Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Analysis
  • Published:

A global-scale assessment of zoonotic virus diversity and spillover potential in urban-adapted mammal species

Abstract

The repeated emergence of pandemic viruses underscores the linkages between land-use change and wildlife disease, and urban-adapted wildlife are of special interest due to their close proximity to humans. However, viral diversity within urban-adapted species and their zoonotic potential remain largely unexplored. Here we compiled a dataset of documented records spanning from 1574 to 2023 on red foxes, raccoons, raccoon dogs, masked palm civets, European hedgehogs, European shrews, wild boars and their viruses, covering 116 countries. These urban-adapted mammals host 286 virus species spanning 24 orders and 38 families, 14 of which are potentially high risk for human infection. Raccoon dogs had increased viral positivity in urban habitats compared to raccoons, wild boars and red foxes. Many viruses in urban-adapted species were phylogenetically related to those found in humans, and our data suggest possible viral spillback. These results highlight zoonotic risks associated with urban-adapted species and suggest enhanced surveillance to mitigate future outbreaks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Workflow for data extraction and curation from the literature.
Fig. 2: Temporal trends and geographic distribution of seven emerging priority urban-adapted mammal species and their associated viruses.
Fig. 3: Overview of viruses harboured by seven urban-adapted mammal species.
Fig. 4: Positivity of viruses in seven urban-adapted mammal species.
Fig. 5: Virus positivity in urban and natural areas within urban-adapted species.
Fig. 6: Phylogenetic trees of ‘human-associated viruses’ in seven urban-adapted mammal species.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The primary dataset is available on GitHub at https://github.com/Viraldata-host/Virus (ref. 80). The sequences of seven urban-adapted mammal species associated viruses analysed in this study are available in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/) under accession numbers shown in Source Data Fig. 6. All animal silhouette images used in Figs. 1, 2, 4, Extended Data Fig. 4 and Supplementary Figs. 4 and 15 were sourced from the public-domain database Phylopic (https://www.phylopic.org/). These images are made available under either the CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication or the Public Domain Mark 1.0, which permits unrestricted use, sharing and adaptation. Phylogenetic tree data for Fig. 6 and Extended Data Figs. 13 are available in Source Data Fig. 6 and Source Data Extended Data Figs. 13. Host–virus associations were compiled from PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), EID2, VIRION and GenBank, with detailed information available in Source Data Fig. 3. Geographic distributions of seven urban-adapted mammal species and associated viruses were compiled from PubMed, CNKI and GBIF (https://www.gbif.org/), with further details provided in Source Data Fig. 2. All source data needed to fully replicate and evaluate the analyses are provided as Source Data Figs. 26 and Source Data Extended Data Figs. 14. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Magle, S. B., Hunt, V. M., Vernon, M. & Crooks, K. R. Urban wildlife research: past, present, and future. Biol. Conserv. 155, 23–32 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Santini, L. et al. One strategy does not fit all: determinants of urban adaptation in mammals. Ecol. Lett. 22, 365–376 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma, D. et al. Global expansion of human–wildlife overlap in the 21st century. Sci. Adv. 10, eadp7706 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jones, K. E. et al. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 451, 990–993 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Olival, K. J. et al. Host and viral traits predict zoonotic spillover from mammals. Nature 546, 646–650 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Plowright, R. K. et al. Land use-induced spillover: a call to action to safeguard environmental, animal, and human health. Lancet Planet. Health 5, e237–e245 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Betke, B. A., Gottdenker, N. L., Meyers, L. A. & Becker, D. J. Ecological and evolutionary characteristics of anthropogenic roosting ability in bats of the world. iScience 27, 110369 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ecke, F. et al. Population fluctuations and synanthropy explain transmission risk in rodent-borne zoonoses. Nat. Commun. 13, 7532 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiao, X., Newman, C., Buesching, C. D., Macdonald, D. W. & Zhou, Z.-M. Animal sales from Wuhan wet markets immediately prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Rep. 11, 11898 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao, J., Cui, W. & Tian, B. The potential intermediate hosts for SARS-CoV-2. Front. Microbiol. 11, 580137 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassell, J. M., Begon, M., Ward, M. J. & Fèvre, E. M. Urbanization and disease emergence: dynamics at the wildlife–livestock–human interface. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 55–67 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bradley, C. A. & Altizer, S. Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 95–102 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Blasdell, K. R. et al. Rats and the city: implications of urbanization on zoonotic disease risk in Southeast Asia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2112341119 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Feng, A. et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in free-ranging white-tailed deer in the United States. Nat. Commun. 14, 4078 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fagre, A. C. et al. Assessing the risk of human-to-wildlife pathogen transmission for conservation and public health. Ecol. Lett. 25, 1534–1549 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. McBride, D. S. et al. Accelerated evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in free-ranging white-tailed deer. Nat. Commun. 14, 5105 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rasche, A. et al. Highly diversified shrew hepatitis B viruses corroborate ancient origins and divergent infection patterns of mammalian hepadnaviruses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 17007–17012 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Goethert, H. K., Mather, T. N., Johnson, R. W. & Telford, S. R. Incrimination of shrews as a reservoir for Powassan virus. Commun. Biol. 4, 1319 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell, S. J. et al. Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes. Virus Evol. 6, veaa065 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Luca, B. et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus infections in wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) show neurotropism and adaptive virus mutations. Microbiol. Spectr. 11, e02867-22 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher, A. M. et al. The ecology of viruses in urban rodents with a focus on SARS-CoV-2. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 12, 2217940 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Schotte, U. et al. Phylogeny and spatiotemporal dynamics of hepatitis E virus infections in wild boar and deer from six areas of Germany during 2013–2017. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 69, e1992–e2005 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang, W.-S. et al. Metatranscriptomic analysis of virus diversity in urban wild birds with paretic disease. J. Virol. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00606-20 (2020).

