Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj biofilms and microbiomes
  3. articles
  4. article
Extracellular vesicles as structured vectors of quorum sensing signals influence aquatic microbial communities
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 31 January 2026

Extracellular vesicles as structured vectors of quorum sensing signals influence aquatic microbial communities

  • Xueli Xu1,2,
  • Jingjing Lin1,
  • Li-Ting Zhu1,2,
  • Lu Long1,2,
  • Yifang Duan1,
  • Jafar Hayatov1,2,
  • Lifeng Lin1,
  • Huihuang Chen1 &
  • …
  • Qiansheng Huang1 

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Environmental sciences
  • Microbiology

Abstract

Quorum sensing (QS) orchestrates collective microbial behaviors and functional acclimatization through chemical communication. However, QS in natural waters is challenged by dilution, alkaline hydrolysis, and enzymatic degradation of freely dissolved autoinducers. Here, we demonstrate that extracellular vesicles (EVs) act as selective, durable, and protective vectors for QS signal molecules under environmental stresses. Specifically, EVs preferentially package hydrophobic acyl‑homoserine lactones, concentrate them locally, and shield them from alkaline hydrolysis, and exhibiting long-distance transport. In addition, EVs possess specific affinity to recipients, thus influencing microbial community. Field investigation via multi-omics showed that EV abundance covaried with salinity, nutrients, chlorophyll a, and biomass, which were validated by culture experiments. Our statistical framework demonstrated that organisms producing moderate EV levels contributed significantly to maintaining community stability and ecosystem functions. Distinctively within this group, QS-active species (including Burkholderiaceae, Pseudomonadaceae, Rhodobacteraceae, Roseobacteraceae, Flavobacteriaceae etc.) emerge as key drivers facilitating these crucial ecological roles. Furthermore, metaproteomics of field EVs reveal QS receptor and synthesis proteins, suggesting coordinated transport of signals and proteins, which indicate new routes for QS crosstalk, particularly for taxa bearing luxR/I solos. Our results show that moderately generated EVs are the potentially important QS signal carriers and ecological regulation hubs in natural waters.

Similar content being viewed by others

The acquisition of additional control over quorum sensing regulation reduces the variability of final cell density in Burkholderia

Article Open access 06 August 2025

Functional metagenomic analysis of quorum sensing signaling in a nitrifying community

Article Open access 28 October 2021

Cracking the code of seasonal seawater biofouling: enhanced biofouling control with quorum sensing inhibitor-functionalized membranes

Article Open access 22 February 2024

Data availability

All the DNA sequences generated during the current study are available in the BIG Submission75, BIG Sub: https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA027247. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (https://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the iProX partner repository76,77 with the dataset identifier PXD065377.

References

  1. Mukherjee, S. & Bassler, B. L. Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 371–382 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coolahan, M. & Whalen, K. E. A review of quorum-sensing and its role in mediating interkingdom interactions in the ocean. Commun. Biol. 8, 179 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Decho, A. W., Norman, R. S. & Visscher, P. T. Quorum sensing in natural environments: emerging views from microbial mats. Trends Microbiol. 18, 73–80 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Papenfort, K. & Bassler, B. L. Quorum-sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 576–588 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abisado R.G. et al. Bacterial quorum sensing and microbial community interactions. mBio. 9, (2018).

