Table 2 Analysis of prescription.
Treatment arm (Logistic regression model) | Treatment arm (Negative binomial model) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time period | Intervention Freq (%) | Control Freq (%) | Adjusted Odds ratio | 95% CI | Intervention Mean (SD) | Control Mean (SD) | Adjusted Incidence ratio | 95% CI | |
(A) For all children in the intention-to-treat population | |||||||||
Prescription uptake | Aug -Sep | 15,716 (35.3) | 16,001 (35.1) | 1.01 | 0.97–1.05 | 0.55 (0.95) | 0.55 (0.95) | 1.01 | 0.98–1.03 |
Aug | 8330 (18.6) | 8475 (18.5) | 1.01 | 0.96–1.05 | 0.24 (0.56) | 0.24 (0.56) | 1.02 | 0.98–1.05 | |
Sep | 10,972 (24.7) | 11,139 (24.5) | 1.01 | 0.97–1.05 | 0.31 (0.62) | 0.31 (0.62) | 1.01 | 0.98–1.04 | |
Jul –Dec | 1.69 (2.45) | 1.68 (2.45) | 1.00 | 0.98–1.02 | |||||
(B) For children in the read receipt (RR) population | |||||||||
Prescription uptake | Aug -Sep | 7423 (35.9) | 16,001 (35.1) | 1.02 | 0.98–1.07 | 0.56 (0.95) | 0.55 (0.93) | 1.02 | 0.98–1.05 |
Aug | 3924 (18.9) | 8475 (18.5) | 1.02 | 0.96–1.08 | 0.25 (0.57) | 0.24 (0.55) | 1.03 | 0.98–1.08 | |
Sep | 5209 (25.2) | 11,139 (24.5) | 1.02 | 0.97–1.08 | 0.32 (0.61) | 0.31 (0.61) | 1.01 | 0.97–1.05 | |
Jul –Dec | 1.72 (2.49) | 1.68 (2.43) | 1.01 | 0.99–1.04 | |||||
