Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Genomic Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj genomic medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
Population-scale genomic screening reveals high frequency of actionable secondary findings in Chinese newborns
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 02 April 2026

Population-scale genomic screening reveals high frequency of actionable secondary findings in Chinese newborns

  • Yushan Huang1,2,
  • Ya Gao2,3,
  • Zonghao Duan1,4,
  • Xiao Jia5,
  • Yue Sun6,
  • Chunhua Liu7,
  • Hui Huang8,
  • Junnian Liu9,
  • Silin Pan6,
  • Xin Jin2,3 &
  • …
  • Mingyan Fang2,3 

npj Genomic Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Diseases
  • Genetics
  • Medical research

Abstract

Secondary findings (SFs) from genome sequencing have significant implications for disease prevention and early intervention, yet their population-specific spectrum remains poorly characterized in non-European cohorts. We performed whole-genome sequencing of 6685 Chinese newborns and evaluated pathogenic variants in 84 genes from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) SF v3.3 list according to ACMG/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) classification guidelines, and cross-referenced against ClinVar. We identified 306 unique actionable variants, comprising 172 known pathogenic variants (KP) and 134 expected pathogenic variants (EP). When heterozygous carriers of autosomal recessive (AR) variants were included, 9.12% (610/6685) of newborns carried at least one pathogenic variant. Under ACMG SF criteria, clinically actionable variants were identified in 5.06% (338/6685) of newborns, predominantly affecting cardiovascular disease genes (3.49%) and cancer predisposition genes (1.26%), most commonly involving LDLR, TTN, and BRCA2. Importantly, 28 variants across 12 genes showed significant allele frequency divergence between Chinese and European ancestries, highlighting ancestry-specific genetic architecture. Our findings support the inclusion of high-penetrance genes prevalent in East Asian populations in population-tailored genomic screening panels, providing essential reference data for the equitable implementation of precision newborn genomics in underrepresented populations.

Data availability

The data supporting the finding of this study, including the allele frequency for all 399,037 genetic variants across the 84 ACMG-recommended genes, have been deposited in the Genome Variation Map (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gvm/) at the National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation/Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, under the accession number that can be publicly accessible at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gvm/getProjectDetail?project=GVM001119. The release of the data was approved by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Project ID: PRJCA043552). To prevent the disclosure of individuals’ genetic identity, the raw sequencing data and information of the research participants are not publicly available. Further analysis of sequencing data will be made available for collaborating researchers upon request, dependent of the HGRAC’s approval.

References

  1. Saeidian, A. H. et al. Secondary ACMG and non-ACMG genetic findings in a multiethnic cohort of 16,713 pediatric participants. Genet. Med. 26, 101225 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Green, R. C. et al. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet. Med. 15, 565–574 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miller, D. T. et al. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2021 update: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet. Med. 23, 1391–1398 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kalia, S. S. et al. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 19, 249–255 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miller, D. T. et al. ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet. Med. 23, 1381–1390 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, D. T. et al. ACMG SF v3.2 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet. Med. 25, 100866 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Amendola, L. M. et al. Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification. Genome Res. 25, 305–315 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jang, M. A., Lee, S. H., Kim, N. & Ki, C. S. Frequency and spectrum of actionable pathogenic secondary findings in 196 Korean exomes. Genet. Med. 17, 1007–1011 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yamaguchi-Kabata, Y. et al. Evaluation of reported pathogenic variants and their frequencies in a Japanese population based on a whole-genome reference panel of 2049 individuals. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 213–230 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chetruengchai, W. & Shotelersuk, V. Actionable secondary findings in the 73 ACMG-recommended genes in 1559 Thai exomes. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 137–142 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hsu, J. S. et al. Complete genomic profiles of 1496 Taiwanese reveal curated medical insights. J. Adv. Res. 66, 197–207 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tang, C. S. et al. Actionable secondary findings from whole-genome sequencing of 954 East Asians. Hum. Genet. 137, 31–37 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, K. et al. ACMG SF v3.3 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet. Med. 27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2025.101454 (2025).

  14. Ovchinnikova, E. V., Garbuz, M. M., Ovchinnikova, A. A. & Kumeiko, V. V. Epidemiology of Wilson’s disease and pathogenic variants of the ATP7B gene leading to diversified protein disfunctions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042402 (2024).

  15. Appadurai, V. et al. Apparent underdiagnosis of Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis revealed by analysis of ~60,000 human exomes. Mol. Genet. Metab. 116, 298–304 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Santos, R. D. Advancing prediction of pathogenicity of familial hypercholesterolemia LDL receptor commonest variants with machine learning models. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 6, 828–830 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jammal Addin, M. B., Young, D., McCarrison, S. & Hunter, L. Dilated cardiomyopathy in a national paediatric population. Eur. J. Pediatr. 178, 1229–1235 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts, A. M. et al. Integrated allelic, transcriptional, and phenomic dissection of the cardiac effects of titin truncations in health and disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 270ra276 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jayson, G. C., Kohn, E. C., Kitchener, H. C. & Ledermann, J. A. Ovarian cancer. Lancet 384, 1376–1388 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Loibl, S., Poortmans, P., Morrow, M., Denkert, C. & Curigliano, G. Breast cancer. Lancet 397, 1750–1769 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pietrangelo, A. Hereditary hemochromatosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Gastroenterology 139, 393–408.e392 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Burke, W. et al. Hereditary hemochromatosisgene discovery and its implications for population-based screening. JAMA 280, 172–178 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Allen, K. J. et al. HFE Cys282Tyr homozygotes with serum ferritin concentrations below 1000 microg/L are at low risk of hemochromatosis. Hepatology 52, 925–933 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cong, P. K. et al. Identification of clinically actionable secondary genetic variants from whole-genome sequencing in a large-scale Chinese population. Clin. Transl. Med. 12, https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.866 (2022).

  25. Lerner-Ellis, J. P. et al. Identification of the gene responsible for methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria, cblC type. Nat. Genet. 38, 93–100 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, C. et al. Mutation spectrum of MMACHC in Chinese pediatric patients with cobalamin C disease: a case series and literature review. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 62, 103713 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huang, Y. et al. Landscape of secondary findings in Chinese population: a practice of ACMG SF v3.0 list. J. Pers. Med. 12, https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091503 (2022).

  28. Cassa, C. A., Tong, M. Y. & Jordan, D. M. Large numbers of genetic variants considered to be pathogenic are common in asymptomatic individuals. Hum. Mutat. 34, 1216–1220 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aloraini, T. et al. The rate of secondary genomic findings in the Saudi population. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 188, 83–88 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kuo, C. W. et al. Frequency and spectrum of actionable pathogenic secondary findings in Taiwanese exomes. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med 8, e1455 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xiao, H. et al. Secondary genomic findings in the 2020 China Neonatal Genomes Project participants. World J. Pediatr. 18, 687–694 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Natarajan, P. et al. Aggregate penetrance of genomic variants for actionable disorders in European and African Americans. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 364ra151 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dewey, F. E. et al. Distribution and clinical impact of functional variants in 50,726 whole-exome sequences from the DiscovEHR study. Science 354, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6814 (2016).

  34. Khera, A. V. et al. Diagnostic yield and clinical utility of sequencing familial hypercholesterolemia genes in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 67, 2578–2589 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nordestgaard, B. G. et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur. Heart J. 34, 3478–3490 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Myśliwiec, M. et al. 2024 Polish recommendations for the management of familial hypercholesterolemia in children and adolescents. Arch. Med. Sci. 20, 1741–1753 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bogsrud, M. P. et al. Treatment goal attainment in children with familial hypercholesterolemia: a cohort study of 302 children in Norway. J. Clin. Lipido. 12, 375–382 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Luirink, I. K. et al. 20-year follow-up of statins in children with familial hypercholesterolemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 1547–1556 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Green, R. C. et al. Actionability of unanticipated monogenic disease risks in newborn genomic screening: findings from the BabySeq Project. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 110, 1034–1045 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wade, C. H., Wilfond, B. S. & McBride, C. M. Effects of genetic risk information on children’s psychosocial wellbeing: a systematic review of the literature. Genet. Med. 12, 317–326 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Botkin, J. R. et al. Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 97, 6–21 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huang, C. et al. An integrated Asian human SNV and indel benchmark established using multiple sequencing methods. Sci. Rep. 10, 9821 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Li, Z. et al. An efficient large-scale whole-genome sequencing analyses practice with an average daily analysis of 100Tbp: ZBOLT. Clin. Transl. Discov. 3, e252 (2023).

  44. Van der Auwera, G. A. et al. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 43, 11.10.1–11.10.33 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  46. McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giab008 (2021).

  48. Li, H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 2987–2993 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, F. et al. Ancestry-agnostic estimation of DNA sample contamination from sequence reads. Genome Res. 30, 185–194 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Manichaikul, A. et al. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 26, 2867–2873 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e164 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kumar, P., Henikoff, S. & Ng, P. C. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1073–1081 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Adzhubei, I. A. et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 7, 248–249 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Adzhubei, I., Jordan, D. M. & Sunyaev, S. R. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 76, 7–20 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Schwarz, J. M., Rodelsperger, C., Schuelke, M. & Seelow, D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat. Methods 7, 575–576 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Landrum, M. J. et al. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D980–D985 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Karczewski, K. J. et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 581, 434–443 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  59. McLaren, W. et al. The ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 122 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Gudmundsson, S. et al. Addendum: the mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 597, E3–E4 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are especially grateful to the participation of the volunteers and their families. We sincerely thank Yuhua Ye for his valuable assistance in the review and interpretation of genetic variants. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (2022YFC2703102), and the China-Serbia Science and Technology Cooperation Committee Exchange Program, Sixth Session (Project 6-3 to M. F.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Yushan Huang & Zonghao Duan

  2. BGI Research, Shenzhen, 518083, China

    Yushan Huang, Ya Gao, Xin Jin & Mingyan Fang

  3. State Key Laboratory of Genome and Multi-omics Technologies, BGI Research, Shenzhen, 518083, China

    Ya Gao, Xin Jin & Mingyan Fang

  4. BGI Research, Wuhan, 430074, China

    Zonghao Duan

  5. Huangdao Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Qingdao, Qingdao, 266400, China

    Xiao Jia

  6. Qingdao Women and Children’s Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266034, China

    Yue Sun & Silin Pan

  7. Huangdao Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning Service Center of Qingdao, Qingdao, 266000, China

    Chunhua Liu

  8. BGI Genomics, Shenzhen, 518083, China

    Hui Huang

  9. BGI Research, Qingdao, 266555, China

    Junnian Liu

Authors
  1. Yushan Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ya Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zonghao Duan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiao Jia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yue Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chunhua Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hui Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Junnian Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Silin Pan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xin Jin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Mingyan Fang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.F. and X.J. conceived and designed the study. Y.H. performed data analysis, quality control, variant annotation and data interpretation. Y.G., Z.D., X.J., Y.S., and C.L. were responsible for participants recruitment and the collection of samples and associated information. H.H., J.L., S.P., and X.J. contributed to data generation. M.F. and Y.H. drafted the manuscript. M.F., Y.H., and X.J. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingyan Fang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Authors Y.H., Y.G., Z.D., H.H., J.L., X.J., and M.F. were employed by Beijing Genomics Institution (BGI) in Shenzhen. The other authors do not have a competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary material-20260215 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Gao, Y., Duan, Z. et al. Population-scale genomic screening reveals high frequency of actionable secondary findings in Chinese newborns. npj Genom. Med. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-026-00565-0

Download citation

  • Received: 19 November 2025

  • Accepted: 18 March 2026

  • Published: 02 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-026-00565-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Precision child health

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Content types
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Genomic Medicine (npj Genom. Med.)

ISSN 2056-7944 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing