Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Making CITES count for sharks and rays

Recent expanded Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) listings for sharks and rays are welcome — yet seizing this opportunity requires that international trade policy is treated not as an end point, but as a catalyst for wider regulatory and market-based reforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: A simplified conceptual diagram of the drivers of shark and ray overfishing.
Fig. 2: Hypothetical supply and demand curves for shark markets and potential perverse market-mediated effects of trade interventions.

References

  1. Dulvy, N. K. et al. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-025-00120-2 (2026).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dulvy, N. K. et al. Curr. Biol. 31, 4773–4787 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cardeñosa, D. et al. Sci. Adv. 11, eadz2821 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Booth, H. et al. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3, e314 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Booth, H. et al. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3, e494 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Booth, H. et al. People Nat. 5, 968–980 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Booth, H., Arlidge, W. N. S., Squires, D. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 715–725 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Milner-Gulland, E. J., Ibbett, H., Wilfred, P., Ngoteya, H. C. & Lestari, P. in Conservation Research, Policy and Practice (eds Sutherland W. J. et al.) 63–81 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2020).

  9. Chen, F. & ’t Sas-Rolfes, M. The Economics of the Wildlife Trade. The Economics of the Wildlife Trade (Routledge, 2025).

  10. Challender, D. W. S., Harrop, S. R. & MacMillan, D. C. Biol. Conserv. 187, 249–259 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mialon, H. M., Klumpp, T. & Williams, M. A. Sci. Adv. 8, 3442 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou, X. et al. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12842 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Emogor, C. A. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 9, 1349–1358 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Booth, H., Squires, D. & Milner‐Gulland, E. J. Fish Fish. 21, 269–289 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Booth, H. et al. Sci. Adv. 11, eadr1000 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hollie Booth.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Nicholas Dulvy for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figure 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Booth, H. Making CITES count for sharks and rays. Nat Ecol Evol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-026-02984-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-026-02984-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing