Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Catastrophic disruption of asteroid 2023 CX1 and implications for planetary defence

Abstract

Mitigation of the threat from airbursting asteroids requires an understanding of the potential risk they pose for the ground. How asteroids release their kinetic energy in the atmosphere is not well understood due to the rarity of large impacts. Here we present a comprehensive, space-to-laboratory characterization of an impact of an L chondrite, which represents a common type of Earth-impacting asteroid. Small asteroid 2023 CX1 was detected in space and predicted to impact over Normandy, France, on 13 February 2023. Observations from several independent sensors and reduction techniques revealed an unusual but potentially high-risk fragmentation behaviour. The nearly spherical 650 ± 160 kg (72 ± 6 cm diameter) asteroid catastrophically fragmented at a dynamic pressure of 4 MPa around 28 km altitude, releasing 98% of its total energy in a concentrated region of the atmosphere. The resulting shock wave was spherical, not cylindrical, and released more energy closer to the ground. This type of fragmentation increases the risk of substantial damage at ground level. These results warrant consideration for a planetary defence strategy for cases where a >3–4 MPa dynamic pressure is expected, including planning for evacuation of areas beneath anticipated disruption locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Fireball light curve and modelled fragmentation behaviour.
Fig. 2: Strewn field of SPLV.
Fig. 3: Energy deposition and ground-level overpressure for 2023 CX1 and Dishchii’bikoh.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Updated astrometric measurements of asteroid 2023 CX1 before impact are publicly available at the MPC (available at https://minorplanetcenter.net). The updated orbital solution is accessible via the JPL Small-Body Database Browser (https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/sbdb_lookup.html#/?sstr=2023). Data supporting the fireball trajectory, photometry, strewn field computations and seismo-acoustic analysis are provided in ref. 82.

Code availability

The proprietary software used in this analysis includes methods for computing the orbit of the asteroid, analysing the fragmentation of the fireball, modelling the strewn field and simulating propagation of the blast wave using ALE3D (https://sd.llnl.gov/stockpile-science/high-performance-computing/proprietary-software). Some of the optical fireball data were calibrated using the open-source SkyFit2 software, which is part of the RMS library available at https://github.com/CroatianMeteorNetwork/RMS. The trajectory parameters for the fireball were independently confirmed using WesternMeteorPyLib (wmpl), which was also used to compute the trajectory and support the modelling of the strewn field. That software is available at https://github.com/wmpg/WesternMeteorPyLib. Probabilities of originating from the Massalia asteroid family were computed using the METEOMOD model, accessible at https://sirrah.troja.mff.cuni.cz/~mira/meteomod/meteomod.php.

References

  1. Brown, P. G. et al. A 500-kiloton airburst over Chelyabinsk and an enhanced hazard from small impactors. Nature 503, 238–241 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenwood, R. C., Burbine, T. H. & Franchi, I. A. Linking asteroids and meteorites to the primordial planetesimal population. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 277, 377–406 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sárneczky, K. 2023 CX1. Minor Planet Electron. Circ. 2024-C103, 1 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colas, F. et al. The FRIPON and Vigie-Ciel networks. In Proc. International Meteor Conference (eds Rault, J.-L. & Roggemans, P.) 34–38 (International Meteor Organization, 2014).

  5. Colas, F. et al. FRIPON: a worldwide network to track incoming meteoroids. Astron. Astrophys. 644, A53 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jenniskens, P. & Colas, F. 2023 CX1. Cent. Bur. Electron. Telegr. 5221, 1 (2023).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zanda, B. et al. Recovery and planned study of the Saint-Pierre-le-Viger meteorite: an achievement of the FRIPON/Vigie-Ciel citizen science program. LPI Contrib. 2990, 6206 (2023).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gattacceca, J. et al. The Meteoritical Bulletin, No. 112. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 59, 1820–1823 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bischoff, A. et al. Saint-Pierre-le-Viger (L5–6) from asteroid 2023 CX1 recovered in Normandy, France—220 years after the historic fall of L’Aigle (L6 breccia) in the neighborhood. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 58, 1385–1398 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Devogèle, M. et al. Aperture photometry on asteroid trails: detection of the fastest rotating near-Earth object. Astron. Astrophys. 689, A63 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Popova, O., Borovička, J. & Campbell-Brown, M. D. in Meteoroids: Sources of Meteors on Earth and Beyond (eds Ryabova, G. O. et al.) 9 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).

