Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Social uncertainty is heterogeneous and sometimes valuable

To win friends, help the needy, avoid exploitation or influence strangers, people must make decisions that are inherently uncertain. In their compelling and insightful perspective on resolving social uncertainty1, FeldmanHall and Shenhav (henceforth F&S) join a growing movement combining computational approaches with social psychological theory2. F&S identify a range of negative and positive aspects of social uncertainty. Here we offer additional ways to think about social uncertainty and suggest potential avenues for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. FeldmanHall, O. & Shenhav, A. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 426–435 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cushman, F. & Gershman, S. Top. Cogn. Sci. 11, 281–298 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dana, J., Weber, R. A. & Kuang, J. X. Econ. Theory 33, 67–80 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kappes, A. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 573–580 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ülkümen, G., Fox, C. R. & Malle, B. F. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145, 1280–1297 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Behrens, T. E. J., Hunt, L. T., Woolrich, M. W. & Rushworth, M. F. S. Nature 456, 245–249 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Diaconescu, A. O. et al. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003810 (2014).

  8. Siegel, J. Z. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 750–756 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huys, Q. J., Guitart-Masip, M., Dolan, R. J. & Dayan, P. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 3, 400–421 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haisley, E. C. & Weber, R. A. Games Econ. Behav. 68, 614–625 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Molly J. Crockett.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kappes, A., Nussberger, AM., Siegel, J.Z. et al. Social uncertainty is heterogeneous and sometimes valuable. Nat Hum Behav 3, 764 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0662-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0662-y

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing