Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Systems Biology and Applications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj systems biology and applications
  3. articles
  4. article
Inferring relationships among major psychiatric disorders in a resting-state functional connectivity-informed embedding space
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 April 2026

Inferring relationships among major psychiatric disorders in a resting-state functional connectivity-informed embedding space

  • Wenjun Bai1,
  • Okito Yamashita1,2,
  • Yuki Sakai3 &
  • …
  • Junichiro Yoshimoto1,4,5 

npj Systems Biology and Applications (2026) Cite this article

  • 1668 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Neuroscience
  • Systems biology

Abstract

Major neuropsychiatric disorders such as major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia (SCZ), as well as the neurodevelopmental disorder autism spectrum disorder (ASD), are traditionally treated as distinct clinical entities. However, genome-wide association studies indicate shared genetic risks, motivating a transdiagnostic view. Resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) is a promising biomarker for these disorders, but its high dimensionality complicates inference of inter-disorder relationships in the native feature space. Here, we develop an rsFC-based embedding-relation workflow that quantifies disorder relationships in a connectivity-informed, low-dimensional embedding space. Central to the workflow is a mutual information-based embedding framework that evaluates candidate embedding approaches and selects an optimal strategy. Using synthetic connectivity data, the framework indicates that rsFC embeddings are best represented in a spherical space under a moderate level of supervision. Building on this insight, we applied the workflow to curated, multi-disorder rsFC datasets to derive shared embedding spaces encompassing the connectivity features of ASD, MDD, and SCZ. In these spaces, we consistently observed a robust three-way relationship: a pronounced neurobiological dissimilarity between ASD and MDD, contrasted with greater similarity between SCZ and both disorders. These findings support a dimensional, transdiagnostic perspective on neuropsychiatric disorders and offer new insights into their shared and distinct neural underpinnings.

Similar content being viewed by others

Evidence of shared and distinct functional and structural brain signatures in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder

Article Open access 14 September 2021

Generalizable and transportable resting-state neural signatures characterized by functional networks, neurotransmitters, and clinical symptoms in autism

Article Open access 28 September 2024

Brain circuits that regulate social behavior

Article Open access 26 April 2025

Data availability

The employed UTO and HuShoWa datasets are derived from the SRPBS database under the Brain/MINDS Beyond human brain MRI project [14], which is consisted of resting-state fMRI scans from 8 different sites. The data is openly accessible via https://bicr-resource.atr.jp/srpbsfc/.

Code availability

The Python code for executing our embedding-relation workflow on designated rsFC datasets can be found at https://github.com/LeonBai/rsFC_embedding.

References

  1. Oldham, J. M. et al. Comorbidity of Axis I and Axis II disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 152, 571–8 (1995).

  2. Angold, A., Costello, E. J. & Erkanli, A. Comorbidity. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discip. 40, 57–87 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Helzer, J. E. et al. Dimensional Approaches in Diagnostic Classification: Refining the Research Agenda for DSM-V (American Psychiatric Pub, 2009).

  4. Casey, B. et al. Dsm-5 and rdoc: progress in psychiatry research?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 810–814 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caspi, A. & Moffitt, T. E. All for one and one for all: mental disorders in one dimension. Am. J. Psychiatry 175, 831–844 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anttila, V. et al. Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science 360, eaap8757 (2018).

  7. Gandal, M. J. et al. Shared molecular neuropathology across major psychiatric disorders parallels polygenic overlap. Science 359, 693–697 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, P. H., Feng, Y.-C. A. & Smoller, J. W. Pleiotropy and cross-disorder genetics among psychiatric disorders. Biol. psychiatry 89, 20–31 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Y., Li, W., Lv, L. & Yue, W. Shared genetic determinants of schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder implicate opposite risk patterns: a genome-wide analysis of common variants. Schizophr. Bull. 50, 1382–1395 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abi-Dargham, A. & Horga, G. The search for imaging biomarkers in psychiatric disorders. Nat. Med. 22, 1248–1255 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Woo, C.-W., Chang, L. J., Lindquist, M. A. & Wager, T. D. Building better biomarkers: brain models in translational neuroimaging. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 365–377 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Friston, K. J. Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect. 1, 13–36 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sudlow, C. et al. Uk biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 12, e1001779 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koike, S. et al. Brain/minds beyond human brain mri project: a protocol for multi-level harmonization across brain disorders throughout the lifespan. NeuroImage Clin. 30, 102600 (2021).

  15. Yahata, N. et al. A small number of abnormal brain connections predicts adult autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–12 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ichikawa, N. et al. Primary functional brain connections associated with melancholic major depressive disorder and modulation by antidepressants. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–12 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yamashita, A. et al. Generalizable brain network markers of major depressive disorder across multiple imaging sites. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000966 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shen, H., Wang, L., Liu, Y. & Hu, D. Discriminative analysis of resting-state functional connectivity patterns of schizophrenia using low dimensional embedding of fMRI. Neuroimage 49, 3110–3121 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Drysdale, A. T. et al. Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression. Nat. Med. 23, 28–38 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tokuda, T. et al. Identification of depression subtypes and relevant brain regions using a data-driven approach. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–13 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huys, Q. J., Maia, T. V. & Frank, M. J. Computational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 404–413 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aggarwal, C. C., Hinneburg, A. & Keim, D. A. On the surprising behavior of distance metrics in high dimensional space. Int. Conf. Database Theory 12, 420–434 (2001).

  23. Kingma, D. P. & Welling, M. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.6114 (2013).

  24. Kingma, D. P., Rezende, D. J., Mohamed, S. & Welling, M. Semi-supervised learning with deep generative models. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 3581–3589 (2014).

  25. Li, X., Geenjaar, E., Fu, Z., Pearlson, G. D. & Calhoun, V. D. Brain functional network connectivity interpolation characterizes neuropsychiatric continuum and heterogeneity. bioRxiv 2024–11 https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.13.623318 (2024).

  26. Craddock, N. & Owen, M. J. The Kraepelinian dichotomy–going, going but still not gone. Br. J. Psychiatry 196, 92–95 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tanaka, S. C. et al. A multi-site, multi-disorder resting-state magnetic resonance image database. Sci. Data 8, 1–15 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roweis, S. T. & Saul, L. K. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. science 290, 2323–2326 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Narayanan, A. et al. Graph2vec: learning distributed representations of graphs. arXiv preprint https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.05005 (2017).

  30. Van der Maaten, L. & Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Machine Learn. Res. 9, 2579−2605 (2008).

  31. McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. Umap: uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv preprint https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426 (2018).

  32. Goldberger, J., Hinton, G. E., Roweis, S. & Salakhutdinov, R. R. Neighbourhood components analysis. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 17, 513–520 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Khemakhem, I., Kingma, D. P., Monti, R. & Hyvärinen, A. Variational autoencoders and nonlinear ICA: a unifying framework. In Proc. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics 2207–2217 (PMLR, 2020).

  34. Heusel, M., Ramsauer, H., Unterthiner, T., Nessler, B. & Hochreiter, S. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, (2017).

  35. Zeng, W. et al. Gmaplatent: geometric mapping in latent space. arXiv preprint https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.23407 (2025).

  36. Perrot, M., Rivière, D. & Mangin, J.-F. Cortical sulci recognition and spatial normalization. Med. Image Anal. 15, 529–550 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yu, M. et al. Statistical harmonization corrects site effects in functional connectivity measurements from multi-site fMRI data. Hum. Brain Mapp. 39, 4213–4227 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yamashita, O. et al. Computational mechanisms of neuroimaging biomarkers uncovered by multicenter resting-state fMRI connectivity variation profile. Mol. Psychiatry 30, 5463–5474 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Montavon, G., Binder, A., Lapuschkin, S., Samek, W. & Müller, K.-R. Layer-wise relevance propagation: an overview. In Proc Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning 193–209 (Springer, 2019).

  40. Yeo, B. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–65 (2011).

  41. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J. & Clubley, E. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 31, 5–17 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Ball, R. & Ranieri, W. F. Comparison of beck depression inventories-ia and-ii in psychiatric outpatients. J. Personal. Assess. 67, 588–597 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Vos de Wael, R. et al. Brainspace: a toolbox for the analysis of macroscale gradients in neuroimaging and connectomics datasets. Commun. Biol. 3, 1–10 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Morrissey, Z. D., Zhan, L., Ajilore, O. & Leow, A. D. rest2vec: vectorizing the resting-state functional connectome using graph embedding. NeuroImage 226, 117538 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Whi, W. et al. Characteristic functional cores revealed by hyperbolic disc embedding and k-core percolation on resting-state fMRI. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–16 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Espadoto, M., Martins, R. M., Kerren, A., Hirata, N. S. & Telea, A. C. Toward a quantitative survey of dimension reduction techniques. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 27, 2153–2173 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nordgaard, J., Sass, L. A. & Parnas, J. The psychiatric interview: validity, structure, and subjectivity. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 263, 353–364 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Razafsha, M. et al. Biomarker identification in psychiatric disorders: from neuroscience to clinical practice. J. Psychiatr. Pract. 21, 37–48 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hettwer, M. et al. Coordinated cortical thickness alterations across six neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders. Nat. Commun. 13, 6851 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Qi, S. et al. Common and unique multimodal covarying patterns in autism spectrum disorder subtypes. Mol. Autism 11, 90 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sadeghi, I. et al. Brain transcriptomic profiling reveals common alterations across neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 20, 4549–4561 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chien, Y.-L., Wu, C.-S. & Tsai, H.-J. The comorbidity of schizophrenia spectrum and mood disorders in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 14, 571–581 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Dadi, K. et al. Benchmarking functional connectome-based predictive models for resting-state fMRI. NeuroImage 192, 115–134 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Takahara, Y. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of pipelines for classification of psychiatric disorders using multi-site resting-state fMRI datasets. Neural Netw. 187, 107335 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Preti, M. G., Bolton, T. A. & Van De Ville, D. The dynamic functional connectome: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Neuroimage 160, 41–54 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Murphy, K. P. Machine Learning: a Probabilistic Perspective (MIT Press, 2012).

  57. Davidson, T. R., Falorsi, L., De Cao, N., Kipf, T. & Tomczak, J. M. Hyperspherical Variational Auto-Encoders 2nd edn (Springer, 2018).

  58. Saez, M. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications (Springer, 1998).

  59. Hadsell, R., Chopra, S. & LeCun, Y. Dimensionality reduction by learning an invariant mapping. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1735–1742 (IEEE, 2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Ayumu Yamashita (The University of Tokyo) and Prof. Kenji Doya (OIST) for comments on an early version of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under Grant Numbers JP24dm0307008, JP25wm0625204s0102, and JP25wm0625122s0502. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, or results interpretation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computational Brain Imaging, Advanced Telecommunication Research Institute International (ATR), Kyoto, Japan

    Wenjun Bai, Okito Yamashita & Junichiro Yoshimoto

  2. Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, RIKEN, Tokyo, Japan

    Okito Yamashita

  3. Department of Neural Computation for Decision Making, Advanced Telecommunication Research Institute International (ATR), Kyoto, Japan

    Yuki Sakai

  4. Department of Biomedical Data Science, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan

    Junichiro Yoshimoto

  5. International Center for Brain Science, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan

    Junichiro Yoshimoto

Authors
  1. Wenjun Bai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Okito Yamashita
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuki Sakai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Junichiro Yoshimoto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

W.J.B. conceives the general idea and performs the overall analysis, while O.Y., Y.S., and J.Y. provide fruitful feedback and suggestions throughout the analysis and revision procedure. W.J.B. wrote the draft of the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenjun Bai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bai, W., Yamashita, O., Sakai, Y. et al. Inferring relationships among major psychiatric disorders in a resting-state functional connectivity-informed embedding space. npj Syst Biol Appl (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-026-00699-y

Download citation

  • Received: 11 June 2025

  • Accepted: 23 March 2026

  • Published: 06 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-026-00699-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Systems neuroscience: combining theory and neurotechnology for a multiscale account of the brain

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Systems Biology and Applications (npj Syst Biol Appl)

ISSN 2056-7189 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing