Extended Data Fig. 3: Comparative evaluation of long-read MAGs and short-read MAGs from Donor 1. | Nature Microbiology

Extended Data Fig. 3: Comparative evaluation of long-read MAGs and short-read MAGs from Donor 1.

From: Long-read metagenomics for strain tracking after faecal microbiota transplant

Extended Data Fig. 3: Comparative evaluation of long-read MAGs and short-read MAGs from Donor 1.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

A. Completeness levels of 124 long-read MAGs (LR MAGs) and 135 short-read MAGs (SR MAGs) from Donor 1 reveal no significant differences. B. Contamination levels of 124 LR MAGs and 135 SR MAGs from Donor 1 assessed using CheckM, showing significantly lower contamination in LR MAGs (p = 0.043; two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test; p < 0.05, *). C. Contig N50 (kb) comparison for 124 LR MAGs and 135 SR MAGs Donor 1, showing significantly higher N50 in LR MAGs (p = 2.2e-16; two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test; p < 0.01, **).

Source data

Back to article page