Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Limited net poleward movement of reef species over a decade of climate extremes

Abstract

Warming seas are expected to drive marine life poleward. However, few systematic observations confirm movement among entire communities at both warm and cool range edges. We analysed two continent-scale reef monitoring datasets to quantify changes in latitudinal range edges of 662 Australian shallow-water reef fishes and invertebrates over a decade punctuated by climate extremes. Temperate and tropical species both showed little net movement overall, with retreat often balancing expansion across the continent. Within regions, however, range edges shifted ~100 km per decade, on average, in the poleward or equatorward directions expected from warming or cooling. Although some species responded rapidly to temperature change, we found little evidence for mass poleward migration over the decade. Previous studies based on extreme species observations, rather than tracking all species through time, may have overestimated the prevalence, magnitude and longevity of range shifts amongst marine taxa.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Sea surface temperature change, trends and thermal anomalies associated with the survey period at reef sites around Australia (2008–2022).
Fig. 2: Limited net movement in warm and cool edges of tropical and temperate reef species from 2010 to 2022.
Fig. 3: Regional latitudinal shifts were greater for cool range edges.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All original survey data can be directly accessed and downloaded through the RLS website and portal: https://reeflifesurvey.com/survey-data/. SST data from the NOAA Coral Reef Watch programme are freely available at https://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/main/. The GitHub repository can be found at https://github.com/yannherfux/range_shifts (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12817835)68. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Data subsets and R scripts specifically used for this analysis are available via GitHub at https://github.com/yannherfux/range_shifts (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12817835)68.

