To win friends, help the needy, avoid exploitation or influence strangers, people must make decisions that are inherently uncertain. In their compelling and insightful perspective on resolving social uncertainty1, FeldmanHall and Shenhav (henceforth F&S) join a growing movement combining computational approaches with social psychological theory2. F&S identify a range of negative and positive aspects of social uncertainty. Here we offer additional ways to think about social uncertainty and suggest potential avenues for future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
FeldmanHall, O. & Shenhav, A. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 426–435 (2019).
Cushman, F. & Gershman, S. Top. Cogn. Sci. 11, 281–298 (2019).
Dana, J., Weber, R. A. & Kuang, J. X. Econ. Theory 33, 67–80 (2007).
Kappes, A. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 573–580 (2018).
Ülkümen, G., Fox, C. R. & Malle, B. F. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145, 1280–1297 (2016).
Behrens, T. E. J., Hunt, L. T., Woolrich, M. W. & Rushworth, M. F. S. Nature 456, 245–249 (2008).
Diaconescu, A. O. et al. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003810 (2014).
Siegel, J. Z. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 750–756 (2018).
Huys, Q. J., Guitart-Masip, M., Dolan, R. J. & Dayan, P. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 3, 400–421 (2015).
Haisley, E. C. & Weber, R. A. Games Econ. Behav. 68, 614–625 (2010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kappes, A., Nussberger, AM., Siegel, J.Z. et al. Social uncertainty is heterogeneous and sometimes valuable. Nat Hum Behav 3, 764 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0662-y
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0662-y