Extended Data Fig. 7: Comparison of edge, intermediate, and interior plots using data from Global Forest Biodiversity Initiatives (GFBI).
From: A globally consistent negative effect of edge on aboveground forest biomass

Boxplots illustrate average basal area (cm2) (a, d, g), tree density (number of trees per ha) (b, e, h), and biomass density (kg ha−1) (c, f, i). In panels a-c, plots with distances less than 50 m, between 50 m and 150 m, and greater than 150 m were classified as edge, intermediate, and interior plots, respectively. These thresholds (50 m and 150 m) correspond to approximately the 25th and 75th percentiles of all distance values. In panels d-f, an expanded interior threshold was used, where edge plots are within 50 m, and interior plots start from 200 m. In panels g-i, an expanded edge threshold includes edge plots up to 100 m, with interior plots beginning at 150 m. In all panels, boxplots show the median (center line), interquartile range (IQR; box limits), and 1.5×IQR (whiskers). Across all threshold scenarios, average basal area, tree density, and biomass density were consistently higher in interior plots compared to edge plots (Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s test, p < 0.001). Intermediate plots generally showed similar values to interior plots, particularly in average basal area and biomass density (Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s test, p > 0.05). Sample size: n = 679 GFBI plots.