Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Nanophotonic chip-space interfaces for multidimensional nonlinear optics

Abstract

Reconfigurable interfaces between confined optical modes in integrated photonic chips and structured light in free space would benefit fundamental optical science and photonic technologies. Here we exploit the anisotropic nonlinear susceptibility tensors associated with thin-film lithium niobate to construct nanophotonic chip-space interfaces capable of generating and multidimensionally engineering structured light via injections of photons to on-chip waveguides. Harnessing the nonlinear Čerenkov radiation in integrated nonlinear microring resonators, we tailor the spatial profile, polarization state, emission wavelength, topological charge and temporal wave packet of structured optical vortices, exhibiting reconfigurability and tunability. To showcase the capabilities of our platform, we use continuous-wave excitation to generate tunable optical skyrmions via the spin–orbit coupling and multistate integrated vortex microcombs in the short near-infrared range via synergistic χ(2) and χ(3) nonlinear optical processes. Our work bridges the research fields of structured light and integrated nonlinear optics, providing opportunities for spatiotemporal light generation and on-chip multidimensional nonlinear optics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Working principle of the NCR-based SF process.
Fig. 2: Engineering on-chip structured SF fields in multiple degrees of freedom.
Fig. 3: Independent and wide-range tunings of the wavelength and TC of the structured optical vortices.
Fig. 4: Wavelength-tunable optical skyrmions with skyrmion numbers of –2 and 4.
Fig. 5: Spatiotemporal vortex pulses with engineerable wave packets.

Data availability

The datasets are available from the corresponding author (D.Z.W., weidzh@mail.sysu.edu.cn) upon request.

References

  1. Pu, M., Ottaviano, L., Semenova, E. & Yvind, K. Efficient frequency comb generation in AlGaAs-on-insulator. Optica 3, 823–826 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lukin, D. M. et al. 4H-silicon-carbide-on-insulator for integrated quantum and nonlinear photonics. Nat. Photon. 14, 330–334 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson, D. J. et al. Integrated gallium phosphide nonlinear photonics. Nat. Photon. 14, 57–62 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boes, A. et al. Lithium niobate photonics: unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum. Science 379, eabj4396 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, X., Bruch, A. W. & Tang, H. X. Aluminum nitride photonic integrated circuits: from piezo-optomechanics to nonlinear optics. Adv. Opt. Photon. 15, 236–317 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, C. et al. Lithium tantalate photonic integrated circuits for volume manufacturing. Nature 629, 784–790 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, L. et al. Homoepitaxial growth of large-area rhombohedral-stacked MoS2. Nat. Mater. 24, 1195–1202 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, C. et al. Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages. Nature 562, 101–104 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Diddams, S. A., Vahala, K. & Udem, T. Optical frequency combs: coherently uniting the electromagnetic spectrum. Science 369, eaay3676 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuznetsov, N. et al. An ultra-broadband photonic-chip-based parametric amplifier. Nature 639, 928–934 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, B. et al. Down-converted photon pairs in a high-Q silicon nitride microresonator. Nature 639, 922–927 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dutt, A., Mohanty, A., Gaeta, A. L. & Lipson, M. Nonlinear and quantum photonics using integrated optical materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 9, 321–346 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bütow, J., Eismann, J. S., Sharma, V., Brandmüller, D. & Banzer, P. Generating free-space structured light with programmable integrated photonics. Nat. Photon. 18, 243–249 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, B. et al. Integrated optical vortex microcomb. Nat. Photon. 18, 625–631 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, Y. et al. Integrated vortex soliton microcombs. Nat. Photon. 18, 632–637 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, J. et al. Integrated optical entangled quantum vortex emitters. Nat. Photon. 19, 471–478 (2025).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cai, X. et al. Integrated compact optical vortex beam emitters. Science 338, 363–366 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang, Y. et al. Harmonic spin–orbit angular momentum cascade in nonlinear optical crystals. Nat. Photon. 14, 658–662 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, Y., Sheng, Y., Zhu, S., Xiao, M. & Krolikowski, W. Nonlinear photonic crystals: from 2D to 3D. Optica 8, 372–381 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, Y., Gao, Z. D., Qi, Z., Zhu, S. N. & Ming, N. B. Nonlinear Čerenkov radiation in nonlinear photonic crystal waveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 163904 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Honardoost, A., Abdelsalam, K. & Fathpour, S. Rejuvenating a versatile photonic material: thin-film lithium niobate. Laser Photonics Rev. 14, 2000088 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Forbes, A., de Oliveira, M. & Dennis, M. R. Structured light. Nat. Photon. 15, 253–262 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shen, Y. et al. Optical skyrmions and other topological quasiparticles of light. Nat. Photon. 18, 15–25 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhan, Q. Spatiotemporal sculpturing of light: a tutorial. Adv. Opt. Photon. 16, 163–228 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, J. et al. Emerging material platforms for integrated microcavity photonics. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 104201 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics 3rd edn (Academic Press, 2008).

  27. Berger, V. Nonlinear photonic crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4136–4139 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Allen, L., Beijersbergen, M. W., Spreeuw, R. J. & Woerdman, J. P. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185–8189 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kulkarni, G., Sahu, R., Magana-Loaiza, O. S., Boyd, R. W. & Jha, A. K. Single-shot measurement of the orbital-angular-momentum spectrum of light. Nat. Commun. 8, 1054 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, B. et al. Bright solid-state sources for single photons with orbital angular momentum. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 302–307 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jack, B., Padgett, M. J. & Franke-Arnold, S. Angular diffraction. New J. Phys. 10, 103013 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhan, Q. Cylindrical vector beams: from mathematical concepts to applications. Adv. Opt. Photon. 1, 1–57 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Vabishchevich, P. & Kivshar, Y. Nonlinear photonics with metasurfaces. Photon. Res. 11, B50 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, J. et al. Doubly resonant second-harmonic generation of a vortex beam from a bound state in the continuum. Optica 7, 1126–1132 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Miao, P. et al. Orbital angular momentum microlaser. Science 353, 464–467 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, J. et al. An InP-based vortex beam emitter with monolithically integrated laser. Nat. Commun. 9, 2652 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, Z. et al. Tunable topological charge vortex microlaser. Science 368, 760–763 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lu, X. et al. Highly-twisted states of light from a high quality factor photonic crystal ring. Nat. Commun. 14, 1119 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, Z. et al. Spin–orbit microlaser emitting in a four-dimensional Hilbert space. Nature 612, 246–251 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Willner, A. E., Pang, K., Song, H., Zou, K. & Zhou, H. Orbital angular momentum of light for communications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 041312 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tsesses, S. et al. Optical skyrmion lattice in evanescent electromagnetic fields. Science 361, 993–996 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Du, L., Yang, A., Zayats, A. V. & Yuan, X. Deep-subwavelength features of photonic skyrmions in a confined electromagnetic field with orbital angular momentum. Nat. Phys. 15, 650–654 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lin, W., Ota, Y., Arakawa, Y. & Iwamoto, S. On-chip optical skyrmionic beam generators. Optica 11, 1588–1594 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Shen, Y., Martínez, E. C. & Rosales-Guzmán, C. Generation of optical skyrmions with tunable topological textures. ACS Photonics 9, 296–303 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kam, A. et al. Quantum skyrmions and high dimensional entanglement mediated by nanophotonics. eLight 6, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43593-026-00124-1 (2026).

  46. Gong, Z., Liu, X., Xu, Y. & Tang, H. X. Near-octave lithium niobate soliton microcomb. Optica 7, 1275–1278 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wan, S. et al. Photorefraction-assisted self-emergence of dissipative Kerr solitons. Laser Photonics Rev. 18, 2300627 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cole, D. C., Lamb, E. S., Del’Haye, P., Diddams, S. A. & Papp, S. B. Soliton crystals in Kerr resonators. Nat. Photon. 11, 671–676 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Karpov, M. et al. Dynamics of soliton crystals in optical microresonators. Nat. Phys. 15, 1071–1077 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lu, J. et al. Two-colour dissipative solitons and breathers in microresonator second-harmonic generation. Nat. Commun. 14, 2798 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Lu, J., Li, M., Zou, C.-L., AlSayem, A. & Tang, H. X. Toward 1% single-photon anharmonicity with periodically poled lithium niobate microring resonators. Optica 7, 1654–1659 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kuo, P. S., Bravo-Abad, J. & Solomon, G. S. Second-harmonic generation using-quasi-phasematching in a GaAs whispering-gallery-mode microcavity. Nat. Commun. 5, 3109 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Nitiss, E., Hu, J., Stroganov, A. & Brès, C.-S. Optically reconfigurable quasi-phase-matching in silicon nitride microresonators. Nat. Photon. 16, 134–141 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Frischwasser, K. et al. Real-time sub-wavelength imaging of surface waves with nonlinear near-field optical microscopy. Nat. Photon. 15, 442–448 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Milione, G., Sztul, H. I., Nolan, D. A. & Alfano, R. R. Higher-order poincare sphere, Stokes parameters, and the angular momentum of light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 053601 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pan, A., Hu, C., Zeng, C. & Xia, J. Fundamental mode hybridization in a thin film lithium niobate ridge waveguide. Opt. Express 27, 35659–35669 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Cagliero, A. Circularly symmetric light waves: an overview. J. Opt. 20, 083501 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFA1400800, X.W.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12293052, C.-H.D.; 12361141824, J.L.; 12274474, D.W.; 62522519, B.C.; 12574428, B.C.; 92250302, C.-H.D.; 12434012, Q.Z.; 62535013, Q.Z.), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (2022B1515020067, D.W.; 2023B1515120070, J.L.; 2024B1515040013, D.W.; 2025B1515020004, B.C.), Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams of ‘The Pearl River Talent Recruitment Program’ (2021ZT09X044, S.F.) and Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology (2023ZD0300804, S.W.). We thank C. Zou for an insightful discussion and J. Li and H. Liang for loaning the equipment. This work was partially carried out at the USTC Center for Micro and Nanoscale Research and Fabrication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

J.L. and D.Z.W. conceived the project. D.Z.W., C.C., X.H.W. and J.L. developed the theory. B.C., D.Z.W., S.W. and Y.X.W. performed the numerical simulations. S.W., P.Y.W., Z.L.T. and Y.C. fabricated the devices. D.Z.W., B.C., S.W., Y.X.W., J.T.M. and J.L. built the setup and characterized the devices. D.Z.W., B.C., S.W., Y.X.W., J.T.M., G.X.Q., X.S.H, T.J., S.N.F., C.H.D. and J.L. analysed the data. D.Z.W. and J.L. wrote the manuscript with inputs from all authors. D.Z.W., S.N.F., Q.W.Z., F.B., X.H.W., C.H.D. and J.L. supervised the project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dunzhao Wei, Xuehua Wang, Chun-hua Dong or Jin Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Materials thanks Shai Tsesses and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Microring fabrication and characterization.

(a) Fabrication processes of the TFLN microring. (b, c) Top-view and cross-section SEM images of a typical TFLN microring. (d, e, f) Transmission spectra and quality factors of x-cut microring (Sample 1) for generation of scalar SF vortices in cases 1 and 2, z-cut microring (Sample 2) for generation of vector SF vortices in cases 3 and 4, z-cut microring (Sample 3) for generation of short NIR vortex microcombs. (g) Thermal tuning of three resonant TM modes for the x-cut microring (Sample 1). The microring is placed on the platform with a temperature controller in the fiber-waveguide coupling system. As the temperature increased from 30C to 100C, the resonant wavelength for the same mode order exhibits a redshift of approximately 0.8 nm. This shift is larger than half of the free spectral range (1.4 nm for Sample 1), allowing for compensation of the SF wavelength difference for SF optical vortices with even and odd TCs, as shown in Fig. 3d. (h) Simulated and measured integrated dispersions of the z-cut microring (Sample 3) for the generation of Kerr solitons.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Schematic of the experimental setup for characterizing the NCR SFG.

(a) The setup for characterizing single-wavelength SF vortices. (b) Schematic of TC measurement in cases 1 and 2 via on-chip interference. (c) The setup for producing and characterizing the short NIR vortex microcombs. WP: waveplate; EDFA: Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier; BS: beam splitter; FPC: fiber polarization controllers; Fiber BS: 2 × 2 fiber beam splitter; M: mirror.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Numerical simulation of the nonlinear polarization and the far-field intensity patterns in cases 1 to 4.

(a) Dependence of the effective nonlinear coefficients on the azimuthal angle for the four cases. The non-zero nonlinear coefficients of the TFLN are set to χ22=2pm/V, χ31= χ15=5pm/V, and χ33=30 pm/V. (b) Simulated far-field intensity patterns in cases 1 to 4 based on the dominant polarization components given in Table 1. The simulated results match well with the experimental results in Fig. 2b,f,j,n. (c) Simulated far-field intensity patterns for lWGM = mn = ± 4, ± 2, ± 2 and ± 1 in cases 1 to 4, respectively, being in excellent agreement with experimental results in Fig. 2d,h,l,p. (d) Simulation on intensity patterns in the x-y plane induced by z-component of the NP in case 4 by using the dipole model representing the SH sources in finite-different time-domain (FDTD). The z-polarized dipoles azimuthally distributing around a circle in the cylindrical coordinate (ρ, φ, z) mimic the NPs for generating out-of-plane SH wave that are produced by χ33 but confined within a circularly subwavelength diffraction structure. Here, ρ and φ are the polar radius and azimuthal angle, respectively, while z denotes the distance from the microring plane. A monitor is placed above the ring to collect the diffracted SH field in the plane perpendicular to the z-axis. (e) The simulated SH far-field intensity distribution, horizontal (y-) polarized intensity distribution and vertical (x-) polarized intensity distribution, respectively. The rotation of 90 between x-polarization and y-polarization reveals a a cylindrical vector beam \({[\cos \varphi \sin \varphi ]}^{T}\), being excellently agreement with the experiment results in Fig. 2n.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Measured spectra and nonlinear conversion efficiencies of the SHG and SFG, respectively.

(a) Spectra of the fundamental and SH waves for the four cases. The degenerated fundamental wavelengths are 1562.04 nm, 1561.30 nm, 1563.37 nm, and 1563.91 nm, leading to the exactly frequency-doubled emission at 781.02 nm, 780.65 nm, 781.69 nm, and 781.96 nm, respectively. (b) Spectra of the fundamental and SF waves for lWGM = mn = ± 4, ± 2, ± 2 and ± 1 in cases 1 to 4, respectively. The fundamental wavelengths for the four cases are fixed at λm = 1556.55 nm, 1558.43 nm, 1557.91 nm, and 1561.30 nm for CCW modes and λn = 1562.02 nm, 1561.30 nm, 1563.37 nm, and 1563.88 nm for CW modes to get a positive lWGM, while swap them to obtain a negative lWGM. Correspondingly, strong SF signals are located at 779.64 nm, 779.93 nm, 780.31 nm, and 781.29 nm, respectively, demonstrating that the prominent out-of-plane radiation comes from nonlinear interactions of the two counter-propagating fundamental waves. (c) Power dependence of SHG on the pump power of the CCW resonant mode in case 2. (d) Power dependence of SFG on the pump power of the CCW resonant mode in case 2. (e-f) Power dependences of SHG and SFG using the unit of dBm corresponding to (c) and (d), respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Experimental characterization of optical vortices carrying single TCs generated in case 1.

(a) Intensity profiles of optical vortices carrying a single TC of mn = 4 at different SF wavelength. (b) Interference patterns between optical vortices in (a) and those carrying a TC of − 4 at the same wavelength. The uniformly distributed 8 antinodes confirm the unchanged TC of lSF = 4 in (a). (c) Intensity profiles of optical vortices carrying single TCs of mn = 1 to 7 at same SF wavelength. (d) Interference patterns between optical vortices in (c) and those carrying single TCs of -1 to -7, respectively. The number of antinodes following the 2lSF scaling law demonstrates the stable tuning of a single TC. The residual signal near the center in (b) and (d) originates from incompletely filtered SH signals carrying zero TC during the interference measurement.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Amplified single NIR spectral lines of spatiotemporal SF vortex and corresponding vortex far-field patterns.

An additional fundamental CCW beam is set to match higher resonant modes with 5 (I), 11 (II), 17 (III), and 23 (IV) FSRs from the λn = 1554.45 nm highlighted in Fig. 5d, resulting in the enhanced SF signals with lWGM = − 5, − 11, − 17, and − 23 at different SF wavelengths in both spectra and the corresponding far-field patterns. Different colors are overlaid on the spectrum and intensity patterns to highlight the amplified SF signals.

Extended Data Table 1 Theoretical results of second-order nonlinear polarization and corresponding generated NCR SF fields in the four cases
Extended Data Table 2 Key parameters of the microring devices used in the experiments
Extended Data Table 3 Comparison of photonic interfaces for optical vortex generation

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, D., Chen, B., Wan, S. et al. Nanophotonic chip-space interfaces for multidimensional nonlinear optics. Nat. Mater. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-026-02570-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-026-02570-1

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing