Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Systems Biology and Applications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj systems biology and applications
  3. articles
  4. article
Association of copy number alterations with the immune transcriptomic landscape in cancer
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 January 2026

Association of copy number alterations with the immune transcriptomic landscape in cancer

  • Stefan Loipfinger1,
  • Arkajyoti Bhattacharya1,
  • Carlos G. Urzúa-Traslaviña1,
  • Marcel A. T. M. van Vugt1,
  • Marco de Bruyn2 &
  • …
  • Rudolf S. N. Fehrmann1 

npj Systems Biology and Applications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1257 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Immunology
  • Oncology

Abstract

Tumors with high copy number alteration (CNA) burden often respond poorly to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. However, how CNAs affect the anti-cancer immune response remains unclear. To address this, we set out to capture the transcriptional effects of CNAs and define a comprehensive landscape of immune-related transcriptional patterns. Hereto, we applied consensus independent component analysis to 294,159 bulk transcriptomic profiles. We demonstrated the predictive power of these patterns for immunotherapy response, their reproducibility across platforms, and their applicability to bulk, single-cell, and spatial transcriptomic data. Our analysis identified both novel inverse and positive associations between high CNA burden and immune-related transcriptional patterns across various cancer types. For example, higher CNA burden correlated with increased immunosuppression, including IL-17-producing cells and regulatory T cells. This resource, along with the classification of these transcriptional patterns as immune-suppressive and immune-stimulatory, may provide insights to improve immunotherapy efficacy in tumors with high CNA burden.

Similar content being viewed by others

Identification of immune-related subtypes of colorectal cancer to improve antitumor immunotherapy

Article Open access 30 September 2021

Optimizing cancer immunotherapy response prediction by tumor aneuploidy score and fraction of copy number alterations

Article Open access 03 June 2023

The impact of mutational clonality in predicting the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced urothelial cancer

Article Open access 15 September 2023

Data availability

The CNA-immune associations can be explored at http://cna-immune.opendatainscience.net. All data, results, and codes generated as part of this study are available at https://zenodo.org/records/17715512. Gene expression data were collected from three public data repositories: Gene Expression Omnibus with accession number GPL570 generated with microarray Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), ARCHS4 RNA-seq from human version v1.10 (https://maayanlab.cloud/archs4/download.html), and TCGA RNA-seq data from the Broad GDAC Firehose portal (https://gdac.broadinstitute.org/). ICI response datasets were obtained from the referenced studies. Single-cell RNA-seq data were obtained from the single-cell tumor immune atlas for precision oncology (https://zenodo.org/records/5205544). Spatial transcriptomic profiles were obtained from the 10x Genomics website (https://www.10xgenomics.com).

References

  1. Chen, D. S. & Mellman, I. Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer–immune set point. Nature 541, 321–330 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haslam, A. & Prasad, V. Estimation of the percentage of US patients with cancer who are eligible for and respond to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy drugs. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e192535 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beroukhim, R. et al. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature 463, 899–905 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, L. et al. Combination of TMB and CNA stratifies prognostic and predictive responses to immunotherapy across metastatic cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 7413–7423 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, M. et al. Cold and heterogeneous T cell repertoire is associated with copy number aberrations and loss of immune genes in small-cell lung cancer. Nat. Commun. 12, 6655 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lu, Z. et al. Tumor copy-number alterations predict response to immune-checkpoint-blockade in gastrointestinal cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer 8, e000374 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davoli, T., Uno, H., Wooten, E. C. & Elledge, S. J. Tumor aneuploidy correlates with markers of immune evasion and with reduced response to immunotherapy. Science 355, eaaf8399 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roh, W. et al. Integrated molecular analysis of tumor biopsies on sequential CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade reveals markers of response and resistance. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaah3560 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rooney, M. S., Shukla, S. A., Wu, C. J., Getz, G. & Hacohen, N. Molecular and genetic properties of tumors associated with local immune cytolytic activity. Cell 160, 48–61 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Safonov, A. et al. Immune gene expression Is associated with genomic aberrations in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 77, 3317–3324 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Balli, D., Rech, A. J., Stanger, B. Z. & Vonderheide, R. H. Immune cytolytic activity stratifies molecular subsets of human pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 3129–3138 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thapa, B. et al. The immune microenvironment, genome-wide copy number aberrations, and survival in mesothelioma. J. Thorac. Oncol. 12, 850–859 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buccitelli, C. et al. Pan-cancer analysis distinguishes transcriptional changes of aneuploidy from proliferation. Genome Res. 27, 501–511 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bhattacharya, A. et al. Transcriptional effects of copy number alterations in a large set of human cancers. Nat. Commun. 11, 715 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barrett, T. et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D991–D995 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lachmann, A. et al. Massive mining of publicly available RNA-seq data from human and mouse. Nat. Commun. 9, 1366 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weinstein, J. N. et al. The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-cancer analysis project. Nat. Genet. 45, 1113–1120 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pusztai, L. et al. Durvalumab with olaparib and paclitaxel for high-risk HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer: results from the adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial. Cancer Cell 39, 989–998 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wolf, D. M. et al. Redefining breast cancer subtypes to guide treatment prioritization and maximize response: predictive biomarkers across 10 cancer therapies. Cancer Cell 40, 609–623 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cho, J.-W. et al. Genome-wide identification of differentially methylated promoters and enhancers associated with response to anti-PD-1 therapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Exp. Mol. Med. 52, 1550–1563 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cho, J. W. et al. Genome-wide methylation patterns predict clinical benefit of immunotherapy in lung cancer. Clin. Epigenetics 12, 119 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Riaz, N. et al. Tumor and microenvironment evolution during immunotherapy with nivolumab. Cell 171, 934–949 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cui, C. et al. Ratio of the interferon-γ signature to the immunosuppression signature predicts anti-PD-1 therapy response in melanoma. NPJ Genom. Med. 6, 7 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gide, T. N. et al. Distinct immune cell populations define response to anti-PD-1 monotherapy and anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 combined therapy. Cancer Cell 35, 238–255 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Van Allen, E. M. et al. Genomic correlates of response to CTLA-4 blockade in metastatic melanoma. Science 350, 207–211 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, D. et al. Integrative molecular and clinical modeling of clinical outcomes to PD1 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Nat. Med. 25, 1916–1927 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, S. T. et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of clinical responses to PD-1 inhibition in metastatic gastric cancer. Nat. Med. 24, 1449–1458 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mariathasan, S. et al. TGFβ attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells. Nature 554, 544–548 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao, J. et al. Immune and genomic correlates of response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in glioblastoma. Nat. Med. 25, 462–469 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Braun, D. A. et al. Interplay of somatic alterations and immune infiltration modulates response to PD-1 blockade in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Med. 26, 909–918 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Borish, L. C. & Steinke, J. W. 2. Cytokines and chemokines. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 111, S460–S475 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ricciotti, E. & FitzGerald, G. A. Prostaglandins and inflammation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 31, 986–1000 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ma, E. H. et al. Serine is an essential metabolite for effector T cell expansion. Cell Metabolism 25, 345–357 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Urzúa-Traslaviña, C. G. et al. Improving gene function predictions using independent transcriptional components. Nat. Commun. 12, 1464 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nieto, P. et al. A single-cell tumor immune atlas for precision oncology. Genome Res. 31, 1913–1926 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kandala, et al. Chronic chromosome instability induced by Plk1 results in immune suppression in breast cancer. Cell Rep. 42, 113266 (2023).

  37. Li, J. et al. Non-cell-autonomous cancer progression from chromosomal instability. Nature 620, 1080–1088 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wertheimer, T. et al. IL-23 stabilizes an effector Treg cell program in the tumor microenvironment. Nat. Immunol. 25, 512–524 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Castle, J. C. et al. Immunomic, genomic and transcriptomic characterization of CT26 colorectal carcinoma. BMC Genomics 15, 190 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Liu, C. et al. Blocking IL-17A enhances tumor response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer 9, e001895 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kridin, K., Abdelghaffar, M., Mruwat, N., Ludwig, R. J. & Thaçi, D. Are interleukin 17 and interleukin 23 inhibitors associated with malignancies?—Insights from an international population-based study. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 38, 315–324 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. de Vries, N. L. et al. γδ T cells are effectors of immunotherapy in cancers with HLA class I defects. Nature 613, 743–750 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lerner, E. C. et al. CD8+ T cells maintain killing of MHC-I-negative tumor cells through the NKG2D–NKG2DL axis. Nat. Cancer 4, 1258–1272 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Beck, J. D. et al. Long-lasting mRNA-encoded interleukin-2 restores CD8+ T cell neoantigen immunity in MHC class I-deficient cancers. Cancer Cell 42, 568–582.e11 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Liberzon, A. et al. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 1, 417–425 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jassal, B. et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D498–D503 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ashburner, M. et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chiappetta, P., Roubaud, M. C. & Torrésani, B. Blind source separation and the analysis of microarray data. J. Comput. Biol. 11, 1090–1109 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Fernández-Delgado, M., Cernadas, E., Barro, S. & Amorim, D. Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems?. J Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 3133–3181 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Webber, W., Moffat, A. & Zobel, J. A similarity measure for indefinite rankings. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 28, 1–38 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Hanarth Fund to R.S.N.F., and by a KWF Kankerbestrijding grant [grant number KWF-14516] awarded to M.A.T.M.v.V. and R.S.N.F.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Stefan Loipfinger, Arkajyoti Bhattacharya, Carlos G. Urzúa-Traslaviña, Marcel A. T. M. van Vugt & Rudolf S. N. Fehrmann

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Marco de Bruyn

Authors
  1. Stefan Loipfinger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arkajyoti Bhattacharya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlos G. Urzúa-Traslaviña
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marcel A. T. M. van Vugt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marco de Bruyn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rudolf S. N. Fehrmann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.S.N.F. conceived and designed this study. S.L., A.B., C.G.U.-T., and R.S.N.F. collected and assembled data and performed data analyses. S.L. and C.G.U.-T. developed the figures used in this study. S.L., A.B., C.G.U.-T., M.A.T.M.v.V., M.d.B., and R.S.N.F. contributed to the data interpretation, writing of the paper, and the final decision to submit the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudolf S. N. Fehrmann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.d.B. received grants from the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF), the European Research Council (ERC), Health Holland (HH), Mendus, BioNovion, Aduro Biotech, Vicinivax, Genmab, and IMMIOS (all paid to the institute); received non-financial support from BioNTech, Surflay Nanotec, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; is a stock option holder in Sairopa; all unrelated to the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary materials

Supplementary data1

Supplementary Data2

Supplementary Data3

Supplementary Data3

Supplementary Data4

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loipfinger, S., Bhattacharya, A., Urzúa-Traslaviña, C.G. et al. Association of copy number alterations with the immune transcriptomic landscape in cancer. npj Syst Biol Appl (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-026-00649-8

Download citation

  • Received: 30 June 2025

  • Accepted: 09 January 2026

  • Published: 17 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-026-00649-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Systems Biology and Applications (npj Syst Biol Appl)

ISSN 2056-7189 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer