Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Navigating thermal stability intricacies of high-nickel cathodes for high-energy lithium batteries

Subjects

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 28 March 2025

This article has been updated

Abstract

High-nickel oxide cathodes, LiNixM1−xO2 (x ≥ 0.8), are preferred in automotive lithium batteries, but they face thermal instability challenges. Inconsistent literature reports and unstandardized testing protocols further complicate quantitative assessments of the thermal stability of these cathodes. We present here a statistical thermal analysis based on the differential scanning calorimetry measurements of 15 representative cathode materials with different compositions, morphologies and states of charge. The findings reveal that each cathode has a critical state of charge that defines its safe operating limit, which is affected by the metal–oxygen bond strength and surface reactivity. The thermal runaway temperature is dictated by the layered Li1−xNiO2 to LiNi2O4 spinel-like phase transition, which is thermodynamically determined by the metal–oxygen bond covalency and kinetically influenced by the cation mixing and particle size. Raman spectroscopy is used to predict the thermal runaway temperature on the basis of the linear relationship between them. Finally, we propose a thermal stability index to quantify cathode thermal stability as a guide for developing safer high-nickel cathodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Design of materials for statistical analysis of the thermal stability of high-Ni cathodes.
Fig. 2: Thermal stability evaluation of LNO and single-element-doped cathodes.
Fig. 3: Thermally driven phase evolution using synchrotron-based in situ-heating XRD.
Fig. 4: Impact of particle morphology on the thermal stability of NMC cathodes.
Fig. 5: Raman spectroscopy for characterizing the thermal stability of the cathode.
Fig. 6: Delineating the factors that influence the thermal stability metrics.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the Article and its Supplementary Information.

Change history

References

  1. Goodenough, J. B. & Kim, Y. Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem. Mater. 22, 587–603 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Manthiram, A. A reflection on lithium-ion battery cathode chemistry. Nat. Commun. 11, 1550 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bianchini, M., Roca‐Ayats, M., Hartmann, P., Brezesinski, T. & Janek, J. There and back again—the journey of LiNiO2 as a cathode active material. Angew. Chem. 58, 10434–10458 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Janek, J. & Zeier, W. G. A solid future for battery development. Nat. Energy 1, 16141 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwade, A. et al. Current status and challenges for automotive battery production technologies. Nat. Energy 3, 290–300 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brand, M. et al. Electrical safety of commercial Li-ion cells based on NMC and NCA technology compared to LFP technology. World Electr. Veh. J. 6, 572–580 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, J. & Dahn, J. R. ARC studies of the thermal stability of three different cathode materials: LiCoO2; Li[Ni0.1Co0.8Mn0.1]O2; and LiFePO4, in LiPF6 and LiBoB EC/DEC electrolytes. Electrochem. Commun. 6, 39–43 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang, X. et al. Investigating the critical characteristics of thermal runaway process for LiFePO4/graphite batteries by a ceased segmented method. iScience 24, 103088 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feng, X., Ren, D., He, X. & Ouyang, M. Mitigating thermal runaway of lithium-ion batteries. Joule 4, 743–770 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feng, X. et al. Thermal runaway mechanism of lithium ion-battery for electric vehicles: a review. Energy Storage Mater. 10, 246–267 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, Y. et al. Challenges and opportunities to mitigate the catastrophic thermal runaway of high‐energy batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2203841 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Finegan, D. P. et al. Characterising thermal runaway within lithium-ion cells by inducing and monitoring internal short circuits. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1377–1388 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, X., Stoliarov, S. I., Denlinger, M., Masias, A. & Snyder, K. Comprehensive calorimetry of the thermally induced failure of a lithium-ion battery. J. Power Sources 280, 516–525 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, X. et al. Thermal runaway of lithium-ion batteries without internal short circuit. Joule 2, 2047–2064 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brand, M. J. et al. Effects of vibrations and shocks on lithium-ion cells. J. Power Sources 288, 62–69 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Manikandan, B., Yap, C. & Balaya, P. Towards understanding heat generation characteristics of Li-ion batteries by calorimetry, impedance, and potentiometry studies. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A2794–A2800 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Feng, X., Lu, L., Ouyang, M., Li, J. & He, X. A 3D thermal runaway propagation model for a large format lithium-ion-battery module. Energy 115, 194–208 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng, J. et al. Tuning of thermal stability in layered Li(NixMnyCoz)O2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 13326–13334 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bak, S.-M. et al. Correlating structural changes and gas evolution during the thermal decomposition of charged LixNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathode materials. Chem. Mater. 25, 337–351 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nam, K.-W. et al. Combining in situ synchrotron X‐ray diffraction and absorption techniques with transmission electron microscopy to study the origin of thermal instability in overcharged cathode materials for lithium‐ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 1047–1063 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma, L., Nie, M., Xia, J. & Dahn, J. R. A systematic study on the reactivity of different grades of charged Li[NixMnyCoz]O2 with electrolyte at elevated temperatures using accelerating rate calorimetry. J. Power Sources 327, 145–150 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Noh, H.-J., Youn, S., Yoon, C. S. & Sun, Y.-K. Comparison of the structural and electrochemical properties of layered Li[NixCoyMnz]O2 (x = 1/3, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 and 0.85) cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 233, 121–130 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Geng, L. et al. Probing thermal stability of Li-ion battery Ni-rich layered oxide cathodes by means of operando gas analysis and neutron diffraction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 7058–7065 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bak, S.-M. et al. Structural changes and thermal stability of Charged LiNixMnyCozO2 cathode materials studied by combined in situ time-resolved XRD and mass spectroscopy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 22594–22601 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoon, W.-S. et al. Time-resolved XRD study on the thermal decomposition of nickel-based layered cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 163, 219–222 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Downie, L. E. & Dahn, J. R. Determination of the voltage dependence of parasitic heat flow in lithium-ion cells using isothermal microcalorimetry. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, A1782–A1787 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiong, D. J. et al. Measuring oxygen release from delithiated LiNixMnyCo1−xyO2 and its effects on the performance of high voltage Li-ion cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A3025–A3037 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, H. et al. Is cobalt needed in Ni-rich positive electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries?. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, A429–A439 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kasnatscheew, J., Röser, S., Börner, M. & Winter, M. Do increased Ni contents in LiNixMnyCozO2 (NMC) electrodes decrease structural and thermal stability of Li-ion batteries? A thorough look by consideration of the Li+ extraction ratio. Energy Mater. 2, 7733–7737 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Matsumoto, K., Inoue, K. & Utsugi, K. A highly safe battery with a non-flammable triethyl-phosphate-based electrolyte. J. Power Sources 273, 954–958 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang, Z. et al. A solvent-anchored non-flammable electrolyte. Matter 6, 445–459 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jo, E. et al. Different thermal degradation mechanisms: role of aluminum in Ni-rich layered cathode materials. Nano Energy 78, 105367 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li, F. et al. Gradient boracic polyanion doping-derived surface lattice modulation of high-voltage Ni-rich layered cathodes for high-energy-density Li-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 4903–4914 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zeng, Z. et al. Non-flammable electrolytes with high salt-to-solvent ratios for Li-ion and Li-metal batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 674–681 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu, G.-R. et al. Non-flammable solvent-free liquid polymer electrolyte for lithium metal batteries. Nat. Commun. 14, 4617 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Weigel, T. et al. Structural and electrochemical aspects of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathode materials doped by various cations. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 508–516 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gomez-Martin, A. et al. Magnesium substitution in Ni-rich NMC layered cathodes for high-energy lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2103045 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xie, Q., Li, W. & Manthiram, A. A Mg-doped high-nickel layered oxide cathode enabling safer, high-energy-density Li-ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 31, 938–946 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Amalraj, S. F. et al. Boron doped Ni-rich LiNi0.85Co0.10Mn0.05O2 cathode materials studied by structural analysis, solid state NMR, computational modeling, and electrochemical performance. Energy Storage Mater. 42, 594–607 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xie, Q., Li, W., Dolocan, A. & Manthiram, A. Insights into boron-based polyanion-tuned high-nickel cathodes for high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 31, 8886–8897 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kadkhodayan, A. & Brenner, A. Temperature-programmed reduction and oxidation of metals supported on γ-alumina. J. Catal. 117, 311–321 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Li, Y. et al. Thermal runaway mechanism of lithium-ion battery with LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 cathode materials. Nano Energy 85, 105878 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hou, J. et al. Unlocking the self-supported thermal runaway of high-energy lithium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 39, 395–402 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee, E. et al. Tracking the influence of thermal expansion and oxygen vacancies on the thermal stability of Ni‐rich layered cathode materials. Adv. Sci. 7, 1902413 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ge, M. et al. Kinetic limitations in single‐crystal high‐nickel cathodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 17350–17355 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wei, Z. et al. Probing the thermal degradation mechanism of polycrystalline and single-crystal Li(Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1)O2 cathodes from the perspective of oxygen vacancy diffusion. Energy Storage Mater. 56, 495–505 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Baddour-Hadjean, R. & Pereira-Ramos, J.-P. Raman microspectrometry applied to the study of electrode materials for lithium batteries. Chem. Rev. 110, 1278–1319 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Flores, E., Novák, P. & Berg, E. J. In situ and operando Raman spectroscopy of layered transition metal oxides for Li-ion battery cathodes. Front. Energy Res. 6, 82 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ohzuku, T., Ueda, A., Nagayama, M., Iwakoshi, Y. & Komori, H. Comparative study of LiCoO2, LiNi12Co12O2 and LiNiO2 for 4 volt secondary lithium cells. Electrochim. Acta 38, 1159–1167 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cui, Z., Guo, Z. & Manthiram, A. Assessing the intrinsic roles of key dopant elements in high-nickel layered oxide cathodes in lithium-based batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2203853 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tayal, A. et al. In situ insights into cathode calcination for predictive synthesis: kinetic crystallization of LiNiO2 from hydroxides. Adv. Mater. 36, 2312027 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Office of Vehicle Technologies of the US Department of Energy through the Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) Program (Battery500 Consortium) award number DE-AC05-76RLO1830 (Z.C. and A.M.) and the Welch Foundation grant F-1254 (C.L. and A.M.). The synchrotron characterization work was supported by the US Department of Energy EERE, Vehicle Technologies Office, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357 (F.W.). We would like to thank S. Lee, S. Kmiec, A. Tayal and D. Wu for their assistance in the single-crystal cathode synthesis, Raman spectroscopy data collection, in situ-heating XRD data processing and ARC data collection, respectively. We thank R. Sim for insightful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.C., C.L. and A.M. conceived the idea and designed the experiments. Z.C. and C.L. performed the synthesis of the materials, DSC and TGA measurements and characterized the physico-chemical properties of the other materials. F.W. performed the in situ heating XRD experiments. All authors wrote the paper. A.M. supervised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arumugam Manthiram.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.M. is a co-founder of TexPower EV Technologies, a company focusing on cobalt-free cathode materials for lithium-based batteries. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Energy thanks Yaxiang Lu, Jinbao Zhao and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–50, Tables 1–4, Notes 1–9 and Refs. 1–60.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, Z., Liu, C., Wang, F. et al. Navigating thermal stability intricacies of high-nickel cathodes for high-energy lithium batteries. Nat Energy 10, 490–501 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-025-01731-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-025-01731-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing