Abstract
Reconfigurable interfaces between confined optical modes in integrated photonic chips and structured light in free space would benefit fundamental optical science and photonic technologies. Here we exploit the anisotropic nonlinear susceptibility tensors associated with thin-film lithium niobate to construct nanophotonic chip-space interfaces capable of generating and multidimensionally engineering structured light via injections of photons to on-chip waveguides. Harnessing the nonlinear Čerenkov radiation in integrated nonlinear microring resonators, we tailor the spatial profile, polarization state, emission wavelength, topological charge and temporal wave packet of structured optical vortices, exhibiting reconfigurability and tunability. To showcase the capabilities of our platform, we use continuous-wave excitation to generate tunable optical skyrmions via the spin–orbit coupling and multistate integrated vortex microcombs in the short near-infrared range via synergistic χ(2) and χ(3) nonlinear optical processes. Our work bridges the research fields of structured light and integrated nonlinear optics, providing opportunities for spatiotemporal light generation and on-chip multidimensional nonlinear optics.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout





Data availability
The datasets are available from the corresponding author (D.Z.W., weidzh@mail.sysu.edu.cn) upon request.
References
Pu, M., Ottaviano, L., Semenova, E. & Yvind, K. Efficient frequency comb generation in AlGaAs-on-insulator. Optica 3, 823–826 (2016).
Lukin, D. M. et al. 4H-silicon-carbide-on-insulator for integrated quantum and nonlinear photonics. Nat. Photon. 14, 330–334 (2020).
Wilson, D. J. et al. Integrated gallium phosphide nonlinear photonics. Nat. Photon. 14, 57–62 (2020).
Boes, A. et al. Lithium niobate photonics: unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum. Science 379, eabj4396 (2023).
Liu, X., Bruch, A. W. & Tang, H. X. Aluminum nitride photonic integrated circuits: from piezo-optomechanics to nonlinear optics. Adv. Opt. Photon. 15, 236–317 (2023).
Wang, C. et al. Lithium tantalate photonic integrated circuits for volume manufacturing. Nature 629, 784–790 (2024).
Liu, L. et al. Homoepitaxial growth of large-area rhombohedral-stacked MoS2. Nat. Mater. 24, 1195–1202 (2025).
Wang, C. et al. Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages. Nature 562, 101–104 (2018).
Diddams, S. A., Vahala, K. & Udem, T. Optical frequency combs: coherently uniting the electromagnetic spectrum. Science 369, eaay3676 (2020).
Kuznetsov, N. et al. An ultra-broadband photonic-chip-based parametric amplifier. Nature 639, 928–934 (2025).
Li, B. et al. Down-converted photon pairs in a high-Q silicon nitride microresonator. Nature 639, 922–927 (2025).
Dutt, A., Mohanty, A., Gaeta, A. L. & Lipson, M. Nonlinear and quantum photonics using integrated optical materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 9, 321–346 (2024).
Bütow, J., Eismann, J. S., Sharma, V., Brandmüller, D. & Banzer, P. Generating free-space structured light with programmable integrated photonics. Nat. Photon. 18, 243–249 (2024).
Chen, B. et al. Integrated optical vortex microcomb. Nat. Photon. 18, 625–631 (2024).
Liu, Y. et al. Integrated vortex soliton microcombs. Nat. Photon. 18, 632–637 (2024).
Huang, J. et al. Integrated optical entangled quantum vortex emitters. Nat. Photon. 19, 471–478 (2025).
Cai, X. et al. Integrated compact optical vortex beam emitters. Science 338, 363–366 (2012).
Tang, Y. et al. Harmonic spin–orbit angular momentum cascade in nonlinear optical crystals. Nat. Photon. 14, 658–662 (2020).
Zhang, Y., Sheng, Y., Zhu, S., Xiao, M. & Krolikowski, W. Nonlinear photonic crystals: from 2D to 3D. Optica 8, 372–381 (2021).
Zhang, Y., Gao, Z. D., Qi, Z., Zhu, S. N. & Ming, N. B. Nonlinear Čerenkov radiation in nonlinear photonic crystal waveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 163904 (2008).
Honardoost, A., Abdelsalam, K. & Fathpour, S. Rejuvenating a versatile photonic material: thin-film lithium niobate. Laser Photonics Rev. 14, 2000088 (2020).
Forbes, A., de Oliveira, M. & Dennis, M. R. Structured light. Nat. Photon. 15, 253–262 (2021).
Shen, Y. et al. Optical skyrmions and other topological quasiparticles of light. Nat. Photon. 18, 15–25 (2023).
Zhan, Q. Spatiotemporal sculpturing of light: a tutorial. Adv. Opt. Photon. 16, 163–228 (2024).
Liu, J. et al. Emerging material platforms for integrated microcavity photonics. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 104201 (2022).
Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics 3rd edn (Academic Press, 2008).
Berger, V. Nonlinear photonic crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4136–4139 (1998).
Allen, L., Beijersbergen, M. W., Spreeuw, R. J. & Woerdman, J. P. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185–8189 (1992).
Kulkarni, G., Sahu, R., Magana-Loaiza, O. S., Boyd, R. W. & Jha, A. K. Single-shot measurement of the orbital-angular-momentum spectrum of light. Nat. Commun. 8, 1054 (2017).
Chen, B. et al. Bright solid-state sources for single photons with orbital angular momentum. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 302–307 (2021).
Jack, B., Padgett, M. J. & Franke-Arnold, S. Angular diffraction. New J. Phys. 10, 103013 (2008).
Zhan, Q. Cylindrical vector beams: from mathematical concepts to applications. Adv. Opt. Photon. 1, 1–57 (2009).
Vabishchevich, P. & Kivshar, Y. Nonlinear photonics with metasurfaces. Photon. Res. 11, B50 (2023).
Wang, J. et al. Doubly resonant second-harmonic generation of a vortex beam from a bound state in the continuum. Optica 7, 1126–1132 (2020).
Miao, P. et al. Orbital angular momentum microlaser. Science 353, 464–467 (2016).
Zhang, J. et al. An InP-based vortex beam emitter with monolithically integrated laser. Nat. Commun. 9, 2652 (2018).
Zhang, Z. et al. Tunable topological charge vortex microlaser. Science 368, 760–763 (2020).
Lu, X. et al. Highly-twisted states of light from a high quality factor photonic crystal ring. Nat. Commun. 14, 1119 (2023).
Zhang, Z. et al. Spin–orbit microlaser emitting in a four-dimensional Hilbert space. Nature 612, 246–251 (2022).
Willner, A. E., Pang, K., Song, H., Zou, K. & Zhou, H. Orbital angular momentum of light for communications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 041312 (2021).
Tsesses, S. et al. Optical skyrmion lattice in evanescent electromagnetic fields. Science 361, 993–996 (2018).
Du, L., Yang, A., Zayats, A. V. & Yuan, X. Deep-subwavelength features of photonic skyrmions in a confined electromagnetic field with orbital angular momentum. Nat. Phys. 15, 650–654 (2019).
Lin, W., Ota, Y., Arakawa, Y. & Iwamoto, S. On-chip optical skyrmionic beam generators. Optica 11, 1588–1594 (2024).
Shen, Y., Martínez, E. C. & Rosales-Guzmán, C. Generation of optical skyrmions with tunable topological textures. ACS Photonics 9, 296–303 (2022).
Kam, A. et al. Quantum skyrmions and high dimensional entanglement mediated by nanophotonics. eLight 6, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43593-026-00124-1 (2026).
Gong, Z., Liu, X., Xu, Y. & Tang, H. X. Near-octave lithium niobate soliton microcomb. Optica 7, 1275–1278 (2020).
Wan, S. et al. Photorefraction-assisted self-emergence of dissipative Kerr solitons. Laser Photonics Rev. 18, 2300627 (2024).
Cole, D. C., Lamb, E. S., Del’Haye, P., Diddams, S. A. & Papp, S. B. Soliton crystals in Kerr resonators. Nat. Photon. 11, 671–676 (2017).
Karpov, M. et al. Dynamics of soliton crystals in optical microresonators. Nat. Phys. 15, 1071–1077 (2019).
Lu, J. et al. Two-colour dissipative solitons and breathers in microresonator second-harmonic generation. Nat. Commun. 14, 2798 (2023).
Lu, J., Li, M., Zou, C.-L., AlSayem, A. & Tang, H. X. Toward 1% single-photon anharmonicity with periodically poled lithium niobate microring resonators. Optica 7, 1654–1659 (2020).
Kuo, P. S., Bravo-Abad, J. & Solomon, G. S. Second-harmonic generation using-quasi-phasematching in a GaAs whispering-gallery-mode microcavity. Nat. Commun. 5, 3109 (2014).
Nitiss, E., Hu, J., Stroganov, A. & Brès, C.-S. Optically reconfigurable quasi-phase-matching in silicon nitride microresonators. Nat. Photon. 16, 134–141 (2022).
Frischwasser, K. et al. Real-time sub-wavelength imaging of surface waves with nonlinear near-field optical microscopy. Nat. Photon. 15, 442–448 (2021).
Milione, G., Sztul, H. I., Nolan, D. A. & Alfano, R. R. Higher-order poincare sphere, Stokes parameters, and the angular momentum of light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 053601 (2011).
Pan, A., Hu, C., Zeng, C. & Xia, J. Fundamental mode hybridization in a thin film lithium niobate ridge waveguide. Opt. Express 27, 35659–35669 (2019).
Cagliero, A. Circularly symmetric light waves: an overview. J. Opt. 20, 083501 (2018).
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFA1400800, X.W.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12293052, C.-H.D.; 12361141824, J.L.; 12274474, D.W.; 62522519, B.C.; 12574428, B.C.; 92250302, C.-H.D.; 12434012, Q.Z.; 62535013, Q.Z.), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (2022B1515020067, D.W.; 2023B1515120070, J.L.; 2024B1515040013, D.W.; 2025B1515020004, B.C.), Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams of ‘The Pearl River Talent Recruitment Program’ (2021ZT09X044, S.F.) and Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology (2023ZD0300804, S.W.). We thank C. Zou for an insightful discussion and J. Li and H. Liang for loaning the equipment. This work was partially carried out at the USTC Center for Micro and Nanoscale Research and Fabrication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.L. and D.Z.W. conceived the project. D.Z.W., C.C., X.H.W. and J.L. developed the theory. B.C., D.Z.W., S.W. and Y.X.W. performed the numerical simulations. S.W., P.Y.W., Z.L.T. and Y.C. fabricated the devices. D.Z.W., B.C., S.W., Y.X.W., J.T.M. and J.L. built the setup and characterized the devices. D.Z.W., B.C., S.W., Y.X.W., J.T.M., G.X.Q., X.S.H, T.J., S.N.F., C.H.D. and J.L. analysed the data. D.Z.W. and J.L. wrote the manuscript with inputs from all authors. D.Z.W., S.N.F., Q.W.Z., F.B., X.H.W., C.H.D. and J.L. supervised the project.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Materials thanks Shai Tsesses and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Microring fabrication and characterization.
(a) Fabrication processes of the TFLN microring. (b, c) Top-view and cross-section SEM images of a typical TFLN microring. (d, e, f) Transmission spectra and quality factors of x-cut microring (Sample 1) for generation of scalar SF vortices in cases 1 and 2, z-cut microring (Sample 2) for generation of vector SF vortices in cases 3 and 4, z-cut microring (Sample 3) for generation of short NIR vortex microcombs. (g) Thermal tuning of three resonant TM modes for the x-cut microring (Sample 1). The microring is placed on the platform with a temperature controller in the fiber-waveguide coupling system. As the temperature increased from 30∘C to 100∘C, the resonant wavelength for the same mode order exhibits a redshift of approximately 0.8 nm. This shift is larger than half of the free spectral range (1.4 nm for Sample 1), allowing for compensation of the SF wavelength difference for SF optical vortices with even and odd TCs, as shown in Fig. 3d. (h) Simulated and measured integrated dispersions of the z-cut microring (Sample 3) for the generation of Kerr solitons.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Schematic of the experimental setup for characterizing the NCR SFG.
(a) The setup for characterizing single-wavelength SF vortices. (b) Schematic of TC measurement in cases 1 and 2 via on-chip interference. (c) The setup for producing and characterizing the short NIR vortex microcombs. WP: waveplate; EDFA: Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier; BS: beam splitter; FPC: fiber polarization controllers; Fiber BS: 2 × 2 fiber beam splitter; M: mirror.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Numerical simulation of the nonlinear polarization and the far-field intensity patterns in cases 1 to 4.
