Efforts by conservation scientists to draw public attention to the biodiversity crisis are increasingly met with denialist rhetoric. We summarize some of the methods used by denialists to undermine scientific evidence on biodiversity loss, and outline pathways forward for the scientific community to counter misinformation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Mental models of the sixth mass extinction reveal pathways for transformative sustainability action
Scientific Reports Open Access 20 February 2026
-
Land conversion to agriculture induces taxonomic homogenization of soil microbial communities globally
Nature Communications Open Access 29 April 2024
-
Enhancing multiple scales of seafloor biodiversity with mussel restoration
Scientific Reports Open Access 23 March 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Rosenau, J. Trends Microbiol. 20, 567–569 (2012).
Sutherland, W. J. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 10–16 (2011).
Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 861 (2019).
Cohen, S. States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering (Polity Press, 2001).
Butchart, S. H. et al. Biol. Conserv. 227, 9–18 (2018).
Lees, A. C. & Pimm, S. L. Curr. Biol. 25, R177–R180 (2015).
Barlow, J. et al. Nature 559, 517–526 (2018).
Díaz, S. et al. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).
Mather, A. S. Area 24, 367–379 (1992).
Cuaresma, J. C. et al. Sci. Rep. 7, 40678 (2017).
Betts, M. G. et al. Science 366, 1236–1239 (2019).
Hansen, M. C. et al. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).
Lewandowsky, S. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 399–404 (2013).
Maclean, I. M. & Wilson, R. J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12337–12342 (2011).
Balmford, A. & Knowlton, N. Science 356, 225 (2017).
Fischhoff, B. Risk Anal. 15, 137–145 (1995).
Phalan, B. et al. Science 351, 450–451 (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.C.L., S.A., J.B. and B.P. all contributed to the writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information (download PDF )
Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, and references.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lees, A.C., Attwood, S., Barlow, J. et al. Biodiversity scientists must fight the creeping rise of extinction denial. Nat Ecol Evol 4, 1440–1443 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01285-z
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01285-z
This article is cited by
-
Mental models of the sixth mass extinction reveal pathways for transformative sustainability action
Scientific Reports (2026)
-
Land conversion to agriculture induces taxonomic homogenization of soil microbial communities globally
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Enhancing multiple scales of seafloor biodiversity with mussel restoration
Scientific Reports (2022)