  12. Fadeenko, Y. I. Destruction of meteoroids in the atmosphere. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 3, 172–174 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Popova, O. et al. Very low strengths of interplanetary meteoroids and small asteroids. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 46, 1525–1550 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Borovička, J., Spurný, P. & Shrbený, L. Two strengths of ordinary chondritic meteoroids as derived from their atmospheric fragmentation modeling. Astron. J. 160, 42 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jenniskens, P. et al. Bolide fragmentation: what parts of asteroid 2008 TC3 survived to the ground? Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 57, 1641–1664 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Whipple, A. L. Lyapunov times of the inner asteroids. Icarus 115, 347–353 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Swindle, T. D., Kring, D. A. & Weirich, J. R. in Advances in 40Ar/39Ar Dating: From Archaeology to Planetary Sciences (eds Jourdan, F. et al.) 333–347 (Geological Society, 2014).

  18. Herzog, G. F. & Caffee, M. W. in Meteorites and Cosmochemical Processes (ed. Davis, A. M.) 419–454 (Elsevier, 2014).

  19. Brown, P. G. et al. The Golden meteorite fall: fireball trajectory, orbit, and meteorite characterization. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 58, 1773–1807 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Povinec, P. P. et al. Radionuclides in Chassigny and Nakhla meteorites of Mars origin: implications for their pre-atmospheric sizes and cosmic-ray exposure ages. Planet. Space Sci. 186, 104914 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brož, M. et al. Young asteroid families as the primary source of meteorites. Nature 634, 566–571 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Marsset, M. et al. The Massalia asteroid family as the origin of ordinary L chondrites. Nature 634, 561–565 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ceplecha, Z., Spurný, P., Borovička, J. & Keclikova, J. Atmospheric fragmentation of meteoroids. Astron. Astrophys. 279, 615–626 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Borovička, J. & Spurný, P. The Carancas meteorite impact-encounter with a monolithic meteoroid. Astron. Astrophys. 485, L1–L4 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown, P. et al. Analysis of a crater-forming meteorite impact in Peru. J. Geophys. Res.: Planets 113, E09007 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Borovička, J., Spurný, P., Grigore, V. I. & Svoreň, J. The January 7, 2015, superbolide over Romania and structural diversity of meter-sized asteroids. Planet. Space Sci. 143, 147–158 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vida, D. et al. Novo Mesto meteorite fall—trajectory, orbit, and fragmentation analysis from optical observations. In Proc. Europlanet Science Congress 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2021-139 (Copernicus Meetings, 2021).

  28. Vida, D. et al. Accurate characterization of metre-sized impactors through casual bolide observations—Novo Mesto superbolide as evidence for a new class of high-risk objects. In Proc. 8th IAA Planetary Defense Conference (International Academy of Astronautics, 2023).

  29. Jenniskens, P. et al. Orbit and origin of the LL7 chondrite Dishchii’bikoh (Arizona). Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 55, 535–557 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Morrison, D. Tunguska Workshop: Applying Modern Tools to Understand the 1908 Tunguska Impact. Technical Memorandum NASA/TM–220174 (NASA, 2018).

  31. Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M. et al. A numerical approach to study ablation of large bolides: application to Chelyabinsk. Adv. Astron. 2021, 8852772 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Moskovitz, N. A. et al. A common origin for dynamically associated near-Earth asteroid pairs. Icarus 333, 165–176 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mommert, M. PHOTOMETRYPIPELINE: an automated pipeline for calibrated photometry. Astron. Comput. 18, 47–53 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gaia Collaboration. Gaia Data Release 2: summary of the contents and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 616, A1 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Flewelling, H. A. et al. The Pan-STARRS1 database and data products. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 251, 7 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bowell, E. et al. in Asteroids II (eds Binzel, R. P. et al.) 524–556 (Univ. Arizona Press, 1989).

  37. Pál, A. FITSH: a software package for image processing. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 421, 1825–1837 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Colomé, J. et al. The OAdM robotic observatory. Adv. Astron. 2010, 183016 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Raab, H. Astrometrica: astrometric data reduction of CCD images. Astrophys. Source Code Library ascl:1230.012 (2012).

  40. Gaffey, M. J. et al. Mineralogical variations within the S-type asteroid class. Icarus 106, 573–602 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Nakamura, T. et al. Itokawa dust particles: a direct link between S-type asteroids and ordinary chondrites. Science 333, 1113 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Berthier, J., Carry, B., Mahlke, M. & Normand, J. SsODNet: Solar System Open Database Network. Astron. Astrophys. 671, A151 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. DeMeo, F. E. & Carry, B. The taxonomic distribution of asteroids from multi-filter all-sky photometric surveys. Icarus 226, 723–741 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Usui, F. et al. Albedo properties of main belt asteroids based on the all-sky survey of the infrared astronomical satellite AKARI. Astrophys. J. 762, 56 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Eberhardt, P., Geiss, J. & Lutz, H. Neutrons in meteorites. Earth Sci. Meteorit. 34, 143–168 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wieler, R. et al. Exposure history of the Torino meteorite. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 31, 265–272 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Leya, I. & Masarik, J. Cosmogenic nuclides in stony meteorites revisited. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 44, 1061–1086 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Leya, I., Hirtz, J. & David, J.-C. Galactic cosmic rays, cosmic-ray variations, and cosmogenic nuclides in meteorites. Astrophys. J. 910, 136 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Borovička, J. The comparison of two methods of determining meteor trajectories from photographs. Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechoslov. 41, 391 (1990).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Borovička, J. et al. Data on 824 fireballs observed by the digital cameras of the European Fireball Network in 2017-2018. I. Description of the network, data reduction procedures, and the catalog. Astron. Astrophys. 667, A97 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vida, D., Gural, P. S., Brown, P. G., Campbell-Brown, M. & Wiegert, P. Estimating trajectories of meteors: an observational Monte Carlo approach. I. Theory. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 491, 2688–2705 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ceplecha, Z. & Revelle, D. O. Fragmentation model of meteoroid motion, mass loss, and radiation in the atmosphere. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 40, 35 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Edwards, W. N., Brown, P. G. & ReVelle, D. O. Estimates of meteoroid kinetic energies from observations of infrasonic airwaves. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 68, 1136–1160 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ens, T. A., Brown, P. G., Edwards, W. N. & Silber, E. Infrasound production by bolides: a global statistical study. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 80, 208–229 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Gi, N. & Brown, P. G. Refinement of bolide characteristics from infrasound measurements. Planet. Space Sci. 143, 169–181 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. ReVelle, D. O. Historical detection of atmospheric impacts by large bolides using acoustic-gravity waves. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 822, 284–302 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. RESIF-RLBP French Broad-band network, RESIF-RAP strong motion network and other seismic stations in metropolitan France. RESIF Information System https://doi.org/10.15778/RESIF.FR (1995).

  58. Virieux, J., Garnier, N., Blanc, E. & Dessa, J.-X. Paraxial ray tracing for atmospheric wave propagation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L20106 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Listowski, C. et al. Stratospheric gravity waves impact on infrasound transmission losses across the International Monitoring System. Pure Appl. Geophys. 181, 33 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Moré, J. J. in Numerical Analysis (ed. Watson, G. A.) 105–116 (Springer, 2006).

