Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Computational Materials
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj computational materials
  3. articles
  4. article
Quantum-annealed machine learning discovers ductile, high strength and corrosion-resistant high-entropy alloy
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 March 2026

Quantum-annealed machine learning discovers ductile, high strength and corrosion-resistant high-entropy alloy

  • Diego Ibarra-Hoyos1,
  • Peter F. Connors2,
  • Ho Jang1,
  • Nathan Grain3,
  • Israel Klich1,4,
  • Gia-Wei Chern1,
  • Peter K. Liaw3,
  • John R. Scully2,5 &
  • …
  • Joseph Poon1,2 

npj Computational Materials , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2963 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Materials science
  • Physics

Abstract

Data scarcity remains a central challenge in materials discovery, where finding meaningful descriptors and tuning models for generalization is critical but inherently a discrete optimization problem prone to multiple local minima confounding the true optimal state. Classical methods often become trapped in these minima, while quantum annealing can escape them via quantum fluctuations, including tunneling, which overcome narrow energy barriers. We present a quantum-assisted machine-learning (QaML) framework that employs quantum annealing to address these combinatorial-optimization challenges through feature selection, support-vector training formulated in QUBO form for classification and regression, and a new QUBO-based neural-network pruning formulation. Recursive batching enables quantum annealing to manage large feature spaces beyond current qubit limits, while quantum-pruned networks exhibit superior generalization over classical methods, suggesting that quantum annealing preferentially samples flatter, more stable regions of the loss landscape. Applied to high-entropy alloys (HEAs), a data-limited but compositionally complex testbed, the framework integrates models for the fracture-strain classification and yield-strength regression under physics-based constraints. The framework identified and experimentally validated Al8Cr38Fe50Mn2Ti2 (at.%), a single-phase BCC alloy exhibiting a 0.2% yield strength of 568 MPa, greater than 40% compressive strain without fracture, and a critical current density in reducing acid nearly an order of magnitude lower than 304 stainless steel. These results establish QA as a practical route to overcome classical optimization limits and accelerate materials discovery.

Similar content being viewed by others

Quantum annealing-assisted lattice optimization

Article Open access 07 January 2025

Phase prediction and experimental realisation of a new high entropy alloy using machine learning

Article Open access 23 March 2023

Assessment of image generation by quantum annealer

Article Open access 29 June 2021

Data Availability

The custom code generated during the current study is not publicly available as it forms part of ongoing research, but is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. This study did not use or generate any publicly available biological sequence data.

References

  1. Vladymyrov, M. No Pressure! Addressing the problem of local minima in manifold learning algorithms. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc., 2019). https://doi.org/10.5555/3454287.3454349.

  2. Sun, R., Li, D., Liang, S., Ding, T. & Srikant, R. The global landscape of neural networks: an overview. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 37, 95–108 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sun, Y.; Xiong, W.; Liang, F. Sparse deep learning: a new framework immune to local traps and miscalibration. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. (Curran Associates Inc., 2021). https://doi.org/10.5555/3540261.3541969.

  4. Kadowaki, T. & Nishimori, H. Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model. Phys. Rev. E 58, 5355–5363 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lucas, A. Ising formulations of many NP problems. Front. Phys. 2014, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2014.00005.

  6. Weidenfeller, J. et al. Scaling of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm on superconducting qubit based hardware. Quantum 6, 870 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barkoutsos, P. K., Nannicini, G., Robert, A., Tavernelli, I. & Woerner, S. Improving variational quantum optimization using CVaR. Quantum 4, 256 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. George, E. P., Curtin, W. A. & Tasan, C. C. High entropy alloys: a focused review of mechanical properties and deformation mechanisms. Acta Mater. 188, 435–474 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, X., Guo, W. & Fu, Y. High-entropy alloys: emerging materials for advanced functional applications. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 9, 663–701 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Senkov, O. N., Miracle, D. B., Chaput, K. J. & Couzinie, J.-P. Development and exploration of refractory high entropy alloys—a review. J. Mater. Res. 33, 3092–3128 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, Y. et al. Microstructures and properties of high-entropy alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci. 61, 1–93 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ron, T., Shirizly, A. & Aghion, E. Additive manufacturing technologies of high entropy alloys (HEA): review and prospects. Materials 16, 2454 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, F., Liaw, P. & Zhang, Y. Recent progress with BCC-structured high-entropy alloys. Metals 12, 501 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng, H. et al. Review—corrosion-resistant high-entropy alloy coatings: a review. J. Electrochem. Soc. 168, 111502 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mei, Y. et al. MoZn-based high entropy alloy catalysts enabled dual activation and stabilization in alkaline oxygen evolution. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adq6758.

  16. Ma, Y. et al. A one-step fabrication of soft-magnetic high entropy alloy fiber with excellent strength and flexibility. Nat. Commun. 15, 10549 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Qi, J. et al. Integrated design of aluminum-enriched high-entropy refractory B2 alloys with synergy of high strength and ductility. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adq0083.

  18. Chen, Y. et al. Phase transformation-mediated high-temperature oxidation in an AlCrFeCoNi2.1 EHEA alloy at elevated temperature. Corros. Sci. 245, 112674 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, T. T., Wang, H. M., Li, G. R., Chou, S. S. & Zhao, B. W. Study on the microstructure and performance of FeCoNiCrMn high-entropy alloy-based composites reinforced by nano-Al2O3 particles. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 35, 3751–3762 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mu, R., Wang, Y., Niu, S., Sun, K. & Yang, Z. Excellent high-temperature strength of (HfZrTiTaNb)C high-entropy carbide diffusion-bonded joint via in-situ alloying of Ni/Nb/Ni composite interlayer. J. Adv. Ceram. 14, 9221010 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dora, T. L. et al. Exploring deformation mechanisms in a refractory high entropy Alloy (MoNbTaW). Int. J. Mech. Sci. 288, 110000 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rickman, J. M.; Balasubramanian, G.; Marvel, C. J.; Chan, H. M.; Burton, M.-T. Machine learning strategies for high-entropy alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0030367.

  23. Mizutani, U. Hume-Rothery Rules for Structurally Complex Alloy Phases. (CRC Press, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1201/b10324.

  24. Guo, S.; Ng, C.; Lu, J.; Liu, C. T. Effect of valence electron concentration on stability of FCC or BCC phase in high entropy alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3587228.

  25. Troparevsky, M. C., Morris, J. R., Kent, P. R. C., Lupini, A. R. & Stocks, G. M. Criteria for predicting the formation of single-phase high-entropy alloys. Phys. Rev. X 5, 011041 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, G. et al. Machine learning-based phase prediction in high-entropy alloys: further optimization of feature engineering. J. Mater. Sci. 60, 3999–4019 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, S., Song, Z., Wang, J., Niu, X. & Chen, H. Enhanced phase prediction of high-entropy alloys through machine learning and data augmentation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 27, 717–729 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li, S. et al. Machine learning phase prediction of light-weight high-entropy alloys containing aluminum, magnesium, and lithium. Metals 14, 400 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao, S. et al. Descriptors for phase prediction of high entropy alloys using interpretable machine learning. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 12, 2807–2819 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dey, D. et al. Improved machine learning framework for prediction of phases and crystal structures of high entropy alloys. J. Alloy. Metall. Syst. 9, 100144 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Poon, S. J.; Qi, J.; Cheung, A. M. Harnessing the complex compositional space of high-entropy alloys. In High-Entropy Materials: Theory, Experiments, and Applications; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2021; pp 63–113.

  32. Pei, Z., Yin, J., Hawk, J. A., Alman, D. E. & Gao, M. C. Machine-learning informed prediction of high-entropy solid solution formation: beyond the Hume-Rothery rules. NPJ Comput. Mater. 6, 50 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Qi, J., Hoyos, D. I. & Poon, S. J. Machine Learning-based classification, interpretation, and prediction of high-entropy-alloy intermetallic phases. High. Entropy Alloy. Mater. 1, 312–326 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wen, C. et al. Machine-learning-assisted compositional design of refractory high-entropy alloys with optimal strength and ductility. Engineering 46, 214–223 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibarra-Hoyos, D., Simmons, Q. & Poon, S. J. Comparing machine learning models for strength and ductility in high-entropy alloys. High. Entropy Alloy. Mater. 3, 101–114 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brown, P. & Zhuang, H. Quantum machine-learning phase prediction of high-entropy alloys. Mater. Today 63, 18–31 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Huang, H.-Y. et al. Quantum advantage in learning from experiments. Science 376, 1182–1186 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Xu, Z., Shang, W., Kim, S., Lee, E. & Luo, T. Quantum annealing-assisted lattice optimization. npj Comput. Mater. 11, 4 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sandt, R. & Spatschek, R. Efficient low temperature Monte Carlo sampling using quantum annealing. Sci. Rep. 13, 6754 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Camino, B. Buckeridge, J. Warburton, P. A. Kendon, V. Woodley, S. M. Quantum computing and materials science: a practical guide to applying quantum annealing to the configurational analysis of materials. J. Appl. Phys. 133, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0151346 (2023).

  41. Guo, Z., Li, R. He, X., Guo, J. & Ju, S. Harnessing quantum power: revolutionizing materials design through advanced quantum computation. Mater. Genome Eng. Adv. 2, https://doi.org/10.1002/mgea.73 (2024).

  42. Graña, I. F.; Varsamopoulos, S.; Ando, T.; Maeshima, H.; Matsuzawa, N. N. Materials Discovery With Quantum-Enhanced Machine Learning Algorithms. 2025. 2503.09517.

  43. Yuan, X.-J. et al. Quantum support vector machines for aerodynamic classification. Intell. Comput. 2, https://doi.org/10.34133/icomputing.0057 (2023).

  44. Camino, B. et al. Exploring the thermodynamics of disordered materials with quantum computing. Sci. Adv. 11, 7156 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Willsch, D., Willsch, M., De Raedt, H. & Michielsen, K. Support vector machines on the D-wave quantum annealer. Comput. Phys. Commun. 248, 107006 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dalal, A., Bagherimehrab, M. & Sanders, B. C. Quantum-Assisted Support Vector Regression. Quantum Inf. Process. 24, 82 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, Z. et al. Is quantum optimization ready? An effort towards neural network compression using adiabatic quantum computing. Future Gener. Computer Syst. 174, 107908 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sur, D. et al. Investigating the synergistic benefits of Al on Cr(III) in the passive films of FeCoNi-Cr-Al CCAs in sulfuric acid. Electrochim. Acta 513, 145523 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Connors, P. F., Sur, D., Han, J. & Scully, J. R. Delineating stainless behavior of austenitic compositionally complex alloys through CALPHAD-informed alloy design. Materialia 43, 102495 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Inman, S. B., Sur, D., Han, J., Ogle, K. & Scully, J. R. Corrosion behavior of a compositionally complex alloy utilizing simultaneous Al, Cr, and Ti passivation. Corros. Sci. 217, 111138 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Inman, S. B. et al. Effect of Ti on the corrosion resistance of Al-Cr-Fe-Mn-Mo-Ni single and multi-phase CCAs. Corros. Sci. 236, 112262 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wang, J. et al. Cooperative of Ti and Cr elements on passivation enhancement of FeCoCrNiTix high-entropy alloys. Corros. Sci. 252, 112937 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Torbati-Sarraf, H., Shabani, M., Jablonski, P. D., Pataky, G. J. & Poursaee, A. The influence of incorporation of Mn on the pitting corrosion performance of crfeconi high entropy alloy at different temperatures. Mater. Des. 184, 108170 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yamanaka, K. et al. Corrosion mechanism of an equimolar AlCoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy additively manufactured by electron beam melting. npj Mater. Degrad. 4, 24 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Godlewska, E. M. et al. Corrosion of Al(Co)CrFeNi High-Entropy Alloys. Front. Mater. 2020, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.566336.

  56. Neven, H.; Denchev, V. S.; Rose, G.; Macready, W. G. Training a binary classifier with the quantum adiabatic algorithm. 2008.

  57. Salloum, H., Salloum, A., Mazzara, M. & Zykov, S. Quantum annealing in machine learning: QBoost on D-Wave quantum annealer. Procedia Comput. Sci. 246, 3285–3293 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Mott, A., Job, J., Vlimant, J.-R., Lidar, D. & Spiropulu, M. Solving a Higgs optimization problem with quantum annealing for machine learning. Nature 550, 375–379 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hoyos, D. I., Chern, G.-W., Klich, I., Poon, J. Quantum-Annealing Enhanced Machine Learning for Interpretable Phase Classification of High-Entropy Alloys.

  60. Nau, M. A., Nutricati, L. A., Camino, B., Warburton, P. A. & Maier, A. K. Quantum annealing feature selection on light-weight medical image datasets. Sci. Rep. 15, 28937 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Liu, J. et al. Effect of Al addition on microstructures and mechanical properties of AlxCrFeNi2.5Mo high entropy alloys. MRS Commun. 13, 425–430 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ye, Y. F., Liu, C. T. & Yang, Y. A geometric model for intrinsic residual strain and phase stability in high entropy alloys. Acta Mater. 94, 152–161 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Toda-Caraballo, I. A general formulation for solid solution hardening effect in multicomponent alloys. Scr. Mater. 127, 113–117 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Reuss, A. Berechnung Der Fließgrenze von Mischkristallen Auf Grund Der Plastizitätsbedingung Für Einkristalle. ZAMM - J. Appl. Math. Mech. / Z. f.ür. Angew. Mathematik und Mech. 9, 49–58 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hill, R. The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate. Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. A 65, 349–354 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Keskar, N. S.; Mudigere, D.; Nocedal, J.; Smelyanskiy, M.; Tang, P. T. P. On Large-batch Training For Deep Learning: Generalization Gap And Sharp Minima. In (ICLR, 2017).

  67. Arlot, S.; Celisse, A. A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Stat. Surv. 2010, 4. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS054.

  68. Christen, P., Hand, D. J. & Kirielle, N. A review of the F-measure: its history, properties, criticism, and alternatives. ACM Comput. Surv. 56, 1–24 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Chicco, D., Warrens, M. J. & Jurman, G. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 7, e623 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ober, J. A. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2018; 2018. https://doi.org/10.3133/70194932.

  71. Fu, X., Schuh, C. A. & Olivetti, E. A. Materials selection considerations for high entropy alloys. Scr. Mater. 138, 145–150 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Santos, J. C. P. et al. Experimental investigation of phase equilibria at 1200°C in the Al-Nb-V system. J. Phase Equilibria Diffus. 41, 172–180 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Klimenko, D. N., Stepanov, N. D. & Zherebtsov, S. V. Prediction of the strength of high entropy alloys of the Al-Cr-Nb-Ti-V-Zr system by the solid-solution hardening model. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1014, 012017 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Dong, J. & Zhong, J. Recent advances in symbolic regression. ACM Comput. Surv. 57, 1–37 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Chancellor, N. Fluctuation-guided search in quantum annealing. Phys. Rev. A 102, 062606 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ohzeki, M., Okada, S., Terabe, M. & Taguchi, S. Optimization of neural networks via finite-value quantum fluctuations. Sci. Rep. 8, 9950 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Baldassi, C. & Zecchina, R. Efficiency of quantum vs. classical annealing in nonconvex learning problems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 1457–1462 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Li, H.; Xu, Z.; Taylor, G.; Studer, C.; Goldstein, T. Visualizing the loss landscape of neural nets. (NIPS, 2018).