References

  1. Cheung, W. W. L. et al. Projecting global marine biodiversity impacts under climate change scenarios. Fish Fish. 10, 235–251 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burrows, M. T. et al. Geographical limits to species-range shifts are suggested by climate velocity. Nature 507, 492–495 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. García Molinos, J. et al. Climate velocity and the future global redistribution of marine biodiversity. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 83–88 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hodapp, D. et al. Climate change disrupts core habitats of marine species. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 3304–3317 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beas-Luna, R. et al. Geographic variation in responses of kelp forest communities of the California current to recent climatic changes. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 6457–6473 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheung, W. W. L. et al. Climate-change induced tropicalisation of marine communities in Western Australia. Mar. Freshw. Res. 63, 415–427 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McLean, M. et al. Disentangling tropicalization and deborealization in marine ecosystems under climate change. Curr. Biol. 31, 4817–4823 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Verges, A. et al. The tropicalization of temperate marine ecosystems: climate-mediated changes in herbivory and community phase shifts. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281, 20140846 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dahms, C. & Killen, S. S. Temperature change effects on marine fish range shifts: a meta-analysis of ecological and methodological predictors. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 4459–4479 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kotiaho, J. S. & Tomkins, J. L. Meta‐analysis, can it ever fail? Oikos 96, 551–553 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fredston-Hermann, A. et al. Cold range edges of marine fishes track climate change better than warm edges. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 2908–2922 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanaka, K. R. et al. North Pacific warming shifts the juvenile range of a marine apex predator. Sci. Rep. 11, 3373 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pecl, G. T. et al. Redmap Australia: challenges and successes with a large-scale citizen science-based approach to ecological monitoring and community engagement on climate change. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 11 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheung, W. W., Watson, R. & Pauly, D. Signature of ocean warming in global fisheries catch. Nature 497, 365–368 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Champion, C., Brodie, S. & Coleman, M. A. Climate-driven range shifts are rapid yet variable among recreationally important coastal-pelagic fishes. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 622299 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harrison, A. L. et al. The political biogeography of migratory marine predators. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1571–1578 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pinsky, M. L., Selden, R. L. & Kitchel, Z. J. Climate-driven shifts in marine species ranges: scaling from organisms to communities. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 12, 153–179 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pandolfi, J. M., Staples, T. L. & Kiessling, W. Increased extinction in the emergence of novel ecological communities. Science 370, 220–222 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Poloczanska, E. S. et al. Global imprint of climate change on marine life. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 919–925 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lenoir, J. & Svenning, J. C. Climate-related range shifts—a global multidimensional synthesis and new research directions. Ecography 38, 15–28 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wernberg, T. et al. Impacts of climate change in a global hotspot for temperate marine biodiversity and ocean warming. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 400, 7–16 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fowler, A. M., Parkinson, K. & Booth, D. J. New poleward observations of 30 tropical reef fishes in temperate southeastern Australia. Mar. Biodivers. 48, 2249–2254 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Verges, A. et al. Long-term empirical evidence of ocean warming leading to tropicalization of fish communities, increased herbivory, and loss of kelp. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13791–13796 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Antão, L. H. et al. Temperature-related biodiversity change across temperate marine and terrestrial systems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 927–933 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pigot, A. L. et al. Abrupt expansion of climate change risks for species globally. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1060–1071 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Edgar, G. J. et al. Continent-wide declines in shallow reef life over a decade of ocean warming. Nature 615, 858–865 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Menegotto, A. & Rangel, T. F. Mapping knowledge gaps in marine diversity reveals a latitudinal gradient of missing species richness. Nat. Commun. 9, 4713 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Edgar, G. J. et al. Establishing the ecological basis for conservation of shallow marine life using Reef Life Survey. Biol. Conserv. 252, 108855 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stuart-Smith, R. D. et al. Assessing national biodiversity trends for rocky and coral reefs through the integration of citizen science and scientific monitoring programs. Bioscience 67, 134–146 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Edgar, G. J. & Barrett, N. S. An assessment of population responses of common inshore fishes and invertebrates following declaration of five Australian marine protected areas. Environ. Conserv. 39, 271–281 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Day, P. B. et al. Species’ thermal ranges predict changes in reef fish community structure during 8 years of extreme temperature variation. Divers. Distrib. 24, 1036–1046 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hughes, T. P. et al. Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature 543, 373–377 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Oliver, E. C. J. et al. Marine heatwaves. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 13, 313–342 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Oliver, E. C. J. et al. The unprecedented 2015/16 Tasman Sea marine heatwave. Nat. Commun. 8, 16101 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Oliver, E. C. J. et al. Marine heatwaves off eastern Tasmania: trends, interannual variability, and predictability. Prog. Oceanogr. 161, 116–130 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Johnson, C. R. et al. Climate change cascades: shifts in oceanography, species’ ranges and subtidal marine community dynamics in eastern Tasmania. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 400, 17–32 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Stuart-Smith, R. D. et al. Ecosystem restructuring along the Great Barrier Reef following mass coral bleaching. Nature 560, 92–96 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Stuart-Smith, R. D. et al. Stability in temperate reef communities over a decadal time scale despite concurrent ocean warming. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 122–134 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Maclean, I. M. D. & Early, R. Macroclimate data overestimate range shifts of plants in response to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 484–490 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Walker, B. et al. Response diversity as a sustainability strategy. Nat. Sustain. 6, 621–629 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Brown, S. C. et al. Faster ocean warming threatens richest areas of marine biodiversity. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 5849–5858 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Chaudhary, C. et al. Global warming is causing a more pronounced dip in marine species richness around the equator. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2015094118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Tewksbury, J. J., Huey, R. B. & Deutsch, C. A. Putting the heat on tropical animals. Science 320, 1296–1297 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wright, S. J., Muller-Landau, H. C. & Schipper, J. A. N. The future of tropical species on a warmer planet. Conserv. Biol. 23, 1418–1426 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Stillman, J. H. Acclimation capacity underlies susceptibility to climate change. Science 301, 65 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Newbold, T. et al. Tropical and Mediterranean biodiversity is disproportionately sensitive to land-use and climate change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1630–1638 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Waldock, C. et al. The shape of abundance distributions across temperature gradients in reef fishes. Ecol. Lett. 22, 685–696 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cahill, A. E. et al. Causes of warm-edge range limits: systematic review, proximate factors and implications for climate change. J. Biogeogr. 41, 429–442 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fordham, D. A. et al. Extinction debt from climate change for frogs in the wet tropics. Biol. Lett. 12, 20160236 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ziegler, S. L. et al. Marine protected areas, marine heatwaves, and the resilience of nearshore fish communities. Sci. Rep. 13, 1405 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Caputi, N. et al. Factors affecting the recovery of invertebrate stocks from the 2011 Western Australian extreme marine heatwave. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 484 (2019).

  52. Smith, K. E. et al. Biological impacts of marine heatwaves. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 15, 119–145 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Nieblas, A.-E. et al. Variability of biological production in low wind‐forced regional upwelling systems: a case study off southeastern Australia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 1548–1558 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Fredston-Hermann, A., Gaines, S. D. & Halpern, B. S. Biogeographic constraints to marine conservation in a changing climate. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1429, 5–17 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Alvarez-Noriega, M. et al. Global biogeography of marine dispersal potential. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1196–1203 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Assis, J. et al. Major shifts at the range edge of marine forests: the combined effects of climate changes and limited dispersal. Sci. Rep. 7, 44348 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Marjakangas, E. L. et al. Ecological barriers mediate spatiotemporal shifts of bird communities at a continental scale. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2213330120 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Carnell, P. E. & Keough, M. J. More severe disturbance regimes drive the shift of a kelp forest to a sea urchin barren in south-eastern Australia. Sci. Rep. 10, 11272 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Veenhof, R. J. et al. Urchin grazing of kelp gametophytes in warming oceans. J. Phycol. 59, 838–855 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. McCrea, R. et al. Realising the promise of large data and complex models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 14, 4–11 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Nathan, R. et al. Big-data approaches lead to an increased understanding of the ecology of animal movement. Science 375, eabg1780 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Waldock, C. et al. A quantitative review of abundance‐based species distribution models. Ecography 2022, e05694 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hughes, T. P. et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the Anthropocene. Science 359, 80–83 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Harris, A. et al. A new high-resolution sea surface temperature blended analysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 1015–1026 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Pebesma, E. J. Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Comput. Geosci. 30, 683–691 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Dowle, M. S. A. data.table: extension of ‘data.frame’. R package version 1.9.2. CRAN https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.data.table (2023).

  67. Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1686 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Herrera Fuchs, Y. Range shifts. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12817835 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support for field surveys was provided by the Australian Research Council; the Australian Institute of Marine Science; the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies; Parks Australia; Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania; New South Wales Department of Primary Industries; Parks Victoria; South Australia Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources; Western Australia Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions; The Ian Potter Foundation; Minderoo Foundation; and the Marine Biodiversity Hub, a collaborative partnership supported through the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme. R.D.S.-S. was supported by ARC FT190100599. We thank the many colleagues and RLS divers who participated in data collection, and Antonia Cooper and Elizabeth Oh for data management. RLS and ATRC data management is supported by Australia’s Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS)—IMOS is enabled by the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy. We are also grateful to the data curators of the NOAA Coral Reef Watch programme for managing extensive datasets and making them available to the public.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.H.F. developed the analysis, code script and manuscript under supervision from R.D.S.-S. and G.J.E. R.D.S.-S. guided research questions and article structure. G.J.E. conceptualized methods to estimate range edges on the basis of abundance-weighted quantiles. A.E.B. and C.W. provided statistical support. All authors contributed to key ideas and interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yann Herrera Fuchs.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Climate Change thanks Manuel Hidalgo and Joice Silva de Souza for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Table 1 Number of range shifts greater than 1° latitude by guild, range edge and region
Extended Data Table 2 Changes in Tasmanian temperate invertebrates’ cool edges
Extended Data Table 3 Changes in southern temperate species’ warm edges
Extended Data Table 4 Changes in southern temperate species’ cool edges

Extended Data Fig. 1 Latitudinal distribution of range shifts.

Density curves show equatorward (dark grey) and poleward (light grey) range shifts where displacement was greater than 1° at warm and cool edges.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Temperature fluctuations of Solitary and Lord Howe Islands.

Yearly averages of sea-surface temperature (SST) fluctuations for sites in Solitary Islands and Lorde Howe Island. Dashed lines indicate the date of the first year and last year these sites were surveyed, which are the two time points used to calculate site-level temperature and latitudinal limit changes in these locations.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Regional latitudinal shifts using data from 2010–2015 and 2016–2021.

a) Number of sites included in analysis per region and period each year. b) Replication of Fig. 3 using averages from all the years a site was surveyed at the two time periods. Positive values in warm and cool edges indicate range expansion and contraction, respectively. Asterisks (*) signal two-sided t-tests where p < 0.05 (mu = 0), for tropical and temperate species. Geographic restrictions for range shift detectability are presented as circles (no restriction), triangles (north coast sampling barrier) and squares (Southern Ocean habitat barrier). Data are presented as mean range shift values ± SEM in each region where N range edges > 10.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Conceptual diagram of range edge estimation.

a) Warm (red) and cool (blue) limits were estimated for a species range from b) the latitudes associated with the 5th and 95th percentiles (black dashed lines) of cumulative abundance for a species distribution. See Methods for details.

Source data

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.

Source data

Source Data Figs. 1–3, Extended Data Figs. 1–4, Extended Data Tables 1–4 and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2

Summarized datasets with range edge calculations for Figs. 1–3, Extended Data Figs. 1–4, Extended Data Tables 1–4 and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fuchs, Y.H., Edgar, G.J., Bates, A.E. et al. Limited net poleward movement of reef species over a decade of climate extremes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 14, 1087–1092 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02116-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02116-w

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing