Abstract
Understanding the structural dynamics of ligands and their interaction with catalytic centres under reaction conditions remains a fundamental challenge, yet it is essential for catalyst design. Here we reveal an in situ transformation of Ni–Fe hydroxide into a stable superoxo-hydroxide phase, which is accompanied by the formation of lattice O–O (Olatt–Olatt) ligands, as demonstrated using operando 18O-labelling spectroelectrochemistry and machine-learning-assisted global optimization. By correlating the intrinsic activity of Fe with the Olatt–Olatt concentration across a series of Fe-incorporated transition-metal hydroxides and oxides, we demonstrate that Olatt–Olatt triggers Fe activation for oxygen evolution electrocatalysis—a finding further supported by first-principles calculations. Oxygen production proceeds via an adsorbate evolution mechanism, and the enhanced reaction kinetics stem from the lowered activation energy at surface Fe sites in the newly formed superoxo-hydroxide structure. This work offers a strategic framework for designing high-performance Fe-incorporated electrocatalysts and underscores the pivotal role of ligand dynamics in activating catalytic centres.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout




Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available within this article and its Supplementary Information. The raw data files in another format are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The software code of LASP and G-NN potential used within the article is available from the corresponding authors upon request or at http://www.lasphub.com.
References
Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Jaroniec, M. & Qiao, S. Z. Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen- and hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2060–2086 (2015).
Seh, Z. W. et al. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: insights into materials design. Science 355, eaad4998 (2017).
Gür, T. M. Review of electrical energy storage technologies, materials and systems: challenges and prospects for large-scale grid storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 2696–2767 (2018).
Kibsgaard, J. & Chorkendorff, I. Considerations for the scaling-up of water splitting catalysts. Nat. Energy 4, 430–433 (2019).
Bockris, O. J. & Otagawa, T. The electrocatalysis of oxygen evolution on perovskites. J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 290–302 (1984).
Suntivich, J., May, K. J., Gasteiger, H. A., Goodenough, J. B. & Shao-Horn, Y. A perovskite oxide optimized for oxygen evolution catalysis from molecular orbital principles. Science 334, 1383–1385 (2011).
Sun, Y. et al. Covalency competition dominates the water oxidation structure–activity relationship on spinel oxides. Nat. Catal. 3, 554–563 (2020).
Subbaraman, R. et al. Trends in activity for the water electrolyser reactions on 3d M(Ni,Co,Fe,Mn) hydr(oxy)oxide catalysts. Nat. Mater. 11, 550–557 (2012).
Burke, M. S., Enman, L. J., Batchellor, A. S., Zou, S. & Boettcher, S. W. Oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis on transition metal oxides and (oxy)hydroxides: activity trends and design principles. Chem. Mater. 27, 7549–7558 (2015).
Chung, D. Y. et al. Dynamic stability of active sites in hydr(oxy)oxides for the oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Energy 5, 222–230 (2020).
Yeo, B. S. & Bell, A. T. Enhanced activity of gold-supported cobalt oxide for the electrochemical evolution of oxygen. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 5587–5593 (2011).
Chen, J. Y. et al. Operando analysis of NiFe and Fe oxyhydroxide electrocatalysts for water oxidation: detection of Fe4+ by Mossbauer spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 15090–15093 (2015).
Zheng, X. et al. Theory-driven design of high-valence metal sites for water oxidation confirmed using in situ soft X-ray absorption. Nat. Chem. 10, 149–154 (2018).
Mefford, J. T. et al. Correlative operando microscopy of oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Nature 593, 67–73 (2021).
Grimaud, A. et al. Activating lattice oxygen redox reactions in metal oxides to catalyse oxygen evolution. Nat. Chem. 9, 457–465 (2017).
Anderson, J. S., Rittle, J. & Peters, J. C. Catalytic conversion of nitrogen to ammonia by an iron model complex. Nature 501, 84–87 (2013).
Čorić, I. et al. Binding of dinitrogen to an iron–sulfur–carbon site. Nature 526, 96–99 (2015).
Grimaud, A. et al. Activation of surface oxygen sites on an iridium-based model catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Energy 2, 16189 (2017).
Huang, Z. F. et al. Chemical and structural origin of lattice oxygen oxidation in Co–Zn oxyhydroxide oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Nat. Energy 4, 329–338 (2019).
Nong, H. N. et al. Key role of chemistry versus bias in electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Nature 587, 408–413 (2020).
Lin, C. et al. In-situ reconstructed Ru atom array on α-MnO2 with enhanced performance for acidic water oxidation. Nat. Catal. 4, 1012–1023 (2021).
Corrigan, D. A. The catalysis of the oxygen evolution reaction by iron impurities in thin film nickel oxide electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 134, 377–384 (1987).
Roy, C. et al. Impact of nanoparticle size and lattice oxygen on water oxidation on NiFeOxHy. Nat. Catal. 1, 820–829 (2018).
Louie, M. W. & Bell, A. T. An investigation of thin-film Ni–Fe oxide catalysts for the electrochemical evolution of oxygen. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12329–12337 (2013).
Trotochaud, L., Young, S. L., Ranney, J. K. & Boettcher, S. W. Nickel–iron oxyhydroxide oxygen-evolution electrocatalysts: The role of intentional and incidental iron incorporation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 6744–6753 (2014).
Friebel, D. et al. Identification of highly active Fe sites in (Ni,Fe)OOH for electrocatalytic water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 1305–1313 (2015).
Ahn, H. S. & Bard, A. J. Surface interrogation scanning electrochemical microscopy of Ni1-xFexOOH (0<x<0.27) oxygen evolving catalyst: kinetics of the ‘fast’ iron sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 313–318 (2016).
Stevens, M. B., Trang, C. D. M., Enman, L. J., Deng, J. & Boettcher, S. W. Reactive Fe-sites in Ni/Fe (Oxy)hydroxide are responsible for exceptional oxygen electrocatalysis activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 11361–11364 (2017).
Lee, S., Banjac, K., Lingenfelder, M. & Hu, X. Oxygen isotope labeling experiments reveal different reaction sites for the oxygen evolution reaction on nickel and nickel iron oxides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 10295–10299 (2019).
Dionigi, F. et al. In-situ structure and catalytic mechanism of NiFe and CoFe layered double hydroxides during oxygen evolution. Nat. Commun. 11, 2522 (2020).
Hao, Y. et al. Recognition of surface oxygen intermediates on NiFe oxyhydroxide oxygen-evolving catalysts by homogeneous oxidation reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 1493–1502 (2021).
Kuai, C. et al. Phase segregation reversibility in mixed-metal hydroxide water oxidation catalysts. Nat. Catal. 3, 743–753 (2020).
Diaz-Morales, O., Ferrus-Suspedra, D. & Koper, M. T. M. The importance of nickel oxyhydroxide deprotonation on its activity towards electrochemical water oxidation. Chem. Sci. 7, 2639–2645 (2016).
Cramer, C. J., Tolman, W. B., Theopold, K. H. & Rheingold, A. L. Variable character of O–O and M–O bonding in side-on (η2) 1:1 metal complexes of O2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 3635–3640 (2003).
Cho, J., Sarangi, R. & Nam, W. Mononuclear metal–O2 complexes bearing macrocyclic N-tetramethylated cyclam ligands. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 1321–1330 (2012).
Zhang, S. et al. Evidence of matrix lattice distortion in Zn1−xCoxO nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 4263–4269 (2009).
Eum, D. et al. Coupling structural evolution and oxygen-redox electrochemistry in layered transition metal oxides. Nat. Mater. 21, 664–672 (2022).
Frati, F., Hunault, M. O. J. Y. & de Groot, F. M. F. Oxygen K-edge X-ray absorption spectra. Chem. Rev. 120, 4056–4110 (2020).
Zaanen, J., Sawatzky, G. A. & Allen, J. W. Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 418–421 (1985).
Sawatzky, G., Green, R., Mall, E., Bc, V. & Vt, C. in Quantum Materials: Experiments and Theory Modeling and Simulation vol. 6 (Pavarini, E. et al.) 1–36 (Verlag des Forschungszentrum, 2016).
Hong, W. T. et al. Charge-transfer-energy-dependent oxygen evolution reaction mechanisms for perovskite oxides. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2190–2200 (2017).
Martirez, J. & Carter, E. A. Unraveling oxygen evolution on iron-doped β-nickel oxyhydroxide: the key role of highly active molecular-like sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 693–705 (2018).
Han, Y. et al. Preparation of Ni2+−Fe3+ layered double hydroxide material with high crystallinity and well-defined hexagonal shapes. Chem. Mater. 20, 360–363 (2008).
Tong, Y. et al. Vibronic superexchange in double perovskite electrocatalyst for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 11165–11169 (2018).
Yu, J., Martin, B. R., Clearfield, A., Luo, Z. & Sun, L. One-step direct synthesis of layered double hydroxide single-layer nanosheets. Nanoscale 7, 9448–9451 (2015).
Gao, P., Patterson, M. L., Tadayyoni, M. A. & Weaver, M. J. Gold as a ubiquitous substrate for intense surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Langmuir 1, 173–176 (1985).
Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 537–541 (2005).
Wei, C. et al. Approaches for measuring the surface areas of metal oxide electrocatalysts for determining their intrinsic electrocatalytic activity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 2518–2534 (2019).
Huang, S. D., Shang, C., Zhang, X. J. & Liu, Z. P. Material discovery by combining stochastic surface walking global optimization with a neural network. Chem. Sci. 8, 6327–6337 (2017).
Huang, S. D., Shang, C., Kang, P. L., Zhang, X. J. & Liu, Z. P. LASP: fast global potential energy surface exploration. WIREs Comput Mol Sci. 9, e1415 (2019).
Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Cococcioni, M. & de Gironcoli, S. Linear response approach to the calculation of the effective interaction parameters in the LDA + U method. Phys. Rev. B 71, 035105 (2005).
Li, Y. F. & Selloni, A. Mechanism and activity of water oxidation on selected surfaces of pure and Fe-doped NiOx. ACS Catal. 4, 1148–1153 (2014).
Fattebert, J. L. & Gygi, F. Linear-scaling first-principles molecular dynamics with plane-waves accuracy. Phys. Rev. B 73, 115124 (2006).
Walter, M. G. et al. Solar water splitting cells. Chem. Rev. 110, 6446–6473 (2010).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2022YFA1505200), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 21972023, 22072030, 22022301, 22272029 and 22472036), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (grant nos. 22520711100, 23ZR1406900 and 2024ZDSYS02) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no. 20720220008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.Z. designed and conceived the experiment. G.S. fabricated the electrodes and carried out electrochemical and in situ spectroscopy characterizations. T.L. and Q.X. performed in situ XRD measurements. C.Y., H.G., H.T., S. Zhao, C.Z., Y.S. and J.W. assisted with other physical characterizations. X.L. and P.-C.C. conducted the TEM characterization. Jiong Li and S. Zhang helped on the XAS data acquisition. J.S. and K.H.L.Z. worked on the thin-film catalyst preparation. Jili Li, Y.-F.L. and Z.-P.L. contributed to the DFT calculations. G.S., Jili Li, Y.-F.L and L.Z. cowrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and provided feedback on the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Chemistry thanks Jakub Drnec, Brett Savoie, Li Song and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Notes 1–7, Figs. 1–45 and Tables 1–15.
Supplementary Data 1
Crystal structures of key OER intermediate states.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 1
Source data for Fig. 1.
Source Data Fig. 2
Source data for Fig. 2.
Source Data Fig. 3
Source data for Fig. 3.
Source Data Fig. 4
Source data for Fig. 4.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, G., Li, J., Lu, T. et al. Lattice O–O ligands in Fe-incorporated hydroxides enhance water oxidation electrocatalysis. Nat. Chem. 17, 1607–1614 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-025-01898-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-025-01898-6