  24. Denstedt, E. et al. Detection of African swine fever virus in free-ranging wild boar in Southeast Asia. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 68, 2669–2675 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Song, T. et al. First detection and phylogenetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 2 in raccoon dogs. BMC Vet. Res. 15, 107 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Albery, G. F. et al. Urban-adapted mammal species have more known pathogens. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 794–801 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Werner, C. S. & Nunn, C. L. Effect of urban habitat use on parasitism in mammals: a meta-analysis. Proc. Biol. Sci. 287, 20200397 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, Y.-M. et al. Host traits shape virome composition and virus transmission in wild small mammals. Cell 186, 4662–4675.e12 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams, S. H. et al. Viral diversity of house mice in New York City. mBio 9, e01354-17 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Snow, N. P., Jarzyna, M. A. & VerCauteren, K. C. Interpreting and predicting the spread of invasive wild pigs. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 2022–2032 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jackowiak, M. et al. Colonization of Warsaw by the red fox Vulpes vulpes in the years 1976–2019. Sci. Rep. 11, 13931 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Fischer, M. L. et al. Assessing and predicting the spread of non-native raccoons in Germany using hunting bag data and dispersal weighted models. Biol. Invasions 18, 57–71 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Myśliwy, I., Perec-Matysiak, A. & Hildebrand, J. Invasive raccoon (Procyon lotor) and raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) as potential reservoirs of tick-borne pathogens: data review from native and introduced areas. Parasit. Vectors 15, 126 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Rijks, J. M. et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus in wild red foxes, the Netherlands, 2021. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27, 2960–2962 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao, C. et al. Hedgehogs as amplifying hosts of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus, China. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 28, 2491 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Goldberg, A. R. et al. Widespread exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in wildlife communities. Nat. Commun. 15, 6210 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pathogens Prioritization: A Scientific Framework for Epidemic and Pandemic Research Preparedness (World Health Organization, 2024).