  79. Sankar, A. R.; Khasbage, Y.; Vigneswaran, R.; Balasubramanian, V. N. A Deeper Look at the Hessian Eigenspectrum of Deep Neural Networks and Its Applications to Regularization; 2021. www.aaai.org.

  80. Hochreiter, S. & Schmidhuber, J. Flat minima. Neural Comput 9, 1–42 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Renner, M., Heubner, U., Rockel, M. B. & Wallis, E. Temperature as a pitting and crevice corrosion criterion in the FeCl 3 test. Mater. Corros. 37, 183–190 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Hassel, A. W. & Lohrengel, M. M. The scanning droplet cell and its application to structured nanometer oxide films on aluminium. Electrochim. Acta 42, 3327–3333 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Sur, D. et al. Revisiting the influence of Sn in Cu-Al alloys: a third element effect enabling stainless steel type corrosion behavior. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ae0eb6.

  84. Sur, D.; Anderson, K. L.; Han, J.; Scully, J. R. Passivity and pitting of single-phase feconi-Cr-Al complex concentrated alloys: An Al-Cr third element effect in sulfuric acid containing chloride. 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5375983.

  85. Gorsse, S., Nguyen, M. H., Senkov, O. N. & Miracle, D. B. Database on the mechanical properties of high entropy alloys and complex concentrated alloys. Data Brief. 21, 2664–2678 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Borg, C. K. H. et al. Expanded dataset of mechanical properties and observed phases of multi-principal element alloys. Sci. Data 7, 430 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Couzinié, J.-P., Senkov, O. N., Miracle, D. B. & Dirras, G. Comprehensive data compilation on the mechanical properties of refractory high-entropy alloys. Data Brief. 21, 1622–1641 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  88. D-Wave Systems Inc. Dwave-Neal: Simulated Annealing Sampler for D-Wave’s Ocean SDK. November 25, 2022. https://github.com/dwavesystems/dwave-neal (accessed 2025-10-26).

  89. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present work is supported by the Office of Naval Research under Grant No. N00014-23-1-2441. NG and PKL acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMR-2226508 and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Grant numbers: AF AFOSR-FA9550-23-1-0503.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Diego Ibarra-Hoyos, Ho Jang, Israel Klich, Gia-Wei Chern & Joseph Poon

  2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Peter F. Connors, John R. Scully & Joseph Poon

  3. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

    Nathan Grain & Peter K. Liaw

  4. Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany

    Israel Klich

  5. Center for Electrochemical Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    John R. Scully

Authors
  1. Diego Ibarra-Hoyos
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter F. Connors
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ho Jang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nathan Grain
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Israel Klich
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gia-Wei Chern
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Peter K. Liaw
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. John R. Scully
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Joseph Poon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: D.I.H., I.K., G.-W.C., and J.P. Methodology: D.I.H. Software & Computational Implementation: D.I.H. and H.J. Investigation (Mechanical & Microstructural Experiments): N.G. and D.I.H. Investigation (Corrosion Testing & Electrochemistry): P.F.C. Writing – Original Draft: D.I.H. Writing – Review & Editing: D.I.H.,J.P., P.K.L., J.R.S., P.F.C., G.-W.C., and I.K. Supervision: I.K., G.-W.C., P.K.L., J.R.S., and J.P. Funding Acquisition: P.K.L., J.R.S., and J.P.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Diego Ibarra-Hoyos or Joseph Poon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information. (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibarra-Hoyos, D., Connors, P.F., Jang, H. et al. Quantum-annealed machine learning discovers ductile, high strength and corrosion-resistant high-entropy alloy. npj Comput Mater (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-026-02032-x

Download citation

  • Received: 01 November 2025

  • Accepted: 23 February 2026

  • Published: 06 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-026-02032-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Computational Materials (npj Comput Mater)

ISSN 2057-3960 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing