Fig. 5: Comparison of the CPFEM results between JAX-CPFEM and MOOSE for Case study 3: polycrystal 304 steel (FCC). | npj Computational Materials

Fig. 5: Comparison of the CPFEM results between JAX-CPFEM and MOOSE for Case study 3: polycrystal 304 steel (FCC).

From: Efficient GPU-computing simulation platform JAX-CPFEM for differentiable crystal plasticity finite element method

Fig. 5

In (a), we show the boundary condition: the tensile experiment fixes the bottom and a corner and pulls the top surface with a prescribed displacement condition. b A comparison of simulation results with the same level of mesh resolution (163) between JAX-CPFEM (points) and MOOSE (line).

Back to article page