  38. Pastoret, P. P. & Brochier, B. Epidemiology and control of fox rabies in Europe. Vaccine 17, 1750–1754 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jin, M. et al. Norovirus outbreak surveillance, China, 2016–2018. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 26, 437 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Xue-Jie, Y. et al. Fever with thrombocytopenia associated with a novel bunyavirus in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 1523–1532 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jackson, R. T., Webala, P. W., Ogola, J. G., Lunn, T. J. & Forbes, K. M. Roost selection by synanthropic bats in rural Kenya: implications for human–wildlife conflict and zoonotic pathogen spillover. R. Soc. Open Sci. 10, 230578 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Balasubramaniam, K. N. et al. Impact of joint interactions with humans and social interactions with conspecifics on the risk of zooanthroponotic outbreaks among wildlife populations. Sci. Rep. 12, 11600 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Becker, D. J., Streicker, D. G. & Altizer, S. Linking anthropogenic resources to wildlife–pathogen dynamics: a review and meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 18, 483–495 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Altizer, S. et al. Food for contagion: synthesis and future directions for studying host–parasite responses to resource shifts in anthropogenic environments. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20170102 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Qi, X. et al. Molecular characterization of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza A viruses isolated from raccoon dogs in China. PLoS ONE 4, e4682 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Martin, B. E. et al. Feral swine in the United States have been exposed to both avian and swine influenza A viruses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, e01346-17 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Schäffr, J. R. et al. Origin of the pandemic 1957 H2 influenza A virus and the persistence of its possible progenitors in the avian reservoir. Virology 194, 781–788 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kawaoka, Y., Krauss, S. & Webster, R. G. Avian-to-human transmission of the PB1 gene of influenza A viruses in the 1957 and 1968 pandemics. J. Virol. 63, 4603–4608 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bean, W. J. et al. Evolution of the H3 influenza virus hemagglutinin from human and nonhuman hosts. J. Virol. 66, 1129–1138 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Olival, K. J. et al. Possibility for reverse zoonotic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to free-ranging wildlife: a case study of bats. PLoS Pathog. 16, e1008758 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Pickering, B. et al. Divergent SARS-CoV-2 variant emerges in white-tailed deer with deer-to-human transmission. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 2011–2024 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Murray, M. H. et al. City sicker? A meta-analysis of wildlife health and urbanization. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 575–583 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang, Y. et al. Behavioral plasticity of raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) provides new insights for urban wildlife management in metropolis Shanghai, China. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 104063 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Süld, K. et al. An invasive vector of zoonotic disease sustained by anthropogenic resources: the raccoon dog in northern Europe. PLoS ONE 9, e96358 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Plowright, R. K., Becker, D. J., McCallum, H. & Manlove, K. R. Sampling to elucidate the dynamics of infections in reservoir hosts. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20180336 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Firth, C. et al. Detection of zoonotic pathogens and characterization of novel viruses carried by commensal Rattus norvegicus in New York City. mBio 5, e01933-14 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Wu, Z. et al. Decoding the RNA viromes in rodent lungs provides new insight into the origin and evolutionary patterns of rodent-borne pathogens in mainland Southeast Asia. Microbiome 9, 18 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Hause, B. M., Nelson, E. A. & Christopher-Hennings, J. North American big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) harbor an exogenous deltaretrovirus. mSphere 5, e00902-20 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Hause, B. M., Nelson, E. & Christopher-Hennings, J. Eptesicus fuscus orthorubulavirus, a close relative of human parainfluenza virus 4, discovered in a bat in South Dakota. Microbiol. Spectr. 9, e0093021 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Streicker, D. G., Franka, R., Jackson, F. R. & Rupprecht, C. E. Anthropogenic roost switching and rabies virus dynamics in house-roosting big brown bats. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 13, 498–504 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Elsmo, E. J. et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus clade 2.3.4.4b infections in wild terrestrial mammals, United States, 2022. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 29, 2451–2460 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Malmlov, A., Breck, S., Fry, T. & Duncan, C. Serologic survey for cross-species pathogens in urban coyotes (Canis latrans), Colorado, USA. J. Wildl. Dis. 50, 946–950 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. GBIF Occurrence Download (GBIF.org, 2024); https://www.gbif.org/zh/occurrence/search

  64. Page, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n71 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Wardeh, M., Risley, C., McIntyre, M. K., Setzkorn, C. & Baylis, M. Database of host–pathogen and related species interactions, and their global distribution. Sci. Data 2, 150049 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Carlson, C. J. et al. The Global Virome in One Network (VIRION): an atlas of vertebrate–virus associations. mBio 13, e0298521 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Gibb, R. et al. Zoonotic host diversity increases in human-dominated ecosystems. Nature 584, 398–402 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wood, S. N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017).