  6. Hmelo, L. R. Quorum sensing in marine microbial environments. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 9, 257–281 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horswill, A. R., Stoodley, P., Stewart, P. S. & Parsek, M. R. The effect of the chemical, biological, and physical environment on quorum sensing in structured microbial communities. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 387, 371–380 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wei, J. R. et al. A mobile quorum-sensing system in Serratia marcescens. J. Bacteriol. 188, 1518–1525 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yates, E. A. et al. N-acylhomoserine lactones undergo lactonolysis in a pH-, temperature-, and acyl chain length-dependent manner during growth of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 70, 5635–5646 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wellington, S. & Greenberg, E. P. Quorum sensing signal selectivity and the potential for interspecies cross talk. mBio 10, e00146–00119 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Slinger, B. L., Banerjee, S., Chandler, J. R. & Blackwell, H. E. Interspecies crosstalk via LuxI/LuxR-type quorum sensing pathways contributes to decreased nematode survival in coinfections of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia multivorans. ACS Chem. Biol. 19, 2557–2568 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wu, F., Menn, D. J. & Wang, X. Quorum-sensing crosstalk-driven synthetic circuits: from unimodality to trimodality. Chem. Biol. 21, 1629–1638 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arashida, N. et al. Identification of novel long chain N-acylhomoserine lactones of chain length C(20) from the marine phototrophic bacterium Rhodovulum sulfidophilum. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 82, 1683–1693 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Decho, A. W. et al. Autoinducers extracted from microbial mats reveal a surprising diversity of N-acylhomoserine lactones (AHLs) and abundance changes that may relate to diel pH. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 409–420 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, Y. C. et al. Diversity, influential factor, and communication network construction of quorum-sensing bacteria in global wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 279, 123437 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, S. et al. Machine learning aided construction of the quorum-sensing communication network for human gut microbiota. Nat. Commun. 13, 3079 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Albataineh, H., Duke, M., Misra, S. K., Sharp, J. S. & Stevens, D. C. Identification of a solo acylhomoserine lactone synthase from the myxobacterium Archangium gephyra. Sci. Rep. 11, 3018 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fuqua, C. The QscR quorum-sensing regulon of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an orphan claims its identity. J. Bacteriol. 188, 3169–3171 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roche, D. M. et al. Communications blackout? Do N-acylhomoserine-lactone-degrading enzymes have any role in quorum sensing? Microbiology 150, 2023–2028 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hudaiberdiev, S. et al. Census of solo LuxR genes in prokaryotic genomes. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 5, 20 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zan, J. et al. A solo luxI-type gene directs acylhomoserine lactone synthesis and contributes to motility control in the marine sponge symbiont Ruegeria sp. KLH11. Microbiology 161, 50–56 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chandler, J. R., Heilmann, S., Mittler, J. E. & Greenberg, E. P. Acyl-homoserine lactone-dependent eavesdropping promotes competition in a laboratory co-culture model. ISME J. 6, 2219–2228 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Toyofuku, M., Schild, S., Kaparakis-Liaskos, M. & Eberl, L. Composition and functions of bacterial membrane vesicles. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 415–430 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu, L. T. et al. Diverse functional genes harboured in extracellular vesicles from environmental and human microbiota. J. Extracell. Vesicles 11, e12292 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Biller, S. J. et al. Bacterial vesicles in marine ecosystems. Science 343, 183–186 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Qin, Y. et al. Widespread of potential pathogen-derived extracellular vesicles carrying antibiotic resistance genes in indoor dust. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 5653–5663 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Long, L. et al. Extracellular vesicles are prevalent and effective carriers of environmental allergens in indoor dust. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 1969–1983 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Teng, Y. et al. Plant-derived exosomal micrornas shape the gut microbiota. Cell Host Microbe 24, 637–652.e638 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gaudin, M. et al. Hyperthermophilic archaea produce membrane vesicles that can transfer DNA. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 5, 109–116 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, Z. et al. Fungal extracellular vesicles mediate cross-kingdom trafficking of virulence effectors into plant cells to promote infection. Mol. Plant 18, 1369–1389 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Biller, S. J. et al. Prochlorococcus extracellular vesicles: molecular composition and adsorption to diverse microbes. Environ. Microbiol. 24, 420–435 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hackl, T. et al. Novel integrative elements and genomic plasticity in ocean ecosystems. Cell 186, 47–62.e16 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Toyofuku, M. et al. Membrane vesicle-mediated bacterial communication. ISME J. 11, 1504–1509 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mashburn, L. M. & Whiteley, M. Membrane vesicles traffic signals and facilitate group activities in a prokaryote. Nature 437, 422–425 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Emge, P. et al. Resilience of bacterial quorum sensing against fluid flow. Sci. Rep. 6, 33115 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, J. et al. AHLs-mediated quorum sensing threshold and its response towards initial adhesion of wastewater biofilms. Water Res. 194, 116925 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhu, Y. L., Hou, H. M., Zhang, G. L., Wang, Y. F. & Hao, H. S. AHLs regulate biofilm formation and swimming motility of Hafnia alvei H4. Front Microbiol. 10, 1330 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chu, W., Vattem, D. A., Maitin, V., Barnes, M. B. & McLean, R. J. Bioassays of quorum sensing compounds using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Chromobacterium violaceum. Methods Mol. Biol. 692, 3–19 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Agmo Hernández V. An overview of surface forces and the DLVO theory. ChemTexts. 9 (2023).

  40. Hmelo, L. & Van Mooy, B. A. S. Kinetic constraints on acylated homoserine lactone-based quorum sensing in marine environments. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 54, 127–133 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pearson, J. P., Delden, C. V. & Iglewski, B. H. Active efflux and diffusion are involved in transport of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cell-to-cell signals. J. Bacteriol. 181, 1203–1210 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Chan, Y. Y. et al. Control of quorum sensing by a Burkholderia pseudomallei multidrug efflux pump. J. Bacteriol. 189, 4320–4324 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Buroni, S. et al. Assessment of three Resistance-Nodulation-Cell Division drug efflux transporters of Burkholderia cenocepacia in intrinsic antibiotic resistance. BMC Microbiol. 9, 200 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gantner, S. et al. In situ quantitation of the spatial scale of calling distances and population density-independent N-acylhomoserine lactone-mediated communication by rhizobacteria colonized on plant roots. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 56, 188–194 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  45. MacDonald, K. L. & Beveridge, T. J. Bactericidal effect of gentamicin-induced membrane vesicles derived from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 on gram-positive bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 48, 810–820 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tashiro, Y. et al. Interaction of bacterial membrane vesicles with specific species and their potential for delivery to target cells. Front. Microbiol. 8, 571 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schatz, D. et al. Communication via extracellular vesicles enhances viral infection of a cosmopolitan alga. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1485–1492 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Case, R. J., Labbate, M. & Kjelleberg, S. AHL-driven quorum-sensing circuits: their frequency and function among the Proteobacteria. ISME J. 2, 345–349 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Monnet, V. & Gardan, R. Quorum-sensing regulators in Gram-positive bacteria: ‘cherchez le peptide. Mol. Microbiol. 97, 181–184 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lequette, Y., Lee, J. H., Ledgham, F., Lazdunski, A. & Greenberg, E. P. A distinct QscR regulon in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing circuit. J. Bacteriol. 188, 3365–3370 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  51. McIntosh, M., Krol, E. & Becker, A. Competitive and cooperative effects in quorum-sensing-regulated galactoglucan biosynthesis in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J. Bacteriol. 190, 5308–5317 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Subramoni, S. & Venturi, V. LuxR-family ‘solos’: bachelor sensors/regulators of signalling molecules. Microbiology 155, 1377–1385 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Morris JJ, Lenski RE, Zinser ER. The Black Queen Hypothesis: evolution of dependencies through adaptive gene loss. mBio. 3, (2012).

  54. Lerat, E. & Moran, N. A. The evolutionary history of quorum-sensing systems in bacteria. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 903–913 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd Edition (2017).

  56. Lv, H. et al. Temperature and nutrients are significant drivers of seasonal shift in phytoplankton community from a drinking water reservoir, subtropical China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 21, 5917–5928 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  57. He, W., Yang, H., Wang, X., Li, H. & Dong, Q. Growth of Salmonella Enteritidis in the presence of quorum sensing signaling compounds produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Food Eng. 17, 959–968 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Fletcher, M. P., Diggle, S. P., Camara, M. & Williams, P. Biosensor-based assays for PQS, HHQ and related 2-alkyl-4-quinolone quorum-sensing signal molecules. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1254–1262 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ziegler, E. W., Brown, A. B., Nesnas, N. & Palmer, A. G. Abiotic hydrolysis kinetics of N-Acyl-L-homoserine Lactones: natural silencing of bacterial quorum sensing signals. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2850–2856 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Huang, Y. L., Ki, J. S., Lee, O. O. & Qian, P. Y. Evidence for the dynamics of Acyl homoserine lactone and AHL-producing bacteria during subtidal biofilm formation. ISME J. 3, 296–304 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mo, Y. et al. Low shifts in salinity determined assembly processes and network stability of microeukaryotic plankton communities in a subtropical urban reservoir. Microbiome 9, 128 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tkacz, A., Hortala, M. & Poole, P. S. Absolute quantitation of microbiota abundance in environmental samples. Microbiome 6, 110 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Nurk, S., Meleshko, D., Korobeynikov, A. & Pevzner, P. A. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 27, 824–834 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Uritskiy, G. V., DiRuggiero, J. & Taylor, J. MetaWRAP-a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome 6, 158 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Yuan, M. M. et al. Climate warming enhances microbial network complexity and stability. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 343–348 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Rosseel, Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Software 48, 1–36 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B. & McCoach, D. B. The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociol. Methods Res. 44, 486–507 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  68. JL Z, KP M. spaa: an R package for computing species association and niche overlap. Research Progress of Biodiversity Conservation in China. 165–174 (2014).

  69. Segata N, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, (2011).

  70. Kleyer, M. et al. Assessing species and community functional responses to environmental gradients: which multivariate methods? J. Veg. Sci. 23, 805–821 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lai, J., Zou, Y., Zhang, J. & Peres-Neto, P. R. Generalizing hierarchical and variation partitioning in multiple regression and canonical analyses using the rdacca.hp R package. Methods Ecol. Evol. 13, 782–788 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Peng C, Chen Q, Tan S, Shen X, Jiang C. Generalized reporter score-based enrichment analysis for omics data. Brief Bioinform. 25, bbae116 (2024).

  73. Shenhav, L. et al. FEAST: fast expectation-maximization for microbial source tracking. Nat. Methods 16, 627–632 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ofek-Lalzar, M. et al. Niche and host-associated functional signatures of the root surface microbiome. Nat. Commun. 5, 4950 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Members & Partners, C.-N. Database Resources of the National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D30–D44 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ma, J. et al. iProX: an integrated proteome resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D1211–D1217 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Chen, T. et al. iProX in 2021: connecting proteomics data sharing with big data. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D1522–D1527 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (32161143016, 42177362), and National Basic Science Data Center “Environment Health DataBase” (NO. NBSDC-DB-21). We thank Prof. Weihua Chu from China Pharmaceutical University for his help in QS biosensor experiments. We thank Prof. Steven Biller for his advice and assistance on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Xiamen Key Laboratory of Indoor Air and Health, State Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, China

    Xueli Xu, Jingjing Lin, Li-Ting Zhu, Lu Long, Yifang Duan, Jafar Hayatov, Lifeng Lin, Huihuang Chen & Qiansheng Huang

  2. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Xueli Xu, Li-Ting Zhu, Lu Long & Jafar Hayatov

Authors
  1. Xueli Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingjing Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li-Ting Zhu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lu Long
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yifang Duan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jafar Hayatov
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lifeng Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Huihuang Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Qiansheng Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.L.X. conducted the experiments, generated and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. J.J.L. performed the microcosmic experiments. L.T.Z. helped with the data analysis and revised the manuscript. L.L. and Y.F.D. provided the suggestions for computational adjustments. L.F.L. and J.H. contributed to the AHLs testing experiments. H.H.C. helped with measuring environmental factors. Q.S.H. designed the experiments, wrote the manuscript, and got the funding.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiansheng Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

41522_2026_924_MOESM1_ESM.

41522_2026_924_MOESM2_ESM.

41522_2026_924_MOESM3_ESM.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, X., Lin, J., Zhu, LT. et al. Extracellular vesicles as structured vectors of quorum sensing signals influence aquatic microbial communities. npj Biofilms Microbiomes (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-026-00924-w

Download citation

  • Received: 09 September 2025

  • Accepted: 22 January 2026

  • Published: 31 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-026-00924-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Water Testing: Advancing the Drinking Water Microbiome and Its Connections to Health and Sustainability

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open Access
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes (npj Biofilms Microbiomes)

ISSN 2055-5008 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology