Fig. 3: Comparison of the CPFEM results between JAX-CPFEM and MOOSE for Case study 2: single crystal copper (FCC). | npj Computational Materials

Fig. 3: Comparison of the CPFEM results between JAX-CPFEM and MOOSE for Case study 2: single crystal copper (FCC).

From: Efficient GPU-computing simulation platform JAX-CPFEM for differentiable crystal plasticity finite element method

Fig. 3

In (a), we show the boundary condition: the tensile experiment fixes the bottom side and pulls the top surface with a prescribed displacement condition. b A comparison of simulation results with different levels of mesh resolution (53, 103, 163, 203, and 253) between MOOSE (lines) and JAX-CPFEM (points).

Back to article page