Extended Data Fig. 9: ER and MAF interaction dependency on KDM1A. | Nature Cell Biology

Extended Data Fig. 9: ER and MAF interaction dependency on KDM1A.

From: MAF amplification licenses ERα through epigenetic remodelling to drive breast cancer metastasis

Extended Data Fig. 9: ER and MAF interaction dependency on KDM1A.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a, Proximity ligation assay (PLA) of HA or KDM1A antibody alone or both antibodies together in MAF-overexpressing MCF7 cells treated with DMSO or ER-PROTAC (50 nM) 24 h prior to fixation. Representative confocal microscopy images for PLA red signal and DAPI nuclear staining with magnified inset are shown. Scale bar, 50 μm; inset scale bar, 10 μm. b, PLA signal quantification. Each dot represents the average PLA signal from 50 to 142 nuclei per condition. n = 3 biological replicates. Bars represent mean ± sem. Statistical significance, two-tailed Wilcoxon n-test. c, Representative immunoblots showing HA co-IP of HA-tagged MAF (S or L isoforms) with endogenous KDM1A upon ER degradation with a PROTAC. d, PLA of HA or ER antibody alone or both antibodies together in MAF-overexpressing MCF7 cells transduced with scrambled (shSc) or KDM1A-targeted shRNA. Representative confocal microscopy images for PLA red signal and DAPI nuclear staining with magnified inset are shown. Scale bar, 50 μm; inset scale bar, 10 μm. e, PLA quantification. Each dot represents the average PLA signal from 53 to 126 nuclei per condition. n = 3 biological replicates. Bars represent mean ± sem. Statistical significance, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test. f, Representative immunoblots showing HA co-IP of HA-tagged MAF (S or L isoforms) with endogenous ER in cells transduced with scrambled or KDM1A-targeted shRNAs.

Source data

Back to article page