(a) Dependence of the effective nonlinear coefficients on the azimuthal angle for the four cases. The non-zero nonlinear coefficients of the TFLN are set to χ22=2pm/V, χ31= χ15=5pm/V, and χ33=30 pm/V. (b) Simulated far-field intensity patterns in cases 1 to 4 based on the dominant polarization components given in Table 1. The simulated results match well with the experimental results in Fig. 2b,f,j,n. (c) Simulated far-field intensity patterns for lWGM = m − n = ± 4, ± 2, ± 2 and ± 1 in cases 1 to 4, respectively, being in excellent agreement with experimental results in Fig. 2d,h,l,p. (d) Simulation on intensity patterns in the x-y plane induced by z-component of the NP in case 4 by using the dipole model representing the SH sources in finite-different time-domain (FDTD). The z-polarized dipoles azimuthally distributing around a circle in the cylindrical coordinate (ρ, φ, z) mimic the NPs for generating out-of-plane SH wave that are produced by χ33 but confined within a circularly subwavelength diffraction structure. Here, ρ and φ are the polar radius and azimuthal angle, respectively, while z denotes the distance from the microring plane. A monitor is placed above the ring to collect the diffracted SH field in the plane perpendicular to the z-axis. (e) The simulated SH far-field intensity distribution, horizontal (y-) polarized intensity distribution and vertical (x-) polarized intensity distribution, respectively. The rotation of 90∘ between x-polarization and y-polarization reveals a a cylindrical vector beam \({[\cos \varphi \sin \varphi ]}^{T}\), being excellently agreement with the experiment results in Fig. 2n.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Measured spectra and nonlinear conversion efficiencies of the SHG and SFG, respectively.
(a) Spectra of the fundamental and SH waves for the four cases. The degenerated fundamental wavelengths are 1562.04 nm, 1561.30 nm, 1563.37 nm, and 1563.91 nm, leading to the exactly frequency-doubled emission at 781.02 nm, 780.65 nm, 781.69 nm, and 781.96 nm, respectively. (b) Spectra of the fundamental and SF waves for lWGM = m − n = ± 4, ± 2, ± 2 and ± 1 in cases 1 to 4, respectively. The fundamental wavelengths for the four cases are fixed at λm = 1556.55 nm, 1558.43 nm, 1557.91 nm, and 1561.30 nm for CCW modes and λn = 1562.02 nm, 1561.30 nm, 1563.37 nm, and 1563.88 nm for CW modes to get a positive lWGM, while swap them to obtain a negative lWGM. Correspondingly, strong SF signals are located at 779.64 nm, 779.93 nm, 780.31 nm, and 781.29 nm, respectively, demonstrating that the prominent out-of-plane radiation comes from nonlinear interactions of the two counter-propagating fundamental waves. (c) Power dependence of SHG on the pump power of the CCW resonant mode in case 2. (d) Power dependence of SFG on the pump power of the CCW resonant mode in case 2. (e-f) Power dependences of SHG and SFG using the unit of dBm corresponding to (c) and (d), respectively.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Experimental characterization of optical vortices carrying single TCs generated in case 1.
(a) Intensity profiles of optical vortices carrying a single TC of m − n = 4 at different SF wavelength. (b) Interference patterns between optical vortices in (a) and those carrying a TC of − 4 at the same wavelength. The uniformly distributed 8 antinodes confirm the unchanged TC of lSF = 4 in (a). (c) Intensity profiles of optical vortices carrying single TCs of m − n = 1 to 7 at same SF wavelength. (d) Interference patterns between optical vortices in (c) and those carrying single TCs of -1 to -7, respectively. The number of antinodes following the 2lSF scaling law demonstrates the stable tuning of a single TC. The residual signal near the center in (b) and (d) originates from incompletely filtered SH signals carrying zero TC during the interference measurement.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Amplified single NIR spectral lines of spatiotemporal SF vortex and corresponding vortex far-field patterns.
An additional fundamental CCW beam is set to match higher resonant modes with 5 (I), 11 (II), 17 (III), and 23 (IV) FSRs from the λn = 1554.45 nm highlighted in Fig. 5d, resulting in the enhanced SF signals with lWGM = − 5, − 11, − 17, and − 23 at different SF wavelengths in both spectra and the corresponding far-field patterns. Different colors are overlaid on the spectrum and intensity patterns to highlight the amplified SF signals.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information (download PDF )
Supplementary Notes 1–3.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, D., Chen, B., Wan, S. et al. Nanophotonic chip-space interfaces for multidimensional nonlinear optics. Nat. Mater. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-026-02570-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-026-02570-1