Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Quantum Information
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj quantum information
  3. articles
  4. article
Quantum computing for corrosion simulation: workflow and resource analysis
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 January 2026

Quantum computing for corrosion simulation: workflow and resource analysis

  • Nam Nguyen1,
  • Thomas W. Watts2,
  • Benjamin Link1,
  • Kristen S. Williams1,
  • Yuval R. Sanders3,
  • Samuel J. Elman3,
  • Maria Kieferova3,
  • Michael J. Bremner3,4,
  • Kaitlyn J. Morrell5,
  • Justin Elenewski5,
  • Eric B. Isaacs2,
  • Samuel D. Johnson2,
  • Luke Mathieson3,
  • Kevin M. Obenland5,
  • Matthew Otten6,
  • Rashmi Sundareswara2 &
  • …
  • Adam Holmes2 

npj Quantum Information , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1058 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational methods
  • Computer science
  • Quantum information

Abstract

Corrosion is a pervasive issue that impacts the structural integrity and performance of materials across various industries, imposing a significant economic impact globally. In fields like aerospace and defense, developing corrosion-resistant materials is critical, but progress is often hindered by the complexities of material-environment interactions. While computational methods have advanced in designing corrosion inhibitors and corrosion-resistant materials, they fall short in understanding the fundamental corrosion mechanisms due to the highly correlated nature of the systems involved. This paper explores the potential of leveraging quantum computing to accelerate the design of corrosion inhibitors and corrosion-resistant materials, with a particular focus on magnesium and niobium alloys. We investigate the quantum computing resources required for high-fidelity electronic ground-state energy estimation (GSEE), which will be used in our hybrid classical-quantum workflow. Representative computational models for magnesium and niobium alloys show that 2292 to 38598 logical qubits and (1.04 to 1962) × 1013 T-gates are required for simulating the ground-state energy of these systems under the first quantization encoding using plane waves basis.

Similar content being viewed by others

One dimensional wormhole corrosion in metals

Article Open access 22 February 2023

Hunting for quantum-classical crossover in condensed matter problems

Article Open access 29 April 2024

Common workflows for computing material properties using different quantum engines

Article Open access 19 August 2021

Data availability

The code for our implementation is available in Ref.~\cite{Obenland2024pyliqtr}.

References

  1. Roberge, P. Corrosion Basics: An Introduction, 3rd Edition (NACE, 2018).

  2. Koch, G. et al. International measures of prevention, application, and economics of corrosion technologies study. NACE International (2016). http://impact.nace.org/documents/Nace-International-Report.pdf.

  3. Williams, K. S. & Thompson, R. J. Galvanic Corrosion Risk Mapping. Corrosion 75, 474–483 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barca, G. M. J. et al. Recent developments in the general atomic and molecular electronic structure system. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 154102 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kothe, D., Lee, S. & Qualters, I. Exascale computing in the United States. Comput. Sci. Eng. 21, 17–29 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Özkan, C. et al. Laying the experimental foundation for corrosion inhibitor discovery through machine learning. npj Mater. Degrad. 8, 21 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rodríguez, J. A., Cruz-Borbolla, J., Arizpe-Carreón, P. A. & Gutiérrez, E. Mathematical models generated for the prediction of corrosion inhibition using different theoretical chemistry simulations. Materials 13, 5656 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ke, H. & Taylor, C. D. Density Functional Theory: An Essential Partner in the Integrated Computational Materials Engineering Approach to Corrosion. Corrosion 75, 708–726 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, C. & Kelly, R. G. The use of finite element methods (fem) in the modeling of localized corrosion. Electrochem. Soc. Interface 23, 47 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor, C. D., Lu, P., Saal, J., Frankel, G. & Scully, J. Integrated computational materials engineering of corrosion resistant alloys. npj Mater. Degrad. 2, 6 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, K. D., Jaworowski, M., Ranjan, R. & Zafiris, G. S. Development of an icme approach for aluminum alloy corrosion. In Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME 2015), 173–180 (Springer, 2016).

  12. Liu, C. & Kelly, R. G. A Review of the Application of Finite Element Method (FEM) to Localized Corrosion Modeling. Corrosion 75, 1285–1299 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sherrill, C. D. & Schaefer, H. F. The configuration interaction method: Advances in highly correlated approaches. Adv. Quantum Chem. 34, 143–269 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guo, S., Watson, M. A., Hu, W., Sun, Q. & Chan, G. K.-L. N-electron valence state perturbation theory based on a density matrix renormalization group reference function, with applications to the chromium dimer and a trimer model of poly(p-phenylenevinylene). J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12 4, 1583–91 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bauer, B., Bravyi, S., Motta, M. & Chan, G. K.-L. Quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry and quantum materials science. Chem. Rev. 120, 12685–12717 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reiher, M., Wiebe, N., Svore, K. M., Wecker, D. & Troyer, M. Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 7555–7560 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Babbush, R. et al. Encoding electronic spectra in quantum circuits with linear t complexity. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041015 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Berry, D. W., Motlagh, D., Pantaleoni, G. & Wiebe, N. Doubling efficiency of Hamiltonian simulation via generalized quantum signal processing (2024). arxiv.org/abs/2401.10321. 2401.10321.

  19. McClean, J. R. et al. Openfermion: the electronic structure package for quantum computers. Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 034014 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson, J. A. Magnesium rich primer for chrome free protection of aluminum alloys. In Proceedings of the Tri-Service Corrosion Conference, vol. 3 (2007).

  21. Zhao, J.-C. & Westbrook, J. H. Ultrahigh-temperature materials for jet engines. MRS Bull. 28, 622–630 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prasad, V. V. S., Baligidad, R. G. & Gokhale, A. A. Niobium and other high temperature refractory metals for aerospace applications. In Aerospace Materials and Material Technologies (2017).

  23. Obenland, K. et al. pyliqtr: Release 1.2.0 (2024). https://github.com/isi-usc-edu/pyLIQTR.

  24. Williams, K. S., Rodriguez-Santiago, V. & Andzelm, J. W. Modeling reaction pathways for hydrogen evolution and water dissociation on magnesium. Electrochim. Acta 210, 261–270 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li, Z. et al. Roaming in highly excited states: The central atom elimination of triatomic molecule decomposition. Science 383, 746–750 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Widom, M. Frequency estimate for multicomponent crystalline compounds. J. Stat. Phys. 167, 726–734 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Samin, A. J., Andersson, D. A., Holby, E. F. & Uberuaga, B. P. Ab initio based examination of the kinetics and thermodynamics of oxygen in Fe-Cr alloys. Phys. Rev. B 99, 174202 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Müller, Y. L. & Natarajan, A. R. Constructing multicomponent cluster expansions with machine-learning and chemical embedding (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06071. 2409.06071

  30. Nakata, A. et al. Large scale and linear scaling DFT with the CONQUEST code. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 164112 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walle, A. & Ceder, G. Automating first-principles phase diagram calculations. J. Phase Equilibria 23, 348–359 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gao, M. C., Niu, C., Jiang, C. & Irving, D. L. Applications of Special Quasi-random Structures to High-Entropy Alloys, 333–368 (Springer International Publishing, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27013-5_10.

  33. Perkins, R. A. & Meier, G. H. The oxidation behavior and protection of niobium. J. Miner., Met. Mater. Soc. 42, 17–21 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Loaiza, I., Khah, A. M., Wiebe, N. & Izmaylov, A. F. Reducing molecular electronic hamiltonian simulation cost for linear combination of unitaries approaches. Quantum Sci. Technol. 8, 035019 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Clinton, L. et al. Towards near-term quantum simulation of materials. Nat. Commun. 15, 211 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, X. -l et al. Effect of casting methods on microstructure and mechanical properties of ZM5 space flight magnesium alloy. China Foundry 15, 418–421 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gujarati, T. P. et al. Quantum computation of reactions on surfaces using local embedding. npj Quantum Inf. 9, 88 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Polmear, I., StJohn, D., Nie, J.-F. & Qian, M. 6 - Magnesium alloys. In Polmear, I., StJohn, D., Nie, J.-F. & Qian, M. (eds.) Light Alloys (Fifth Edition), 287–367 (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017).

  39. Bai, J. et al. Applications of Magnesium alloys for aerospace: A Review. J. Magnes. Alloy. 11, 3609 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Golroudbary, S. R., Makarava, I., Repo, E., Kraslawski, A. & Luukka, P. Magnesium life cycle in automotive industry. Procedia CIRP 105, 589–594 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Würger, T., Feiler, C., Vonbun-Feldbauer, G. B., Zheludkevich, M. L. & Meißner, R. H. A first-principles analysis of the charge transfer in magnesium corrosion. Sci. Rep. 10, 15006 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fogarty, R. M. & Horsfield, A. P. Molecular dynamics study of structure and reactions at the hydroxylated Mg(0001)/bulk water interface. J. Chem. Phys. 157, 154705 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schrödinger, L.L.C. Schrödinger release 2024-2: Materials science suite (2024). https://www.schrodinger.com/materials-science.

  45. Jones, R. O. Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 897–923 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Su, Y., Berry, D. W., Wiebe, N., Rubin, N. & Babbush, R. Fault-tolerant quantum simulations of chemistry in first quantization. PRX Quantum 2, 040332 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Martin, R. M. Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods (Cambridge University Press, 2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805769.

  48. Babbush, R. et al. Low-depth quantum simulation of materials. Phys. Rev. X 8, 011044 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Goedecker, S., Teter, M. & Hutter, J. Separable dual-space gaussian pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 54, 1703–1710 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hartwigsen, C., Goedecker, S. & Hutter, J. Relativistic separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials from H to rn. Phys. Rev. B 58, 3641–3662 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Harrigan, M. P. et al. Expressing and analyzing quantum algorithms with qualtran (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04643. 2409.04643.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency under Contract No. HR001122C0074. J.E., K.M., and K.O. also specifically acknowledge support by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency under Air Force Contract No. FA8702-15-D-0001. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. M.J.B. acknowledges the support of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology (CQC2T), project number CE17010001. N.N. and K.S.W. acknowledge Boeing Technical Fellow David Heck for numerous helpful discussions on magnesium alloy composition, properties, and aerospace usage. B.L. and K.S.W. acknowledge Christopher Taylor from DNV and Ohio State University for providing insights on first principles modeling of HER and methods to construct realistic solvation models. B.L. thanks Casey Brock from Schr\"{o}dinger, LLC for technical assistance with constructing the magnesium supercells. N.N., K.S.W., and B.L. would like to thank the Boeing DC\&N organization, Jay Lowell, and Marna Kagele for creating an environment that made this research possible. The authors thank John Carpenter for his support in creating high-resolution figures for this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Applied Mathematics, Boeing Research & Technology, Huntsville, USA

    Nam Nguyen, Benjamin Link & Kristen S. Williams

  2. HRL Laboratories LLC, Malibu, CA, USA

    Thomas W. Watts, Eric B. Isaacs, Samuel D. Johnson, Rashmi Sundareswara & Adam Holmes

  3. Centre for Quantum Software and Information, School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering & Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia

    Yuval R. Sanders, Samuel J. Elman, Maria Kieferova, Michael J. Bremner & Luke Mathieson

  4. Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia

    Michael J. Bremner

  5. MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA, USA

    Kaitlyn J. Morrell, Justin Elenewski & Kevin M. Obenland

  6. Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA

    Matthew Otten

Authors
  1. Nam Nguyen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas W. Watts
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benjamin Link
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kristen S. Williams
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuval R. Sanders
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Samuel J. Elman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Maria Kieferova
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Michael J. Bremner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kaitlyn J. Morrell
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Justin Elenewski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Eric B. Isaacs
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Samuel D. Johnson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Luke Mathieson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Kevin M. Obenland
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Matthew Otten
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Rashmi Sundareswara
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Adam Holmes
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.N., S.J.E., and K.M. wrote the main manuscript. All authors were involved in completing the analysis, conducting the research, and all authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nam Nguyen, Samuel J. Elman, Matthew Otten or Adam Holmes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, N., Watts, T.W., Link, B. et al. Quantum computing for corrosion simulation: workflow and resource analysis. npj Quantum Inf (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-025-01171-1

Download citation

  • Received: 02 May 2025

  • Accepted: 15 December 2025

  • Published: 23 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-025-01171-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Content types
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Quantum Information (npj Quantum Inf)

ISSN 2056-6387 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics