Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Southern Ocean net primary production influenced by seismically modulated hydrothermal iron

Abstract

Iron is the primary limiting nutrient for phytoplankton growth, and consequently CO2 drawdown, in the Southern Ocean. A recurring phytoplankton bloom above the Australian Antarctic Ridge was recently attributed to hydrothermally sourced iron. Here we examine satellite remote-sensing estimates of net primary production, earthquake location catalogues and Lagrangian plume modelling of particle trajectories in surface ocean currents to show that interannual variability in net primary production is related to seismicity and the advective spread of downstream surface waters. By spatially decomposing the relationship between seismicity, advective spread and net primary production, we demonstrate that net primary production at the surface, above the hydrothermal vents, can be predicted by elevated seismicity in the months before the growing season. Farther from the vents, greater advective spread reduces net primary production. We hypothesize that the connection between earthquakes and net primary production is mediated by the link between seismicity and hydrothermal emissions while advective spread controls the dilution of entrained iron; however, the physical mechanism behind the rapid surfacing of hydrothermal iron is still unknown. These findings challenge prevailing views on how geophysical processes influence ocean primary production.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Bathymetry and phytoplankton distribution in the AAR region.
Fig. 2: Interannual variability in NPP in the AAR bloom.
Fig. 3: Earthquake distribution at the AAR.
Fig. 4: Relationships between NPP, EER and LPA in the AAR bloom.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data used in this study can be found in the Stanford Digital Repository at https://doi.org/10.25740/yc804kn7989 (ref. 69).

Code availability

No custom code central to the conclusions of this study was developed. All analyses rely on standard statistical and arithmetic methods. The net primary production53 and Lagrangian particle modelling57 has been published elsewhere and is available from the original authors and is not redistributed here.

References

  1. Marinov, I., Gnanadesikan, A., Toggweiler, J. R. & Sarmiento, J. L. The Southern Ocean biogeochemical divide. Nature 441, 964–967 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd, P. W. et al. Mesoscale iron enrichment experiments 1993–2005: synthesis and future directions. Science 315, 612–617 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Baar, H. J. W. et al. On iron limitation of the Southern Ocean: experimental observations in the Weddell and Scotia seas. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 65, 105–122 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin, J. H., Gordon, R. M. & Fitzwater, S. E. Iron in Antarctic waters. Nature 345, 156–158 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tagliabue, A. et al. Hydrothermal contribution to the oceanic dissolved iron inventory. Nat. Geosci. 3, 252–256 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tagliabue, A. & Resing, J. Impact of hydrothermalism on the ocean iron cycle. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 374, 20150291 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ardyna, M. et al. Hydrothermal vents trigger massive phytoplankton blooms in the Southern Ocean. Nat. Commun. 10, 2451 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schine, C. M. S. et al. Massive Southern Ocean phytoplankton bloom fed by iron of possible hydrothermal origin. Nat. Commun. 12, 1211 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moreau, S. et al. Wind-driven upwelling of iron sustains dense blooms and food webs in the eastern Weddell Gyre. Nat. Commun. 14, 1303 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hahm, D. et al. First hydrothermal discoveries on the Australian–Antarctic Ridge: discharge sites, plume chemistry, and vent organisms. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 16, 3061–3075 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G. L. & Strong, A. L. Environmental controls of marine productivity hot spots around Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 120, 5545–5565 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cann, J. & Strens, M. Modeling periodic megaplume emission by black smoker systems. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 94, 12227–12237 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cowen, J. P., Baker, E T. & Embley, R. W. in The Subseafloor Biosphere at Mid-Ocean Ridges (eds Wilcock, W. S. D. et al.) 227–243 (AGU, 2004).

  14. Wilcock, W. S. et al. The recent volcanic history of Axial Seamount: geophysical insights into past eruption dynamics with an eye toward enhanced observations of future eruptions. Oceanography 31, 114–123 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mittal, T. & Delbridge, B. Detection of the 2012 Havre submarine eruption plume using Argo floats and its implications for ocean dynamics. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 511, 105–116 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baker, E. T., Fox, C. G. & Cowen, J. P. In situ observations of the onset of hydrothermal discharge during the 1998 Submarine Eruption of Axial Volcano, Juan de Fuca Ridge. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 3445–3448 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Feely, R. et al. Chemical variations of hydrothermal particles in the 1996 Gorda Ridge Event and chronic plumes. Deep Sea Res. 2 45, 2637–2664 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Buck, N. J., Resing, J. A., Baker, E. T. & Lupton, J. E. Chemical fluxes from a recently erupted shallow submarine volcano on the Mariana Arc. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 19, 1660–1673 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hensen, C. et al. Marine transform faults and fracture zones: a joint perspective integrating seismicity, fluid flow and life. Front. Earth Sci. 7, 39 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seropian, G., Kennedy, B. M., Walter, T. R., Ichihara, M. & Jolly, A. D. A review framework of how earthquakes trigger volcanic eruptions. Nat. Commun. 12, 1004 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Coumou, D., Driesner, T., Geiger, S., Heinrich, C. A. & Matthäi, S. The dynamics of mid-ocean ridge hydrothermal systems: splitting plumes and fluctuating vent temperatures. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 245, 218–231 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Resing, J. A., Feely, R. A., Massoth, G. J. & Baker, E. T. The water-column chemical signature after the 1998 eruption of Axial Volcano. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 3645–3648 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Massoth, G. J. et al. Manganese and iron in hydrothermal plumes resulting from the 1996 Gorda Ridge Event. Deep Sea Res. 2 45, 2683–2712 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Geoffroy, L. et al. Hydrothermal fluid flow triggered by an earthquake in Iceland. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 54 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dziak, R. P., Chadwick, W. W., Fox, C. G. & Embley, R. W. Hydrothermal temperature changes at the southern Juan de Fuca Ridge associated with MW 6.2 Blanco Transform earthquake. Geology 31, 119–122 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fornari, D. et al. Time-series temperature measurements at high-temperature hydrothermal vents, East Pacific Rise 9°49′–51′ N: evidence for monitoring a crustal cracking event. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 160, 419–431 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson, H. P. et al. Earthquake-induced changes in a hydrothermal system on the Juan de Fuca mid-ocean ridge. Nature 407, 174–177 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Okubo, A. Oceanic diffusion diagrams. Deep Sea Res. 18, 789–802 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sunda, W. G. & Huntsman, S. A. Interrelated influence of iron, light and cell size on marine phytoplankton growth. Nature 390, 389–392 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Timmermans, K. R., van der Wagt, B. & de Baar, H. J. Growth rates, half-saturation constants, and silicate, nitrate, and phosphate depletion in relation to iron availability of four large, open-ocean diatoms from the Southern Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49, 2141–2151 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Di Iorio, D. et al. Measurements and models of heat flux and plumes from hydrothermal discharges near the deep seafloor. Oceanography 25, 168–179 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bonnet, S. et al. Natural iron fertilization by shallow hydrothermal sources fuels diazotroph blooms in the ocean. Science 380, 812–817 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Speer, K. G. Thermocline penetration by buoyant plumes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 355, 443–458 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lavelle, J., Di Iorio, D. & Rona, P. A turbulent convection model with an observational context for a deep-sea hydrothermal plume in a time-variable cross flow. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118, 6145–6160 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tagliabue, A. Constraining the contribution of hydrothermal iron to Southern Ocean export production using deep ocean iron observations. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.754517 (2022).

  36. Jenkins, W. J. Using excess 3He to estimate Southern Ocean upwelling time scales. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL087266 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Birchill, A. J. et al. Pathways and timescales of Southern Ocean hydrothermal iron and manganese transport. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 413 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thomson, R. E., Subbotina, M. M. & Anisimov, M. V. Numerical simulation of hydrothermal vent-induced circulation at Endeavour Ridge. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 110, C01004 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Xu, G. & German, C. R. Dispersion of deep-sea hydrothermal plumes at the Endeavour Segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge: a multiscale numerical study. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, 1213470 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lund, D. et al. Enhanced East Pacific Rise hydrothermal activity during the last two glacial terminations. Science 351, 478–482 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Middleton, J. L., Langmuir, C. H., Mukhopadhyay, S., McManus, J. F. & Mitrovica, J. X. Hydrothermal iron flux variability following rapid sea level changes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 3848–3856 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Costa, K. M. et al. Hydrothermal deposition on the Juan de Fuca Ridge over multiple glacial–interglacial cycles. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 479, 120–132 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Martin, J. H. Glacial–interglacial CO2 change: the iron hypothesis. Paleoceanography 5, 1–13 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lambert, F. et al. Dust fluxes and iron fertilization in Holocene and Last Glacial Maximum climates. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 6014–6023 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jacobel, A. W., McManus, J. F., Anderson, R. F. & Winckler, G. Repeated storage of respired carbon in the equatorial Pacific Ocean over the last three glacial cycles. Nat. Commun. 8, 1727 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tagliabue, A., Aumont, O. & Bopp, L. The impact of different external sources of iron on the global carbon cycle. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 920–926 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  47. ETOPO 2022 15 Arc-Second Global Relief Model (NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, accessed 15 May 2023); https://doi.org/10.25921/fd45-gt74

  48. Orsi, A. H., Whitworth, T. & Nowlin, W. D. On the meridional extent and fronts of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Deep Sea Res. I 42, 641–673 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bird, P. An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000252 (2003).

  50. Peng, G., Meier, W. N., Scott, D. J. & Savoie, M. H. A long-term and reproducible passive microwave sea ice concentration data record for climate studies and monitoring. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 5, 311–318 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Reynolds, R. W. et al. Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J. Clim. 20, 5473–5496 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ocean Color (NASA, 2025); https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/

  53. Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G. L. & Bushinsky, S. Primary production in the Southern Ocean, 1997–2006. J. Geophys. Res. 113, C08004 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kara, A. B., Rochfor, P. A. & Hurlburt, H. E. Naval Research Laboratory Mixed Layer Depth (NMLD) Climatologies (Naval Research Laboratory, 2002).

  55. Gregg, W. W. & Carder, K. L. A simple spectral solar irradiance model for cloudless maritime atmospheres. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35, 1657–1675 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Dobson, F. W. & Smith, S. D. Bulk models of solar radiation at sea. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 114, 165–182 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  57. d’Ovidio, F. et al. The biogeochemical structuring role of horizontal stirring: Lagrangian perspectives on iron delivery downstream of the Kerguelen Plateau. Biogeosciences 12, 5567–5581 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sergi, S. et al. Interaction of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current with seamounts fuels moderate blooms but vast foraging grounds for multiple marine predators. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00416 (2020).

  59. Sanial, V. et al. Study of the phytoplankton plume dynamics off the Crozet Islands (Southern Ocean): a geochemical–physical coupled approach. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 119, 2227–2237 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sanial, V. et al. Use of Ra isotopes to deduce rapid transfer of sediment-derived inputs off Kerguelen. Biogeosciences 12, 1415–1430 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ardyna, M. et al. Delineating environmental control of phytoplankton biomass and phenology in the Southern Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 5016–5024 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes (USGS, 2025); https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/earthquakes

  63. Storchak, D. A. et al. Rebuild of the Bulletin of the International Seismological Centre (ISC)—part 2: 1980–2010. Geosci. Lett. 7, 18 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  64. ISC Bulletin (ISC, 2025); http://www.isc.ac.uk/iscbulletin/search/

  65. Hanks, T. C. & Kanamori, H. A moment magnitude scale. J. Geophys. Res.:Solid Earth 84, 2348–2350 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Scordilis, E. Empirical global relations converting MS and mb to moment magnitude. J. Seismol. 10, 225–236 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Aki, K. Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N = a – bM and its confidence limits. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. 43, 237–239 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Utsu, T. A method for determining the value of “b” in a formula log n = a – bm showing the magnitude–frequency relation for earthquakes. Geophys. Bull. Hokkaido Univ. 13, 99–103 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Schine, C., Lund Snee, J.-E., Lyford, A., Van Dijken, G. & Arrigo, K. Data used in article “Southern Ocean net primary production influenced by seismically-modulated hydrothermal iron”. Stanford Digit. Repository https://doi.org/10.25740/yc804kn7989 (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Sergi and F. D’Ovidio for their contribution to the Lagrangian plume modelling, R. Dunbar, H. Joy-Warren, C. Payne, S. Lim, M. Ardyna and M. M. Mills for their constructive comments in the early stages of investigation and D. Whitt for his support in the final phase of paper development. Any use of trade, firm or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation grant OPP 2135184, awarded to K.R.A., and by the NASA New (Early Career) Investigator Program (NIP) in Earth Science grant 20-NIP20-0113 awarded to D. Whitt.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.M.S.S. was responsible for data curation, conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, visualization and writing (original draft). J-E.L.S. was responsible for conceptualization, methodology, visualization and writing (review and editing). A.L. was responsible for formal analysis, visualization and writing (reviewing and editing). G.v.D. was responsible for data curation, methodology and writing (reviewing and editing). K.R.A. was responsible for conceptualization, supervision, funding acquisition and writing (reviewing and editing).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Casey M. S. Schine.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Geoscience thanks Kazuhiro Misumi, Joseph Resing and Peter Strutton for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: James Super, in collaboration with the Nature Geoscience team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Annual integrated NPP (g C m−2 yr−1) from 1997 through 2008.

The positions of KR1 (south) and KR2 (north) are shown by the magenta lines10. The positions of the sACCf and sbACC are shown as white dotted lines from north to south, respectively, same as in Fig. 1 (ref. 48). The outline of the AAR bloom mask is shown in gray. 2008-2019 are shown in Extended Data Fig. 2.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Annual integrated NPP (g C m−2 yr−1) from 2008 through 2019.

The positions of KR1 (south) and KR2 (north) are shown by the magenta lines10. The position of the sACCf and sbACC are shown as white dotted lines from north to south, respectively, same as in Fig. 1 (ref. 48). The outline of the AAR bloom mask is shown in gray. 1997-2008 are shown in Extended Data Fig. 1.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Lagrangian plume for each growing season (Nov-Apr) showing water mass age in days for 1997 through 2008.

The positions of KR1 (south) and KR2 (north) are shown by the magenta lines10. The position of the pf, sACCf and sbACC are shown as white dotted lines from north to south, respectively, same as in Fig. 1 (ref. 48). The outline of the AAR bloom mask is shown in gray. 2008-2019 are shown in Extended Data Fig. 4.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Lagrangian plume for each growing season (Nov-Apr) showing water mass age in days for 2008 through 2019.

The positions of KR1 (south) and KR2 (north) are shown by the magenta lines10. The position of the pf, sACCf and sbACC are shown as white dotted lines from north to south, respectively, same as in Fig. 1 (ref. 48). The outline of the AAR bloom mask is shown in gray. 1997-2008 are shown in Extended Data Fig. 3.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Regression performance for models relating NPP to earthquake energy and plume area.

The R-squared and p-values shown here correspond to the relationships analyzed in Fig. 4. (a and c) are for the relationship between annual integrated Net Primary Production (NPP) and earthquake energy release and (b and d) are for the relationship between NPP and Lagrangian plume area. White dashed lines and magenta lines are as in Fig. 1 (refs. 10,48) and the gray outline shows the mask area used for spatial integrations of NPP.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Details of calculation of seasonally detrended daily NPP.

Daily spatially-integrated net primary production (NPP) from September 1997 through July 2018 (a). Seasonal component of daily NPP (b), and remainder component of NPP after seasonal cycle has been removed (c). The remainder component is used in the time-lagged correlation analysis in Fig. 4d.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–5 and Discussion.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schine, C.M.S., Lund Snee, JE., Lyford, A. et al. Southern Ocean net primary production influenced by seismically modulated hydrothermal iron. Nat. Geosci. 19, 106–112 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01862-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01862-6

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology