Table 1 Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses of the association of variables with DFS in the training cohort

From: Prognostic value of nuclear features based on tumor-associated collagen signatures in breast cancer

Variable

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

HR

(95%CI)

P Value

HR

(95%CI)

P Value

Age

 >50 vs ≤50

1.156

0.831

1.610

0.389

NA

  

NA

Molecular subtype

 Luminal B vs Luminal A

1.995

1.218

3.269

0.006

NA

  

NA

 HER2-enriched vs Luminal A

1.754

0.974

3.158

0.061

NA

  

NA

 Triple-negative vs Luminal A

1.691

0.917

3.121

0.093

NA

  

NA

Tumor size

 2–5 cm vs ≤ 2 cm

1.616

1.120

2.331

0.010

1.538

1.055

2.243

0.025

 ≥5 cm vs ≤2 cm

3.364

1.868

6.059

<0.0001

1.835

0.971

3.468

0.062

Nodal status

 1–3 vs 0

1.518

0.951

2.425

0.080

1.278

0.780

2.093

0.330

 ≥4 vs 0

3.430

2.355

4.997

<0.0001

1.746

1.146

2.661

0.010

Clinical stage

 Ⅱ vs Ⅰ

1.642

0.991

2.718

0.054

NA

  

NA

 Ⅲ vs Ⅰ

4.131

2.523

6.765

<0.0001

NA

  

NA

Histological grade

 G2 vs G1

1.249

0.755

2.065

0.386

0.934

0.557

1.567

0.797

 G3 vs G1

1.520

0.890

2.595

0.125

1.559

0.902

2.696

0.112

Chemotherapy

 No vs Yes

0.533

0.321

0.886

0.015

0.526

0.307

0.903

0.020

Radiation therapy

 No vs Yes

1.454

1.039

2.036

0.029

NA

  

NA

TACS -score

2.890

2.410

3.466

<0.0001

2.115

1.717

2.606

<0.0001

TCMF1-score

3.667

2.716

4.953

<0.0001

1.861

1.354

2.557

0.00013

TCMF2-score

4.187

3.164

5.540

<0.0001

2.192

1.587

3.029

<0.0001

  1. Bolded values represent significant shifts in plausibility (P < 0.05)