4479).