  61. Riebe, M. E. I. et al. Cosmic-ray exposure ages of six chondritic Almahata Sitta fragments. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 52, 2353–2374 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. Wieler, R. Cosmic-ray-produced noble gases in meteorites. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 47, 125–170 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Leya, I. et al. Calibration of cosmogenic noble gas production based on 36Cl-36Ar ages. Part 2. The 81Kr-Kr dating technique. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 50, 1863–1879 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. Martin, I. H. M. J. A=71. Zn, Ga, Ge, As, Se, Br, Kr. Nucl. Data Sheets Sect. B 1, 13–26 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. Nishiizumi, K., Regnier, S. & Marti, K. Cosmic ray exposure ages of chondrites, pre-irradiation and constancy of cosmic ray flux in the past. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 50, 156–170 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. Dalcher, N. et al. Calibration of cosmogenic noble gas production in ordinary chondrites based on 36Cl-36Ar ages. Part 1. Refined production rates for cosmogenic 21Ne and 38Ar. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 48, 1841–1862 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. Lewis, J. A. & Jones, R. H. Phosphate and feldspar mineralogy of equilibrated L chondrites: the record of metasomatism during metamorphism in ordinary chondrite parent bodies. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 51, 1886–1913 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. Povinec, P., Sýkora, I., Ferrière, L. & Koeberl, C. Analyses of radionuclides in the Oued Awlitis 001 and Galb Inal lunar meteorites by HPGe gamma-ray spectrometry. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 324, 349–357 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Kováčik, A., Sýkora, I. & Povinec, P. P. Monte Carlo and experimental efficiency calibration of gamma-spectrometers for non-destructive analysis of large volume samples of irregular shapes. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 298, 665–672 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Eugster, O., Busemann, H., Lorenzetti, S. & Terribilini, D. Ejection ages from krypton-81-krypton-83 dating and pre-atmospheric sizes of Martian meteorites. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 37, 1345–1360 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. Martschini, M. et al. 5 years of ion-laser interaction mass spectrometry—status and prospects of isobar suppression in IAMS by lasers. Radiocarbon 64, 555–568 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Lachner, J. et al. Highly sensitive 26Al measurements by ion-laser-interaction mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 465, 116576 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Rugel, G. et al. The first four years of the AMS-facility DREAMS: status and developments for more accurate radionuclide data. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 370, 94–100 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. Cripe, J. D. & Moore, C. B. Total sulfur content of ordinary chondrites. Meteoritics 10, 387 (1975).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. Grady, M. M., Wright, I. P. & Pillinger, C. T. A preliminary investigation into the nature of carbonaceous material in ordinary chondrites. Meteoritics 24, 147 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. Hashizume, K. & Sugiura, N. Nitrogen isotopes in bulk ordinary chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59, 4057–4069 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. Graf, T. et al. Cosmogenic nuclides and nuclear tracks in the chondrite Knyahinya. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 54, 2511–2520 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. Bischoff, A. et al. The anomalous polymict ordinary chondrite breccia of Elmshorn (H3-6)—late reaccretion after collision between two ordinary chondrite parent bodies, complete disruption, and mixing possibly about 2.8 Gyr ago. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 59, 2321–2356 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. Standish, E. M. JPL Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides. Interoffice Memo DE405/LE405 (JPL, 1998).

  80. Granvik, M. et al. Debiased orbit and absolute-magnitude distributions for near-Earth objects. Icarus 312, 181–207 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  81. Nesvorný, D. et al. NEOMOD: a new orbital distribution model for near-Earth objects. Astron. J. 166, 77 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Egal, A. et al. 2023 CX1 - Saint-Pierre-le-Viger data. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15328378 (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Alexandersen (MPC) for reviewing and correcting station coordinates in the MPC database. Model wind data was provided by R. Brožková from the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute. Data visualization was provided by P. Geoffroy. We thank E. J. Christensen, R. L. Seaman and J. Stone for providing observations from the Catalina Sky Survey. The following camera operators contributed 2023 CX1 imaging to the FRIPON, GMN and UKMON networks: M. Rushton, A. Pratt, S. Saunders, J. Olver, N. Russel and M. McIntyre. Targeted fireball observations were made by V. Devillepoix, J.-L. Devillepoix, P. Devillepoix, A. Favre, A. Greenway, L. Greenway, Y. Trotel and P. Wright, among others. Observatori del Montsec-IEEC recorded the fireball from Sant Esteve de la Farga, Lleida, Catalonia, at a nominal distance of 900 km. We thank B. Gladman for the dynamical computations of the escape route of the asteroid. We thank F. Nikodem, L. Smuła and M. Smuła for providing the coordinates and masses of the fragments found. We thank R. Wieler for contributing to the discussion of the noble gas results. The help of the VERA cosmogenics team, especially S. Adler, R. Golser, P. Steier and C. Vivo-Vilches, is highly appreciated. The meteorite field search was supported by members of the FRIPON/Vigie-Ciel citizen science network, with participants listed at https://www.vigie-ciel.org/2024/10/21/2023cx1-splv-consortium. A.E., D.V., P. Brown and P.W. were supported in part by the NASA Meteoroid Environment Office (Cooperative Agreement 80NSSC21M0073). J.B. and P. Spurný were supported by the Czech Science Foundation (Grant No. 19-26232X). S.A. received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme (Marie Skodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 101150536) for the project FLAME. D.F. and S.N. conducted their research at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with NASA (80NM0018D0004). The Czech Science Foundation supported this research (Grant Nos. 25-16507S to M. Birlan and 25-16789S to J. Hanuš). Funding was also received from the Hungarian National Research, Development, and Innovation Office (Grant Nos. K-138962 and GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00003) and from the Slovak Science and Grant Agency (Project VEGA-1/0487/23 to P.P., I.S. and I.K.). D. Krietsch, L.M.E. and H.B. were supported by the Swiss SNF and NCCR PlanetS (Grant Nos. 51NF40_205606 and SNF_219860). The VERA cosmogenics team was supported by the ChETEC-INFRA (Horizon 2020, Grant No. 101008324). T.S.-R. acknowledges funding from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Spanish Government; Grant Nos. PGC2021 and PID2021-125883NB-C21). This work was (partially) supported by the Spanish MICIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF A way of making Europe by the European Union (Grant No. PID2021-122842OB-C21) and the Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona (Unidad de Excelencia María de Maeztu; Grant No. CEX2019-000918-M). J.M.T.-R. acknowledges support from the Spanish project funded by MCIN/AEI (Project PID2021-128062NB-I00). A.J. acknowledges support from the ANID Millennium Science Initiative (Grant Nos. ICN12_009 and IM23-0001). R.A.M. acknowledges support from FONDECYT/ANID (Grant No. 124 0049) and from ANID, Fondo GEMINI, Astrónomo de Soporte GEMINI-ANID (Grant No. 3223 AS0002). D.H. and J.J. were supported in part by the SIAA Foundation Interactive Astronomy and Astrophysics in Tübingen, Germany. The Joan Oró Telescope at the Montsec Observatory is owned by the Catalan Government and operated by the Institute of Space Studies of Catalonia (IEEC). The UK Fireball Alliance meteor camera observatory was supported by the Science and Technology Facilities Council (Grant No. ST/Y004817/1). P.J. was supported by NASA (Grant No. 80NSSC18K0854).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

