Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Biodiversity scientists must fight the creeping rise of extinction denial

Efforts by conservation scientists to draw public attention to the biodiversity crisis are increasingly met with denialist rhetoric. We summarize some of the methods used by denialists to undermine scientific evidence on biodiversity loss, and outline pathways forward for the scientific community to counter misinformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

References

  1. Rosenau, J. Trends Microbiol. 20, 567–569 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sutherland, W. J. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 10–16 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 861 (2019).

  4. Cohen, S. States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering (Polity Press, 2001).

  5. Butchart, S. H. et al. Biol. Conserv. 227, 9–18 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lees, A. C. & Pimm, S. L. Curr. Biol. 25, R177–R180 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barlow, J. et al. Nature 559, 517–526 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Díaz, S. et al. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mather, A. S. Area 24, 367–379 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cuaresma, J. C. et al. Sci. Rep. 7, 40678 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Betts, M. G. et al. Science 366, 1236–1239 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansen, M. C. et al. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewandowsky, S. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 399–404 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maclean, I. M. & Wilson, R. J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12337–12342 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Balmford, A. & Knowlton, N. Science 356, 225 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fischhoff, B. Risk Anal. 15, 137–145 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Phalan, B. et al. Science 351, 450–451 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.C.L., S.A., J.B. and B.P. all contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander C. Lees.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, and references.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lees, A.C., Attwood, S., Barlow, J. et al. Biodiversity scientists must fight the creeping rise of extinction denial. Nat Ecol Evol 4, 1440–1443 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01285-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01285-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing