Fig. 6: PRC1 constrains TFIID binding to inhibit gene expression. | Nature Cell Biology

Fig. 6: PRC1 constrains TFIID binding to inhibit gene expression.

From: The Polycomb system sustains promoters in a deep OFF state by limiting pre-initiation complex formation to counteract transcription

Fig. 6: PRC1 constrains TFIID binding to inhibit gene expression.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a, Heat map illustrating cChIP–seq signal for RINGB (PRC1) (green, left) or endogenously T7-tagged TAF1 (blue, right) in untreated or IAA-treated ES cells across TSSs. The distance in kilobases from left and right of TSSs is shown below each heat map. To visualize changes in T7-TAF1 signal, the log2-transformed fold change in IAA-treated versus untreated (that is, log2FC(IAA/UNT)) value is shown to the right of the T7-TAF1 cChIP–seq signal. To visualize steady-state gene expression levels and increases in gene expression after RING1B-AID depletion, RPKM (reads per kilobase per million mapped reads) values for untreated cells and log2FC(IAA/UNT) values were calculated for each corresponding gene using calibrated nuclear RNA sequencing (cnRNA-seq) data21 and plotted as heat maps on the right. TSSs were segregated into non-Polycomb (n = 9,899), Polycomb (n = 4,869) and non-CpG islands (n = 5,869) groupings based on the presence of non-methylated CpG island (CGI) and binding of PRC1 and PRC2 at their promoters as previously described8. Heat maps are ranked by RING1B signal. Genes examined in live-cell imaging of transcription (red) as well as some classical Polycomb genes (black) are indicated. b, A meta plot (left) illustrating the log2FC(IAA/UNT) of T7-TAF1 cChIP–seq signal at the three classes of TSSs shown in a and a box plot (right) showing log2FC(IAA/UNT) of cChIP signal integrated over ±1 kb from TSSs. The boxes centred on median value show the IQR to represent minimal and maximal values, the centre lines represent the median and whiskers extend by 1.5× IQR or the most extreme point (whichever is closer to the median), whereas notches extend by 1.58× IQR/n1/2, giving a roughly 95% confidence interval for comparing medians. P values were calculated using a two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test. ***P = 2.2 × 10–16 (non-Polycomb versus non-CGI), ***P = 6.5 × 10–132 (non-Polycomb versus Polycomb) and ***P = 2.2 × 10–16 (Polycomb versus non-CGI). c, Schematic illustrating the combinatorial degron strategy used to examine the contribution of TFIID to de-repression of Polycomb target genes after depletion of PRC1. d, Western blot analysis of the levels of RING1B-AID and dTAG-TAF1 after simultaneous addition of IAA and dTAG-13 over a 2-h time course. SUZ12 is shown as a loading control. Shown are the representative result of at least three experiments. e, A smRNA-FISH image labelling Zic2 (Polycomb target) transcripts in untreated cells or after 4 h of IAA treatment (RING1B depletion) illustrating increased transcript numbers. White dashed lines indicate cell outlines. Scale bar, 10 µm. f, smRNA-FISH analysis of transcript-per-cell distributions for untreated cells, TAF1-depleted (dTAG-13-treated) cells, RING1B-AID-depleted (IAA-treated) cells, and both RING1B- and TAF1-depleted (IAA + dTAG-13-treated) cells. Depletions were performed for 4 h and at least 400 cells were measured for each gene in each condition. Source numerical data and unprocessed blots are available in Source data.

Source data

Back to article page