A.E., D.V., F.C. and B.Z. coordinated the research. A.E., D.V., B.Z. and P.J. drafted the paper. M. Micheli, K.S., A.P., D.F., S.N., L.C., F.O., D.H., J.J., P.D., T.S.-R. and A.E. collected and calibrated the data associated with asteroid discovery, imaging and astrometry. N.M., T.K., T.S.-R., J. Hanuš, M.D., L.B., K.K., M. Birlan, D.A.N., A. Sonka and F.L. collected and calibrated the data related to the asteroid photometry. P.W., P.V., M. Marsset, M. Brož, P. Shober, A.L. and A.E. completed the asteroid dynamical analysis. J.B., P. Spurný, D.V., H.A.R.D., A.E., S.A., R.N., M. McIntyre, D.Š., J. Vaubaillon, K.B., J.D. and the FRIPON International Team (FIT) collected and analysed the data relevant to meteor triangulation and photometry. J.B., P. Spurný, D.V. and H.A.R.D. undertook the fragmentation and strewn-field calculation. F.C., S. Bouley, A. Steinhausser, B.Z., P.V., J. Vaubaillon, A.M., K.A., L.M., J.D., K.B., M. Birlan, S. Bouquillon, S.J., P. Beck, P.J. and FIT collected and calibrated the data associated with meteorite recovery and search campaign coordination. P. Brown, J.A. and L.E. collected and calibrated the data for the infrasound analysis. A.L.P., G.M.-R., J. Vergoz, J. Vergne and L.McF. collected and calibrated the data related to the seismo-acoustic analysis. B.Z., J.G., L.F., M.G., S.P., I.B., J.-A.B. and P.S.-J. collected and calibrated the data relevant to meteorite sampling and characterization. D. Krietsch, H.B., C.M. and L.M.E. collected and calibrated the data in the analysis of noble gas isotopes in the meteorites. P.P., I.S., I.K., O.M., M. Martschini, S.M. and A.W. collected and calibrated the data in the analysis of cosmogenic nuclides in the meteorites. S.d.V. collected and calibrated the data in the analysis of meteorite density. D.R. undertook the blast-wave pressure calculations. P.J., O.H. and P. Brown provided general guidance and improvements to the paper. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Auriane Egal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Astronomy thanks Thomas Burbine, Toshihiro Kasuga and Eleanor Sansom for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Trajectory solutions for 2023 CX1 from telescopic and fireball data.

Comparison between the position of 2023 CX1 at the top of the atmosphere as computed from ground-based astrometry and from fireball observations (blue). The selected reference altitude of 101.755 km corresponds to the first observed position of the fireball. Ellipses represent the 3σ confidence level. The initial solution (red) was calculated using altitudes of observing stations as originally reported to the MPC. An updated solution recalculated after correcting the observers’ coordinates and assuming a 20 m positional uncertainty is shown in magenta. The joint solution (black) combines data from both telescopic and fireball observations.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Asteroid light curve.

Asteroid brightness of 2023 CX1, starting at 23:30:02 UTC, phase angle corrected and normalized to a common distance to the asteroid, measured by the TJO (C65, green), St Pardon de Conques (I93, grey), Visjan (L01, red) and Berthelot (L54, blue) observatories. Data points represent normalized magnitudes with 1-sigma error bars derived from the photometric calibration for each individual frame (see Methods ‘Asteroid photometry’).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Synthetic probability maps linking 2023 CX1 to asteroid families.

Synthetic probability maps for an orbit with a given semi-major axis a and inclination i to originate from one of the L chondrite-like asteroid families: Massalia2 (a), Juno (b), and Gefion (c), using the METEOMOD software21.

Extended Data Table 1 Pre-atmospheric radius and mass of 2023 CX1
Extended Data Table 2 Fragmentation details of 2023 CX1
Extended Data Table 3 Atmospheric trajectory of 2023 CX1 before and after the main flare
Extended Data Table 4 Summary of infrasound signal characteristics from the 2023 CX1 fireball
Extended Data Table 5 Arrival features of the seismo-acoustic signal detected by several stations in France and the United Kingdom
Extended Data Table 6 Noble gas concentrations and isotopic ratios in SPLV samples
Extended Data Table 7 Cosmogenic and radiogenic isotopes, elemental concentrations, and exposure ages of SPLV samples

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Tables 1–7 and Fig. 1.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Egal, A., Vida, D., Colas, F. et al. Catastrophic disruption of asteroid 2023 CX1 and implications for planetary defence. Nat Astron 9, 1624–1637 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-025-02659-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-025-02659-8

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing