Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Systems Biology and Applications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj systems biology and applications
  3. articles
  4. article
Improving severity grading of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in AML via data-driven and model-based deep learning
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 March 2026

Improving severity grading of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in AML via data-driven and model-based deep learning

  • Yu Zhou1 na1,
  • Yuyang Xiao1 na1,
  • Qian Wang2 na1,
  • Chenfeng Mo1,
  • Rui Cao2,
  • Hongli Liu2,
  • Xin Ma2,
  • Li Fu2,
  • Huimin Gao2,
  • Li Xu2,
  • Suoqin Jin1,
  • Fuling Zhou2 &
  • …
  • Xiufen Zou1 

npj Systems Biology and Applications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1158 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Oncology

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) frequently leads to life-threatening complications, yet current assessment standards lack the specificity required for personalized risk prediction. We present MM-AI-AML, a two-stage framework merging mechanistic mathematical modeling (MM) with artificial intelligence (AI) to predict myelosuppression severity using pre-treatment clinical data. Initially, a dynamic model simulating post-chemotherapy kinetics across four blood cell lineages was developed to derive a quantitative severity indicator, providing objective labels for 479 AML patients and 900 virtual cases. Subsequently, a TabNet deep learning classifier was trained on 51 clinical features to predict risk. MM-AI-AML demonstrated robust performance, achieving AUCs of 0.85 and 0.78 in internal and external validation cohorts, respectively, significantly outperforming traditional classifiers. Key predictive features included serum albumin, A/G ratio, and lactate dehydrogenase. High-risk stratification by the model was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital survival. By bridging mechanistic insights with interpretable machine learning, MM-AI-AML enables precise, personalized clinical decision-making for managing chemotherapy-related complications in AML.

Similar content being viewed by others

Unified classification and risk-stratification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Article Open access 08 August 2022

Disulfidptosis-related lncRNA signature to assess the immune microenvironment and drug sensitivity in acute myeloid leukemia

Article Open access 30 December 2024

Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for complications in patients with acute leukemia based on machine learning

Article Open access 19 November 2025

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors with a signed data access agreement. The source code supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the AML-DynamicPredictor repository (https://github.com/oolongice/AML-DynamicPredictor).

Code availability

The source code supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the AML-DynamicPredictor repository, (https://github.com/oolongice/AML-DynamicPredictor).

References

  1. Jan, M. et al. Clonal evolution of preleukemic hematopoietic stem cells precedes human acute myeloid leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 149ra118–149ra118 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Venugopal, K. et al. Dnmt3a harboring leukemia-associated mutations directs sensitivity to DNA damage at replication forks. Clin. Cancer Res. 28, 756–769 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rochet, N. et al. Phase II study evaluating consolidation whole abdominal intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer stage FIGO III-the OVAR-IMRT-02 study. BMC Cancer 11, 1–7 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wessels, H. et al. Pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of pelmeg®, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar in healthy subjects. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 7, e00507 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein, R. S. et al. Patient burden and real-world management of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression: results from an online survey of patients with solid tumors. Adv. Ther. 37, 3606–3618 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Repetto, L. et al. Incidence and clinical impact of chemotherapy induced myelotoxicity in cancer patients: an observational retrospective survey. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 72, 170–179 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dueck, A. C. et al. Validity and reliability of the Us National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). JAMA Oncol. 1, 1051–1059 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thanarajasingam, G., Hubbard, J. M., Sloan, J. A. & Grothey, A. The imperative for a new approach to toxicity analysis in oncology clinical trials. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 107, djv216 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thanarajasingam, G. et al. Longitudinal adverse event assessment in oncology clinical trials: the toxicity over time (toxt) analysis of alliance trials ncctg n9741 and 979254. Lancet Oncol. 17, 663–670 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thanarajasingam, G. et al. Beyond maximum grade: modernising the assessment and reporting of adverse events in haematological malignancies. Lancet Haematol. 5, e563–e598 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harkos, C. et al. Using mathematical modelling and ai to improve delivery and efficacy of therapies in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 25, 324–340 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reynolds, D. A. et al. Gaussian mixture models. In: Li, S. Z. & Jain, A. K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Biometrics. 741–742 (Springer, Boston, MA, 2009).

  13. Hearst, M. A., Dumais, S. T., Osuna, E., Platt, J. & Scholkopf, B. Support vector machines. IEEE Intell. Syst. Appl. 13, 18–28 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. & Williams, R. J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323, 533–536 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cox, D. R. The regression analysis of binary sequences. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 20, 215–232 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, T. Xgboost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System (Cornell University, 2016).

  18. Schauer, R. & Kamerling, J. P. Sialic acids in cancer biology and immunity. ChemBioChem 12, 2246–2264 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Varki, A. Multiple changes in sialic acid biology during human evolution. Glycoconj. J. 26, 231–245 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, Q. et al. Serum sialic acid level as a novel biomarker for disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 28, 1319–1326 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou, X., Sun, X. & Zhao, W. Prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase in hematological malignancies. Medicine 96, e8502 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, D. et al. Procalcitonin as a biomarker for severe sepsis and septic shock patients: a meta-analysis. Crit. Care 19, 1–9 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, K.-W. et al. Coagulation parameters and risk of progressive hemorrhagic injury after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BioMed. Res. Int. 2020, 2020 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ye, X.-L., Zhang, J.-M. & Liu, H.-C. Serum amyloid a as a marker of disease activity and treatment response in acute leukemia. World J. Clin. Cases 4, 47 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ali, R. et al. Glucose metabolism in cancer and ischemia: possible therapeutic consequences of metabolic reprogramming. Curr. Pharm. Des. 22, 5392–5400 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sproston, N. R. & Ashworth, J. J. Role of c-reactive protein at sites of inflammation and infection. Front. Immunol. 9, 754 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Okuno, S. et al. Serum β2-microglobulin level is a significant predictor of mortality in maintenance haemodialysis patients. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 24, 571–577 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, J. et al. Globulin as a predictor for treatment-free survival in chronic myeloid leukemia. J. Cancer 9, 2335–2341 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Azab, B. et al. The prognostic value of the albumin/globulin ratio in cancer patients. Int. J. Surg. 11, 882–886 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li, S. et al. Albumin and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (nlr) predict survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with sbrt. Radiat. Oncol. 13, 1–8 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yang, X.-H. et al. Cholinesterase and mortality risk in acute leukemia patients. Hematology 24, 343–348 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, Z. et al. Complement factor b production in renal tubular cells and its role in sodium transporter expression. Circulation 137, 2423–2442 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Park, J. H. et al. Platelet to lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Res. 51, 227–232 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Batool, R., Butt, M. S., Sultan, M. T., Saeed, F. & Naz, R. Protein–energy malnutrition: a risk factor for various ailments. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 55, 242–253 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gerbing, R. B. et al. Shorter remission telomere length predicts delayed neutrophil recovery after acute myeloid leukemia therapy: a report from the children’s oncology group. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 3766–3772 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Arik, S. Ö & Pfister, T. Tabnet: attentive interpretable tabular learning. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. 35, 6679–6687 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Buhmann, M. D. Radial basis functions. Acta Numer. 9, 1–38 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pezoulas, V. C. et al. Generation of virtual patient data for in-silico cardiomyopathies drug development using tree ensembles: a comparative study. In 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) (eds Akay, M., Weiland, J. & Spandidos, D. A.) 5343–5346 (IEEE, 2020).

  39. Pezoulas, V. C. et al. Medical data quality assessment: on the development of an automated framework for medical data curation. Comput. Biol. Med. 107, 270–283 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pezoulas, V. C. et al. Enhancing medical data quality through data curation: a case study in primary sjögren’s syndrome. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 118, 90–96 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Robnik-Sikonja, M. semiArtificial: Generator of Semi-Artificial Data. R package version 2.4.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semiArtificial (2021).

  42. Teutonico, D. et al. Generating virtual patients by multivariate and discrete re-sampling techniques. Pharm. Res. 32, 3228–3237 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Friberg, L. E., Henningsson, A., Maas, H., Nguyen, L. & Karlsson, M. O. Model of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression with parameter consistency across drugs. J. Clin. Oncol. 20, 4713–4721 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Friberg, L. E. & Karlsson, M. O. Mechanistic models for myelosuppression. Investig. N. Drugs 21, 183–194 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fornari, C. et al. Understanding hematological toxicities using mathematical modeling. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 104, 644–654 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kennedy, J. & Eberhart, R. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN’95—International Conference on Neural Networks, Vol. 4 (eds Palaniswami, M., II, R. J. M., Fukuda, T. & deSilva, C.) 1942–1948 (IEEE, 1995).

  47. Fornari, C., Pin, C., Yates, J. W., Mettetal, J. T. & Collins, T. A. Importance of stability analysis when using nonlinear semimechanistic models to describe drug-induced hematotoxicity. CPT: Pharmacomet. Syst. Pharmacol. 9, 498–508 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Marini, F. & Walczak, B. Particle swarm optimization (pso). a tutorial. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 149, 153–165 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Miller, A. B. et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47, 207–214 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Razali, N. M. et al. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. J. Stat. Model. Anal. 2, 21–33 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  51. McKnight, P. E. & Najab, J. Mann-Whitney U test. In: Weiner, I. B. & Craighead, W. E. (eds) The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2010).

  52. Moon, T. K. The expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 13, 47–60 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Berthold, M. & Diamond, J. Boosting the performance of RBF networks with dynamic decay adjustment. Adv. Neural Inform Proc. Syst. 7, 521–528 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 92374108 to X.Z.), the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12331018 to X.Z. and No. 82370176 to F.Z.), and the Major Research Plan of Hubei Province of China(Grant No. CZKYXM2023036JZ to F.Z.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Yu Zhou, Yuyang Xiao, Qian Wang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

    Yu Zhou, Yuyang Xiao, Chenfeng Mo, Suoqin Jin & Xiufen Zou

  2. Department of Hematology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

    Qian Wang, Rui Cao, Hongli Liu, Xin Ma, Li Fu, Huimin Gao, Li Xu & Fuling Zhou

Authors
  1. Yu Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuyang Xiao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qian Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chenfeng Mo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rui Cao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hongli Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xin Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Li Fu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Huimin Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Li Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Suoqin Jin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Fuling Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Xiufen Zou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

F.Z. and X.Z. conceived and designed the study. Q.W., R.C., H.L., X.M., L.F., H.G., and L.X. acquired the data. Y.X. and Y.Z. analyzed the data. Y.X., C.M., and S.J. developed and trained the model. Y.X., Q.W., and Y.Z. verified the underlying raw data. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Y.X. and Q.W., and revised by Y.Z., F.Z. and X.Z. All authors contributed to manuscript preparation. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fuling Zhou or Xiufen Zou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Xiao, Y., Wang, Q. et al. Improving severity grading of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in AML via data-driven and model-based deep learning. npj Syst Biol Appl (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-026-00687-2

Download citation

  • Received: 13 November 2025

  • Accepted: 07 March 2026

  • Published: 24 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-026-00687-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Fostering Cross-Disciplinary Modeling in Biology and Medicine

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Systems Biology and Applications (npj Syst Biol Appl)

ISSN 2056-7189 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer