Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Magnetic-susceptibility-dependent ratiometric probes for enhancing quantitative MRI

Abstract

In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), quantitative measurements of analytes are hindered by difficulties in distinguishing the MRI signals of activation of the probe by the analyte from those of the accumulation of the intact probe. Here we show that imaging sensitivity and quantitation can be enhanced by ratiometric MRI probes with a high relaxivity-ratio change (more than 2.5-fold at 7 T) via magnetic-susceptibility-dependent magnetic resonance tuning. Specifically, polymeric probes that incorporate paramagnetic Mn-porphyrin and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles inducing opposite changes in the longitudinal and transverse magnetic relaxivities responded to analyte concentration independently of probe concentration. In mice, the probes allowed for quantitative real-time dynamic imaging of H2O2, H2S or pH in subcutaneous tumours, in livers with drug-induced injury and in orthotropic gliomas. The ratiometric MRI probes may be advantageously used to obtain molecular insight into pathological processes and to circumvent interference from dynamic changes in probe concentration within the body while providing anatomical information.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic illustration of the Ms-dMRT strategy for ratiometric MRI probes with large responsive dynamic range.
Fig. 2: Design and magnetic response of ratiometric MRI probes based on Ms-dMRT.
Fig. 3: Ratiometric MRI with Ms-dMRT probes in solution.
Fig. 4: Ratiometric MRI of acidity or H2O2 in tumour.
Fig. 5: Quantification of H2O2 in tumour via ratiometric MRI.
Fig. 6: Ratiometric MRI and quantification of H2O2 during drug-induced liver injury.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data supporting the results in this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. All data generated in this study, including source data for the figures, are available in Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21802755)61. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Barandov, A. et al. Sensing intracellular calcium ions using a manganese-based MRI contrast agent. Nat. Commun. 10, 897 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lilley, L. M. et al. Self-immolative activation of β-galactosidase-responsive probes for in vivo MR imaging in mouse models. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 388–394 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shin, T.-H. et al. High-resolution T1 MRI via renally clearable dextran nanoparticles with an iron oxide shell. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 252–263 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ni, D., Bu, W., Ehlerding, E. B., Cai, W. & Shi, J. Engineering of inorganic nanoparticles as magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 7438–7468 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, P. et al. Coordinatively unsaturated Fe3+ based activatable probes for enhanced MRI and therapy of tumors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 11088–11096 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. An, R. et al. Smart magnetic and fluorogenic photosensitizer nanoassemblies enable redox-driven disassembly for photodynamic therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 132, 20817–20825 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou, Z. et al. Early stratification of radiotherapy response by activatable inflammation magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Commun. 11, 3032 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Z. et al. Two-way magnetic resonance tuning and enhanced subtraction imaging for non-invasive and quantitative biological imaging. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 482–490 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pierre, V. C., Harris, S. M. & Pailloux, S. L. Comparing strategies in the design of responsive contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: a case study with copper and zinc. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 342–351 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, P. et al. Quantitative mapping of glutathione within intracranial tumors through interlocked MRI signals of a responsive nanoprobe. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 133, 8211–8219 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wahsner, J., Gale, E. M., Rodríguez, A. R. & Caravan, P. Chemistry of MRI contrast agents: current challenges and new frontiers. Chem. Rev. 119, 957–1057 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi, J.-S. et al. Distance-dependent magnetic resonance tuning as a versatile MRI sensing platform for biological targets. Nat. Mater. 16, 537–542 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mi, P. et al. A pH-activatable nanoparticle with signal-amplification capabilities for non-invasive imaging of tumour malignancy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 724–730 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Angelovski, G. What we can really do with bioresponsive MRI contrast agents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 7038–7046 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, G. & Angelovski, G. Highly potent MRI contrast agent displaying outstanding sensitivity to zinc ions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 5734–5738 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Angelovski, G. Heading toward macromolecular and nanosized bioresponsive MRI probes for successful functional imaging. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 2215–2224 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Genicio, N., López, M. B., Gröhn, O. & Gallo, J. Ratiometric magnetic resonance imaging: contrast agent design towards better specificity and quantification. J. Coord. Chem. 447, 214150–214164 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ekanger, L. A. & Allen, M. J. Overcoming the concentration-dependence of responsive probes for magnetic resonance imaging. Metallomics 7, 405–421 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gündüz, S. et al. Ratiometric method for rapid monitoring of biological processes using bioresponsive MRI contrast agents. ACS Sens. 1, 483–487 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thorarinsdottir, A. E., Du, K., Collins, J. H. P. & Harris, T. D. Ratiometric pH imaging with a CoII2 MRI probe via CEST effects of opposing pH dependences. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 15836–15847 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Du, K., Waters, E. A. & Harris, T. D. Ratiometric quantitation of redox status with a molecular Fe2 magnetic resonance probe. Chem. Sci. 8, 4424–4430 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Okada, S. et al. Ratiometric MRI sensors based on core-shell nanoparticles for quantitative pH imaging. Adv. Mater. 26, 2989–2992 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuan, Y. et al. Furin-mediated intracellular self-assembly of olsalazine nanoparticles for enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and tumour therapy. Nat. Mater. 18, 1376–1383 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Aime, S., Fedeli, F., Sanino, A. & Terreno, E. A R2/R1 ratiometric procedure for a concentration-independent, pH-responsive, Gd (III)-based MRI agent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 11326–11327 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Catanzaro, V. et al. A R2p/R1p ratiometric procedure to assess matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity by magnetic resonance imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 3926–3930 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, Y., Hu, Y. & Ye, D. Activatable multimodal probes for in vivo imaging and theranostics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, 202209512–202209530 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Louie, A. Multimodality imaging probes: design and challenges. Chem. Rev. 110, 3146–3195 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hu, Y. et al. Enzyme-mediated in situ self-assembly promotes in vivo bioorthogonal reaction for pretargeted multimodality imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 18082–18093 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, H. & Meade, T. J. Molecular magnetic resonance imaging with Gd(III)-based contrast agents: challenges and key advances. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 17025–17041 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Frullano, L., Catana, C., Benner, T., Sherry, A. D. & Caravan, P. Bimodal MR-PET agent for quantitative pH imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 2382–2384 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tang, Y. et al. Self-accelerating H2O2-responsive plasmonic nanovesicles for synergistic chemo/starving therapy of tumors. Theranostics 10, 8691–8704 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Xiang, H. et al. Highly stable silica-coated bismuth nanoparticles deliver tumor microenvironment-responsive prodrugs to enhance tumor-specific photoradiotherapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 11449–11461 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Perez, J. M., Josephson, L., Loughlin, T. O., Högemann, D. & Weissleder, R. Magnetic relaxation switches capable of sensing molecular interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 816–820 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Min, C. et al. Mechanism of magnetic relaxation switching sensing. ACS Nano 6, 6821–6828 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, F. et al. Dynamically reversible iron oxide nanoparticle assemblies for targeted amplification of T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of tumors. Nano Lett. 19, 4213–4220 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, C. et al. An electric-field-responsive paramagnetic contrast agent enhances the visualization of epileptic foci in mouse models of drug-resistant epilepsy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 278–289 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang, X. et al. Multi-chromatic pH-activatable 19F-MRI nanoprobes with binary ON/OFF pH transitions and chemical-shift barcodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 8074–8078 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cheng, D. et al. Design strategy of fluorescent probes for live drug-induced acute liver injury imaging. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 403–415 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nathwani, R. A., Pais, S., Reynolds, T. B. & Kaplowitz, N. Serum alanine aminotransferase in skeletal muscle diseases. Hepatology 41, 380–382 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cheng, P. et al. Unimolecular chemo-fluoro-luminescent reporter for crosstalk-free duplex imaging of hepatotoxicity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 10581–10584 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shuhendler, A. J., Pu, K., Cui, L., Uetrecht, J. P. & Rao, J. Real-time imaging of oxidative and nitrosative stress in the liver of live animals for drug-toxicity testing. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 373–380 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wu, Y. et al. Activatable probes for diagnosing and positioning liver injury and metastatic tumors by multispectral optoacoustic tomography. Nat. Commun. 9, 3983 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu, H.-W. et al. Recent progresses in small-molecule enzymatic fluorescent probes for cancer imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 7140–7180 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen, F. et al. Activatable magnetic/photoacoustic nanoplatform for redox-unlocked deep-tissue molecular imaging in vivo via Prussian blue nanoprobe. Anal. Chem. 92, 13452–13461 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang, C. et al. H2S-activated ‘one-key triple-lock’ bis-metal coordination network for visualizing precise therapy of colon cancer. CCS Chem. 3, 2126–2142 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang, H. et al. Ultrasensitive magnetic resonance imaging of systemic reactive oxygen species in vivo for early diagnosis of sepsis using activatable nanoprobes. Chem. Sci. 10, 3770–3778 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Li, A. et al. Deep-tissue real-time imaging of drug-induced liver injury with peroxynitrite-responsive 19F MRI nanoprobes. Chem. Comm. 57, 9622–9625 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Peng, J. et al. Real-time in vivo hepatotoxicity monitoring through chromophore-conjugated photon-upconverting nanoprobes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 4165–4169 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Du, K., Ramachandran, A. & Jaeschke, M. Oxidative stress during acetaminophen hepatotoxicity: sources, pathophysiological role and therapeutic potential. Redox Biol. 10, 148–156 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Song, G. et al. A magneto-optical nanoplatform for multimodality imaging of tumors in mice. ACS Nano 13, 7750–7758 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang, Y. et al. A T2ex MRI Dy-based contrast agent for direct pH imaging using a ratiometric approach. Dalton Trans. 50, 2014–2017 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Nagai, T., Yamada, S., Tominaga, T., Ichikawa, M. & Miyawaki, A. Expanded dynamic range of fluorescent indicators for Ca2+ by circularly permuted yellow fluorescent proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10554–10559 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Tang, J.-H. et al. Molecular engineering of self-immolative bioresponsive MR probes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 10045–10050 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Kotera, I., Iwasaki, T., Imamura, H., Noji, H. & Nagai, T. Reversible dimerization of Aequorea victoria fluorescent proteins increases the dynamic range of FRET-based indicators. ACS Chem. Biol. 5, 215–222 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang, J. & Katz, E. Digital biosensors with built-in logic for biomedical applications. Isr. J. Chem. 51, 141–150 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Huang, X. et al. Ratiometric optical nanoprobes enable accurate molecular detection and imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 2873–2920 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Afshari, M. J. et al. Vision for ratiometric nanoprobes: in vivo noninvasive visualization and readout of physiological hallmarks. ACS Nano 17, 7109–7134 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Algar, W. R., Hildebrandt, N., Vogel, S. S. & Medintz, I. L. FRET as a biomolecular research tool – understanding its potential while avoiding pitfalls. Nat. Methods 16, 815–829 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pelot, N. A. & Bowen, C. V. Quantification of superparamagnetic iron oxide using inversion recovery balanced steady-state free precession. Magn. Reson. Imaging 31, 953–960 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kim, K. H. & Park, S.-H. Artificial neural network for suppression of banding artifacts in balanced steady-state free precession MRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging 37, 139–146 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang, C. et al. Magnetic-susceptibility-dependent ratiometric probes for enhancing quantitative MRI. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21802755 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. U21A20287 to G.S. and 22234003 to X.-B.Z.), the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2019YFA0210100 to X.-B.Z.), and the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (grant no. JCYJ20210324140205013 to G.S.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.Z. synthesized various responsive polymers and Mn-porphyrins. J.X. prepared superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and Gd2O3 nanoparticles. C.Z. and B.N. completed the test experiment in solution. C.L. performed the TEM experiments and measured field-dependent magnetization hysteresis loops. T.Y. collected spectra data and conducted the MTT assay. L.X. constructed orthotopic glioma tumour models. C.Z., B.N. and J.X. built other animal models and conducted all animal experiments. C.Z. collected raw data in all experiments and designed schematics. G.S. and C.Z. designed all experiments. G.S. conceived the idea for this project. G.S. supervised all experiments. G.S., C.Z. and J.R. analysed all data and interpreted the results. C.Z., G.S. and J.R. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors provided critical feedback on the research and the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiao-Bing Zhang, Jianghong Rao or Guosheng Song.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Biomedical Engineering thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Merger of mapping images of tumour with corresponding MR images for H+-RMN or Ir-RMN-2.

a, b, Merger of T1 and T2 mapping images of tumour with corresponding T1/ T2-weighted MRI images of 4T1 tumour bearing mice intratumourally injected with H+-RMN or Ir-RMN-2.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 The effect of varying volumes of injected buffer on the RMS (r2/ r1) of tumours.

a, Schematic illustration of two groups of 4T1 tumour-bearing mice i.t. injected with H+-RMN, each group with the same mass but different volumes of buffer solution. b, c, Merger of T1/ T2-weighted MRI images and relaxation time mapping for Group 1 - 2, before and 4 h post injection of H+-RMN, respectively. d, e, Quantification of T2 relaxation time (d) and T1 relaxation time (e) of 4T1 tumour bearing mice i.t. injected with different volumes of H+-RMN (Group 1 - 2), measured from (b) and (c). f, RMS (r2/ r1) of tumour for Group 1 - 2, calculated from (d) and (e). For df, n = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student’s t-tests. n.s: no statistically significant differences (P = 0.622).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Merger of mapping images of tumour with corresponding MR images for H2O2-RMN or Ir-RMN-1.

a, b, Merger of T1 and T2 mapping images of tumour with corresponding T1/ T2-weighted MRI images of 4T1 tumour bearing mice intratumourally injected with H2O2-RMN or Ir-RMN-1.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Ratiometric MRI of H2S in tumour.

a, Merger of representative T1 and T2 mapping images of HCT116 tumour with corresponding T1/ T2-weighted MRI images, before and 6 h post injection of H2S-RMN. b, c, Quantification of T2 relaxation time (b) and T1 relaxation time (c) from (a). d, RMS (r2/ r1) of HCT116 tumour, calculated from (b) and (c). For bd, n = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Assessment tissue H2O2 levels between the tumours in living animals and those excised after sacrifice.

a, In vivo fluorescence images of 4T1-tumour-bearing mice intratumourally injected with NIR-H2O2 at different time pointes. b, Ex vivo fluorescence images of isolated tumour tissues intratumourally injected with NIR-H2O2 at different time pointes. c, Normalized fluorescence intensity form (a) and (b), n = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student’s t-tests. n.s: no statistically significant differences (P = 0.891 at 40 min, P = 0.877 at 90 min).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Quantification of H2S in tumour via ratiometric MRI.

a, Schematic illustration of quantification H2S concentration in tumour via using the standard curve between H2S concentration and the RMS (r2/ r1) of H2S-RMN. b, Quantification of H2S concentrations in HCT116 tumours for Group 1 - 4 via a commercial H2S kit. cf, Merger of representative T1 and T2 mapping images of tumour with corresponding T1/ T2-weighted MRI images for Group 1 - 4, before and 6 h post injection of H2S-RMN into mice bearing HCT116 tumours. g, Quantification of T2 relaxation time, measured from (c) - (f). h, RMS (r2/ r1) of tumour for Group 1 - 4, calculated from (g) and Supplementary Fig. 51. i, Correlation between RMS (r2/ r1) of tumour area and H2S concentration of tumour tissue for Group 1 - 4. For b, gi, n = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Quantification pH in tumour via ratiometric MRI.

a, Schematic illustration of quantification pH in tumour via using the standard curve between intratumour pH value and the RMS (r2/ r1) of H+-RMN. b, Quantification the pH value of Group 1 - 4, via a microelectrode pH meter. cf, Representative T1 and T2 mapping images of tumour merged with corresponding T1/ T2-weighted MRI images for Group 1 - 4. g, Quantification of T2 relaxation time, measured from (c) - (f). h, RMS (r2/ r1) of tumour for Group 1 - 4, calculated from (g) and Supplementary Fig. 52. i, Correlation between RMS (r2/ r1) of tumour area and pH value of tumour tissue for Group 1 - 4. For b, gi, n = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 T2-weighted MRI of drug-induced liver injury.

a, Coronal section of T2-weighted MRI images of representative slice in mice treated with APAP, APAP + H2O2-RMN and saline + H2O2-RMN, respectively. b, Normalized T2-MRI intensity from (a). c, Corresponding quantification of T2-MRI signal for APAP + H2O2-RMN and saline + H2O2-RMN from (a).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Ratiometric MRI of H2O2 during drug-induced liver injury.

ac, Merger of T1/ T2-weighted MRI images and relaxation time mapping of mice treated with saline + H2O2-RMN, APAP + H2O2-RMN or GSH + APAP + H2O2-RMN over time, respectively.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 10 Ratiometric MRI of orthotopic brain-tumour xenografts in mice.

a, b, T2-weighted MR images, T1 and T2 mapping images of orthotopic brain tumour bearing mice intravenously injected with H2O2-RMN or Ir-RMN-1 over time.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary methods, figures and tables.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data

Source data for the supplementary figures.

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, C., Nan, B., Xu, J. et al. Magnetic-susceptibility-dependent ratiometric probes for enhancing quantitative MRI. Nat. Biomed. Eng 9, 671–685 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-024-01286-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-024-01286-4

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer