Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A biochemical sensor with continuous extended stability in vivo

Abstract

The development of biosensors that can detect specific analytes continuously, in vivo, in real time has proven difficult due to biofouling, probe degradation and signal drift that often occur in vivo. By drawing inspiration from intestinal mucosa that can protect host cell receptors in the presence of the gut microbiome, we develop a synthetic biosensor that can continuously detect specific target molecules in vivo. The biomimetic multicomponent sensor features the hierarchical nano-bio interface design with three-dimensional bicontinuous nanoporous structure, polymer coating and aptamer switches, balancing small-molecule sensing and surface protection in complex biological environments. Our system is stable for at least 1 month in undiluted serum in vitro or 1 week implanted within the blood vessels of free-moving rats, retaining over 50% baseline signal and reproducible calibration curves. We demonstrate that the implanted system can intravenously track pharmacokinetics in real time even after 4 days of continuous exposure to flowing blood within rat femoral vein. In this way, our work provides a generalizable design foundation for biosensors that can continuously operate in vivo for extended durations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: A biologically inspired approach for long-term, stable electrochemical sensing in complex biological matrices.
Fig. 2: SENSBIT performance after a month-long incubation in human serum in vitro.
Fig. 3: SENSBIT exhibits greatly reduced surface contamination in human whole blood.
Fig. 4: In vivo real-time kanamycin monitoring over several hours with SENSBIT.
Fig. 5: Impact of week-long sensor–blood interface in free-moving rats.
Fig. 6: Intravenous real-time monitoring of kanamycin pharmacokinetics during anaesthesia with SENSBIT after 1, 2 or 4 days of i.v. implantation in free-moving rats.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files. Extra data are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data for Figs. 1–6 are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Sohn, E. Diagnosis: frontiers in blood testing. Nature 549, S16–S18 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gao, W. et al. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature 529, 509–514 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, J., Campbell, A. S., de Ávila, B. E.-F. & Wang, J. Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 389–406 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ye, C. et al. A wearable aptamer nanobiosensor for non-invasive female hormone monitoring. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 330–337 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sempionatto, J. R. et al. An epidermal patch for the simultaneous monitoring of haemodynamic and metabolic biomarkers. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 737–748 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, M. et al. A wearable electrochemical biosensor for the monitoring of metabolites and nutrients. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 1225–1235 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tavallaie, R. et al. Nucleic acid hybridization on an electrically reconfigurable network of gold-coated magnetic nanoparticles enables microRNA detection in blood. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 1066–1071 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Drummond, T. G., Hill, M. G. & Barton, J. K. Electrochemical DNA sensors. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1192–1199 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakatsuka, N. et al. Aptamer–field-effect transistors overcome Debye length limitations for small-molecule sensing. Science 362, 319–324 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Flynn, C. D. et al. Biomolecular sensors for advanced physiological monitoring. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 1, 560–575 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, L. et al. Rapid and ultrasensitive electromechanical detection of ions, biomolecules and SARS-CoV-2 RNA in unamplified samples. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 276–285 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yin, F. et al. DNA-framework-based multidimensional molecular classifiers for cancer diagnosis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 677–686 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Swensen, J. S. et al. Continuous, real-time monitoring of cocaine in undiluted blood serum via a microfluidic, electrochemical aptamer-based sensor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 4262–4266 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Vallée-Bélisle, A., Ricci, F. & Plaxco, K. W. Thermodynamic basis for the optimization of binding-induced biomolecular switches and structure-switching biosensors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13802–13807 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferguson, B. S. et al. Real-time, aptamer-based tracking of circulating therapeutic agents in living animals. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 213ra165 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Arroyo-Currás, N. et al. Real-time measurement of small molecules directly in awake, ambulatory animals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 645–650 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Parolo, C. et al. Real-time monitoring of a protein biomarker. ACS Sens. 5, 1877–1881 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sabaté del Río, J., Henry, O. Y. F., Jolly, P. & Ingber, D. E. An antifouling coating that enables affinity-based electrochemical biosensing in complex biological fluids. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 1143–1149 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Song, E., Li, J., Won, S. M., Bai, W. & Rogers, J. A. Materials for flexible bioelectronic systems as chronic neural interfaces. Nat. Mater. 19, 590–603 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shaver, A. & Arroyo-Currás, N. The challenge of long-term stability for nucleic acid-based electrochemical sensors. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 32, 100902 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leslie, D. C. et al. A bioinspired omniphobic surface coating on medical devices prevents thrombosis and biofouling. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1134–1140 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaffer, I. H. & Weitz, J. I. The blood compatibility challenge. Part 1: blood-contacting medical devices: the scope of the problem. Acta Biomater. 94, 2–10 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Frutiger, A. et al. Nonspecific binding—fundamental concepts and consequences for biosensing applications. Chem. Rev. 121, 8095–8160 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan, D. et al. Combinatorial polyacrylamide hydrogels for preventing biofouling on implantable biosensors. Adv. Mater. 34, 2109764 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, S. et al. Implantable hydrogel-protective DNA aptamer-based sensor supports accurate, continuous electrochemical analysis of drugs at multiple sites in living rats. ACS Nano 17, 18525–18538 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Li, H. et al. A biomimetic phosphatidylcholine-terminated monolayer greatly improves the in vivo performance of electrochemical aptamer-based sensors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 7492–7495 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Watkins, Z., Karajic, A., Young, T., White, R. & Heikenfeld, J. Week-long operation of electrochemical aptamer sensors: new insights into self-assembled monolayer degradation mechanisms and solutions for stability in serum at body temperature. ACS Sens. 8, 1119–1131 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Daggumati, P., Matharu, Z., Wang, L. & Seker, E. Biofouling-resilient nanoporous gold electrodes for DNA sensing. Anal. Chem. 87, 8618–8622 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Seo, J. W. et al. Real-time monitoring of drug pharmacokinetics within tumor tissue in live animals. Sci. Adv. 8, eabk2901 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Peterson, L. W. & Artis, D. Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 141–153 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wagner, C. E., Wheeler, K. M. & Ribbeck, K. Mucins and their role in shaping the functions of mucus barriers. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 34, 189–215 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Luo, L. Principles of Neurobiology (Garland Science, 2020).

  33. Latz, E. et al. Ligand-induced conformational changes allosterically activate Toll-like receptor 9. Nat. Immunol. 8, 772–779 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bansil, R. & Turner, B. S. The biology of mucus: composition, synthesis and organization. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 124, 3–15 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun, W. W. et al. Nanoarchitecture and dynamics of the mouse enteric glycocalyx examined by freeze-etching electron tomography and intravital microscopy. Commun. Biol. 3, 5 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Shaver, A., Curtis, S. D. & Arroyo-Currás, N. Alkanethiol monolayer end groups affect the long-term operational stability and signaling of electrochemical, aptamer-based sensors in biological fluids. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 11214–11223 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Companion Handbook to the WHO Guidelines for the Programmatic Management of Drug-resistant Tuberculosis (World Health Organization, 2014).

  38. Chien, J. C., Baker, S. W., Soh, H. T. & Arbabian, A. Design and analysis of a sample-and-hold CMOS electrochemical sensor for aptamer-based therapeutic drug monitoring. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits 55, 2914–2929 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lowe, S., O’Brien-Simpson, N. M. & Connal, L. A. Antibiofouling polymer interfaces: poly(ethylene glycol) and other promising candidates. Polym. Chem. 6, 198–212 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sharma, S., Johnson, R. W. & Desai, T. A. XPS and AFM analysis of antifouling PEG interfaces for microfabricated silicon biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 20, 227–239 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shaver, A. et al. Nuclease hydrolysis does not drive the rapid signaling decay of DNA aptamer-based electrochemical sensors in biological fluids. Langmuir 37, 5213–5221 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Chandrasekaran, A. R. Nuclease resistance of DNA nanostructures. Nat. Rev. Chem. 5, 225–239 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Armstrong, J. K., Wenby, R. B., Meiselman, H. J. & Fisher, T. C. The hydrodynamic radii of macromolecules and their effect on red blood cell aggregation. Biophys. J. 87, 4259–4270 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Lin, P.-H. & Li, B.-R. Antifouling strategies in advanced electrochemical sensors and biosensors. Analyst 145, 1110–1120 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Laktionov, M. Y., Zhulina, E. B., Richter, R. P. & Borisov, O. V. Polymer brush in a nanopore: effects of solvent strength and macromolecular architecture studied by self-consistent field and scaling theory. Polymers 13, 3929 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Fu, K. et al. Accelerated electron transfer in nanostructured electrodes improves the sensitivity of electrochemical biosensors. Adv. Sci. 8, 2102495 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. White, R. J., Rowe, A. A. & Plaxco, K. W. Re-engineering aptamers to support reagentless, self-reporting electrochemical sensors. Analyst 135, 589–594 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Maganzini, N., Thompson, I., Wilson, B. & Soh, H. T. Pre-equilibrium biosensors as an approach towards rapid and continuous molecular measurements. Nat. Commun. 13, 7072 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Jaffer, I. H., Fredenburgh, J. C., Hirsh, J. & Weitz, J. I. Medical device-induced thrombosis: what causes it and how can we prevent it? J. Thromb. Haemost. 13, S72–S81 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Weber, M. et al. Blood-contacting biomaterials: in vitro evaluation of the hemocompatibility. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 6, 99 (2018).

  51. Bard, A. J., Faulkner, L. R. & White, H. S. Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2022).

  52. Das, J. et al. Reagentless biomolecular analysis using a molecular pendulum. Nat. Chem. 13, 428–434 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Helmsley Trust, Wellcome LEAP SAVE programme, Stanford Material and Child Health Research Institute pilot grant and the National Institutes of Health (NIH, OT2OD025342). Part of this work was performed at the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities (SNSF), Stanford Nanofabrication Facility (SNF) and Stanford University Cell Sciences Imaging Core Facility (RRID:SCR_017787), supported by the National Science Foundation under award ECCS-2026822 and ECCS-1542152. We thank the Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection for providing facilities and the Stanford Veterinary Service Center for their assistance with animal care and training. Viability and cell proliferation assays were performed by N. Quispe Calla at Stanford Transgenic, Knockout and Tumor Model Center. Flow cytometry analysis for this project was done on instruments in the Stanford Shared FACS Facility. Y.C. was supported by the T. S. Lo Graduate Fellowship at Stanford University. Z.O. was supported by the Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute at Stanford University. Y.C. also thanks E. Sullivan of the Technical Communications Program at Stanford for thoughtful feedback on writing, and E. Bagley and N. Torres for lab management support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.C. and K.X.F. conceived the project. H.T.S. supervised the project. Y.C. and K.X.F. initiated the idea of using a hierarchical nanoarchitecture for long-term stable biosensing in complex biological matrices. Y.C., K.X.F. and H.T.S. designed the experiments. Y.C. performed the experiments, and collected and analysed the data. Y.C. and Z.O. conducted the optical experiments and image analysis. R.C. performed animal surgeries and trained Y.C. Y.C., J.W.K and J.-C.C. worked on improving intravenous microwire probes. V.K. and H.Y.Y.N. advised on electrochemical sensing. Y.C., K.X.F., M.E and H.T.S. co-wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Tom Soh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Y.C., K.X.F. and H.T.S. are listed as co-inventors on a patent application related to this work filed at the US Patent and Trademark Office (No. PCT/US2024/060103). All other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Biomedical Engineering thanks Yi Zhang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Table 1, Notes 1–5, Figs. 1–29, Videos 1 and 2, and References.

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Peer Review File (download PDF )

Supplementary Video 1 (download MP4 )

Intravenous implantation. Successful intravenous access was confirmed on the basis of blood flow after retracting the implanted probes.

Supplementary Video 2 (download MP4 )

Multiday implantation in free-moving rat. The rat was able to move freely while the implanted electrode probes were constantly subjected to blood flow and mechanical strain.

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Fu, K.X., Cotton, R. et al. A biochemical sensor with continuous extended stability in vivo. Nat. Biomed. Eng 9, 1517–1530 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-025-01389-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-025-01389-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research