  69. Simpson, G. L. Modelling palaeoecological time series using generalised additive models. Front. Ecol. Evol. 6, 149 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Sterne, J. A. C. et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 343, d4002 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Stanley, T. D. & Doucouliagos, H. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Res. Synth. Methods 5, 60–78 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Xu, S. et al. Ggtree: a serialized data object for visualization of a phylogenetic tree and annotation data. iMeta 1, e56 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2016).

  77. Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Bonacich, P. & Lloyd, P. Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations. Soc. Networks 23, 191–201 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Wells, K., Morand, S., Wardeh, M. & Baylis, M. Distinct spread of DNA and RNA viruses among mammals amid prominent role of domestic species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 470–481 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Wei, X. et al. An open database of seven urban-adapted mammal species virus surveillance. GitHub https://github.com/Viraldata-host/Virus (2026).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32470561, Y.X.; 32271605, Z.Y.X.H.) and Taishan Scholars Project (tsqn202306003, Y.X.). D.J.B. was supported by the National Science Foundation (BII 2213854). The funders had no role in the conceptualization and design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.X. and F.W. conceptualized the initial hypothesis and conceived and designed the study. X.W., H.L., S.L., Y.W., J.L. and L.H. collected the data and conducted the data analyses. X.W., H.L. and D.J.B. performed the statistical analyses. X.W. and S.L. carried out phylogenetic analyses and interpretation. X.W., S.L. and H.L. created and prepared the figures and tables. Y.X., D.J.B., Z.Y.X.H., X.W. and H.L. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. X.W., H.L., Z.Y.X.H., S.L., Y.W., J.L., L.H., Y.L., D.J.B., F.W. and Y.X. contributed substantially to data acquisition, interpretation, and revision and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Daniel J. Becker, Fuwen Wei  (魏辅文) or Yifei Xu  (许一菲).

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Microbiology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Phylogenetic tree of SFTSV showing potential bidirectional transmission between urban-adapted wildlife and humans.

The trees were midpoint-rooted, with the scale bar representing the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Only support values > 80% are shown. Virus names include GenBank accession numbers, host species, sampling location, and sampling year.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Additional phylogenetic trees illustrating clustering between viruses from urban-adapted species and human viruses.

The trees were midpoint-rooted, with the scale bar representing the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Only support values > 80% are shown. Virus names include GenBank accession numbers, host species, sampling location, and sampling year.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Additional phylogenetic trees of viruses from urban-adapted species clustering with human and domestic animal viruses.

The trees were midpoint-rooted, with the scale bar representing the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Only support values > 80% are shown. Virus names include GenBank accession numbers, host species, sampling location, and sampling year.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Virus transmission among seven urban-adapted mammal species, domestic animals, and humans.

a) The human-associated virus-sharing network. Node size indicates the number of ‘human-associated viruses’ carried by each urban-adapted species. The edge thickness represents the number of shared viruses between two hosts. b) Boxplot showing the number of shared ‘human-associated viruses’ between each urban-adapted species and domestic animals. The sample size for each group is n = 21. c) Boxplot showing the number of shared viruses between each domestic animal and urban-adapted species. The sample size for each group is n = 7. The lollipop chart displays the eigenvector centrality of each domestic animal species, with circle color representing the eigenvector centrality and the y-axis representing the weighted eigenvector centrality. In b and c, the boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR), which spans from the first to the third quartiles. The lines outside the boxes represent values within 1.5 times the IQR. The horizontal line within each box marks the median, while the rhombus indicates the mean.

Source data

Supplementary information

Source data

41564_2026_2311_MOESM5_ESM.zip (download ZIP )

Source Data Fig. 2 Statistical source data. Source Data Fig. 3 Statistical source data. Source Data Fig. 4 Statistical source data. Source Data Fig. 5 Statistical source data. Source Data Fig. 6 Unprocessed phylogenetic tree. Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1 Unprocessed phylogenetic tree. Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2 Unprocessed phylogenetic tree. Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3 Unprocessed phylogenetic tree. Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4 Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, X., Li, H., Huang, Z.Y.X. et al. A global-scale assessment of zoonotic virus diversity and spillover potential in urban-adapted mammal species. Nat Microbiol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-026-02311-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-026-02311-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing